A skill your agent uses when drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page, two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2, rebuttal due May 11 in 2026)…

MITAuto-check passedDocuments & Office

Install Eccv Author Response

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-author-response -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eccv-author-response --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response .claude/skills/eccv-author-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
eccv-author-response
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1k tokens
SKILL.md length
445 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page, two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2, rebuttal due May 11 in 2026)…

  • Works in 3 steps: If a number already exists in the… → If a small experiment is genuinely… → Never promise a camera-ready experiment…
  • Drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page
  • SKILL.md covers What the one page is for, Budgeting a page against three…, New-experiment judgment and Nine-day schedule, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Eccv Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page, two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2, rebuttal due May 11 in 2026), with references counted inside the page, no venue-forbidden extras, and arguments sized for the area-chair discussion that follows.

Its SKILL.md is about 1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Documents & Office, covering PDF. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page
  • Two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2
  • Rebuttal due May 11 in 2026)
  • With references counted inside the page

Example prompts

  • “/eccv-author-response”

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. If a number already exists in the supplement, quote it — that is retrieval,
  2. If a small experiment is genuinely decisive and the FAQ permits it, report
  3. Never promise a camera-ready experiment you have not already run; ECCV ACs

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Eccv Author Response loads about 1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 82 tokens; SKILL.md has 445 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~82
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 445 words, ~1,033 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/eccv-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
eccv-author-response
description
Use when drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page, two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2, rebuttal due May 11 in 2026), with references counted inside the page, no venue-forbidden extras, and arguments sized for the area-chair discussion that follows.

ECCV Author Response

Use this when ECCV reviews land. In the 2026 cycle reviews were released May 2, the rebuttal was due May 11, and reviewers received rebuttals on May 12 — nine calendar days to answer everything. The rebuttal was optional, a single-page PDF including references, set in a two-column rebuttal template even though the paper itself is single-column LNCS.

What the one page is for

The rebuttal's real reader is the area chair running the post-rebuttal discussion, not the reviewer who wrote the complaint. Write each block so an AC can lift it directly into a meta-review: objection, answer, pointer into the submitted PDF.

  • Answer misreadings first — they are the cheapest score to recover.
  • Answer requests whose evidence already exists in the paper or supplement second; cite figure/table/line numbers, never "see above".
  • Concede real limitations in one sentence each; a clean concession reads better in discussion than a strained defense.
  • Skip philosophical disagreements about importance; one page cannot win them.

Budgeting a page against three reviews

BlockShare of the pageContent rule
Header + shared clarification~15%One paragraph fixing the misunderstanding all reviewers share, if any
Reviewer 1 (most negative, fixable)~35%Two or three numbered points, each ending in a PDF pointer
Reviewer 2~25%Same pattern, shorter
Reviewer 3 (already positive)~10%Thank, confirm, correct one detail
References~15%Only citations actually used in the rebuttal — they count against the page

References counting inside the single page is the ECCV-specific squeeze: every citation you add deletes a sentence of argument. Cite by number into the paper's own bibliography where possible instead of restating entries.

Show full SKILL.md (177 more words)Show less

New-experiment judgment

ECCV rebuttal norms on new results vary by cycle and are enforced by ACs, so check the current author FAQ before pasting fresh numbers (待核实 for any cycle you are in). The safe pattern regardless of cycle:

  1. If a number already exists in the supplement, quote it — that is retrieval, not new work.
  2. If a small experiment is genuinely decisive and the FAQ permits it, report it in one row with its protocol named, no new figure.
  3. Never promise a camera-ready experiment you have not already run; ECCV ACs read unbacked promises as concessions.

Nine-day schedule

text
Day 0-1  (May 2-3):  read all reviews twice; classify every point:
                     misread / evidence-exists / real-gap / opinion
Day 2-3:            draft answers for misread + evidence-exists points
Day 4-5:            run at most ONE decisive check if the cycle allows it
Day 6:              compress to one page in the official rebuttal template
Day 7:              co-author pass — every claim gets a PDF pointer or dies
Day 8  (May 10):    freeze; upload a day before the May 11 cutoff

Tone calibration for a European generalist panel

ECCV panels mix subfields more than a specialist workshop would; the reviewer who scored you lowest may be adjacent to, not inside, your niche. Spell out what a neighboring-subfield reader needs (what the benchmark measures, why the baseline is the right one) instead of assuming shared folklore. Avoid sarcasm and priority fights — the AC discussion happens in your absence, and your prose is the only advocate present.

