A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising CSCW prose — group-level framing, concepts a field can reuse, participant voice handled with care, theory that earns its keep, and length discipline…

MITAuto-check passedWriting & Content

Install Cscw Writing Style

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-writing-style -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cscw-writing-style --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-writing-style .claude/skills/cscw-writing-style && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
cscw-writing-style
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
595 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising CSCW prose — group-level framing, concepts a field can reuse, participant voice handled with care, theory that earns its keep, and length discipline…

  • Revising CSCW prose — group-level framing
  • SKILL.md covers Length: no cap, but a scale, The group-level sentence, Concepts, theory, and… and Calibration under re-review, plus 1 more section
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Concepts a field can reuse

What it does

Cscw Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting or revising CSCW prose — group-level framing, concepts a field can reuse, participant voice handled with care, theory that earns its keep, and length discipline under the 5,000-12,000-word scrutiny band where contribution is weighed against every page.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Writing & Content, covering Brand voice and tone. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Revising CSCW prose — group-level framing
  • Concepts a field can reuse
  • Participant voice handled with care
  • Theory that earns its keep

Example prompts

  • “/cscw-writing-style”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Cscw Writing Style loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 72 tokens; SKILL.md has 595 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~72
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 595 words, ~1,253 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/cscw-writing-style/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
cscw-writing-style
description
Use when drafting or revising CSCW prose — group-level framing, concepts a field can reuse, participant voice handled with care, theory that earns its keep, and length discipline under the 5,000-12,000-word scrutiny band where contribution is weighed against every page.

CSCW Writing Style

A CSCW paper is judged by readers from several intellectual traditions at once — ethnographers, statisticians, system builders, social theorists — inside a journal process where the same reviewers may read the paper twice. The prose must therefore do two unusual things: make each tradition's part legible to the others, and hold up under a second, more skeptical read during Revise and Resubmit.

Length: no cap, but a scale

CSCW imposes no formal page limit. The 2026-cycle CFP instead put weight on a band: papers under roughly 5,000 words or over roughly 12,000 words attract extra scrutiny, and a paper whose length is incommensurate with its contribution can be desk rejected. Treat length as a claim you are making: every additional section asserts that the contribution needs it. Practical calibration:

  • Write the paper the contribution needs, then defend the word count in one sentence. If you cannot, cut until you can.
  • Long ≠ thorough. A 14,000-word manuscript signals unedited fieldnotes more often than it signals depth; move protocol detail to appendices.
  • Short ≠ crisp. Under ~5,000 words, reviewers will ask whether the study is a workshop paper wearing a journal costume.

The group-level sentence

The single most common style failure at this venue is drift back to the individual user. Audit every claim sentence:

Drifted (individual)Anchored (collective)
"Users struggled to trust the bot's suggestions""Teams routed the bot's suggestions through a senior member before acting on them"
"Participants felt burnout""The moderation team rotated exposure to harmful content to distribute burnout"
"People adopted the feature""The community renegotiated its norms around what the feature made visible"
"The tool improved efficiency""The tool redistributed articulation work from editors to contributors"

If a finding cannot be written in the right-hand register, either the analysis stopped too early or the paper belongs at a different venue (cscw-topic-selection).

Show full SKILL.md (291 more words)Show less

Concepts, theory, and participant voice

  • Name your concept once, define it, then use it consistently. CSCW's canon is full of load-bearing vocabulary (awareness, articulation work, place vs. space). A new concept must be defined against — not merely alongside — the existing terms.
  • Theory must produce consequences. Every theoretical frame invoked should change either the analysis or the design discussion. A framework cited in the introduction and never touched again reads as ornament and will be flagged.
  • Quote people as evidence, not decoration. Each participant quote should carry analytic weight the surrounding prose then does; a quote that merely restates the preceding sentence is filler. For sensitive communities, paraphrase or lightly alter quotes when verbatim text is reverse-searchable, and say that you did so.
  • Report your positionality where it matters — in fieldwork with communities the authors belong to or hold power over, a sentence about the researchers' relationship to the setting is analytic information, not confession.

