New: 98,000+ skills indexed from GitHub repos with 100+ stars · every skill safety-checkedBrowse top skillsTop skills
Esc to closeBrowse all skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills

Agent skill

Cvpr Author Response

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when planning or drafting the CVPR one-page rebuttal after reviews are released, covering the official rebuttal template, the ban on new contributions and external links…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Cvpr Author Response

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cvpr-author-response -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cvpr-author-response --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/CVPR-Skills/skills/cvpr-author-response .claude/skills/cvpr-author-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
cvpr-author-response
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
794 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when planning or drafting the CVPR one-page rebuttal after reviews are released, covering the official rebuttal template, the ban on new contributions and external links…

  • Works in 4 steps: Read all reviews once without… → Build a flat list of every distinct… → Check scores against the venue's… → …
  • Drafting the CVPR one-page rebuttal after reviews are released
  • SKILL.md covers What the one page legally is, Triage before typing, A page layout that ACs can skim and Tone calibration, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Cvpr Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when planning or drafting the CVPR one-page rebuttal after reviews are released, covering the official rebuttal template, the ban on new contributions and external links, triaging multiple reviews at 16k-submission scale, choosing which numbers fit in one page, and writing for the AC who reads the discussion.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Drafting the CVPR one-page rebuttal after reviews are released
  • Covering the official rebuttal template
  • The ban on new contributions and external links
  • Triaging multiple reviews at 16k-submission scale

Example prompts

  • “/cvpr-author-response”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Read all reviews once without responding, then close the laptop for a few hours;
  2. Build a flat list of every distinct objection with reviewer IDs and a
  3. Check scores against the venue's realities (25% acceptance) before deciding how
  4. Assign the roles from cvpr-workflow and set the internal freeze 24 hours before

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are latex).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Cvpr Author Response loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 84 tokens; SKILL.md has 794 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~84
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.6k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 794 words, ~1,627 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/cvpr-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
cvpr-author-response
description
Use when planning or drafting the CVPR one-page rebuttal after reviews are released, covering the official rebuttal template, the ban on new contributions and external links, triaging multiple reviews at 16k-submission scale, choosing which numbers fit in one page, and writing for the AC who reads the discussion.

CVPR Author Response

Use this when CVPR reviews land. In the 2026 cycle, reviews reached authors on January 22 and the rebuttal closed January 29, with reviewer–AC discussion running January 30 – February 5 and decisions on February 20. One week, one page — the format is the strategy.

What the one page legally is

The rebuttal is an optional, single-page PDF built on the rebuttal.tex template in the official author kit. Two rules from the Author Guidelines carry teeth:

  • Responses longer than one page are simply not read, and that includes pages that technically fit because margins or fonts were squeezed — altered formatting counts as over-length.
  • The rebuttal exists to correct factual errors and supply requested information. It is explicitly not for new contributions or unrequested new experiments, reviewers are told not to demand significant new experiments, and it must stay anonymous with no links to external material (no anonymous repos, no video URLs, no project pages).

That last clause surprises people arriving from venues with revision uploads: at CVPR you cannot attach anything. If a number matters, it goes in the page as a sentence or a five-row table.

Triage before typing

With ~16,000 papers in the 2026 pool, your reviewers wrote many reviews and your AC is tracking dozens of papers. The rebuttal's real reader is the AC during the discussion window. Triage accordingly:

Review signalRebuttal moveBudget
Factual error ("no ablation on X" when Table 4 has it)Quote the reviewer, cite the exact table/line, one sentence2–3 lines each
Misread contribution / scopeRestate the claim in one crisp sentence, point to where the paper says it4–6 lines
Requested clarification (protocol, metric, split)Answer directly; give the number3–5 lines
Requested small experimentRun it if it fits the week; report as a mini-table6–10 lines
Demand for a full new benchmark or method variantDecline politely; explain why out of scope for a rebuttal2–3 lines
Subjective "not novel enough"Delta-list against the 2–3 closest citations, no adjectives4–6 lines

Answer every reviewer, but not every sentence of every reviewer. Ignoring one review entirely reads as concession in the discussion phase.

A page layout that ACs can skim

latex
% rebuttal.tex skeleton — headings are navigation for the AC
\section*{Shared concerns (R1, R3): fairness of the baseline comparison}
% one paragraph + mini-table with matched-backbone numbers
\section*{R1: reported speed}
% cite Sec. 4.2 line refs; give ms/frame on the named GPU from the CRF hardware
\section*{R2: missing citation [Foo 2025]}
% concede, state the delta in one sentence, promise camera-ready citation
\section*{R3: qualitative failures}
% point to supplement Sec. C; summarize the two failure modes in text

Group shared objections once instead of three times; name reviewers in headings; lead with the concern you can kill with a fact, because the first inches of the page set the AC's prior about who is being careful.

