Agent skill

Devpsych Review Process

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

Install Devpsych Review Process

skills CLI

$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-review-process -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills devpsych-review-process --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process .claude/skills/devpsych-review-process && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Paste into Claude Code

Install the "devpsych-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process into .claude/skills/devpsych-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "devpsych-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.

Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

$skill-installer

$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process

Type this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-review-process -a codex

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills devpsych-review-process --agent codex

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process .agents/skills/devpsych-review-process && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.

Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/

Paste into Codex

Install the "devpsych-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process into .agents/skills/devpsych-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "devpsych-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.

Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-review-process -a cursor

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills devpsych-review-process --agent cursor

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process .cursor/skills/devpsych-review-process && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.

Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/

Paste into Cursor

Install the "devpsych-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process into .cursor/skills/devpsych-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "devpsych-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.

Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

gemini skills install

$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process

--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-review-process -a gemini-cli

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills devpsych-review-process --agent gemini-cli

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process .gemini/skills/devpsych-review-process && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.

Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/

Paste into Gemini CLI

Install the "devpsych-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process into .gemini/skills/devpsych-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "devpsych-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.

Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills devpsych-review-process

Installs for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

skills CLI

$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-review-process -a github-copilot

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process .github/skills/devpsych-review-process && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.

GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/

Paste into GitHub Copilot

Install the "devpsych-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process into .github/skills/devpsych-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "devpsych-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.

GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-review-process -a opencode

OpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills devpsych-review-process --agent opencode

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process .opencode/skills/devpsych-review-process && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.

OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/

Paste into OpenCode

Install the "devpsych-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process into .opencode/skills/devpsych-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "devpsych-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.

OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

Facts

Skill name: devpsych-review-process
GitHub stars: 1.2k
Token cost: ~1.5k tokens
SKILL.md length: 517 words
Files: 1
Skills in repo: 2,387
Repo updated: Sep 27, 2026
First seen: Oct 7, 2026
Licence: MIT

At a glance

Works in 5 steps: Masked (anonymized) review available.… → Editorial triage. The handling editor… → External review assesses the theoretical… → …
You need to understand how Developmental Psychology (APA) evaluates a manuscript — masked peer review
SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How review works, What developmental reviewers… and Desk-reject and…, plus 5 more sections
Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Devpsych Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when you need to understand how Developmental Psychology (APA) evaluates a manuscript — masked peer review, editorial weighting of developmental significance, design rigor (age/cohort, invariance, attrition), JARS reporting, and TOP transparency. Use when stress-testing a paper before submission or interpreting a decision letter. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Load testing and Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

You need to understand how Developmental Psychology (APA) evaluates a manuscript — masked peer review
Editorial weighting of developmental significance
Design rigor (age/cohort
TOP transparency

Example prompts

“/devpsych-review-process”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

Masked (anonymized) review available. Authors may request masked review; if so, keep author
Editorial triage. The handling editor assesses developmental significance, theory advance, design
External review assesses the theoretical contribution, the credibility of the change claim
Transparency and reporting are weighed. Under TOP and JARS, missing data-availability statements,
Decisions. Reject, revise and resubmit, or accept; expect substantive revision and frequent

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Devpsych Review Process loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 112 tokens; SKILL.md has 517 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it: ~112
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches: ~1.5k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 517 words, ~1,464 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/devpsych-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).

name: devpsych-review-process
description: Use when you need to understand how Developmental Psychology (APA) evaluates a manuscript — masked peer review, editorial weighting of developmental significance, design rigor (age/cohort, invariance, attrition), JARS reporting, and TOP transparency. Use when stress-testing a paper before submission or interpreting a decision letter. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

Review Process (devpsych-review-process)

Developmental Psychology combines theory-advancing selectivity with rigorous developmental-method scrutiny. The journal offers masked peer review, and editors and reviewers weigh not only whether the finding is interesting, but whether the developmental claim is credible (age vs. cohort, measurement invariance, attrition), whether reporting meets JARS, and whether transparency meets TOP. Knowing this lets you pre-empt the common rejection reasons.