Output format

text
[Rebuttal verdict] worth submitting / skip (already sunk or already safe)
[Point map] <review point -> misread / evidence-exists / real-gap / opinion>
[Page budget] <block -> lines allocated>
[PDF pointers] <claim -> figure/table/section in the submission>
[Risks] <new-result rule check, reference overflow, tone flags>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Eccv Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Eccv Author Response compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Eccv Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Vc Industry Researchzebbern/claude-code-guide4.7k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Paper Interpretationdigoal/blog8.6k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassGPL-2.0
Paper LensYSQ-boop/paper-lens101—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Paper ReviewRapidAI/MaClaw147—~1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Ma Fulltext Managementhtlin222/meta-pipe139—~1.7kAutomated safety check: NotesCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Vc Industry Research

    zebbern/claude-code-guide

    Generate professional primary market / venture capital industry research reports, including sector deep-dives, investment memos, and market analysis.

    4.7k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated today
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed
  • 从论文 PDF 文件或论文 PDF URL 生成通俗易懂、图文并茂、带批判性评估的中文 Markdown 解读,并保存到当前项目的 markdown 目录。Use when the user asks to interpret,精读,解读,summarize,explain,analyze, or write an article from an academic paper PDF…

    8.6k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed
  • Paper Lens

    YSQ-boop/paper-lens

    Read and critically analyze one academic paper from an arXiv URL/ID or a local PDF, producing a source-grounded Markdown report that can grow from a quick read into a reviewer-level deep review.

    101 GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed
  • Paper Review

    RapidAI/MaClaw

    论文深度解读 Skill — 下载论文PDF → LLM深度解读(问题/创新点/方法原理/实验分析)→ PDF图片提取 → 生成组会PPT → 生成解读音频MP3。端到端学术论文解读工具。

    147 GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated today
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed
  • Ma Fulltext Management

    htlin222/meta-pipe

    Collect and manage full-text PDFs for included studies, track provenance, and prepare documents for extraction.

    139 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 17 days ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check: notes
  • Paper Interpreter

    chujianyun/skills

    论文解读助手。适用于用户发送 arXiv 论文链接,并希望下载论文、解读论文、生成读书笔记、做论文拆解或输出详细报告时使用。会在工作目录创建论文文件夹、下载 PDF 与 TeX Source(如有)、生成中文 Markdown 报告。默认先交付初稿,不自动复查;如果用户明确同意,再安排后续复查。不适用于只要简短推荐语的情况。

    742 GitHub stars~810 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Eccv Author Response

What does Eccv Author Response do?

A skill your agent uses when drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page, two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2, rebuttal due May 11 in 2026)…. Eccv Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page, two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2, rebuttal due May 11 in 2026), with references counted inside the page, no venue-forbidden extras, and arguments sized for the area-chair discussion that follows.

When should I use Eccv Author Response?

Eccv Author Response fits situations like: drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page; two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2; rebuttal due May 11 in 2026); with references counted inside the page.

How do I install Eccv Author Response in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/eccv-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Eccv Author Response in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/eccv-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Eccv Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/eccv-author-response, .gemini/skills/eccv-author-response, .github/skills/eccv-author-response and .opencode/skills/eccv-author-response in your project.

What does Eccv Author Response need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Eccv Author Response is instructions for the agent only.

Does Eccv Author Response access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Eccv Author Response safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Eccv Author Response use?

Eccv Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Eccv Author Response use?

About 1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Eccv Author Response?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Eccv Author Response: Vc Industry Research (zebbern/claude-code-guide, 4.7k stars), Paper Interpretation (digoal/blog, 8.6k stars), Paper Lens (YSQ-boop/paper-lens, 101 stars) and Paper Review (RapidAI/MaClaw, 147 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Eccv Author Response?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.