A skill your agent uses when drafting an EACL author response during the ACL Rolling Review rebuttal window, covering how to triage reviewer points, address the action editor who writes the…

MITAuto-check passedAI & LLM Engineering

Install Eacl Author Response

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-author-response -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eacl-author-response --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-author-response .claude/skills/eacl-author-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
eacl-author-response
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1k tokens
SKILL.md length
456 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when drafting an EACL author response during the ACL Rolling Review rebuttal window, covering how to triage reviewer points, address the action editor who writes the…

  • Drafting an EACL author response during the ACL Rolling Review rebuttal window
  • SKILL.md covers Read the room first, Objection-to-move table, Drafting rules and Runnable-experiment discipline, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Covering how to triage reviewer points

What it does

Eacl Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting an EACL author response during the ACL Rolling Review rebuttal window, covering how to triage reviewer points, address the action editor who writes the meta-review, answer NLP objection patterns, run in-window experiments, flag deficient reviews, and decide respond-now versus revise-for-a-later-venue given EACL's single cycle.

Its SKILL.md is about 1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in AI & LLM Engineering, covering Natural language processing. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Drafting an EACL author response during the ACL Rolling Review rebuttal window
  • Covering how to triage reviewer points
  • Address the action editor who writes the meta-review
  • Answer NLP objection patterns

Example prompts

  • “/eacl-author-response”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Eacl Author Response loads about 1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 92 tokens; SKILL.md has 456 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~92
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 456 words, ~1,039 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/eacl-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
eacl-author-response
description
Use when drafting an EACL author response during the ACL Rolling Review rebuttal window, covering how to triage reviewer points, address the action editor who writes the meta-review, answer NLP objection patterns, run in-window experiments, flag deficient reviews, and decide respond-now versus revise-for-a-later-venue given EACL's single cycle.

EACL Author Response

Use this to work the ARR rebuttal window for a paper aimed at EACL. In ARR the response is addressed to reviewers and to the action editor who will synthesize a meta-review; that meta-review, not any single score, is what EACL's area chairs read at commitment. Reopen the current ARR author guidelines before drafting.

Read the room first

  • Identify the action editor's lens: the meta-review is where reviews get weighed, so a response that moves the action editor matters more than one that merely satisfies the harshest reviewer.
  • Separate blocking objections (a claim reviewers think is unsupported, a missing baseline, a reproducibility gap) from preference comments (a different framing, an extra dataset a reviewer would like). Spend the word budget on the blocking set.
  • EACL's single cycle raises the stakes of this window: for an edition like EACL 2027 there is no next cycle to defer to, so a fixable objection should be fixed now if the experiment fits the window.

Objection-to-move table

Reviewer objection patternStrong response moveWeak response move
"Claim broader than evidence"Narrow the claim in text; point to the exact tableArgue the claim is "obviously" fine
"Missing tuned/LLM baseline"Add it if runnable in-window; else scope the claimDismiss the baseline as unfair
"Not enough languages"Add the runnable subset; state the residual in LimitationsAssert results "would generalize"
"Possible contamination"Report an overlap check or decontamination resultIgnore or hand-wave
"Significance unclear"Report a test / CIs over seedsCite a single-run delta
Show full SKILL.md (204 more words)Show less

Drafting rules

  • Lead each reply with the concrete change ("We added X; see revised Table 2"), then the reasoning — reviewers skim.
  • Do not introduce unsupported new claims or results you cannot show; a promise you cannot substantiate reads worse than an honest limitation.
  • Keep the tone factual and non-defensive; the action editor is reading for whether you engaged, not whether you "won."
  • Respect anonymity: no links that deanonymize, no "as we said in our NAACL paper."

Runnable-experiment discipline

text
For each requested experiment:
  fits_window?  = can it finish and be written before the response deadline?
  changes_claim? = would the result actually alter a reviewer's objection?
  -> run only if fits_window AND changes_claim
  -> otherwise: acknowledge, scope the claim, and record it in Limitations

Do not start a sprawling experiment that cannot land in time; a half-reported result invites a sharper objection.

