A skill your agent uses when making a CoRL robot-learning paper reproducible — pinning simulator and driver versions, releasing training configs, demonstration data and checkpoints, documenting…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Corl Reproducibility

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill corl-reproducibility -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills corl-reproducibility --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/CoRL-Skills/skills/corl-reproducibility .claude/skills/corl-reproducibility && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
corl-reproducibility
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
567 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when making a CoRL robot-learning paper reproducible — pinning simulator and driver versions, releasing training configs, demonstration data and checkpoints, documenting…

  • Making a CoRL robot-learning paper reproducible — pinning simulator and driver versions
  • SKILL.md covers The rerunnable half:…, The auditable half: hardware, Data and checkpoint release and During review vs after…, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Releasing training configs

What it does

Corl Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when making a CoRL robot-learning paper reproducible — pinning simulator and driver versions, releasing training configs, demonstration data and checkpoints, documenting hardware setups that cannot be rerun, seed policy, evaluation scripts, and honest availability statements for code, data, and robot platforms.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Reproducible research. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Making a CoRL robot-learning paper reproducible — pinning simulator and driver versions
  • Releasing training configs
  • Demonstration data and checkpoints
  • Documenting hardware setups that cannot be rerun

Example prompts

  • “/corl-reproducibility”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are yaml).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    Links to these hosts (documentation or services it may open):

    • corl.org

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Corl Reproducibility loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 84 tokens; SKILL.md has 567 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~84
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.6k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 567 words, ~1,561 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/corl-reproducibility/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
corl-reproducibility
description
Use when making a CoRL robot-learning paper reproducible — pinning simulator and driver versions, releasing training configs, demonstration data and checkpoints, documenting hardware setups that cannot be rerun, seed policy, evaluation scripts, and honest availability statements for code, data, and robot platforms.

CoRL Reproducibility

Robot-learning papers have a split reproducibility problem: the training half is software and can in principle be rerun anywhere, while the hardware half is a physical setup nobody else owns. Strong CoRL papers treat these halves differently — the software half is made rerunnable, the hardware half is made auditable — and say plainly which is which.

The rerunnable half: simulation and training

The silent reproducibility killers in this field are version-shaped:

  • Simulator versions change physics. Contact solvers, default damping, and collision margins shift between releases of MuJoCo, Isaac, PyBullet, and friends; a policy's success rate is a function of the simulator build. Pin the exact version and any physics-relevant flags.
  • Environment wrappers drift. Task-suite repositories (benchmark forks, custom reward shims) move under you; record the commit hash of every env repo, not just your own.
  • GPU nondeterminism. cuDNN autotuning and atomics make bit-identical training runs unrealistic — so define reproducibility at the distribution level: same configs + fresh seeds should land inside your reported seed spread.
yaml
# repro-manifest.yaml — ship at the repo root; one block per results table
table_3:
  code_commit: ""            # your repo @ exact hash
  env_suite:  {repo: "", commit: "", sim: "mujoco==X.Y.Z", physics_flags: []}
  training:   {config: "configs/table3.yaml", seeds: [0,1,2,3,4], gpu: "1xA100-80GB", hours: 14}
  data:       {demos: "dataset-v2 (1,204 episodes)", url_or_status: "", license: ""}
  checkpoints: {released: true, path: "ckpts/table3/", selection_rule: "last epoch, no eval peeking"}
  evaluation: {script: "eval/run.py", episodes_per_task: 50, init_state_list: "eval/states.json"}
expected_tolerance: "per-task success within ±4 pts of Table 3 mean"

The selection_rule line matters more than it looks: checkpoint selection via test-set peeking is the field's quiet irreproducibility engine, and stating the rule is the cheapest credibility purchase available.

The auditable half: hardware

Nobody will re-run your robot, so the goal is that a skeptical expert could verify the experiment happened as described and rebuild an equivalent rig:

What to documentWhy an auditor needs it
Robot model, end-effector, firmware/driver versionsBehavior differs across firmware, not just robots
Sensor models, mounting poses, calibration procedureCamera extrinsics silently dominate visuomotor results
Control interface: frequency, action space, safety filters"30 Hz end-effector deltas" vs "torque control" are different papers
Deployed compute + inference latencyPolicy behavior is latency-dependent
Scene inventory: objects (make/size), fixtures, lightingEnables an equivalent-rig rebuild and honest comparison
Raw episode logs and unedited evaluation videoThe audit trail for every printed success rate

Log every evaluation episode at capture time (timestamped video plus a CSV of outcomes); retrofitting an audit trail after reviews ask for it is impossible.

Show full SKILL.md (234 more words)Show less

Data and checkpoint release

  • Demonstration datasets are results: release episode counts, collection method (teleop rig, scripted, crowdsourced), operator count, and filtering rules.
  • Released checkpoints let others reproduce evaluation even when training is too expensive to repeat — for large policies this is often the highest-value artifact you can ship.
  • If data or weights cannot be released (proprietary platform, human-subject footage), say so in the paper with the reason, and release what remains: configs, eval scripts, sim environments, and metrics logs. A precise partial-release statement outperforms a vague "code available upon request."

