New: 98,000+ skills indexed from GitHub repos with 100+ stars · every skill safety-checkedBrowse top skillsTop skills
Esc to closeBrowse all skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills

Agent skill

Curranthro Theory Building

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when building the conceptual/theoretical argument of a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript into an agenda-setting, all-fields contribution that can anchor the CA✩…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Curranthro Theory Building

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill curranthro-theory-building -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills curranthro-theory-building --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-theory-building .claude/skills/curranthro-theory-building && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
curranthro-theory-building
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
549 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when building the conceptual/theoretical argument of a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript into an agenda-setting, all-fields contribution that can anchor the CA✩…

  • Works in 4 steps: Concept — define the key analytic… → Interpretive logic / mechanism — the… → Evidence-to-claim link — show which… → …
  • Building the conceptual/theoretical argument of a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript into an agenda-setting
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Build the argument (by mode of…, Reflexivity & positionality (a… and The "commentary stress test"…, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Curranthro Theory Building is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when building the conceptual/theoretical argument of a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript into an agenda-setting, all-fields contribution that can anchor the CA✩ comment-and-reply Treatment — whether the work is ethnographic, archaeological, biological, or linguistic. CA rewards a portable, debatable concept and reflexive argument over a bare finding or thick description alone. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses or write fieldnotes.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Building the conceptual/theoretical argument of a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript into an agenda-setting
  • All-fields contribution that can anchor the CA✩ comment-and-reply Treatment — whether the work is ethnographic

Example prompts

  • “/curranthro-theory-building”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Concept — define the key analytic precisely; distinguish it from neighbors and from the
  2. Interpretive logic / mechanism — the social process: who does what, with what meaning, under
  3. Evidence-to-claim link — show which fieldwork moments, utterances, or materials ground each
  4. Scope conditions & portability — where the argument holds and where it does not. Portability ≠

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Curranthro Theory Building loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 121 tokens; SKILL.md has 549 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~121
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 549 words, ~1,260 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/curranthro-theory-building/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
curranthro-theory-building
description
Use when building the conceptual/theoretical argument of a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript into an agenda-setting, all-fields contribution that can anchor the CA✩ comment-and-reply Treatment — whether the work is ethnographic, archaeological, biological, or linguistic. CA rewards a portable, debatable concept and reflexive argument over a bare finding or thick description alone. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses or write fieldnotes.

Theory & Argument Building (curranthro-theory-building)

At CA, evidence is not a contribution until it is attached to an argument other anthropologists can use — and argue with — elsewhere. A Major Article anchors the CA✩ Treatment: international commentators will press the concept, the mechanism, and the scope. So the argument must be bold enough to be worth commenting on and robust enough to survive published critique with the author's Reply still standing. This skill turns fieldwork, material, or measurements into theory: explicit concepts, mechanisms or interpretive logics, scope conditions, and positionality, in the idiom of your subfield.

When to trigger

  • The ethnography/data are rich but the conceptual payoff is thin or too safe to commentate on
  • A reviewer said the paper is "descriptive," "undertheorized," or "just a case"
  • You need to state concepts, mechanisms, and scope conditions explicitly
  • You must make your positionality and relationship to the field part of the argument

Build the argument (by mode of work)

Ethnographic / interpretive paper
  1. Concept — define the key analytic precisely; distinguish it from neighbors and from the interlocutors' own terms (say where you keep their term and why).
  2. Interpretive logic / mechanism — the social process: who does what, with what meaning, under what constraints. Make it legible without flattening complexity.
  3. Evidence-to-claim link — show which fieldwork moments, utterances, or materials ground each claim, and what would have disconfirmed your reading.
  4. Scope conditions & portability — where the argument holds and where it does not. Portability ≠ universalizing the particular.
Archaeological / biological paper
  • State the substantive question the material/biological evidence addresses before the methods.
  • Keep inferential assumptions transparent (taphonomy, dating, sampling, comparative frames).
  • Translate findings into a claim about social life or human variation anthropologists can use, not only a site- or specimen-specific result.
Linguistic-anthropology paper
  • Show what the language practice indexes (identity, power, ideology, cognition) beyond its form.
  • Connect the discourse/grammar analysis to a cultural or social argument readers in other fields share.
Show full SKILL.md (232 more words)Show less

Reflexivity & positionality (a CA hallmark)

  • Make explicit who you are in this field — your relationship to interlocutors, how access shaped what you saw, and how your position bears on the interpretation. Reflexivity is part of the argument's credibility, not a confessional aside — and it disarms a predictable line of commentary.

