Agent skill

Ecai Artifact Evaluation

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when planning the reproducibility/artifact story for an ECAI paper — noting that ECAI/FAIA has NO ACM/IEEE-style artifact-badging committee, so credibility is carried by the…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Ecai Artifact Evaluation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecai-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ecai-artifact-evaluation --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-artifact-evaluation .claude/skills/ecai-artifact-evaluation && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
ecai-artifact-evaluation
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
507 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when planning the reproducibility/artifact story for an ECAI paper — noting that ECAI/FAIA has NO ACM/IEEE-style artifact-badging committee, so credibility is carried by the…

  • Planning the reproducibility/artifact story for an ECAI paper — noting that ECAI/FAIA has NO ACM/IEEE-style artifact-badging committee
  • SKILL.md covers Match the artifact to the…, What "good" looks like at…, A pragmatic checklist (adapt,… and Do not import the wrong…, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • So credibility is carried by the paper and its supplement and judged by the same reviewers

What it does

Ecai Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when planning the reproducibility/artifact story for an ECAI paper — noting that ECAI/FAIA has NO ACM/IEEE-style artifact-badging committee, so credibility is carried by the paper and its supplement and judged by the same reviewers, and adapting an ML-style reproducibility package (or a complete proof appendix for theory work) to that reality.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Reproducible research. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Planning the reproducibility/artifact story for an ECAI paper — noting that ECAI/FAIA has NO ACM/IEEE-style artifact-badging committee
  • So credibility is carried by the paper and its supplement and judged by the same reviewers
  • Adapting an ML-style reproducibility package (or a complete proof appendix for theory work) to that reality

Example prompts

  • “/ecai-artifact-evaluation”

Requirements

  • Docker

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Ecai Artifact Evaluation loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 94 tokens; SKILL.md has 507 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~94
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 507 words, ~1,272 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/ecai-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
ecai-artifact-evaluation
description
Use when planning the reproducibility/artifact story for an ECAI paper — noting that ECAI/FAIA has NO ACM/IEEE-style artifact-badging committee, so credibility is carried by the paper and its supplement and judged by the same reviewers, and adapting an ML-style reproducibility package (or a complete proof appendix for theory work) to that reality.

ECAI Artifact Evaluation

Start with a correction that saves authors from importing the wrong workflow: ECAI does not run an ACM/IEEE-style artifact-evaluation track with a separate badge committee. There is no "Artifacts Available / Functional / Reusable / Reproduced" pipeline as at ACM SIGSOFT venues, and no separate artifact deadline to hit after acceptance. In ECAI, the reproducibility story is carried by the paper and its supplement and judged by the same reviewers who read the paper, during the one review round.

That makes the "artifact" a submission-time asset, not a post-acceptance badge chase. Its job is to make the reviewer trust the claim inside a 7-page body. (Confirm on the current call whether the edition adds any optional reproducibility checklist or appendix mechanism — this is 待核实 per cycle and can differ between a standalone ECAI and the joint IJCAI-ECAI 2026.)

Match the artifact to the contribution shape

ECAI is a general-AI venue, so "artifact" means different things:

Contribution shapeThe credibility artifact is...
Theory / KR / argumentationA complete proof appendix (full proofs the body only sketches) plus, if applicable, a reference solver/encoding
Planning / search / optimizationThe domain files, instances, seeds, and a runnable implementation reproducing the reported node/quality numbers
Machine learningCode, data (or a loader), configs, seeds, and cached outputs so results reproduce without live API calls
Multi-agent systemsThe environment, agent code, and the exact evaluation protocol (episodes, seeds, metrics)
Applied AI (PAIS)Enough of the pipeline and (sanitized) data to make the deployment claim credible

What "good" looks like at review time

  • Anonymized. The supplement is read under double-blind review; strip repository owners, institution names, and system names that identify you (ecai-submission).
  • Self-contained. A reviewer opens it once, in a short window; it must run or be readable without chasing dependencies or your lab's private data.
  • Decision-critical content stays in the body. The supplement holds support (full proofs, extra tables, code) — not the claim itself. Nothing a reviewer needs to judge the paper may live only in the supplement (ecai-supplementary).
  • Proportional. Match effort to the claim: a theory paper's artifact is a rigorous proof appendix, not a Docker image; an empirical paper's artifact is a runnable, seeded package.
Show full SKILL.md (148 more words)Show less

A pragmatic checklist (adapt, don't badge-chase)

text
[ ] Full proofs present for every theorem the body sketches (theory work)
[ ] Code runs from a clean checkout with a documented entrypoint (empirical work)
[ ] Data included or a script fetches a versioned public source; seeds fixed
[ ] Cached model/API outputs included so results do not re-sample at run time
[ ] A short README maps each paper claim/table -> the file that reproduces it
[ ] Archive anonymized: no owner, institution, funding, or system-name leaks
[ ] Total size and runtime reasonable for a reviewer's one-pass read

Do not import the wrong machinery

  • No ACM/IEEE badges. Do not promise "Artifacts Evaluated - Reusable" or design around a badge committee — none exists at ECAI. Credibility is reviewer-judged, in-band.
  • No separate artifact-track deadline. Everything ships with the paper (abstract 12 Jan / paper 19 Jan for IJCAI-ECAI 2026); there is no later artifact submission.
  • Not a leaderboard. ECAI values understanding (a proof, a fair comparison) over a single benchmark number; an artifact that only re-prints a leaderboard score misses the venue's bar (ecai-experiments).

