Agent skill

Cikm Artifact Evaluation

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when packaging the code, datasets, knowledge graphs, prompts, and demo systems around a CIKM paper — choosing the artifact form per track (research, applied, resource, demo)…

MITAuto-check passedKnowledge Management

Install Cikm Artifact Evaluation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cikm-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cikm-artifact-evaluation --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/CIKM-Skills/skills/cikm-artifact-evaluation .claude/skills/cikm-artifact-evaluation && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
cikm-artifact-evaluation
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
724 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when packaging the code, datasets, knowledge graphs, prompts, and demo systems around a CIKM paper — choosing the artifact form per track (research, applied, resource, demo)…

  • Packaging the code
  • SKILL.md covers Artifact role by track, Resource-track packaging bar, KG-specific packaging and Demo systems as artifacts, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Knowledge graphs

What it does

Cikm Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when packaging the code, datasets, knowledge graphs, prompts, and demo systems around a CIKM paper — choosing the artifact form per track (research, applied, resource, demo), meeting the resource track's reuse-and-documentation bar, and staging anonymous review artifacts into citable public releases.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Knowledge Management, covering Knowledge graphs. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Packaging the code
  • Knowledge graphs
  • Demo systems around a CIKM paper — choosing the artifact form per track (research
  • Meeting the resource tracks reuse-and-documentation bar

Example prompts

  • “/cikm-artifact-evaluation”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Cikm Artifact Evaluation loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 83 tokens; SKILL.md has 724 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~83
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.6k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 724 words, ~1,620 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/cikm-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
cikm-artifact-evaluation
description
Use when packaging the code, datasets, knowledge graphs, prompts, and demo systems around a CIKM paper — choosing the artifact form per track (research, applied, resource, demo), meeting the resource track's reuse-and-documentation bar, and staging anonymous review artifacts into citable public releases.

CIKM Artifact Evaluation

CIKM has no verified badge-granting artifact track (2026 lineup: full, short, applied, resource, demo — source map, 2026-07-08), but artifacts do more work here than at most venues, because two of the five tracks are about artifacts: Resource papers publish them, and Demonstration papers perform them. This skill covers the artifact strategy per track and the staging from anonymous review object to public citable release.

Artifact role by track

TrackThe artifact is...Bar it must clear
Full / Short ResearchSupporting evidence, cited anonymouslyRegenerates headline results; survives a ten-minute inspection
Applied ResearchProof of practiceSubstantiates the launch/deployment claim the track requires
ResourceThe contribution itselfDocumented, licensed, maintained, adoptable by strangers
DemonstrationThe thing being demonstratedRuns live, in front of people, on conference-venue conditions

Resource-track packaging bar

A CIKM resource paper is graded on whether others will build on the object. The verified call names data resources, software, evaluation tasks, and open-source frameworks. Package accordingly:

  • Provenance and license first: where the data came from, what consent/terms cover it, and a license a university lab and a company can both act on. An unlicensed dataset is unadoptable regardless of quality.
  • Schema and statistics: field-level documentation, size, class balance, known gaps — the datasheet discipline, applied without the buzzword.
  • Baselines included: a resource ships with reference numbers and the scripts that produce them, or every adopter re-invents the evaluation differently.
  • Maintenance posture: versioning scheme, issue channel, and an honest statement of how long the hosting is funded. Reviewers of resource papers have watched too many datasets rot at dead URLs.
  • All of it inside 4 pages (2026) — the paper is the resource's brochure and datasheet condensed; depth lives in the repository.

KG-specific packaging

Knowledge graphs — a CIKM staple — need artifact fields other objects skip: the dump date of any upstream KG, the extraction queries or rules that produced the subgraph, entity-resolution decisions (what merged, what split), and per-relation counts. Two teams "using Wikidata" are usually using different graphs; the artifact is where that ambiguity dies.

Demo systems as artifacts

A demo paper's artifact must run where demos actually happen: conference Wi-Fi, projector resolution, a visitor who types adversarial queries. Package a local fallback (cached index, canned dataset, offline model), a 90-second scripted tour, and a reset mechanism that restores clean state between visitors. The 4-page paper should include the architecture and what a visitor experiences — reviewers accept demos they can imagine standing in front of.

Show full SKILL.md (317 more words)Show less

Licensing quick guide

License choice is an adoption decision, and CIKM's mixed academic/industry audience makes it consequential:

ObjectWorkable defaultsWatch out for
CodeMIT/Apache-2.0 for maximum reuseCopyleft blocks industrial adopters — choose deliberately, not accidentally
Original dataCC BY (attribution) or CC BY-NCNC clauses exclude exactly the applied audience CIKM attracts
Derived data (from a KG, a crawl, an API)Whatever the upstream terms forceUpstream terms propagate: a Wikidata extraction, a scraped corpus, and an API dump each carry different obligations
Models/checkpointsCode license or a stated model licenseBase-model license inheritance for fine-tuned checkpoints

Two failure modes recur in resource-track reviews: no license at all (unadoptable), and a license the authors had no right to grant because upstream terms forbid redistribution. Resolve the rights question before the paper claims release.

Hosting for the decade, not the deadline

CIKM papers become baselines years later (cikm-reproducibility), so host on that horizon: an institutional or platform repository under an organization account rather than a personal one; an archival deposit with a DOI for the exact proceedings-version snapshot; dataset hosting with a stated funding horizon rather than a lab NAS URL. The cheapest insurance is the archival snapshot — it survives graduations, lab moves, and platform pivots, all of which the venue's older artifact links have visibly failed to.

