A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a project belongs at CSCW — is the group, community, or organization the real unit of analysis?

MITAuto-check passed

Install Cscw Topic Selection

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-topic-selection -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cscw-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-topic-selection .claude/skills/cscw-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
cscw-topic-selection
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.5k tokens
SKILL.md length
608 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a project belongs at CSCW — is the group, community, or organization the real unit of analysis?

  • Works in 3 steps: Who is the protagonist? If the sentence… → What does the technology mediate? CSCW… → Would the finding survive a platform…
  • Deciding whether a project belongs at CSCW — is the group
  • SKILL.md covers The unit-of-analysis test, The routing decision, Contribution kinds CSCW's own… and Decision procedure, plus 1 more section
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Cscw Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding whether a project belongs at CSCW — is the group, community, or organization the real unit of analysis? — and running the routing decision against CHI, ICWSM, DIS, GROUP, TOCHI, and social-science journals before any drafting or platform account setup begins.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Deciding whether a project belongs at CSCW — is the group
  • Organization the real unit of analysis?

Example prompts

  • “/cscw-topic-selection”

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Who is the protagonist? If the sentence "we show that ___" is completed by a
  2. What does the technology mediate? CSCW cares about coordination, division of
  3. Would the finding survive a platform swap? Strong CSCW work says something

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Cscw Topic Selection loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 75 tokens; SKILL.md has 608 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~75
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.5k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 608 words, ~1,468 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/cscw-topic-selection/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
cscw-topic-selection
description
Use when deciding whether a project belongs at CSCW — is the group, community, or organization the real unit of analysis? — and running the routing decision against CHI, ICWSM, DIS, GROUP, TOCHI, and social-science journals before any drafting or platform account setup begins.

CSCW Topic Selection

CSCW publishes human-centered research on technology that supports or reshapes social, cooperative, and collaborative practice. The venue test is not "does this involve people and computers" — nearly everything does — but whether the paper's explanatory action happens at the level of a group, community, organization, or network. Run this decision before writing, because the framing it produces changes the introduction, the methods, and even which platform you submit through.

The unit-of-analysis test

Ask three questions of the project's core claim:

  1. Who is the protagonist? If the sentence "we show that ___" is completed by a team, a community, a moderation crew, a platform's user population, or an organization, CSCW is plausible. If it is completed by "users" as interchangeable individuals, you are probably describing a different venue's paper.
  2. What does the technology mediate? CSCW cares about coordination, division of labor, governance, trust, awareness, and collective sense-making. A faster or prettier interaction with no social consequence is not the venue's question.
  3. Would the finding survive a platform swap? Strong CSCW work says something about cooperative practice that outlives the specific system studied. If your contribution evaporates when the platform changes its UI, sharpen the social claim first.

The routing decision

Signal in your projectBetter homeWhy
The novelty is an interaction technique, input method, or interface designCHI (or UIST for technique depth)CSCW reviewers will ask "where is the group?" and find no answer
Large-scale social-media measurement with no design or cooperative-work stakeICWSMMeasurement-first culture; CSCW wants the collaboration consequence drawn out
A designed artifact where the argument is the design process itselfDISDesign-research epistemology has its own reviewing home
Smaller-scope group-work study wanting a community conversationGROUPSame intellectual family, different scale and pacing
A mature line needing unlimited space and no conference tieTOCHI or a social-science journalCSCW already runs journal review, but PACMHCI CSCW papers carry a conference presentation expectation
Governance/harms analysis where accountability frameworks are the coreFAccTPolicy-normative reviewing culture fits better

The CHI/CSCW boundary is the one most authors get wrong, in both directions. Both venues accept qualitative and quantitative work about people and technology. The working separation: CHI's center of gravity is the human-computer interaction — capability, interface, individual experience; CSCW's is the human-human arrangement that computing mediates. A study of how a screen-reader user navigates a document is CHI-shaped; a study of how blind and sighted colleagues co-edit that document is CSCW-shaped. When a project genuinely supports both framings, choose by which literature you need reviewers to know deeply — and note that as of 2026 the two venues differ structurally: CHI runs an annual deadline, while CSCW has moved to rolling journal-style submission (see cscw-workflow).

Show full SKILL.md (158 more words)Show less

Contribution kinds CSCW's own canon rewards

The venue's Lasting Impact lineage (see resources/exemplars/library.md) spans organizational analysis, concept development, theory for design, sensitive-community fieldwork, and large-scale trace analysis. All five registers are first-class. What they share is not a method but a shape: an empirical or analytic account of cooperative practice that other researchers can build with.

Weak-fit signals, regardless of topic:

  • The word "collaborative" appears only in the motivation section.
  • Participants were recruited as isolated individuals for a lab task, and the "group" exists only as an aggregate statistic.
  • The design implications could have been written before the study.
  • The paper studies a community's data without any account of the community's own practices, norms, or stakes — extraction without engagement.

