A skill your agent uses when running the Responsible NLP checklist as a claims audit for an EACL paper, covering hyperparameter and compute disclosure, verbatim prompt and decoding reporting…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Eacl Reproducibility

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-reproducibility -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eacl-reproducibility --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-reproducibility .claude/skills/eacl-reproducibility && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
eacl-reproducibility
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~917 tokens
SKILL.md length
291 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when running the Responsible NLP checklist as a claims audit for an EACL paper, covering hyperparameter and compute disclosure, verbatim prompt and decoding reporting…

  • Running the Responsible NLP checklist as a claims audit for an EACL paper
  • SKILL.md covers Treat the checklist as a…, Contamination stance (LLM era), Variance and significance floor and Multilingual coverage honesty, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Covering hyperparameter and compute disclosure

What it does

Eacl Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when running the Responsible NLP checklist as a claims audit for an EACL paper, covering hyperparameter and compute disclosure, verbatim prompt and decoding reporting, data-contamination stance, variance and significance reporting, multilingual coverage claims, and consistency between the checklist answers and what the paper actually contains.

Its SKILL.md is about 920 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Reproducible research and Natural language processing. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Running the Responsible NLP checklist as a claims audit for an EACL paper
  • Covering hyperparameter and compute disclosure
  • Verbatim prompt and decoding reporting
  • Data-contamination stance

Example prompts

  • “/eacl-reproducibility”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Eacl Reproducibility loads about 917 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 93 tokens; SKILL.md has 291 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~93
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~917

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 291 words, ~917 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/eacl-reproducibility/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
eacl-reproducibility
description
Use when running the Responsible NLP checklist as a claims audit for an EACL paper, covering hyperparameter and compute disclosure, verbatim prompt and decoding reporting, data-contamination stance, variance and significance reporting, multilingual coverage claims, and consistency between the checklist answers and what the paper actually contains.

EACL Reproducibility

Use this to audit an EACL paper against the Responsible NLP checklist, which ARR files at submission and which the action editor and reviewers read alongside the PDF. The checklist is not paperwork: misleading answers are desk-rejection grounds, and inconsistencies between the checklist and the paper are what careful EACL reviewers hunt for. Reopen the current checklist at aclrollingreview.org/responsibleNLPresearch before auditing.

Treat the checklist as a claims audit

Every "yes" in the checklist implies a location in the paper. Walk the paper claim by claim and confirm each is backed:

Claim typeMust discloseCommon EACL failure
Model resultsHyperparameters, tuning, model size"Default settings" with no numbers
ComputeHardware, run time, total budgetSilent on cost of large runs
LLM promptsVerbatim prompts + decoding paramsParaphrased or omitted prompts
DataSource, license, splits, preprocessingUndocumented or "on request" data
MetricsVariance over seeds / significance testSingle-run deltas reported as wins
MultilingualLanguages, resource levels, per-language resultsAggregate hides where it fails

Contamination stance (LLM era)

  • State explicitly whether evaluation data could have leaked into training — for closed LLMs this is often unknowable, and the honest move is to say so and bound the risk rather than claim clean evaluation. The "Leak, Cheat, Repeat" exemplar in ../../resources/exemplars/library.md is the reference discipline.
  • Where feasible, run an overlap or decontamination check and report it.

Variance and significance floor

text
Reporting rule of thumb:
  - >= 3-5 seeds for any headline comparison
  - report mean +/- CI or std, not a single run
  - a significance test when two systems are "close"
  - never claim a win on an unreplicated single-run delta

Multilingual coverage honesty

  • If the paper claims a cross-lingual or multilingual result, the checklist audit must confirm the languages are named, the resource levels are stated, and per-language results exist somewhere — an aggregate average is not evidence for every language.
  • For lower-resourced languages, confirm dataset provenance and annotation context are documented; this is a recurring EACL reviewer expectation.