Tone calibration

  • Quote reviewers verbatim before answering; paraphrases invite "that's not what I said."
  • Concede real errors fast and specifically — a clean concession buys credibility for the contested points.
  • No sarcasm, no appeals to arXiv fame, no "as any expert knows." The discussion phase happens without you in the room; give allies quotable sentences.
  • Numbers over adjectives. "mIoU 54.1 → 55.8 with matched training schedule" survives discussion; "significantly better" does not.
Show full SKILL.md (323 more words)Show less

A paragraph, before and after

Draft rebuttal prose tends to argue; shipping rebuttal prose demonstrates. Compare:

Before: "We respectfully disagree with R2's claim that our comparison is unfair. As explained in the paper, our method uses standard settings, and it is common practice in the field to compare this way. We believe the improvement is clearly significant."

After: "R2: 'the baseline uses a weaker backbone.' Both rows of Table 2 use ResNet-50 with the schedule from [24] (Sec. 4.1, L412–418). Under R2's suggested ViT-B setting, the gap is +1.9 AP (mini-table below), consistent with the paper's +2.1."

The rewrite quotes the objection, cites the paper by line, gives a number, and never characterizes its own results. Every paragraph on the page should survive the same transformation: objection verbatim → paper location → number.

First-hours protocol when reviews land

  1. Read all reviews once without responding, then close the laptop for a few hours; the first-read emotional register writes bad rebuttals.
  2. Build a flat list of every distinct objection with reviewer IDs and a fixability tag: factual / clarification / small-run / out-of-scope.
  3. Check scores against the venue's realities (25% acceptance) before deciding how much of the week the paper deserves versus the resubmission draft.
  4. Assign the roles from cvpr-workflow and set the internal freeze 24 hours before the OpenReview deadline.

What you cannot fix in January

The rebuttal cannot rescue a paper whose evidence is missing, and reviewers are instructed not to expect new experiments. If every review converges on the same absent comparison, the plan is the next cycle (or ICCV/ECCV), not one page of protest. Spend the week where movement is possible: factual corrections, misreadings, and small requested numbers.

Reverify each cycle

  • Rebuttal existence, length cap, and template — chairs have restructured response formats at CVF venues before.
  • Exact window dates and whether reviewer–author discussion (beyond one PDF) exists.
  • Whether revision uploads or supplement updates are permitted (they were not in 2026).

Output format

text
[Rebuttal plan] file / skip (reason)
[Shared concerns] <grouped items with reviewer IDs>
[Factual corrections] <claim → paper location>
[Numbers to include] <experiment → mini-table budget>
[Declined requests] <item → one-line rationale>
[Page budget] <lines allocated per section, total ≤ 1 page>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in CVPR-Skills/skills/cvpr-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Cvpr Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Cvpr Author Response compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Cvpr Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Responsive Unitsthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74k—~472Automated safety check: PassMIT
Fast Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Icassp Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Aaai Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~924Automated safety check: PassMIT
Socc Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Responsive Units

    thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

    A skill your agent uses when reviewing stylesheets, component styles, and responsive behavior related to Use relative units for responsive layouts.

    74k GitHub stars~472 tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed

  • Fast Author Response

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when drafting USENIX FAST author responses, covering the short pre-notification rebuttal during the author-response period and — distinctively — the one-shot-revision change…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Icassp Author Response

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when drafting an ICASSP rebuttal or author response to reviews, covering the recently added and short author-response window, the single-blind setting where reviewers already…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed

  • Aaai Author Response

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance…

    1.2k GitHub stars~924 tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Socc Author Response

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when drafting an ACM SoCC author response (rebuttal) during a round's response window, covering the single written turn, answering both the systems and the data/measurement…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

  • Tacas Author Response

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when drafting a TACAS (ETAPS) author response for the rebuttal window, covering the short single-round rebuttal, answering soundness and benchmark-fairness objections with…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo

  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Cvpr Author Response

What does Cvpr Author Response do?

A skill your agent uses when planning or drafting the CVPR one-page rebuttal after reviews are released, covering the official rebuttal template, the ban on new contributions and external links…. Cvpr Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when planning or drafting the CVPR one-page rebuttal after reviews are released, covering the official rebuttal template, the ban on new contributions and external links, triaging multiple reviews at 16k-submission scale, choosing which numbers fit in one page, and writing for the AC who reads the discussion.

When should I use Cvpr Author Response?

Cvpr Author Response fits situations like: drafting the CVPR one-page rebuttal after reviews are released; covering the official rebuttal template; the ban on new contributions and external links; triaging multiple reviews at 16k-submission scale.

How do I install Cvpr Author Response in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cvpr-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (CVPR-Skills/skills/cvpr-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/cvpr-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Cvpr Author Response in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cvpr-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (CVPR-Skills/skills/cvpr-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/cvpr-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Cvpr Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cvpr-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/cvpr-author-response, .gemini/skills/cvpr-author-response, .github/skills/cvpr-author-response and .opencode/skills/cvpr-author-response in your project.

What does Cvpr Author Response need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Cvpr Author Response is instructions for the agent only.

Does Cvpr Author Response access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Cvpr Author Response safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Cvpr Author Response use?

Cvpr Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Cvpr Author Response use?

About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Cvpr Author Response?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Cvpr Author Response: Responsive Units (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Fast Author Response (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars), Icassp Author Response (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars) and Aaai Author Response (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Cvpr Author Response?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.