Decision procedure

Run this before committing to the venue:

text
[Claim owner]      Complete: "This paper shows that <group/community/org> ___"
                   If no collective completes it honestly → re-route or re-frame.
[Mediation]        Name the cooperative practice the technology touches
                   (coordination / governance / awareness / trust / labor).
[Survival test]    State the finding with the platform name deleted.
                   Still interesting? → CSCW-shaped.
[Nearest neighbor] Name the ONE venue you'd choose if CSCW rejected the framing,
                   and why its reviewers differ.
[Regime check]     Confirm the current submission pathway (rolling via
                   Manuscript Central as of 2026-07-08) before planning dates.

Fit verdict format

text
[CSCW fit] Strong / Conditional / Weak — one sentence on the unit of analysis
[Cooperative practice at stake] <named practice>
[Contribution kind] organizational analysis / concept / theory-for-design /
                    community study / trace analysis / system
[Re-route candidate] <venue + the reviewer-culture reason>
[Framing repair] <the single change that would most improve CSCW fit>

Facts here reflect cscw.acm.org and the rolling CFP as checked on 2026-07-08; the venue is mid-transition, so re-verify submission mechanics whenever routing advice turns into a plan.

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-topic-selection of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Cscw Topic Selection next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Cscw Topic Selection compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Cscw Topic Selection this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
TopicsZimoLiao/scholaraio577—~294Automated safety check: PassMIT
Topic Modelingbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.5k—~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Bestblogs Topicginobefun/BestBlogs4k—~670Automated safety check: PassNone
Zsxq Topicitwanger/toBeBetterJavaer18k—~564Automated safety check: PassNone
Pubmed Topic Recommendaipoch/medical-research-skills2k—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Topics

    ZimoLiao/scholaraio

    A skill your agent uses when the user asks about research themes, topic distribution, BERTopic clustering, topic overview, topic papers, topic merges, or HTML topic visualizations.

    577 GitHub stars~294 tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Topic Modeling

    brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

    Structural topic modeling: STM spec, topic count, coherence-exclusivity.

    4.5k GitHub stars~3.7k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Bestblogs Topic

    ginobefun/BestBlogs

    A skill your agent uses when the user asks about a specific topic, subject area, or wants to explore curated topic pages on BestBlogs.

    4k GitHub stars~670 tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Zsxq Topic

    itwanger/toBeBetterJavaer

    知识星球主题管理:搜索主题、查看主题详情、发布帖子、编辑主题、发表评论、回复某条评论(楼中楼)、回答提问、删除主题;通过 api call 查看主题评论列表、设置精华、设置标签、查看自己提的问题与已回答记录。当用户需要查找内容、发帖、编辑主题、评论、回复评论、回答问题、删除主题、查看主题评论、查看自己的提问记录、或管理主题精华和标签时使用。

    18k GitHub stars~564 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Pubmed Topic Recommend

    aipoch/medical-research-skills

    Generate ~5 actionable research topic recommendations by querying PubMed E-utilities; use when a user provides a research direction/constraints and needs evidence-backed topic ideas quickly.

    2k GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 22 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Fills in empty embedded help text for TiXL's UI topics by distilling the maintainer's own video explanations into short, user-facing doc entries.

    5.1k GitHub stars~952 tokensUpdated today
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Cscw Topic Selection

What does Cscw Topic Selection do?

A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a project belongs at CSCW — is the group, community, or organization the real unit of analysis? Cscw Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding whether a project belongs at CSCW — is the group, community, or organization the real unit of analysis?

When should I use Cscw Topic Selection?

Cscw Topic Selection fits situations like: deciding whether a project belongs at CSCW — is the group; organization the real unit of analysis?.

How do I install Cscw Topic Selection in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-topic-selection -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/cscw-topic-selection in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Cscw Topic Selection in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-topic-selection -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/cscw-topic-selection in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Cscw Topic Selection in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-topic-selection -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/cscw-topic-selection, .gemini/skills/cscw-topic-selection, .github/skills/cscw-topic-selection and .opencode/skills/cscw-topic-selection in your project.

What does Cscw Topic Selection need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Cscw Topic Selection is instructions for the agent only.

Does Cscw Topic Selection access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Cscw Topic Selection safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Cscw Topic Selection use?

Cscw Topic Selection is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Cscw Topic Selection use?

About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Cscw Topic Selection?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Cscw Topic Selection: Topics (ZimoLiao/scholaraio, 577 stars), Topic Modeling (brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills, 4.5k stars), Bestblogs Topic (ginobefun/BestBlogs, 4k stars) and Zsxq Topic (itwanger/toBeBetterJavaer, 18k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Cscw Topic Selection?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.