Checklist-to-paper consistency sweep

text
[ ] Every checklist "yes" maps to a section/appendix number
[ ] Hyperparameters + search space stated
[ ] Compute budget stated for expensive runs
[ ] Prompts + decoding params verbatim (if LLMs used)
[ ] Data source, license, splits, preprocessing documented
[ ] Variance/significance reported for headline claims
[ ] Contamination risk addressed honestly
[ ] Per-language results present for multilingual claims
[ ] AI-assistance use disclosed truthfully

Output format

text
[Reproducibility risk] Low / Medium / High
[Checklist-paper mismatches] <specific "yes" answers not backed in text>
[Disclosure gaps] <hyperparameters/compute/prompts/data>
[Evidence floor] <seeds/variance/significance findings>
[Contamination] <stance + any check run>
[Fix order] <what to add before the cycle deadline>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-reproducibility of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Eacl Reproducibility next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Eacl Reproducibility compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Eacl Reproducibility this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~917Automated safety check: PassMIT
HypoGeniC Hypothesis GenerationK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills48k1 repos~3.6kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Ablation Study Plannerwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep17k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Radiology Annotationhuang-sir1/radiology-skills1.9k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Scholar Openjoshzyj/open-scholar-skill168—~14kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • HypoGeniC Hypothesis Generation

    K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

    Plans and audits runs of the HypoGeniC and HypoRefine packages, which propose hypotheses from labeled text datasets, with local checks before any model call.

    48k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.6k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Ablation Study Planner

    wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep

    Plans the ablation studies a paper needs after main results support its claim: Codex designs them like a reviewer, Claude Code checks feasibility and runs them.

    17k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Radiology Annotation

    huang-sir1/radiology-skills

    Design/audit imaging truth, readers, ROI geometry, reproducibility and label noise; not model training.

    1.9k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 18 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Scholar Open

    joshzyj/open-scholar-skill

    Implement open science practices for a social science study.

    168 GitHub stars~14k tokensUpdated 21 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Guides an agent through reproducing papers built on the CHARLS health and retirement survey, from variable mapping to cognition, depression and isolation scores.

    617 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.8k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Eacl Reproducibility

What does Eacl Reproducibility do?

A skill your agent uses when running the Responsible NLP checklist as a claims audit for an EACL paper, covering hyperparameter and compute disclosure, verbatim prompt and decoding reporting…. Eacl Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when running the Responsible NLP checklist as a claims audit for an EACL paper, covering hyperparameter and compute disclosure, verbatim prompt and decoding reporting, data-contamination stance, variance and significance reporting, multilingual coverage claims, and consistency between the checklist answers and what the paper actually contains.

When should I use Eacl Reproducibility?

Eacl Reproducibility fits situations like: running the Responsible NLP checklist as a claims audit for an EACL paper; covering hyperparameter and compute disclosure; verbatim prompt and decoding reporting; data-contamination stance.

How do I install Eacl Reproducibility in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-reproducibility -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/eacl-reproducibility in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Eacl Reproducibility in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-reproducibility -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/eacl-reproducibility in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Eacl Reproducibility in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-reproducibility -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/eacl-reproducibility, .gemini/skills/eacl-reproducibility, .github/skills/eacl-reproducibility and .opencode/skills/eacl-reproducibility in your project.

What does Eacl Reproducibility need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Eacl Reproducibility is instructions for the agent only.

Does Eacl Reproducibility access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Eacl Reproducibility safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Eacl Reproducibility use?

Eacl Reproducibility is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Eacl Reproducibility use?

About 917 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Eacl Reproducibility?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Eacl Reproducibility: HypoGeniC Hypothesis Generation (K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills, 48k stars), Ablation Study Planner (wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep, 17k stars), Radiology Annotation (huang-sir1/radiology-skills, 1.9k stars) and Scholar Open (joshzyj/open-scholar-skill, 168 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Eacl Reproducibility?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.