When to trigger

Before submitting, to stress-test the manuscript
Deciding whether to request masked review and how to anonymize
Interpreting a decision letter and setting expectations

How review works

Masked (anonymized) review available. Authors may request masked review; if so, keep author identity out of the manuscript and out of shared links (see devpsych-submission). Masked review is intended to reduce bias against (e.g.) early-career or under-represented authors.
Editorial triage. The handling editor assesses developmental significance, theory advance, design rigor, and fit; weak-fit or "not-developmental" papers may be declined without full review.
External review assesses the theoretical contribution, the credibility of the change claim (age/cohort, invariance, attrition, power), analysis and JARS disclosure, and transparency.
Transparency and reporting are weighed. Under TOP and JARS, missing data-availability statements, unjustified opacity, or non-JARS reporting weaken a paper.
Decisions. Reject, revise and resubmit, or accept; expect substantive revision and frequent requests for invariance tests, attrition analyses, added robustness, or fuller disclosure.

What developmental reviewers reliably probe

Is it change, or a snapshot? A cross-sectional age difference framed as development draws fire.
Age vs. cohort. Could the "age effect" be a cohort/era effect? Reviewers ask routinely.
Measurement invariance. Is the construct the same across the ages you compare?
Attrition. Is the trajectory biased by who dropped out, and is missingness modeled?
Power for the change parameter and JARS-complete reporting.

Show full SKILL.md (228 more words)Show less

Desk-reject and decline-without-review patterns

Confirm current categories against the official guidelines, but recognize these shapes:

Pattern an editor sees	Likely outcome	Pre-empt it by
Single-age finding framed as developmental	desk reject (fit)	add an age contrast/wave or reframe
Cross-sectional age effect, no cohort discussion	review with heavy R&R	address age vs. cohort up front
Trajectory interpreted with no invariance test	R&R or reject	report configural→metric→scalar first
Listwise deletion with non-trivial attrition	R&R	refit with FIML/MI; add attrition analysis
"Data available on request," no statement	returned for compliance	add a data-availability statement + DOIs

Worked micro-example (illustrative triage)

Manuscript: preregistered three-wave growth study (N = 300; ages 4-8),
            invariance established, FIML for attrition, open de-identified
            data + scripts, identifiable video via Databrary.
Editor read: developmental significance (within-person growth + mechanism),
            rigor (invariance + attrition handled), transparency (TOP-strong).
Likely route: external review, probable R&R for added robustness/disclosure.
Counter-case: same finding, one age group, cross-sectional, no invariance,
            data on request → likely declined or not-developmental.

How reviewers weigh the evidence (calibration anchors)

A credible within-person change claim — invariant measure, modeled attrition, powered slope — is the strongest signal; it converts "interesting correlation" into "developmental finding."
Transparency under TOP is judged in context: a candid, justified restriction on minors' data with an access path reads better than silent opacity or unethical open posting.
Masked review is a tool against bias, not a guarantee — anonymize the manuscript and the repository links, or it is undone.

Anti-patterns

A single-age or purely cross-sectional finding sold as developmental
Ignoring age-vs-cohort, measurement invariance, or attrition
Exploratory trajectory shapes dressed as confirmatory (JARS violation)
Weak or absent transparency / data-availability statement
Expecting acceptance without an invariance/attrition/disclosure-heavy R&R

Output format

【Developmental significance】clear + theory-advancing? [Y/N]
【Change claim credible】age/cohort + invariance + attrition + power? [Y/N]
【JARS reporting】complete (ES+CI, exclusions, missing data)? [Y/N]
【Transparency (TOP)】data-availability + preregistration handled? [Y/N]
【Masked review】manuscript + links anonymized? [Y/N]
【Realistic outcome】reject / R&R / accept
【Next】devpsych-submission (or devpsych-rebuttal if decided)

Supplementary resources

../../resources/official-source-map.md — masked review, JARS, TOP, and editorial policy
../../resources/exemplars/library.md — verified exemplars showing credible developmental claims

