A skill your agent uses when designing or auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference, matched-substrate baseline fairness in the…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Eccv Experiments

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-experiments -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eccv-experiments --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-experiments .claude/skills/eccv-experiments && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
eccv-experiments
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.1k tokens
SKILL.md length
431 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when designing or auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference, matched-substrate baseline fairness in the…

  • Auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference
  • SKILL.md covers The six-month-staleness test, Matched-substrate fairness, Ablations that isolate, not… and Qualitative evidence discipline, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Matched-substrate baseline fairness in the foundation-model era

What it does

Eccv Experiments is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when designing or auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference, matched-substrate baseline fairness in the foundation-model era, ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, qualitative failure evidence, and run sequencing toward a March freeze.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference
  • Matched-substrate baseline fairness in the foundation-model era
  • Ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism
  • Qualitative failure evidence

Example prompts

  • “/eccv-experiments”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Eccv Experiments loads about 1.1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 83 tokens; SKILL.md has 431 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~83
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.1k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 431 words, ~1,055 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/eccv-experiments/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
eccv-experiments
description
Use when designing or auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference, matched-substrate baseline fairness in the foundation-model era, ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, qualitative failure evidence, and run sequencing toward a March freeze.

ECCV Experiments

Use this while the experimental plan is still changeable. ECCV's calendar shapes the evidence problem: results freeze in early March, reviews weigh them in May against everything published since, and the field first reads the paper at a September conference — the numbers must still look current six months after the freeze.

The six-month-staleness test

For each headline table, ask: if the strongest lab in this niche publishes their CVPR camera-ready in June, does this table still support the claim in September? Evidence that passes: mechanism-isolating ablations, efficiency frontiers (accuracy vs compute), and generality sweeps across datasets. Evidence that fails: a raw leaderboard number 0.2 points above a moving SOTA. Build the paper's claim on the first kind and let the leaderboard row be corroboration, not the thesis.

Matched-substrate fairness

The first thing a 2026-era vision reviewer checks is whether wins come from the method or from what it was fed:

Axis to matchUnfair patternFair protocol
Backbone / pretrainingYour ViT-L vs their ResNet-50 numbersRe-run the top baselines on your backbone, or add a matched-backbone row
Training dataExtra pseudo-labeled or web data only on your sideA same-data row, with the extra-data row labeled as such
Input resolution / TTAHigher test resolution quoted against lowerState resolution and TTA per row
Compute / epochs4x schedule vs baselines' 1xReport schedule; add an equal-budget row
Foundation-model accessAPI model in your pipeline, none in baselinesGive baselines the same tool or ablate it out

One honest matched row protects the paper better than three inflated rows — the mismatched-substrate objection is the most common substantive ECCV review attack and cannot be answered in a one-page rebuttal without a matched number already in hand.

Show full SKILL.md (146 more words)Show less

Ablations that isolate, not decorate

  • Each claimed component gets exactly one toggle row; combinatorial grids go to the supplement.
  • Include the "replace with the dumb version" row (attention → average, learned prior → uniform): it distinguishes mechanism from capacity.
  • Ablate on the mid-sized benchmark, not the smallest one, so effects clear seed noise (eccv-reproducibility for the variance bar).

Qualitative evidence discipline

Vision panels weigh pixels. Ship, in body or supplement: same-scene comparisons against the two strongest baselines; a random-sample grid (not curated) for at least one dataset; and a failure panel tied to the limitations paragraph. A paper with only curated successes reads as hiding something — the failure panel is credibility infrastructure.

Run sequencing toward March 5

text
T-10 weeks:  falsifier first — the experiment most likely to kill the
             claim (matched-substrate row on the main benchmark)
T-8:         main-table runs launched; seeds x3 on deciding rows
T-6:         ablation toggles; efficiency/frontier measurements
T-4:         cross-dataset generality; qualitative harvesting begins
T-2:         freeze new runs; regenerate all tables from logged results
T-1:         random-sample grids, failure panel, supplement tables
T-0 (Mar 5): body tables locked; supplement week polishes, never adds

Launching the falsifier first is the ECCV-specific discipline: with a biennial venue, discovering at T-2 that the matched row erases the win wastes not a cycle but two years.

Output format

text
[Evidence verdict] mechanism-backed / leaderboard-fragile / incomplete
[Staleness test] <headline table -> survives September? why>
[Substrate audit] <axis -> matched / mismatched -> repair row needed>
[Ablation map] <claimed component -> isolating toggle present?>
[Run queue] <next runs in falsifier-first order with weeks-to-freeze>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-experiments of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Eccv Experiments next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Eccv Experiments compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Eccv Experiments this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Design Audit Against Rams' Principlesthedotmack/claude-mem98k—~4.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Experiment Designeralirezarezvani/claude-skills28k1 repos~783Automated safety check: PassMIT
Experimental Designaiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw15k—~286Automated safety check: PassMIT
Experiment Auditwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep17k1 repos~2.7kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Experiment Auditwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep17k—~3.2kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Audits a design against Dieter Rams' ten principles of good design, scores each with evidence, and hands off a make-plan prompt for a new, refined or redesigned outcome.

    98k GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Experiment Designer

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    A skill your agent uses when planning product experiments, writing testable hypotheses, estimating sample size, prioritizing tests, or interpreting A/B outcomes with practical statistical rigor.

    28k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~783 tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Experimental Design

    aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw

    Best practices for designing reproducible ML experiments. An agent skill from aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw.

    15k GitHub stars~286 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Experiment Audit

    wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep

    Audit experiment integrity before claiming results. An agent skill from wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep.

    17k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.7k tokens
    DatabasesAuto-check: notes
  • Experiment Audit

    wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep

    Audit experiment integrity before claiming results. An agent skill from wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep.

    17k GitHub stars~3.2k tokensUpdated yesterday
    DatabasesAuto-check: notes
  • OpenClaw Design Audit

    openclaw/clawhub

    Audits OpenClaw frontend code and rendered pages for token misuse, reimplemented primitives, accessibility and responsive defects and off-brand copy, with an evidence-based report.

    9.5k GitHub stars~498 tokensUpdated today
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Eccv Experiments

What does Eccv Experiments do?

A skill your agent uses when designing or auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference, matched-substrate baseline fairness in the…. Eccv Experiments is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when designing or auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference, matched-substrate baseline fairness in the foundation-model era, ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, qualitative failure evidence, and run sequencing toward a March freeze.

When should I use Eccv Experiments?

Eccv Experiments fits situations like: auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference; matched-substrate baseline fairness in the foundation-model era; ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism; qualitative failure evidence.

How do I install Eccv Experiments in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-experiments -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-experiments in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/eccv-experiments in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Eccv Experiments in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-experiments -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-experiments in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/eccv-experiments in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Eccv Experiments in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-experiments -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/eccv-experiments, .gemini/skills/eccv-experiments, .github/skills/eccv-experiments and .opencode/skills/eccv-experiments in your project.

What does Eccv Experiments need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Eccv Experiments is instructions for the agent only.

Does Eccv Experiments access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Eccv Experiments safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Eccv Experiments use?

Eccv Experiments is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Eccv Experiments use?

About 1.1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Eccv Experiments?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Eccv Experiments: Design Audit Against Rams' Principles (thedotmack/claude-mem, 98k stars), Experiment Designer (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars), Experimental Design (aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw, 15k stars) and Experiment Audit (wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep, 17k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Eccv Experiments?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,219 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.