Post-acceptance: make it permanent and open

Once accepted, convert the anonymized supplement into a permanent, open release to match ECAI's open-access ethos:

  • Deposit code/data in a DOI-issuing archive (e.g. Zenodo/Software Heritage) with an open license.
  • De-anonymize repository owners and restore acknowledgements (ecai-camera-ready).
  • Put the permanent link in the camera-ready so the open-access paper points to a stable artifact.

Output format

text
[Artifact type] proof appendix / runnable code+data / environment+protocol / deployment pipeline
[Anonymity] clean / leaks: <where>
[Claim map] each theorem/table -> proof or reproducing file
[Self-containment] runs/readable in one pass? missing deps: <list>
[Reality check] no ACM/IEEE badge assumed; nothing decision-critical hidden in the supplement
[Post-acceptance] DOI archive + open license + de-anonymized link planned for camera-ready

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-artifact-evaluation of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Ecai Artifact Evaluation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Ecai Artifact Evaluation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Ecai Artifact Evaluation this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guidexjtulyc/MedgeClaw6171 repos~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Compute Environment Setupaipoch/open-science5.5k—~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Figure Styleaipoch/open-science5.5k—~5.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Add Bactopia Toolbactopia/bactopia522—~4.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Guides an agent through reproducing papers built on the CHARLS health and retirement survey, from variable mapping to cognition, depression and isolation scores.

    617 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.8k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Compute Environment Setup

    aipoch/open-science

    Prepares setup instructions and a named activation file for a user-managed software environment on an Open-Science SSH or Slurm compute host.

    5.5k GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Figure Style

    aipoch/open-science

    Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots.

    5.5k GitHub stars~5.1k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Add Bactopia Tool

    bactopia/bactopia

    Scaffold a complete Bactopia Tool across all three tiers -- module, subworkflow, and workflow entry point under workflows/bactopia-tools/.

    522 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Modeling Code and Result Contracts

    yushui2022/MathModel-Skill

    Generates result-evidence contracts, tables and runnable q1 to q3 modeling code scaffolds for a math modeling paper from a model route, a data plan and cleaned data.

    454 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Ecai Artifact Evaluation

What does Ecai Artifact Evaluation do?

A skill your agent uses when planning the reproducibility/artifact story for an ECAI paper — noting that ECAI/FAIA has NO ACM/IEEE-style artifact-badging committee, so credibility is carried by the…. Ecai Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when planning the reproducibility/artifact story for an ECAI paper — noting that ECAI/FAIA has NO ACM/IEEE-style artifact-badging committee, so credibility is carried by the paper and its supplement and judged by the same reviewers, and adapting an ML-style reproducibility package (or a complete proof appendix for theory work) to that reality.

When should I use Ecai Artifact Evaluation?

Ecai Artifact Evaluation fits situations like: planning the reproducibility/artifact story for an ECAI paper — noting that ECAI/FAIA has NO ACM/IEEE-style artifact-badging committee; so credibility is carried by the paper and its supplement and judged by the same reviewers; adapting an ML-style reproducibility package (or a complete proof appendix for theory work) to that reality.

How do I install Ecai Artifact Evaluation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecai-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/ecai-artifact-evaluation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Ecai Artifact Evaluation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecai-artifact-evaluation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/ecai-artifact-evaluation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Ecai Artifact Evaluation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecai-artifact-evaluation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ecai-artifact-evaluation, .gemini/skills/ecai-artifact-evaluation, .github/skills/ecai-artifact-evaluation and .opencode/skills/ecai-artifact-evaluation in your project.

What does Ecai Artifact Evaluation need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ecai Artifact Evaluation is instructions for the agent only. Our summary lists: Docker.

Does Ecai Artifact Evaluation access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Ecai Artifact Evaluation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Ecai Artifact Evaluation use?

Ecai Artifact Evaluation is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Ecai Artifact Evaluation use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Ecai Artifact Evaluation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ecai Artifact Evaluation: Peer Review (K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer, 2.4k stars), CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guide (xjtulyc/MedgeClaw, 617 stars), Compute Environment Setup (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars) and Figure Style (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Ecai Artifact Evaluation?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.