A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM CHI paper — contribution statements, structure for mixed reviewer audiences, participant voice, calibrated claims, accessible…

MITAuto-check passedWriting & Content

Install Chi Writing Style

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill chi-writing-style -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills chi-writing-style --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/CHI-Skills/skills/chi-writing-style .claude/skills/chi-writing-style && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
chi-writing-style
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
658 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM CHI paper — contribution statements, structure for mixed reviewer audiences, participant voice, calibrated claims, accessible…

  • Revising the prose of an ACM CHI paper — contribution statements
  • SKILL.md covers The contribution statement is…, Section-by-section: what each…, Participant voice without… and Calibration is the house…, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Structure for mixed reviewer audiences

What it does

Chi Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM CHI paper — contribution statements, structure for mixed reviewer audiences, participant voice, calibrated claims, accessible and bias-free writing, and length discipline in a venue that reviews words against contribution instead of pages.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Writing & Content, covering Brand voice and tone. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Revising the prose of an ACM CHI paper — contribution statements
  • Structure for mixed reviewer audiences
  • Participant voice
  • Calibrated claims

Example prompts

  • “/chi-writing-style”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Chi Writing Style loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 77 tokens; SKILL.md has 658 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~77
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 658 words, ~1,446 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/chi-writing-style/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
chi-writing-style
description
Use when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM CHI paper — contribution statements, structure for mixed reviewer audiences, participant voice, calibrated claims, accessible and bias-free writing, and length discipline in a venue that reviews words against contribution instead of pages.

CHI Writing Style

A CHI paper is read by a jury that rarely shares one methodological culture: a quantitative experimenter, a design researcher, and an ethnographer may all review the same submission. The prose must therefore do explicit work that a single-culture venue lets authors skip — naming the contribution type, justifying the method choice to outsiders, and calibrating claims to human evidence. And because CHI reviews length against contribution ("papers should be commensurate with their contribution"; 5,000–8,000 words encouraged, per the CHI 2027 Papers page, read 2026-07-08), every paragraph is auditable: does this paragraph earn its words?

The contribution statement is load-bearing

CHI convention puts an explicit contribution list at the end of the introduction. Write it first, keep it honest, and let it govern the paper:

text
This paper contributes:
(1) <empirical finding>: the first interview study (n=24) of <population>
    doing <activity>, showing <the finding in one clause>;
(2) <artifact>: <system>, an open-source <what>, which embodies <the design claim>;
(3) <design implications>: five implications for <who>, grounded in (1) and
    tested against (2).

Each bullet must name its type (finding, artifact, method, theory — the taxonomy in chi-topic-selection), its evidence, and its beneficiary. A bullet you cannot phrase this way is not yet a contribution; cutting it now is cheaper than a reviewer doing it in November.

Section-by-section: what each reviewer culture checks

SectionThe question it must answerStyle failure that costs papers
AbstractWhat was done, with whom, what was foundMotivation essay; findings withheld like a plot twist
IntroductionWhy this, why now, contributionsThree pages of stage-setting before any claim
Related workWhere this sits in HCI's conversationAnnotated bibliography instead of positioning (chi-related-work)
MethodEnough to replicate and to trustNarrative gloss; missing recruitment, analysis, ethics
Findings/ResultsEvidence, organized by claimOrganized by chronology of what the team did
DiscussionSo what — for design, theory, practiceRestating results with "interestingly" attached
LimitationsHonest scope boundariesRitual humility ("small sample") without consequences

Participant voice without ventriloquism

Quotes are evidence at CHI, and their handling is a style signature:

  • Attribute with stable IDs (P7), balance across participants, and never let one articulate participant carry three themes.
  • Interpret after quoting; a quote is not self-explanatory.
  • Report speech faithfully but humanely — mark elisions, do not correct grammar silently, do not mock dialect through excessive [sic].
  • Describe people the way current bias-free-language guidance and the communities in question prefer (identity-first vs person-first varies by community — accessibility research has explicit norms; when studying a specific community, follow its stated preference and say so).
Show full SKILL.md (283 more words)Show less

Calibration is the house register

HCI findings are situated. The credible CHI register scopes claims in the sentence that makes them, not only in the limitations section: "participants in our two-week deployment", "for information-seeking tasks like ours", "we observed, among these 24 U.S.-based teachers". Reviewers punish two opposite failures — universal claims from situated studies, and findings hedged into vapor. The discipline: one claim sentence per finding, scoped, in active voice, with the evidence pointer attached.

