Short
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Rewrite the previous response more briefly while preserving the substance.
A skill your agent uses when writing the ECAI author response (rebuttal) — the single, short, double-blind reply during the response window (IJCAI-ECAI 2026: 7-10 April 2026) that must correct…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Ecai Author Response
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecai-author-response -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ecai-author-response --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response .claude/skills/ecai-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "ecai-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response into .claude/skills/ecai-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ecai-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-responseType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecai-author-response -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ecai-author-response --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response .agents/skills/ecai-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "ecai-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response into .agents/skills/ecai-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ecai-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecai-author-response -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ecai-author-response --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response .cursor/skills/ecai-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "ecai-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response into .cursor/skills/ecai-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ecai-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecai-author-response -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ecai-author-response --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response .gemini/skills/ecai-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ecai-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response into .gemini/skills/ecai-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ecai-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ecai-author-responseInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecai-author-response -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response .github/skills/ecai-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ecai-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response into .github/skills/ecai-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ecai-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecai-author-response -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ecai-author-response --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response .opencode/skills/ecai-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ecai-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response into .opencode/skills/ecai-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ecai-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
ecai-author-response- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.2k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 620 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when writing the ECAI author response (rebuttal) — the single, short, double-blind reply during the response window (IJCAI-ECAI 2026: 7-10 April 2026) that must correct…
- Works in 3 steps: One-line framing (optional, ≤1… → Per-reviewer, per-point answers. Address… → Shared-concern block (if two reviewers…
- Writing the ECAI author response (rebuttal) — the single
- SKILL.md covers What the response can and…, Structure (short and scannable), Double-blind discipline and Triage: which points to answer, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Ecai Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the ECAI author response (rebuttal) — the single, short, double-blind reply during the response window (IJCAI-ECAI 2026: 7-10 April 2026) that must correct factual misreadings and supply asked-for evidence within a strict length limit, knowing there is no second round and the area chair decides.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Writing the ECAI author response (rebuttal) — the single
- Double-blind reply during the response window (IJCAI-ECAI 2026: 7-10 April 202
- That must correct factual misreadings and supply asked-for evidence within a strict length limit
- Knowing there is no second round and the area chair decides
Example prompts
- “/ecai-author-response”
Workflow steps
3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- One-line framing (optional, ≤1 sentence). The single most important correction, up front.
- Per-reviewer, per-point answers. Address the specific objections each reviewer raised, in
- Shared-concern block (if two reviewers raised the same point). Answer once, reference it.
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Ecai Author Response loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 84 tokens; SKILL.md has 620 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 620 words, ~1,247 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/ecai-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- ecai-author-response
- description
- Use when writing the ECAI author response (rebuttal) — the single, short, double-blind reply during the response window (IJCAI-ECAI 2026: 7-10 April 2026) that must correct factual misreadings and supply asked-for evidence within a strict length limit, knowing there is no second round and the area chair decides.
ECAI Author Response
ECAI gives you one response, and there is no revision round after it. This is not a journal rebuttal that precedes a Major Revision; it is a single, short, double-blind reply that the area chair reads before the accept/reject discussion. Write it as a precision instrument: fix what is factually wrong, supply the one number a reviewer said was missing, and give the area chair a clean reason to champion the paper.
For IJCAI-ECAI 2026 the author-response window is 7-10 April 2026, after the summary-reject phase (4 Mar) and before final notification (29 Apr). Verify the exact window and any length limit on the current call before writing.
What the response can and cannot do
| The response CAN | The response CANNOT |
|---|---|
| Correct a factual misreading ("the reviewer read Table 2 as X; it reports Y") | Add a new experiment or theorem that changes the contribution |
| Supply a specific number/clarification a reviewer explicitly requested | Re-run the study or promise a revised version — there is no revision round |
| Point to the exact line/lemma/figure that answers an objection | Argue taste or "significance" against a reviewer's judgment |
| Clarify scope a reviewer misjudged | Reveal author identity to make a credibility argument |
Structure (short and scannable)
Length is tight (verify the cap). Do not spend it on throat-clearing.
- One-line framing (optional, ≤1 sentence). The single most important correction, up front.
- Per-reviewer, per-point answers. Address the specific objections each reviewer raised, in their order. Lead each with the reviewer's concern in a few words, then the answer.
- Shared-concern block (if two reviewers raised the same point). Answer once, reference it.
Keep every answer evidenced and checkable: a table cell, a lemma number, a definition, a line in the supplement. An assertion the area chair cannot verify from the existing paper is worth little in a single-round process.
Double-blind discipline
The response is read under double-blind review. Do not:
- name your group, institution, or prior system;
- write "as we showed in our [X]" in a way that identifies you — cite neutrally;
- link a non-anonymized repository to prove a claim.
