TransformerLens Interpretability
Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs
Guides mechanistic interpretability work with TransformerLens: loading models, caching activations, using HookPoints, activation patching and attention-pattern analysis.
A skill your agent uses when interpreting where a CSCW paper stands in review — the PACMHCI journal model's decision vocabulary (Revise for External Review, Revise and Resubmit, Conditional Accept)…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Cscw Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cscw-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process .claude/skills/cscw-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "cscw-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process into .claude/skills/cscw-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cscw-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cscw-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process .agents/skills/cscw-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "cscw-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process into .agents/skills/cscw-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cscw-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cscw-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process .cursor/skills/cscw-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "cscw-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process into .cursor/skills/cscw-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cscw-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cscw-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process .gemini/skills/cscw-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "cscw-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process into .gemini/skills/cscw-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cscw-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cscw-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process .github/skills/cscw-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "cscw-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process into .github/skills/cscw-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cscw-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cscw-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process .opencode/skills/cscw-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "cscw-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process into .opencode/skills/cscw-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cscw-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
cscw-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.1k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 491 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when interpreting where a CSCW paper stands in review — the PACMHCI journal model's decision vocabulary (Revise for External Review, Revise and Resubmit, Conditional Accept)…
- Works in 2 steps: R&R is the main sequence, not a… → The second round is a real filter.…
- Interpreting where a CSCW paper stands in review — the PACMHCI journal models decision vocabulary (Revise for External Review
- SKILL.md covers The decision ladder…, Same-reviewer re-review: the…, The rolling editorial board… and Waiting-time interpretation, plus 1 more section
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Cscw Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when interpreting where a CSCW paper stands in review — the PACMHCI journal model's decision vocabulary (Revise for External Review, Revise and Resubmit, Conditional Accept), same-reviewer re-review, the rolling editorial board, and what each outcome statistically implied in the last cycle.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Interpreting where a CSCW paper stands in review — the PACMHCI journal models decision vocabulary (Revise for External Review
- Revise and Resubmit
- Conditional Accept)
- Same-reviewer re-review
Example prompts
- “/cscw-review-process”
Workflow steps
2 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- R&R is the main sequence, not a consolation. A paper that survives to
- The second round is a real filter. Roughly a fifth of R&R papers still
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Cscw Review Process loads about 1.1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 79 tokens; SKILL.md has 491 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 491 words, ~1,131 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/cscw-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- cscw-review-process
- description
- Use when interpreting where a CSCW paper stands in review — the PACMHCI journal model's decision vocabulary (Revise for External Review, Revise and Resubmit, Conditional Accept), same-reviewer re-review, the rolling editorial board, and what each outcome statistically implied in the last cycle.
CSCW Review Process
CSCW reviews papers the way a journal does, wearing a conference's name. Decisions come in revision vocabulary, revised papers return to the same reviewers, and — under the rolling model launched for CSCW 2027+ — the process is run by an editorial board (Editors-in-Chief Amy Bruckman and Eric Gilbert, with handling editors per methodological track) rather than a per-year program committee. Reading the process correctly changes how you write, revise, and wait.
The decision ladder (2026-cycle vocabulary)
| Decision | What it means | What it asks of you |
|---|---|---|
| Revise for External Review | Screeners saw promise but flaws worth fixing before reviewers are spent on it | A focused repair on a short clock; treat as a free pre-review |
| Revise and Resubmit (R&R) | The default serious outcome: reviewers want a substantially revised paper, which they will re-read | The full revision campaign (cscw-author-response) |
| Conditional Accept with Minor Changes | The paper is in, pending verifiable edits | Execute precisely; do not renegotiate scope |
| Accept | Done; production begins | cscw-camera-ready |
| Reject | The venue is declining this version | Post-mortem before any re-entry |
Calibration from the final fixed cycle (May 2025, feeding CSCW 2026): after external review, only 33.8% of papers received a final decision — 66.2% received R&R. In the second round, 152 papers were accepted (61 outright in March 2026, 91 via minor changes) and 44 were rejected. Two structural lessons:
- R&R is the main sequence, not a consolation. A paper that survives to external review most likely enters a revision loop; budget for it from day one.
- The second round is a real filter. Roughly a fifth of R&R papers still failed; a revision is a second full evaluation, not a formality.
Show full SKILL.md (215 more words)Show less
Same-reviewer re-review: the defining mechanic
Unlike rebuttal-based conferences, CSCW's revision loop returns to people who remember the first version. Consequences:
- Every reviewer request becomes a tracked obligation; the re-review begins from the response letter, not from page one.
