A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a result is COLT-shaped (Conference on Learning Theory) — a theorem-first learning-theory contribution — versus better routed to ALT, STOC/FOCS…

MITAuto-check passedData & Analytics

Install Colt Topic Selection

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill colt-topic-selection -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills colt-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/COLT-Skills/skills/colt-topic-selection .claude/skills/colt-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
colt-topic-selection
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.9k tokens
SKILL.md length
828 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a result is COLT-shaped (Conference on Learning Theory) — a theorem-first learning-theory contribution — versus better routed to ALT, STOC/FOCS…

  • Works in 3 steps: Is the headline sentence a mathematical… → Would a learning theorist care before… → Does the proof carry the weight? If the…
  • NeurIPS/ICML/AISTATS
  • SKILL.md covers The three-question fit test, Routing table, The open-problem vehicle and Scope self-interrogation, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Colt Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding whether a result is COLT-shaped (Conference on Learning Theory) — a theorem-first learning-theory contribution — versus better routed to ALT, STOC/FOCS, NeurIPS/ICML/AISTATS, JMLR, or a statistics journal, and whether the right vehicle is a full paper or a COLT open-problem piece.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Data & Analytics, covering Statistics. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • NeurIPS/ICML/AISTATS
  • A statistics journal
  • Whether the right vehicle is a full paper
  • A COLT open-problem piece

Example prompts

  • “/colt-topic-selection”

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Is the headline sentence a mathematical statement? "We prove the first
  2. Would a learning theorist care before seeing experiments? COLT reviewers
  3. Does the proof carry the weight? If the technique is assembly of known parts,

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Colt Topic Selection loads about 1.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 80 tokens; SKILL.md has 828 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~80
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 828 words, ~1,856 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/colt-topic-selection/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
colt-topic-selection
description
Use when deciding whether a result is COLT-shaped (Conference on Learning Theory) — a theorem-first learning-theory contribution — versus better routed to ALT, STOC/FOCS, NeurIPS/ICML/AISTATS, JMLR, or a statistics journal, and whether the right vehicle is a full paper or a COLT open-problem piece.

COLT Topic Selection

Use this before writing begins. COLT solicits papers on theoretical aspects of machine learning, described in the 2026 CFP (checked 2026-07-08) as a subject at the intersection of computer science, statistics, and applied mathematics, with an explicitly inclusive view that includes theory shedding light on empirical phenomena. The practical bar: the contribution must be a theorem — a rate, a separation, a characterization, a hardness result, or an algorithm whose guarantee is the point.

The three-question fit test

  1. Is the headline sentence a mathematical statement? "We prove the first $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret bound for X" is COLT-shaped. "We propose a method that empirically improves X" is not, regardless of how much analysis decorates it.
  2. Would a learning theorist care before seeing experiments? COLT reviewers evaluate the result on the model's motivation and the bound's strength alone.
  3. Does the proof carry the weight? If the technique is assembly of known parts, the result must be strong enough to stand without technique credit; if the result is modest, the technique must be the contribution — one of the two must be true.

Routing table

Signal in the projectBest venue reading
Regret/sample-complexity/oracle-complexity bound, new or improved rateCore COLT
Matching lower bound via a new instance constructionCore COLT
Theory explaining a deep-learning phenomenon, theorem-firstCOLT (in-scope by the CFP's inclusive view) or ML-conference theory track
Learning theory with a long, self-contained development (60+ pages of ideas, not just proofs)JMLR or Annals of Statistics — journal-length exposition
Algorithmic result where combinatorial/complexity machinery dominates the learning contentSTOC / FOCS / SODA
Learning theory, but the community fit is the smaller algorithmic-learning-theory circuitALT (sister venue, autumn deadline cycle — verify)
Theorems plus substantial experiments as co-equal evidenceAISTATS or NeurIPS/ICML
Statistical methodology with inference guarantees and applied audienceAISTATS or a statistics journal
Probabilistic/Bayesian modeling contribution, uncertainty-firstUAI
A precise, motivated question you cannot answerCOLT Open Problem piece (see below)

