Agent skill

Devpsych Open Science And Transparency

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when meeting Developmental Psychology's (APA) open-science and transparency expectations under the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines — data and materials…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Devpsych Open Science And Transparency

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-open-science-and-transparency -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills devpsych-open-science-and-transparency --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-open-science-and-transparency .claude/skills/devpsych-open-science-and-transparency && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
devpsych-open-science-and-transparency
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.8k tokens
SKILL.md length
635 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when meeting Developmental Psychology's (APA) open-science and transparency expectations under the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines — data and materials…

  • Works in 5 steps: Data and materials availability. Make… → Persistent identifiers (DOIs). Use… → Preregistration. Preregister… → …
  • Preregistration
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, What TOP-style transparency…, Build-it-right checklist and Sharing data from minors — do…, plus 6 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Devpsych Open Science And Transparency is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when meeting Developmental Psychology's (APA) open-science and transparency expectations under the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines — data and materials sharing with persistent identifiers, preregistration, sample-size justification, and JARS-consistent disclosure — with the ethical handling of data from minors and vulnerable populations. Prepares compliance; it does not waive requirements.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Reproducible research and Experimental design. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Preregistration
  • Sample-size justification
  • JARS-consistent disclosure — with the ethical handling of data from minors and vulnerable populations

Example prompts

  • “/devpsych-open-science-and-transparency”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Data and materials availability. Make data, analysis scripts, and materials available where
  2. Persistent identifiers (DOIs). Use repositories that mint DOIs (OSF, ICPSR, Databrary, Dataverse,
  3. Preregistration. Preregister confirmatory developmental hypotheses and the analysis plan; report
  4. Sample-size justification. Provide an explicit basis for N (power for the change parameter,
  5. JARS disclosure. All exclusions, conditions, measures, and how sample size was determined.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Devpsych Open Science And Transparency loads about 1.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 114 tokens; SKILL.md has 635 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~114
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.8k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 635 words, ~1,782 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/devpsych-open-science-and-transparency/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
devpsych-open-science-and-transparency
description
Use when meeting Developmental Psychology's (APA) open-science and transparency expectations under the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines — data and materials sharing with persistent identifiers, preregistration, sample-size justification, and JARS-consistent disclosure — with the ethical handling of data from minors and vulnerable populations. Prepares compliance; it does not waive requirements.

Open Science & Transparency (devpsych-open-science-and-transparency)

Developmental Psychology has adopted the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines, so a submission is judged partly on disclosure, data/materials availability, and preregistration. The developmental twist is that much data come from minors and vulnerable populations, so "share everything" is tempered by consent scope, confidentiality, and re-identification risk — handled as a justified, documented constraint, not silent opacity. Build this early, not at acceptance.

When to trigger

  • Building data/materials deposits and the data-availability statement
  • Deciding whether and how to share data collected from children/vulnerable groups (and what to withhold)
  • Linking a preregistration and reporting its status under JARS
  • A reviewer or editor flagged transparency, reproducibility, or sample-size justification

What TOP-style transparency asks (verify current wording on the official page)

  1. Data and materials availability. Make data, analysis scripts, and materials available where ethically possible, with a data-availability statement; constraints (consent scope, minors' confidentiality, IRB limits) must be stated and justified, with an access path where feasible.
  2. Persistent identifiers (DOIs). Use repositories that mint DOIs (OSF, ICPSR, Databrary, Dataverse, Zenodo) — not transient personal links. Databrary is purpose-built for sharing developmental video and identifiable data under permission.
  3. Preregistration. Preregister confirmatory developmental hypotheses and the analysis plan; report the status honestly and keep confirmatory/exploratory consistent end to end (JARS).
  4. Sample-size justification. Provide an explicit basis for N (power for the change parameter, precision, or a decision rule) — required reporting, not a nicety (see devpsych-study-design).
  5. JARS disclosure. All exclusions, conditions, measures, and how sample size was determined.

Build-it-right checklist

  • Data deposited with a DOI and a data dictionary/codebook (or a justified exemption)
  • Analysis scripts deposited; results regenerate in a fresh session
  • Materials (tasks, stimuli, coding manuals) deposited with a DOI where licensing allows
  • Preregistration linked (anonymized for masked review); confirmatory/exploratory consistent
  • Data-availability statement drafted, stating what is shared and what is restricted, and why
  • Sample-size justification reported (power for the change parameter)
  • Minors'/vulnerable-population data handled per consent and IRB; identifiable material via a permission-based archive (e.g., Databrary) or de-identified with documented limits
  • Shared links anonymized for the masked submission

Sharing data from minors — do it honestly

  • If full open data are not ethical (consent did not cover broad sharing, video is identifiable, IRB restricts redistribution), state what is restricted, why, and how others can access or approximate it — restricted-access archives (ICPSR, Databrary), de-identified extracts, synthetic data, or code release. Unjustified opacity counts against the paper; a documented constraint does not.
Show full SKILL.md (232 more words)Show less

Data-availability statement — worked draft (illustrative)

For the three-wave effortful-control package; confirm current required wording on the official page.

Data availability: De-identified trial-level data and analysis scripts for
  all three waves are openly available at OSF (DOI 10.XXXX/osf.io/abcde),
  with a codebook. Identifiable observational video is shared under
  permission via Databrary (DOI 10.XXXX/...), consistent with consent and IRB.
Materials: Task scripts and the effortful-control coding manual are deposited
  (DOI 10.XXXX/osf.io/fghij).
Preregistration: Hypotheses, the invariance-test plan, and the growth model
  were preregistered before wave-3 analysis (osf.io/pqrst).
Constraints: Raw video cannot be openly posted (identifiability, minors);
  access is available to authorized researchers via Databrary.