Anonymous-to-public staging

text
Review stage:  anonymized hosting, no author-resolving URLs/metadata,
               referenced from the PDF where each claim needs it
Acceptance:    real repository public by camera-ready (13-day window in 2026 —
               prepare during the review wait)
Public stage:  license chosen; versioned release tagged to the proceedings
               numbers; archival DOI (e.g., a Zenodo-class deposit) so citation
               outlives the hosting; README linking the ACM DL record

The GenAI Usage Disclosure obligation follows the artifact too: generated code, synthetic data, or AI-produced labels inside the package belong in the paper's disclosure section (cikm-reproducibility).

Naming and versioning conventions

Give the artifact the paper's short name (the mechanism name from cikm-writing-style), version it semantically with the proceedings snapshot tagged (e.g., v1.0-cikm2026), and keep the README's first line identical to the paper title so search engines and readers connect the two objects. Post- publication improvements go in later versions with a changelog; the tagged snapshot stays frozen because it is what the paper's numbers mean.

Output format

text
[Track role] evidence / proof-of-practice / the-contribution / the-performance
[Package state] provenance / license / docs / baselines / maintenance
[KG fields] dump date / extraction / resolution decisions (if applicable)
[Staging] review-anonymous → public-citable, with dates
[Adoption blocker] <the single thing most likely to stop a stranger from using it>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in CIKM-Skills/skills/cikm-artifact-evaluation of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Cikm Artifact Evaluation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Cikm Artifact Evaluation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Cikm Artifact Evaluation this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Obsidian Canvas BoardsAgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian15k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Ontology1mancompany/OneManCompany4422 repos~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Knowledge Graphgnomeria/usbtree691—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Graphagenticnotetaking/arscontexta3.5k—~4.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
LLM Wiki Knowledge GraphEgonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Obsidian Canvas Boards

    AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian

    Creates, inspects and updates Obsidian JSON Canvas boards in a vault, with text, file, link, group and edge nodes, using safe recoverable edits.

    15k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 29 days ago
    Knowledge ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Ontology

    1mancompany/OneManCompany

    Typed knowledge graph for structured agent memory and composable skills.

    442 GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~1.5k tokens
    Knowledge ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Knowledge Graph

    gnomeria/usbtree

    Set up and maintain a lightweight, file-based knowledge graph of the repo — entities, typed relations, decisions, gotchas — so agents load context fast instead of re-exploring the codebase every…

    691 GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Knowledge ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Graph

    agenticnotetaking/arscontexta

    Interactive knowledge graph analysis. An agent skill from agenticnotetaking/arscontexta.

    3.5k GitHub stars~4.9k tokensUpdated 7 mo ago
    Knowledge ManagementAuto-check: notes
  • LLM Wiki Knowledge Graph

    Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything

    Detects a Karpathy-pattern LLM wiki and builds an interactive knowledge graph with entities, implicit relationships and topic clusters.

    86k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Knowledge ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Gitnexus Guide

    aws-samples/sample-kolya-br-proxy

    Official

    A skill your agent uses when the user asks about GitNexus itself — available tools, how to query the knowledge graph, MCP resources, graph schema, or workflow reference.

    106 GitHub starsUsed in 11 repos~867 tokens
    Knowledge ManagementAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Cikm Artifact Evaluation

What does Cikm Artifact Evaluation do?

A skill your agent uses when packaging the code, datasets, knowledge graphs, prompts, and demo systems around a CIKM paper — choosing the artifact form per track (research, applied, resource, demo)…. Cikm Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when packaging the code, datasets, knowledge graphs, prompts, and demo systems around a CIKM paper — choosing the artifact form per track (research, applied, resource, demo), meeting the resource track's reuse-and-documentation bar, and staging anonymous review artifacts into citable public releases.

When should I use Cikm Artifact Evaluation?

Cikm Artifact Evaluation fits situations like: packaging the code; knowledge graphs; demo systems around a CIKM paper — choosing the artifact form per track (research; meeting the resource tracks reuse-and-documentation bar.

How do I install Cikm Artifact Evaluation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cikm-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (CIKM-Skills/skills/cikm-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/cikm-artifact-evaluation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Cikm Artifact Evaluation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cikm-artifact-evaluation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (CIKM-Skills/skills/cikm-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/cikm-artifact-evaluation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Cikm Artifact Evaluation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cikm-artifact-evaluation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/cikm-artifact-evaluation, .gemini/skills/cikm-artifact-evaluation, .github/skills/cikm-artifact-evaluation and .opencode/skills/cikm-artifact-evaluation in your project.

What does Cikm Artifact Evaluation need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Cikm Artifact Evaluation is instructions for the agent only.

Does Cikm Artifact Evaluation access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Cikm Artifact Evaluation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Cikm Artifact Evaluation use?

Cikm Artifact Evaluation is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Cikm Artifact Evaluation use?

About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Cikm Artifact Evaluation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Cikm Artifact Evaluation: Obsidian Canvas Boards (AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian, 15k stars), Ontology (1mancompany/OneManCompany, 442 stars), Knowledge Graph (gnomeria/usbtree, 691 stars) and Graph (agenticnotetaking/arscontexta, 3.5k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Cikm Artifact Evaluation?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.