The open-problem vehicle

COLT has a tradition of publishing short open-problem pieces in its proceedings — citable, reviewed, and historically influential (verified instance: Agarwal, Krishnamurthy, Langford, Luo & Schapire, "Open Problem: First-Order Regret Bounds for Contextual Bandits," COLT 2017, PMLR v65:4-7; several such problems have been resolved by later full papers). In the 2025 cycle the format was: at most 4 pages excluding references, title beginning "Open Problem:", non-anonymous, submitted via CMT on its own timeline. Whether and how the track runs in your cycle: 待核实 in the current CFP.

Choose the open-problem route when you can state the question with full formality, prove the easy directions, explain why standard techniques fail, and ideally attach a modest prize of honor (tradition, not requirement). It converts a stalled project into community agenda-setting.

Scope self-interrogation

text
Q1. State the main claim as: quantifier prefix + model + bound/separation.
    -> Cannot? The project is not yet a COLT project; it is a research direction.
Q2. Name the nearest prior theorem and your delta type
    (gap-closing / log-removal / assumption-weakening / new-model separation).
    -> No nameable neighbor? Either the model is unmotivated or the search
       is incomplete -- both are pre-writing problems.
Q3. Is every experiment you are planning deletable without weakening the claim?
    -> If deleting them guts the paper, route to AISTATS/NeurIPS/ICML instead.
Q4. Will the proof survive a hostile expert with unlimited appendix access?
    -> "Probably" means the verification pass comes before the venue decision.
Show full SKILL.md (378 more words)Show less

Vignette: three fates for one project

A team analyzes gradient descent on a two-layer network and can prove convergence to a global minimum under an over-parameterization condition.

  • As stands — plausible COLT: the headline is a theorem about a practical algorithm, in-scope under the CFP's "theory that sheds light on empirical phenomena." The COLT version leads with the convergence rate, the over-parameterization threshold, and the technique that beats prior NTK-style arguments; the experiment section shrinks to one illustrative training curve.
  • Weakened theory, strong benchmarks — misroute: if the honest version needs assumptions no practical network meets and the interesting content is empirical, the NeurIPS/ICML framing (empirical contribution, theory as support) is both more honest and more likely to succeed.
  • Question sharpened, proof missing — open problem: if the threshold conjecture resists proof but can be stated exactly, a COLT open-problem piece stating the conjecture, the partial results, and why current techniques fail converts the stall into a citable contribution.

Common misroutes seen at COLT

  • The "theory-flavored systems paper": an algorithm with a convergence guarantee under assumptions the target application violates, pitched as theory. Reviewers ask what the theorem teaches; have an answer that is not the benchmark table.
  • The "known result in new clothes": a bound classical in sequential analysis or empirical-process theory, rediscovered. The statistics lane of colt-related-work exists to catch this before a reviewer does.
  • The "journal paper in a 12-page costume": a development whose value is the full landscape, mutilated to fit. If the body cannot carry the spine (see colt-writing-style), choose JMLR.
  • The "two-community orphan": too applied for COLT, too theoretical for an applied venue. Usually a framing failure — pick the community whose open question you actually answer and write for it alone.

Timing considerations

  • COLT's single annual deadline (February 4, 2026 for the 39th edition) sits between the autumn ML-conference cluster and summer; a NeurIPS reject in September leaves comfortable repair time, an ICML reject usually does not — plan the cascade.
  • ALT and COLT deadlines are roughly anti-phased, making ALT the natural same-community fallback; verify the current ALT cycle before promising the team.

Cycle-volatility warnings

  • Scope emphasis and the topics list are re-issued every cycle; the intersection framing above is the 2026 wording (待核实 later).
  • Open-problem track existence, format, and deadline: current CFP only.

