Deepseek Reason
ruvnet/ruflo
Reasoning-mode completion against DeepSeek's deepseek-reasoner model (R1) via /v1/chat/completions.
A skill your agent uses when reasoning about the EACL review pipeline through ACL Rolling Review, covering reviewers and the action editor's meta-review, the commitment step where EACL decides main…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Eacl Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eacl-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process .claude/skills/eacl-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "eacl-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process into .claude/skills/eacl-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eacl-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eacl-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process .agents/skills/eacl-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "eacl-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process into .agents/skills/eacl-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eacl-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eacl-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process .cursor/skills/eacl-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "eacl-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process into .cursor/skills/eacl-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eacl-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eacl-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process .gemini/skills/eacl-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "eacl-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process into .gemini/skills/eacl-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eacl-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eacl-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process .github/skills/eacl-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "eacl-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process into .github/skills/eacl-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eacl-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eacl-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process .opencode/skills/eacl-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "eacl-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process into .opencode/skills/eacl-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eacl-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
eacl-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~838 tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 338 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when reasoning about the EACL review pipeline through ACL Rolling Review, covering reviewers and the action editor's meta-review, the commitment step where EACL decides main…
- Reasoning about the EACL review pipeline through ACL Rolling Review
- SKILL.md covers The pipeline, stage by stage, Findings is a real outcome, The single-cycle consequence… and Confidentiality and conduct, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Covering reviewers and the action editors meta-review
What it does
Eacl Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when reasoning about the EACL review pipeline through ACL Rolling Review, covering reviewers and the action editor's meta-review, the commitment step where EACL decides main versus Findings versus reject, ethics escalation, confidentiality, and when to route a reviewed package to a sibling ACL venue.
Its SKILL.md is about 840 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Reasoning about the EACL review pipeline through ACL Rolling Review
- Covering reviewers and the action editors meta-review
- The commitment step where EACL decides main versus Findings versus reject
- Ethics escalation
Example prompts
- “/eacl-review-process”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Eacl Review Process loads about 838 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 82 tokens; SKILL.md has 338 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 338 words, ~838 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/eacl-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- eacl-review-process
- description
- Use when reasoning about the EACL review pipeline through ACL Rolling Review, covering reviewers and the action editor's meta-review, the commitment step where EACL decides main versus Findings versus reject, ethics escalation, confidentiality, and when to route a reviewed package to a sibling *ACL venue.
EACL Review Process
Use this to model how an EACL decision actually gets made, so advice matches the machinery. EACL outsources reviewing to ACL Rolling Review and keeps only the final decision: a paper is reviewed in an ARR cycle, receives an action-editor meta-review, and is then committed to EACL, where senior area chairs and program chairs sort commitments into main, Findings of ACL: EACL, or reject. Reopen the current ARR and EACL pages before relying on specifics.
The pipeline, stage by stage
| Stage | Who acts | Output |
|---|---|---|
| ARR review | Reviewers (usually 3) | Scores + written reviews |
| Rebuttal | Authors | Responses (see eacl-author-response) |
| Meta-review | Action editor | Synthesized assessment |
| Commitment | Authors | Package committed to EACL |
| Venue decision | EACL SACs / PCs | Main / Findings / reject |
The meta-review is the pivot: EACL's committee reads it, not the raw reviews in isolation, so the rebuttal should aim to shape it.
Findings is a real outcome
- Findings of ACL: EACL is archival, Anthology-published, and decided at commitment;
notification is simultaneous with the main track. A Findings offer is an acceptance, not a
rejection — weigh it as such (see
eacl-topic-selectionfor the accept-Findings calculus).
The single-cycle consequence for routing
- Because an edition like EACL 2027 draws from one ARR cycle with no fallback, a package that misses commitment or is rejected cannot simply wait for "the next EACL cycle" — the next opportunity is a different conference. Plan re-routing to a sibling *ACL venue (ACL, EMNLP, NAACL, AACL) as a first-class option, carrying the ARR reviews forward.
Confidentiality and conduct
- ARR review is confidential; do not solicit, share, or discuss reviews outside the process.
- Reviewers and authors are bound by the ACL code of conduct; harassment or coercion (including citation coercion) is reportable.
Ethics escalation
If a submission raises an ethics concern:
reviewer/AE flags it -> ethics review track -> may condition or block acceptance
Authors: address ethics/data-governance issues in the paper and checklist up front;
an unresolved flag can override otherwise-positive reviews.Reading an outcome
- A reject with substantive reviews is a resource: the ARR reviews travel with a resubmission to another venue, so a clean rebuttal and revision plan are not wasted.
- A borderline meta-review often turns on the honesty of Limitations and the strength of the rebuttal — both are within author control.
Output format
[Pipeline position] <review / rebuttal / meta-review / commitment / decision>
[Meta-review read] <what the action editor likely concludes>
[Findings scenario] <accept-Findings vs push-for-main vs re-route>
[Ethics/conduct flags] <any, with handling>
[Next step] <commit here / re-route to sibling venue with ARR reviews>© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Eacl Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eacl Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~838 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Deepseek Reasonruvnet/ruflo | 74k | — | ~626 | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Ejentum Reasoning Harnesssickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | 47k | 1 repos | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Nowait Reasoning Optimizerdavila7/claude-code-templates | 32k | 2 repos | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Analyzing Active Directory Acl Abusemukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills | 34k | — | ~1.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Recall Reasoningparcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 | 3.9k | 1 repos | ~758 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Ejentum Reasoning Harness
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
MCP server exposing four cognitive harness modes (reasoning, code, anti-deception, memory).
Nowait Reasoning Optimizer
davila7/claude-code-templates
Implements the NOWAIT technique for efficient reasoning in R1-style LLMs.
Analyzing Active Directory Acl Abuse
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3 to identify GenericAll, WriteDACL, and WriteOwner abuse paths
Recall Reasoning
parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3
Search past reasoning for relevant decisions and approaches. An agent skill from parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3.
- Official
Nv Reason Cxr
NVIDIA/skills
Used for command-shape or live NV-Reason-CXR chest X-ray reasoning smoke tests.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Eacl Review Process
What does Eacl Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when reasoning about the EACL review pipeline through ACL Rolling Review, covering reviewers and the action editor's meta-review, the commitment step where EACL decides main…. Eacl Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when reasoning about the EACL review pipeline through ACL Rolling Review, covering reviewers and the action editor's meta-review, the commitment step where EACL decides main versus Findings versus reject, ethics escalation, confidentiality, and when to route a reviewed package to a sibling ACL venue.
When should I use Eacl Review Process?
Eacl Review Process fits situations like: reasoning about the EACL review pipeline through ACL Rolling Review; covering reviewers and the action editors meta-review; the commitment step where EACL decides main versus Findings versus reject; ethics escalation.
How do I install Eacl Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/eacl-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Eacl Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/eacl-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Eacl Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/eacl-review-process, .gemini/skills/eacl-review-process, .github/skills/eacl-review-process and .opencode/skills/eacl-review-process in your project.
What does Eacl Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Eacl Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Eacl Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Eacl Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Eacl Review Process use?
Eacl Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Eacl Review Process use?
About 838 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Eacl Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Eacl Review Process: Deepseek Reason (ruvnet/ruflo, 74k stars), Ejentum Reasoning Harness (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars), Nowait Reasoning Optimizer (davila7/claude-code-templates, 32k stars) and Analyzing Active Directory Acl Abuse (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills, 34k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Eacl Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.