Vc Industry Research
zebbern/claude-code-guide
Generate professional primary market / venture capital industry research reports, including sector deep-dives, investment memos, and market analysis.
A skill your agent uses when drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page, two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2, rebuttal due May 11 in 2026)…
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-author-response -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eccv-author-response --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response .claude/skills/eccv-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "eccv-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response into .claude/skills/eccv-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eccv-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-responseType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-author-response -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eccv-author-response --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response .agents/skills/eccv-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "eccv-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response into .agents/skills/eccv-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eccv-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-author-response -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eccv-author-response --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response .cursor/skills/eccv-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "eccv-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response into .cursor/skills/eccv-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eccv-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-author-response -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eccv-author-response --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response .gemini/skills/eccv-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "eccv-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response into .gemini/skills/eccv-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eccv-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eccv-author-responseInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-author-response -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response .github/skills/eccv-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "eccv-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response into .github/skills/eccv-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eccv-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-author-response -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eccv-author-response --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response .opencode/skills/eccv-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "eccv-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response into .opencode/skills/eccv-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eccv-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
eccv-author-responseA skill your agent uses when drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page, two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2, rebuttal due May 11 in 2026)…
Eccv Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page, two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2, rebuttal due May 11 in 2026), with references counted inside the page, no venue-forbidden extras, and arguments sized for the area-chair discussion that follows.
Its SKILL.md is about 1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Documents & Office, covering PDF. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Eccv Author Response loads about 1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 82 tokens; SKILL.md has 445 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 445 words, ~1,033 tokens.
.claude/skills/eccv-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).Use this when ECCV reviews land. In the 2026 cycle reviews were released May 2, the rebuttal was due May 11, and reviewers received rebuttals on May 12 — nine calendar days to answer everything. The rebuttal was optional, a single-page PDF including references, set in a two-column rebuttal template even though the paper itself is single-column LNCS.
The rebuttal's real reader is the area chair running the post-rebuttal discussion, not the reviewer who wrote the complaint. Write each block so an AC can lift it directly into a meta-review: objection, answer, pointer into the submitted PDF.
| Block | Share of the page | Content rule |
|---|---|---|
| Header + shared clarification | ~15% | One paragraph fixing the misunderstanding all reviewers share, if any |
| Reviewer 1 (most negative, fixable) | ~35% | Two or three numbered points, each ending in a PDF pointer |
| Reviewer 2 | ~25% | Same pattern, shorter |
| Reviewer 3 (already positive) | ~10% | Thank, confirm, correct one detail |
| References | ~15% | Only citations actually used in the rebuttal — they count against the page |
References counting inside the single page is the ECCV-specific squeeze: every citation you add deletes a sentence of argument. Cite by number into the paper's own bibliography where possible instead of restating entries.
ECCV rebuttal norms on new results vary by cycle and are enforced by ACs, so check the current author FAQ before pasting fresh numbers (待核实 for any cycle you are in). The safe pattern regardless of cycle:
Day 0-1 (May 2-3): read all reviews twice; classify every point:
misread / evidence-exists / real-gap / opinion
Day 2-3: draft answers for misread + evidence-exists points
Day 4-5: run at most ONE decisive check if the cycle allows it
Day 6: compress to one page in the official rebuttal template
Day 7: co-author pass — every claim gets a PDF pointer or dies
Day 8 (May 10): freeze; upload a day before the May 11 cutoffECCV panels mix subfields more than a specialist workshop would; the reviewer who scored you lowest may be adjacent to, not inside, your niche. Spell out what a neighboring-subfield reader needs (what the benchmark measures, why the baseline is the right one) instead of assuming shared folklore. Avoid sarcasm and priority fights — the AC discussion happens in your absence, and your prose is the only advocate present.
[Rebuttal verdict] worth submitting / skip (already sunk or already safe)
[Point map] <review point -> misread / evidence-exists / real-gap / opinion>
[Page budget] <block -> lines allocated>
[PDF pointers] <claim -> figure/table/section in the submission>
[Risks] <new-result rule check, reference overflow, tone flags>© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Just SKILL.md in ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Eccv Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eccv Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Vc Industry Researchzebbern/claude-code-guide | 4.7k | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Paper Interpretationdigoal/blog | 8.6k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | GPL-2.0 | |
| Paper LensYSQ-boop/paper-lens | 101 | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Paper ReviewRapidAI/MaClaw | 147 | — | ~1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Ma Fulltext Managementhtlin222/meta-pipe | 139 | — | ~1.7k | Automated safety check: Notes | Custom licence |
zebbern/claude-code-guide
Generate professional primary market / venture capital industry research reports, including sector deep-dives, investment memos, and market analysis.
digoal/blog
从论文 PDF 文件或论文 PDF URL 生成通俗易懂、图文并茂、带批判性评估的中文 Markdown 解读,并保存到当前项目的 markdown 目录。Use when the user asks to interpret,精读,解读,summarize,explain,analyze, or write an article from an academic paper PDF…
YSQ-boop/paper-lens
Read and critically analyze one academic paper from an arXiv URL/ID or a local PDF, producing a source-grounded Markdown report that can grow from a quick read into a reviewer-level deep review.
RapidAI/MaClaw
论文深度解读 Skill — 下载论文PDF → LLM深度解读(问题/创新点/方法原理/实验分析)→ PDF图片提取 → 生成组会PPT → 生成解读音频MP3。端到端学术论文解读工具。
htlin222/meta-pipe
Collect and manage full-text PDFs for included studies, track provenance, and prepare documents for extraction.
chujianyun/skills
论文解读助手。适用于用户发送 arXiv 论文链接,并希望下载论文、解读论文、生成读书笔记、做论文拆解或输出详细报告时使用。会在工作目录创建论文文件夹、下载 PDF 与 TeX Source(如有)、生成中文 Markdown 报告。默认先交付初稿,不自动复查;如果用户明确同意,再安排后续复查。不适用于只要简短推荐语的情况。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
A skill your agent uses when drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page, two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2, rebuttal due May 11 in 2026)…. Eccv Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page, two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2, rebuttal due May 11 in 2026), with references counted inside the page, no venue-forbidden extras, and arguments sized for the area-chair discussion that follows.
Eccv Author Response fits situations like: drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page; two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2; rebuttal due May 11 in 2026); with references counted inside the page.
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/eccv-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ECCV-Skills/skills/eccv-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/eccv-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/eccv-author-response, .gemini/skills/eccv-author-response, .github/skills/eccv-author-response and .opencode/skills/eccv-author-response in your project.
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Eccv Author Response is instructions for the agent only.
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
Eccv Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
About 1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Eccv Author Response: Vc Industry Research (zebbern/claude-code-guide, 4.7k stars), Paper Interpretation (digoal/blog, 8.6k stars), Paper Lens (YSQ-boop/paper-lens, 101 stars) and Paper Review (RapidAI/MaClaw, 147 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.