Files

Just SKILL.md in Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Devpsych Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Devpsych Review Process compared with similar skills
Skill	Stars	Used in	Tokens	Auto-check	Licence	Repo updated
Devpsych Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills	1.2k	—	~1.5k	Automated safety check: Pass	MIT	12 days ago
Paper ReviewEvoScientist/EvoSkills	476	—	~4.5k	Automated safety check: Pass	Apache-2.0	9 days ago
Weakness Scannerflonat/flonat-research	146	—	~1.5k	Automated safety check: Pass	MIT	10 days ago
LLM Counciltenfoldmarc/llm-council-skill	822	1 repos	~4.2k	Automated safety check: Pass	None	5 mo ago
Paper ReviewCamusGIT/EvoQuant	151	2 repos	~2.6k	Automated safety check: Pass	Apache-2.0	1 mo ago
Review Paperpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow	1.7k	—	~7.3k	Automated safety check: Pass	MIT	12 days ago

Similar skills

Paper Review
EvoScientist/EvoSkills
Guides self-review of YOUR OWN academic paper before submission with adversarial stress-testing.
476 GitHub stars~4.5k tokensUpdated 9 days ago
Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
Weakness Scanner
flonat/flonat-research
Identify recurring weak arguments, unsupported assumptions, and vulnerable inference patterns across a literature corpus.
146 GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
LLM Council
tenfoldmarc/llm-council-skill
Run any question, idea, or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors who independently analyze it, peer-review each other anonymously, and synthesize a final verdict.
822 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.2k tokens
Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
Paper Review
CamusGIT/EvoQuant
Guides self-review of YOUR OWN academic paper before submission with adversarial stress-testing.
151 GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.6k tokens
Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
Review Paper
pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow
Comprehensive manuscript review with three modes: single-pass (default), --adversarial critic-fixer loop, and --peer [journal] simulated peer-review pipeline (editor + 2 dispositioned referees +…
1.7k GitHub stars~7.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
Grant Mock Reviewer
aipoch/medical-research-skills
Simulate structured grant peer review for biomedical proposals; use when stress-testing significance, innovation, approach, feasibility, and reviewer-facing weaknesses before submission.
2k GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated 22 days ago
Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo

Aaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
Auto-check passed
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
Auto-check passed
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
Auto-check passed
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
Auto-check passed
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
Auto-check passed
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
Auto-check passed

Questions about Devpsych Review Process

What does Devpsych Review Process do?

A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how Developmental Psychology (APA) evaluates a manuscript — masked peer review, editorial weighting of developmental significance, design rigor…. Devpsych Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when you need to understand how Developmental Psychology (APA) evaluates a manuscript — masked peer review, editorial weighting of developmental significance, design rigor (age/cohort, invariance, attrition), JARS reporting, and TOP transparency.

When should I use Devpsych Review Process?

Devpsych Review Process fits situations like: you need to understand how Developmental Psychology (APA) evaluates a manuscript — masked peer review; editorial weighting of developmental significance; design rigor (age/cohort; TOP transparency.

How do I install Devpsych Review Process in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/devpsych-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Devpsych Review Process in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/devpsych-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Devpsych Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/devpsych-review-process, .gemini/skills/devpsych-review-process, .github/skills/devpsych-review-process and .opencode/skills/devpsych-review-process in your project.

What does Devpsych Review Process need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Devpsych Review Process is instructions for the agent only.

Does Devpsych Review Process access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Devpsych Review Process safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Devpsych Review Process use?

Devpsych Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Devpsych Review Process use?

About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Devpsych Review Process?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Devpsych Review Process: Paper Review (EvoScientist/EvoSkills, 476 stars), Weakness Scanner (flonat/flonat-research, 146 stars), LLM Council (tenfoldmarc/llm-council-skill, 822 stars) and Paper Review (CamusGIT/EvoQuant, 151 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Devpsych Review Process?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.

Install Devpsych Review Process

Facts

At a glance

What it does

When your agent uses it

Example prompts

Workflow steps

What it can do on your machine

Tool permissions

Runs code

Network

Credentials

Context cost

Safety

SKILL.md

Review Process (devpsych-review-process)

When to trigger

How review works

What developmental reviewers reliably probe

Desk-reject and decline-without-review patterns

Worked micro-example (illustrative triage)

How reviewers weigh the evidence (calibration anchors)

Anti-patterns

Output format

Supplementary resources

Files

Compare with similar skills

Similar skills

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

Related

Questions about Devpsych Review Process