A de-anonymizing rebuttal can sink an otherwise-acceptable paper.
Show full SKILL.md (265 more words)Show less
Triage: which points to answer
You cannot fix everything in a few hundred words. Prioritize:
- Factual errors that, uncorrected, justify rejection — highest value; these are winnable.
- Missing-number requests you can answer from work already done (a metric already computed, a proof already in the supplement).
- Clarifications of scope or claim the reviewer misread.
- Skip or briefly acknowledge pure-taste objections and requests that would require new work — promising future work does not move a single-round decision.
Worked micro-example (illustrative, fictional)
R2 says the completeness proof assumes a finite state space, making it inapplicable. The completeness result (Thm. 1) does not assume finiteness; it requires only that the fallback heuristic is admissible and the branching factor is finite, both stated in §3.1. The proof step R2 cites (line 214) bounds regret, not the state count. We will make the assumption list explicit in the camera-ready.
R3 asks for the node-expansion numbers on the IPC-2018 domains specifically. These are already in the supplement (Table S4); the median reduction there is reported per domain. We will surface a one-line summary in §4 of the camera-ready. (Answers an explicit request from work already done; promises only a minor, camera-ready-legal edit.)
Common failure modes
- Debating the area chair's future decision instead of arming an advocate with facts.
- Promising a revised paper — ECAI has no round in which to deliver it.
- Spreading the length limit thin across every minor comment instead of concentrating on the reject-driving points.
- Introducing new claims the reviewers could not check — often read as moving the goalposts.
- Leaking identity to bolster credibility.
Output format
[Response budget] length cap: <chars/words>; window: <dates>
[Reject-driving points] <list, each mapped to a checkable answer in the existing paper/supplement>
[Per-reviewer answers] R1: ... / R2: ... / R3: ... (concern -> evidenced reply)
[Camera-ready-legal promises] only minor edits (assumption lists, surfacing an existing number)
[Anonymity check] no author/institution/system identity revealed© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Ecai Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecai Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Shortsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | 47k | 1 repos | ~281 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Responsive Unitsthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist | 74k | — | ~472 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Author Response Builderaipoch/medical-research-skills | 1.9k | — | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Rebuttal ResponseM1n-n9/paper-lifecycle | 693 | — | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Hermes Agent Skill AuthoringNousResearch/hermes-agent | 252k | — | ~3.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Responsive Units
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
A skill your agent uses when reviewing stylesheets, component styles, and responsive behavior related to Use relative units for responsive layouts.
Author Response Builder
aipoch/medical-research-skills
Turns reviewer comments into structured, professional point-by-point responses linked to manuscript revisions, clarifications, rebuttals, and additional analyses.
Rebuttal Response
M1n-n9/paper-lifecycle
Plan, triage, and write academic rebuttals and review responses.
Hermes Agent Skill Authoring
NousResearch/hermes-agent
Author in-repo SKILL.md files: frontmatter and structure. An agent skill from NousResearch/hermes-agent.
Fast Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting USENIX FAST author responses, covering the short pre-notification rebuttal during the author-response period and — distinctively — the one-shot-revision change…
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Ecai Author Response
What does Ecai Author Response do?
A skill your agent uses when writing the ECAI author response (rebuttal) — the single, short, double-blind reply during the response window (IJCAI-ECAI 2026: 7-10 April 2026) that must correct…. Ecai Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the ECAI author response (rebuttal) — the single, short, double-blind reply during the response window (IJCAI-ECAI 2026: 7-10 April 2026) that must correct factual misreadings and supply asked-for evidence within a strict length limit, knowing there is no second round and the area chair decides.
When should I use Ecai Author Response?
Ecai Author Response fits situations like: writing the ECAI author response (rebuttal) — the single; double-blind reply during the response window (IJCAI-ECAI 2026: 7-10 April 202; that must correct factual misreadings and supply asked-for evidence within a strict length limit; knowing there is no second round and the area chair decides.
How do I install Ecai Author Response in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecai-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/ecai-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Ecai Author Response in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecai-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/ecai-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Ecai Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecai-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ecai-author-response, .gemini/skills/ecai-author-response, .github/skills/ecai-author-response and .opencode/skills/ecai-author-response in your project.
What does Ecai Author Response need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ecai Author Response is instructions for the agent only.
Does Ecai Author Response access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Ecai Author Response safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Ecai Author Response use?
Ecai Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Ecai Author Response use?
About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Ecai Author Response?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ecai Author Response: Short (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars), Responsive Units (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Author Response Builder (aipoch/medical-research-skills, 1.9k stars) and Rebuttal Response (M1n-n9/paper-lifecycle, 693 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Ecai Author Response?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.