Write for the ear and the screen reader

Accessibility is a review-community value and a camera-ready requirement (chi-camera-ready), and it starts in drafting: expand every acronym at first use, keep sentences parseable when heard rather than seen, never encode meaning purely in color or spatial position ("the red bars", "as seen on the left"), and write figure references that work without the figure ("error rates halved (Fig. 3)" not "see Fig. 3"). These habits also serve the many CHI reviewers reading in their second or third language.

Length discipline in a no-page-limit venue

No maximum length means the justification is on you. Practical passes:

  • Run texcount -inc -sum main.tex at every full draft; drift above ~8,000 words needs a reason you could state to a reviewer, and 12,000+ risks desk rejection (chi-submission).
  • The three chronic bloat sites in CHI drafts: related work written as coverage proof (halve it by making every citation do positioning work), methods detail that belongs in the supplement (move instruments out, keep decisions in), and discussion sections that re-narrate findings (each discussion move must add an implication, comparison, or consequence).
  • Short papers (<5,000 words) are a legitimate, reviewed-to-scale form — cutting to short is often the strongest move for a single clean finding.

Output format

text
[Contribution statement] <n> bullets, each typed+evidenced: yes/no
[Audience test] method justified for non-specialist reviewer: yes/no
[Claim calibration] unscoped universals found: <list or none>
[Voice] quote balance across participants: ok / dominated by <IDs>
[Accessible prose] acronyms, color-independence, hearable sentences: pass/fail
[Word count] <n> words — verdict: short / standard / justify / cut

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in CHI-Skills/skills/chi-writing-style of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Chi Writing Style next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Chi Writing Style compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Chi Writing Style this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Avoid AI Writingconorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing4.9k3 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
BrandOhh-889/skyroc79513 repos~733Automated safety check: PassMIT
Khazix WeChat Article WriterKKKKhazix/khazix-skills21k1 repos~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Writing Guidelinesvercel-labs/agent-skills32k7 repos~309Automated safety check: PassNone
Unslop AI Writing Cleanuptheclaymethod/unslop518—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Avoid AI Writing

    conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing

    Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms").

    4.9k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~8.1k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Brand

    Ohh-889/skyroc

    Brand voice, visual identity, messaging frameworks, asset management, brand consistency.

    795 GitHub starsUsed in 13 repos~733 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Khazix WeChat Article Writer

    KKKKhazix/khazix-skills

    Writes long-form WeChat official account articles in the personal style of the Khazix account, from briefs, links, PDFs or rough notes, with a topic quality check.

    21k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.9k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Writing Guidelines

    vercel-labs/agent-skills

    Official

    Review docs/prose for Writing Guidelines compliance. An agent skill from vercel-labs/agent-skills.

    32k GitHub starsUsed in 7 repos~309 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Unslop AI Writing Cleanup

    theclaymethod/unslop

    Removes AI writing tells from prose through an audit-first flow, routing to a two-pass rewrite, a report-only cleanup, voice teaching or mimicry depending on the sub-command used.

    518 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • UX Writing

    content-designer/ux-writing-skill

    Applies UX writing practice to interface copy such as buttons, errors, forms and onboarding, using four quality standards and accessibility guidance.

    224 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.8k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Chi Writing Style

What does Chi Writing Style do?

A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM CHI paper — contribution statements, structure for mixed reviewer audiences, participant voice, calibrated claims, accessible…. Chi Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM CHI paper — contribution statements, structure for mixed reviewer audiences, participant voice, calibrated claims, accessible and bias-free writing, and length discipline in a venue that reviews words against contribution instead of pages.

When should I use Chi Writing Style?

Chi Writing Style fits situations like: revising the prose of an ACM CHI paper — contribution statements; structure for mixed reviewer audiences; participant voice; calibrated claims.

How do I install Chi Writing Style in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill chi-writing-style -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (CHI-Skills/skills/chi-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/chi-writing-style in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Chi Writing Style in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill chi-writing-style -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (CHI-Skills/skills/chi-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/chi-writing-style in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Chi Writing Style in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill chi-writing-style -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/chi-writing-style, .gemini/skills/chi-writing-style, .github/skills/chi-writing-style and .opencode/skills/chi-writing-style in your project.

What does Chi Writing Style need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Chi Writing Style is instructions for the agent only.

Does Chi Writing Style access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Chi Writing Style safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Chi Writing Style use?

Chi Writing Style is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Chi Writing Style use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Chi Writing Style?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Chi Writing Style: Avoid AI Writing (conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing, 4.9k stars), Brand (Ohh-889/skyroc, 795 stars), Khazix WeChat Article Writer (KKKKhazix/khazix-skills, 21k stars) and Writing Guidelines (vercel-labs/agent-skills, 32k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Chi Writing Style?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.