Flagging a deficient review

  • If a review is unsupported, off-topic, or hostile, you may flag it to the action editor through the proper ARR channel rather than fighting it point-by-point in the public reply.
  • Document the specific deficiency (factual error, no justification) — flagging is for genuine process failures, not for a low score you dislike.

When not to respond hard

  • If the reviews reveal a structural gap no in-window experiment can close, the honest move may be to accept the outcome and plan a later venue — but remember EACL's calendar: the next *ACL opportunity is a different conference, so eacl-topic-selection and eacl-workflow should drive that call.

Output format

text
[Response plan] <blocking objections, ranked>
[Action-editor angle] <what the meta-review needs to hear>
[In-window experiments] <run / defer, with reason>
[Reviewer replies] <one concise reply per reviewer>
[Deficient-review flags] <if any, with documented reason>
[Route decision] <respond-and-commit / revise-for-later-venue>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Eacl Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Eacl Author Response compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Eacl Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hugging Face TokenizersOrchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs13k6 repos~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
OpenMed Model Card Writermaziyarpanahi/openmed5.5k—~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Gptqmodel Tokenizer NormalizationModelCloud/GPTQModel1.3k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Andrej KarpathyK-Dense-AI/mimeo282—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Comparetaishi-i/awesome-japanese-nlp-resources1k—~4.1kAutomated safety check: NotesCC0-1.0

Similar skills

  • Hugging Face Tokenizers

    Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs

    Shows how to load, train and use fast Hugging Face tokenizers, with BPE, WordPiece and Unigram models, padding, truncation and alignment tracking.

    13k GitHub starsUsed in 6 repos~3.4k tokens
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • OpenMed Model Card Writer

    maziyarpanahi/openmed

    Fills in a model card for an OpenMed clinical NER or de-identification model from its evaluation reports: intended use, metrics, subgroups and limitations.

    5.5k GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated yesterday
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Diagnose and correct GPT-QModel tokenizer initialization, tokenization normalization, special-token handling, prompt rendering, and chat-template problems.

    1.3k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated today
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Andrej Karpathy

    K-Dense-AI/mimeo

    Applies the mental models and frameworks of Andrej Karpathy (deep learning, former Director of AI at Tesla, founding member of OpenAI, Eureka Labs).

    282 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Compare

    taishi-i/awesome-japanese-nlp-resources

    Compare several Japanese NLP libraries, models, or datasets for a keyword (a specific tool name, or a function/task like '形態素解析') across a handful of criteria chosen for that comparison, rendered as…

    1k GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes
  • Research

    taishi-i/awesome-japanese-nlp-resources

    Analyze current trends and challenges in Japanese NLP for a topic.

    1k GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Eacl Author Response

What does Eacl Author Response do?

A skill your agent uses when drafting an EACL author response during the ACL Rolling Review rebuttal window, covering how to triage reviewer points, address the action editor who writes the…. Eacl Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting an EACL author response during the ACL Rolling Review rebuttal window, covering how to triage reviewer points, address the action editor who writes the meta-review, answer NLP objection patterns, run in-window experiments, flag deficient reviews, and decide respond-now versus revise-for-a-later-venue given EACL's single cycle.

When should I use Eacl Author Response?

Eacl Author Response fits situations like: drafting an EACL author response during the ACL Rolling Review rebuttal window; covering how to triage reviewer points; address the action editor who writes the meta-review; answer NLP objection patterns.

How do I install Eacl Author Response in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/eacl-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Eacl Author Response in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/eacl-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Eacl Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/eacl-author-response, .gemini/skills/eacl-author-response, .github/skills/eacl-author-response and .opencode/skills/eacl-author-response in your project.

What does Eacl Author Response need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Eacl Author Response is instructions for the agent only.

Does Eacl Author Response access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Eacl Author Response safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Eacl Author Response use?

Eacl Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Eacl Author Response use?

About 1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Eacl Author Response?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Eacl Author Response: Hugging Face Tokenizers (Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs, 13k stars), OpenMed Model Card Writer (maziyarpanahi/openmed, 5.5k stars), Gptqmodel Tokenizer Normalization (ModelCloud/GPTQModel, 1.3k stars) and Andrej Karpathy (K-Dense-AI/mimeo, 282 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Eacl Author Response?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.