The "commentary stress test" (CA-specific)

For a Major Article, run the argument through three imagined Comments before you submit:

  1. The skeptic of the concept — "the concept is just X renamed." Can you show it does new work?
  2. The reach skeptic — "this only works for this case." Can you state portable scope conditions?
  3. The cross-subfield reader — "I don't see the stake for my field." Have you named it? If you cannot answer all three, the theory is not yet ready for the CA✩ Treatment — tighten it into a general logic or reframe (back to curranthro-topic-selection).

Anti-patterns

  • Thick description with no portable, debatable concept (rich case, thin theory)
  • A concept so cautious that no commentator would bother engaging it — the wrong fit for a Major Article
  • Universalizing a single ethnographic particular with no scope conditions
  • Concepts named but never grounded in specific evidence
  • Erasing positionality / writing a "view from nowhere" in an interpretive field
  • Importing a deficit framing of communities rather than their own analytics

Output format

【Core claim】one sentence
【Concept】the key analytic, defined
【Mechanism / interpretive logic】the social process
【Evidence link】what grounds it / what would disconfirm it
【Positionality】how the author's relation to the field bears on the reading
【Scope + portability】where it holds / who else can use it
【Commentary stress test】answers to the three imagined Comments
【Next】curranthro-research-design

Supplementary resources

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-theory-building of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Curranthro Theory Building next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Curranthro Theory Building compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Curranthro Theory Building this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Jmf Theory And Conceptual Frameworkfranklee16/academic-research-skills2231 repos~1kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Integration Theoryparcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33.9k1 repos~929Automated safety check: NotesMIT
Statistical Theory Analysisaiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw15k—~375Automated safety check: PassMIT
Game Theorybrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.6k—~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Asymptotic Theorybrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.6k—~4.6kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Jmf Theory And Conceptual Framework

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when building the theoretical and conceptual framework of a Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) manuscript.

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1k tokens
    Auto-check passed

  • Integration Theory

    parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3

    Problem-solving strategies for integration theory in measure theory

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~929 tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

  • Statistical Theory Analysis

    aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw

    Analyze theoretical properties of statistical methods under the formal formulation: identifiability, bias, variance, consistency, asymptotics, coverage, error bounds, robustness, and limitations.

    15k GitHub stars~375 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Game Theory

    brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

    This skill covers game-theoretic methods in structural econometrics and industrial organization.

    4.6k GitHub stars~3.7k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

  • Asymptotic Theory

    brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

    M-estimation, influence functions, and semiparametric efficiency theory for causal inference

    4.6k GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

  • Operator Theory

    parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3

    Problem-solving strategies for operator theory in functional analysis

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~879 tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo

  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Curranthro Theory Building

What does Curranthro Theory Building do?

A skill your agent uses when building the conceptual/theoretical argument of a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript into an agenda-setting, all-fields contribution that can anchor the CA✩…. Curranthro Theory Building is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when building the conceptual/theoretical argument of a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript into an agenda-setting, all-fields contribution that can anchor the CA✩ comment-and-reply Treatment — whether the work is ethnographic, archaeological, biological, or linguistic.

When should I use Curranthro Theory Building?

Curranthro Theory Building fits situations like: building the conceptual/theoretical argument of a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript into an agenda-setting; all-fields contribution that can anchor the CA✩ comment-and-reply Treatment — whether the work is ethnographic.

How do I install Curranthro Theory Building in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill curranthro-theory-building -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-theory-building in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/curranthro-theory-building in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Curranthro Theory Building in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill curranthro-theory-building -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-theory-building in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/curranthro-theory-building in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Curranthro Theory Building in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill curranthro-theory-building -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/curranthro-theory-building, .gemini/skills/curranthro-theory-building, .github/skills/curranthro-theory-building and .opencode/skills/curranthro-theory-building in your project.

What does Curranthro Theory Building need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Curranthro Theory Building is instructions for the agent only.

Does Curranthro Theory Building access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Curranthro Theory Building safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Curranthro Theory Building use?

Curranthro Theory Building is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Curranthro Theory Building use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Curranthro Theory Building?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Curranthro Theory Building: Jmf Theory And Conceptual Framework (franklee16/academic-research-skills, 223 stars), Integration Theory (parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3, 3.9k stars), Statistical Theory Analysis (aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw, 15k stars) and Game Theory (brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills, 4.6k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Curranthro Theory Building?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.