During review vs after acceptance

  • During review everything must be anonymous (see corl-submission): anonymized repo mirrors, no lab-identifying video, no cloud buckets with named projects.
  • The 2026 camera-ready pipeline has a sharp constraint: PMLR does not accept video as supplementary material, so post-acceptance videos, code, and data live on external hosting (project site, GitHub, archive), linked from the main text (corl.org author instructions, read 2026-07-08). Plan the public homes of artifacts before the October camera-ready deadline, and prefer DOI-stamped archives for anything you cite as permanent.
  • No formal reproducibility checklist was verified for the 2026 cycle in this pack (待核实) — but reviewer expectations enforce one informally; use the manifest above regardless of what the form requires.

Availability statement patterns

text
Strong:  "Code, training configs, evaluation scripts, and the 1,204-episode
          teleop dataset: <URL>. Checkpoints for Tables 2-4: <URL>. Hardware
          evaluations are documented in Appendix C (rig spec, logs, uncut video);
          the platform itself cannot be redistributed."
Weak:    "Code will be released upon acceptance."      (unverifiable promise)
Broken:  "Results reproducible with standard settings." (no artifact at all)

Pre-submission audit

text
[ ] repro-manifest present; one block per headline table
[ ] Simulator/env/driver versions + commits pinned everywhere
[ ] Seed policy stated; checkpoint selection rule stated
[ ] Hardware rig spec complete enough for an equivalent rebuild
[ ] Episode-level logs + uncut eval video archived internally
[ ] Data/checkpoint release plan with named blockers, if any
[ ] Anonymous during review; external hosting plan ready for camera-ready

Verify the live cycle's supplementary and camera-ready rules at https://www.corl.org/contributions/instruction-for-authors before promising any artifact channel — PMLR-side constraints and CoRL-side forms both change yearly.

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in CoRL-Skills/skills/corl-reproducibility of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Corl Reproducibility next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Corl Reproducibility compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Corl Reproducibility this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guidexjtulyc/MedgeClaw6171 repos~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Compute Environment Setupaipoch/open-science5.5k—~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Figure Styleaipoch/open-science5.5k—~5.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Add Bactopia Toolbactopia/bactopia522—~4.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Guides an agent through reproducing papers built on the CHARLS health and retirement survey, from variable mapping to cognition, depression and isolation scores.

    617 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.8k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Compute Environment Setup

    aipoch/open-science

    Prepares setup instructions and a named activation file for a user-managed software environment on an Open-Science SSH or Slurm compute host.

    5.5k GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Figure Style

    aipoch/open-science

    Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots.

    5.5k GitHub stars~5.1k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Add Bactopia Tool

    bactopia/bactopia

    Scaffold a complete Bactopia Tool across all three tiers -- module, subworkflow, and workflow entry point under workflows/bactopia-tools/.

    522 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Modeling Code and Result Contracts

    yushui2022/MathModel-Skill

    Generates result-evidence contracts, tables and runnable q1 to q3 modeling code scaffolds for a math modeling paper from a model route, a data plan and cleaned data.

    454 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Corl Reproducibility

What does Corl Reproducibility do?

A skill your agent uses when making a CoRL robot-learning paper reproducible — pinning simulator and driver versions, releasing training configs, demonstration data and checkpoints, documenting…. Corl Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when making a CoRL robot-learning paper reproducible — pinning simulator and driver versions, releasing training configs, demonstration data and checkpoints, documenting hardware setups that cannot be rerun, seed policy, evaluation scripts, and honest availability statements for code, data, and robot platforms.

When should I use Corl Reproducibility?

Corl Reproducibility fits situations like: making a CoRL robot-learning paper reproducible — pinning simulator and driver versions; releasing training configs; demonstration data and checkpoints; documenting hardware setups that cannot be rerun.

How do I install Corl Reproducibility in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill corl-reproducibility -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (CoRL-Skills/skills/corl-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/corl-reproducibility in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Corl Reproducibility in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill corl-reproducibility -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (CoRL-Skills/skills/corl-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/corl-reproducibility in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Corl Reproducibility in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill corl-reproducibility -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/corl-reproducibility, .gemini/skills/corl-reproducibility, .github/skills/corl-reproducibility and .opencode/skills/corl-reproducibility in your project.

What does Corl Reproducibility need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Corl Reproducibility is instructions for the agent only.

Does Corl Reproducibility access the network?

SKILL.md names 1 domain. As links in the text: corl.org. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Corl Reproducibility safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Corl Reproducibility use?

Corl Reproducibility is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Corl Reproducibility use?

About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Corl Reproducibility?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Corl Reproducibility: Peer Review (K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer, 2.4k stars), CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guide (xjtulyc/MedgeClaw, 617 stars), Compute Environment Setup (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars) and Figure Style (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Corl Reproducibility?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.