- Contradicting your own round-one text without flagging it reads as evasion; a visible change log builds the trust that converts R&R into acceptance.
- Reviewer identity is stable, so tonal repair matters: a defensive round-one response poisons a round the same person will judge.
The rolling editorial board (CSCW 2027+)
- Submissions go to an EiC or Associate Editor matched to the paper's methodological track (track boundaries were 待核实 at the 2026-07-08 check); the editor recruits expert reviewers and owns the decision.
- Advertised pace: decisions roughly 3-4 months from submission, continuous rather than batched.
- Practical shifts for authors: no bidding lottery — editor matching makes the abstract and keywords routing inputs, so write them for the editor who will triage; and there is no cohort, so your paper is not competing against a deadline batch but against the standard itself.
Waiting-time interpretation
[< 1 month] likely in editor triage / reviewer recruitment — silence is normal
[2-4 months] in review; the advertised decision window (rolling)
[> 4-5 months] polite status query to the handling editor is appropriate
[R&R issued] your clock now: the revision deadline is set per paper —
confirm it in the decision letter, don't assume a defaultStanding-report format
[Stage] triage / external review / R&R round n / minor changes / decision
[Regime] rolling (editorial board) / residual fixed-cycle
[Reviewers] same-set re-review expected? yes (R&R) / new assignment
[Base rate] last verified cycle: 66.2% R&R after external review; ~78% of
round-two papers accepted (152 of 196)
[Next move] <the single action that advances the paper now>All statistics and names verified 2026-07-08 against cscw.acm.org blog posts and the rolling CFP; the rolling model is explicitly a soft launch, so expect its mechanics to be tuned — re-verify before relying on any number here.
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Cscw Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cscw Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| TransformerLens InterpretabilityOrchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs | 13k | 3 repos | ~3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Nnsight Remote InterpretabilityOrchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs | 13k | 2 repos | ~3.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Paper Interpretationdigoal/blog | 8.6k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | GPL-2.0 | |
| Implementing Zero Standing Privilege With Cyberarkmukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills | 34k | — | ~2.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Interpret Resultsbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills | 4.6k | — | ~620 | Automated safety check: Notes | Custom licence |
Similar skills
Nnsight Remote Interpretability
Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs
Provides guidance for interpreting and manipulating neural network internals using nnsight with optional NDIF remote execution.
Paper Interpretation
digoal/blog
从论文 PDF 文件或论文 PDF URL 生成通俗易懂、图文并茂、带批判性评估的中文 Markdown 解读，并保存到当前项目的 markdown 目录。Use when the user asks to interpret,精读,解读,summarize,explain,analyze, or write an article from an academic paper PDF…
Implementing Zero Standing Privilege With Cyberark
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Deploy CyberArk Secure Cloud Access (SCA) to eliminate standing privileges in AWS, Azure, and GCP by provisioning ephemeral, scoped roles on a just-in-time basis governed by the TEA framework (Time…
Interpret Results
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
Writes academic prose interpreting regression output. An agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills.
- Official
Culture Index Interpreter
trailofbits/skills
Interprets Culture Index surveys and behavioral profiles, from single-person readings to team composition, burnout risk, hiring profiles and interview analysis.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Cscw Review Process
What does Cscw Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when interpreting where a CSCW paper stands in review — the PACMHCI journal model's decision vocabulary (Revise for External Review, Revise and Resubmit, Conditional Accept)…. Cscw Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when interpreting where a CSCW paper stands in review — the PACMHCI journal model's decision vocabulary (Revise for External Review, Revise and Resubmit, Conditional Accept), same-reviewer re-review, the rolling editorial board, and what each outcome statistically implied in the last cycle.
When should I use Cscw Review Process?
Cscw Review Process fits situations like: interpreting where a CSCW paper stands in review — the PACMHCI journal models decision vocabulary (Revise for External Review; revise and Resubmit; conditional Accept); same-reviewer re-review.
How do I install Cscw Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/cscw-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Cscw Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/cscw-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Cscw Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/cscw-review-process, .gemini/skills/cscw-review-process, .github/skills/cscw-review-process and .opencode/skills/cscw-review-process in your project.
What does Cscw Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Cscw Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Cscw Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Cscw Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Cscw Review Process use?
Cscw Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Cscw Review Process use?
About 1.1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Cscw Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Cscw Review Process: TransformerLens Interpretability (Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs, 13k stars), Nnsight Remote Interpretability (Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs, 13k stars), Paper Interpretation (digoal/blog, 8.6k stars) and Implementing Zero Standing Privilege With Cyberark (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills, 34k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Cscw Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.