Calibration under re-review

Because R&R returns to the same reviewers, overclaiming is a double cost: it draws the objection in round one and the check in round two. Write claims that a hostile re-reader can verify against your own data sections:

  • Scope every generalization: "in the six communities we studied," "among moderators of crisis-support forums."
  • Separate what participants said, what traces show, and what you interpret — with different verbs ("reported," "exhibited," "we read this as").
  • Put limitations where they belong analytically, not as a ritual final paragraph.

First-page audit

text
[Protagonist]  Is a group/community/organization the subject of the first
               claim sentence? yes / no
[Stake]        Does ¶2 say what breaks if the field keeps misunderstanding
               this — or just that "little is known"?
[Concept]      Is there one named, reusable idea? Can a reviewer paraphrase
               it in a sentence?
[Methods+ethics] Are counts, settings, consent posture, and data-sensitivity
               handling visible by end of the introduction?
[Length claim] Word count: <n>. One-sentence defense if outside 5,000-12,000.

Run the audit again on the revised manuscript before any R&R resubmission — the introduction is where reviewers first test whether the revision was real.

The word-band and template facts reflect the 2026-cycle CFP checked 2026-07-08; confirm they carry into the rolling model before citing them to a co-author.

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-writing-style of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Cscw Writing Style next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Cscw Writing Style compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Cscw Writing Style this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Avoid AI Writingconorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing4.9k3 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
BrandOhh-889/skyroc79513 repos~733Automated safety check: PassMIT
Khazix WeChat Article WriterKKKKhazix/khazix-skills21k1 repos~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Writing Guidelinesvercel-labs/agent-skills32k7 repos~309Automated safety check: PassNone
Unslop AI Writing Cleanuptheclaymethod/unslop518—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Avoid AI Writing

    conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing

    Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms").

    4.9k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~8.1k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Brand

    Ohh-889/skyroc

    Brand voice, visual identity, messaging frameworks, asset management, brand consistency.

    795 GitHub starsUsed in 13 repos~733 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Khazix WeChat Article Writer

    KKKKhazix/khazix-skills

    Writes long-form WeChat official account articles in the personal style of the Khazix account, from briefs, links, PDFs or rough notes, with a topic quality check.

    21k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.9k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Writing Guidelines

    vercel-labs/agent-skills

    Official

    Review docs/prose for Writing Guidelines compliance. An agent skill from vercel-labs/agent-skills.

    32k GitHub starsUsed in 7 repos~309 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Unslop AI Writing Cleanup

    theclaymethod/unslop

    Removes AI writing tells from prose through an audit-first flow, routing to a two-pass rewrite, a report-only cleanup, voice teaching or mimicry depending on the sub-command used.

    518 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • UX Writing

    content-designer/ux-writing-skill

    Applies UX writing practice to interface copy such as buttons, errors, forms and onboarding, using four quality standards and accessibility guidance.

    224 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.8k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Cscw Writing Style

What does Cscw Writing Style do?

A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising CSCW prose — group-level framing, concepts a field can reuse, participant voice handled with care, theory that earns its keep, and length discipline…. Cscw Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting or revising CSCW prose — group-level framing, concepts a field can reuse, participant voice handled with care, theory that earns its keep, and length discipline under the 5,000-12,000-word scrutiny band where contribution is weighed against every page.

When should I use Cscw Writing Style?

Cscw Writing Style fits situations like: revising CSCW prose — group-level framing; concepts a field can reuse; participant voice handled with care; theory that earns its keep.

How do I install Cscw Writing Style in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-writing-style -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/cscw-writing-style in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Cscw Writing Style in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-writing-style -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/cscw-writing-style in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Cscw Writing Style in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-writing-style -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/cscw-writing-style, .gemini/skills/cscw-writing-style, .github/skills/cscw-writing-style and .opencode/skills/cscw-writing-style in your project.

What does Cscw Writing Style need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Cscw Writing Style is instructions for the agent only.

Does Cscw Writing Style access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Cscw Writing Style safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Cscw Writing Style use?

Cscw Writing Style is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Cscw Writing Style use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Cscw Writing Style?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Cscw Writing Style: Avoid AI Writing (conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing, 4.9k stars), Brand (Ohh-889/skyroc, 795 stars), Khazix WeChat Article Writer (KKKKhazix/khazix-skills, 21k stars) and Writing Guidelines (vercel-labs/agent-skills, 32k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Cscw Writing Style?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.