Output format

text
[Fit] core COLT / plausible COLT / misroute
[Headline claim] <quantifiers + model + bound/separation, one line>
[Delta type] <vs. nearest prior theorem>
[Alternative vehicle] full paper / open-problem piece / ALT / JMLR / AISTATS / STOC-FOCS
[Pre-writing blocker] <verification, motivation, or search gap to close first>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in COLT-Skills/skills/colt-topic-selection of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Colt Topic Selection next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Colt Topic Selection compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Colt Topic Selection this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Sandbox Benchvercel/next.js143k—~4.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Statistical Analysisspacering-net/codeg3.9k3 repos~5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
StatsmodelszLanqing/codex-claude-academic-skills4.7k15 repos~4.9kAutomated safety check: PassBSD-3-Clause
AI Daily DigestvigorX777/ai-daily-digest1.6k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Statistical Powerspacering-net/codeg3.9k1 repos~3.6kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Sandbox Bench

    vercel/next.js

    Official

    Benchmark React or Next.js changes on Vercel Sandbox VMs with paired A/B statistics: react PR/commit vs base, or Next.js PR/commit vs base, measured end-to-end through the bench/render-pipeline app…

    143k GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated today
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Statistical Analysis

    spacering-net/codeg

    Guided statistical analysis for research data - test selection, assumption checking, effect sizes, power analysis, Bayesian alternatives, and APA-formatted reporting.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~5k tokens
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Statsmodels

    zLanqing/codex-claude-academic-skills

    Statistical models library for Python. An agent skill from zLanqing/codex-claude-academic-skills.

    4.7k GitHub starsUsed in 15 repos~4.9k tokens
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • AI Daily Digest

    vigorX777/ai-daily-digest

    Fetches RSS feeds from 90 top Hacker News blogs (curated by Karpathy), uses AI to score and filter articles, and generates a daily digest in Markdown with Chinese-translated titles, category…

    1.6k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 7 mo ago
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Statistical Power

    spacering-net/codeg

    Sample-size and statistical power calculations for planning studies.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.6k tokens
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check: notes
  • Agent Session Monitor

    higress-group/higress

    Real-time agent conversation monitoring - monitors Higress access logs, aggregates conversations by session, tracks token usage.

    9.5k GitHub stars~3.3k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Colt Topic Selection

What does Colt Topic Selection do?

A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a result is COLT-shaped (Conference on Learning Theory) — a theorem-first learning-theory contribution — versus better routed to ALT, STOC/FOCS…. Colt Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding whether a result is COLT-shaped (Conference on Learning Theory) — a theorem-first learning-theory contribution — versus better routed to ALT, STOC/FOCS, NeurIPS/ICML/AISTATS, JMLR, or a statistics journal, and whether the right vehicle is a full paper or a COLT open-problem piece.

When should I use Colt Topic Selection?

Colt Topic Selection fits situations like: neurIPS/ICML/AISTATS; A statistics journal; whether the right vehicle is a full paper; A COLT open-problem piece.

How do I install Colt Topic Selection in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill colt-topic-selection -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (COLT-Skills/skills/colt-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/colt-topic-selection in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Colt Topic Selection in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill colt-topic-selection -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (COLT-Skills/skills/colt-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/colt-topic-selection in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Colt Topic Selection in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill colt-topic-selection -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/colt-topic-selection, .gemini/skills/colt-topic-selection, .github/skills/colt-topic-selection and .opencode/skills/colt-topic-selection in your project.

What does Colt Topic Selection need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Colt Topic Selection is instructions for the agent only.

Does Colt Topic Selection access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Colt Topic Selection safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Colt Topic Selection use?

Colt Topic Selection is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Colt Topic Selection use?

About 1.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Colt Topic Selection?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Colt Topic Selection: Sandbox Bench (vercel/next.js, 143k stars), Statistical Analysis (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Statsmodels (zLanqing/codex-claude-academic-skills, 4.7k stars) and AI Daily Digest (vigorX777/ai-daily-digest, 1.6k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Colt Topic Selection?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.