Transparency-readiness decision table

SituationEditorial readWhat to deposit / state
De-identified tabular data + scriptsexpected baselineDOIs for data, materials, scripts + run log
Identifiable child video/audioconstraint accepted if justifiedpermission-based archive (Databrary) + access path
Consent did not cover broad sharingpartial sharingde-identified extract + restricted-access path; say so
Secondary/large panel (NICHD, ECLS)acceptable with provenancecite source, version; share derivation scripts
"Available on request"reads as non-compliantreplace with a persistent DOI / restricted archive

Reviewer / editor pushback and the venue fix

  • "No DOI, just a personal link" → swap every transient link for a persistent identifier or a restricted archive before the masked submission.
  • "Statement says open but the repo is empty" → deposit first, draft the statement from live DOIs.
  • "How can children's video be shared?" → use Databrary/permission-based access; state the path, do not post identifiable material openly.
  • "No sample-size justification" → add the power/precision rationale for the change parameter.

Anti-patterns

  • Treating data/materials sharing as optional or "available on request"
  • Posting identifiable data from minors openly (a confidentiality breach), or refusing all sharing with no justification
  • Personal/transient links instead of DOIs / restricted archives
  • Omitting the sample-size justification
  • Identifying author info in OSF/Databrary links during masked review

Output format

【Open data】deposited + DOI + data dictionary (or justified restriction)? [Y/N]
【Open materials】deposited + DOI? [Y/N]
【Analysis scripts】deposited + fresh-session reproducible? [Y/N]
【Preregistration】linked (anonymized) + consistent with reporting? [Y/N/NA]
【Data-availability statement】drafted (what is shared / restricted / why)? [Y/N]
【Minors' data】handled per consent/IRB via permission-based access? [Y/N/NA]
【Sample-size justification】reported? [Y/N]
【Next】devpsych-review-process

Supplementary resources

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-open-science-and-transparency of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Devpsych Open Science And Transparency next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Devpsych Open Science And Transparency compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Devpsych Open Science And Transparency this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Light Experiment CodingLight0305/Light-skills640—~2.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Ablation Study Plannerwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep17k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Light Research PlanLight0305/Light-skills640—~5.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Scientific Workflow ToolsDrugClaw/DrugClaw126—~712Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Bio Experimental Design Multiple TestingGPTomics/bioSkills1.2k1 repos~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Light Experiment Coding

    Light0305/Light-skills

    Builds the code for a frozen research experiment test-first, with leakage controls, seed handling and saved evidence so results can be rerun and audited.

    640 GitHub stars~2.3k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Ablation Study Planner

    wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep

    Plans the ablation studies a paper needs after main results support its claim: Codex designs them like a reviewer, Claude Code checks feasibility and runs them.

    17k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Light Research Plan

    Light0305/Light-skills

    Light 科研主线第 5 步·研究方案与实验设计:把 idea-critique 放行的 idea 与 data feasibility 拆成能真执行、能写进论文、 能复现的 question/estimand、实验矩阵与预注册包。何时用:idea 已通过审查要落地 / 要设计实验·消融·对比·敏感性· 泛化·鲁棒性 / 写研究方案 PROJECTPLAN / 锁 primary…

    640 GitHub stars~5.3k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Scientific Workflow Tools

    DrugClaw/DrugClaw

    Research-method workflow guide for hypothesis framing, peer-review style critique, reproducibility planning, study-design checks, and scientific-writing structure.

    126 GitHub stars~712 tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence…

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.5k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Scientific Critical Thinking

    jaechang-hits/SciAgent-Skills

    Evaluating scientific evidence and claims. An agent skill from jaechang-hits/SciAgent-Skills.

    374 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.7k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Devpsych Open Science And Transparency

What does Devpsych Open Science And Transparency do?

A skill your agent uses when meeting Developmental Psychology's (APA) open-science and transparency expectations under the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines — data and materials…. Devpsych Open Science And Transparency is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when meeting Developmental Psychology's (APA) open-science and transparency expectations under the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines — data and materials sharing with persistent identifiers, preregistration, sample-size justification, and JARS-consistent disclosure — with the ethical handling of data from minors and vulnerable populations.

When should I use Devpsych Open Science And Transparency?

Devpsych Open Science And Transparency fits situations like: preregistration; sample-size justification; JARS-consistent disclosure — with the ethical handling of data from minors and vulnerable populations.

How do I install Devpsych Open Science And Transparency in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-open-science-and-transparency -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-open-science-and-transparency in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/devpsych-open-science-and-transparency in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Devpsych Open Science And Transparency in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-open-science-and-transparency -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-open-science-and-transparency in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/devpsych-open-science-and-transparency in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Devpsych Open Science And Transparency in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-open-science-and-transparency -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/devpsych-open-science-and-transparency, .gemini/skills/devpsych-open-science-and-transparency, .github/skills/devpsych-open-science-and-transparency and .opencode/skills/devpsych-open-science-and-transparency in your project.

What does Devpsych Open Science And Transparency need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Devpsych Open Science And Transparency is instructions for the agent only.

Does Devpsych Open Science And Transparency access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Devpsych Open Science And Transparency safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Devpsych Open Science And Transparency use?

Devpsych Open Science And Transparency is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Devpsych Open Science And Transparency use?

About 1.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Devpsych Open Science And Transparency?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Devpsych Open Science And Transparency: Light Experiment Coding (Light0305/Light-skills, 640 stars), Ablation Study Planner (wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep, 17k stars), Light Research Plan (Light0305/Light-skills, 640 stars) and Scientific Workflow Tools (DrugClaw/DrugClaw, 126 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Devpsych Open Science And Transparency?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.