A skill your agent uses when positioning an ACM CCS submission against the security big-four and specialist literature, including arXiv preprints, prior CCS/S&P/USENIX/NDSS papers, concurrent…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Ccs Related Work

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ccs-related-work -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ccs-related-work --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ACM-CCS-Skills/skills/ccs-related-work .claude/skills/ccs-related-work && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
ccs-related-work
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~876 tokens
SKILL.md length
410 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when positioning an ACM CCS submission against the security big-four and specialist literature, including arXiv preprints, prior CCS/S&P/USENIX/NDSS papers, concurrent…

  • Positioning an ACM CCS submission against the security big-four and specialist literature
  • SKILL.md covers Positioning checks, Literature-lane table, Positioning vignette and Concurrent-work judgment calls, plus 1 more section
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Including arXiv preprints

What it does

Ccs Related Work is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when positioning an ACM CCS submission against the security big-four and specialist literature, including arXiv preprints, prior CCS/S&P/USENIX/NDSS papers, concurrent disclosures, CVE and advisory records, and the attack-and-defense lineage that a SIGSAC program committee expects to see credited.

Its SKILL.md is about 880 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Academic paper search, Literature review and Vulnerability scanning. It works with arXiv. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Positioning an ACM CCS submission against the security big-four and specialist literature
  • Including arXiv preprints
  • Prior CCS/S&P/USENIX/NDSS papers
  • Concurrent disclosures

Example prompts

  • “/ccs-related-work”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Ccs Related Work loads about 876 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 80 tokens; SKILL.md has 410 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~80
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~876

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 410 words, ~876 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/ccs-related-work/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
ccs-related-work
description
Use when positioning an ACM CCS submission against the security big-four and specialist literature, including arXiv preprints, prior CCS/S&P/USENIX/NDSS papers, concurrent disclosures, CVE and advisory records, and the attack-and-defense lineage that a SIGSAC program committee expects to see credited.

Use this to audit novelty and eligibility. Reopen the current CFP for dual-submission, anonymity, and prior-publication rules before advising authors.

Positioning checks

  • Separate a genuine security advance from an engineering increment: a new attack class, a broken assumption, a defense with a new guarantee, or a measurement that overturns received wisdom.
  • Compare against all four top venues, not just CCS. A SIGSAC PC expects the nearest attack or defense from S&P, USENIX Security, and NDSS to be cited and distinguished.
  • Credit the practitioner and disclosure record: relevant CVEs, vendor advisories, and public exploit write-ups count as prior art at CCS even when they are not peer-reviewed papers.
  • Cite arXiv and preprint versions without breaking double-blind review; do not point reviewers to identity-revealing pages or your own advisory.
  • Explain overlap with any concurrent disclosure and do not submit duplicate archival work.
  • Use related work to sharpen the delta: a stronger attacker, a weaker assumption, a lower overhead, a wider measurement, or a defense where prior work had only detection.

Literature-lane table

Literature laneTypical sourcesWhat CCS reviewers check
Security big fourCCS, IEEE S&P, USENIX Security, NDSS proceedingsWhether the nearest attack/defense is compared or explicitly distinguished
Specialist venuesPETS/PoPETs, ESORICS, ACSAC, CRYPTO/EUROCRYPTWhether the sub-community's known results are acknowledged
Practitioner recordCVEs, vendor advisories, CTF and exploit write-upsWhether a known real-world case predates the claimed novelty

A bibliography citing only academic papers while ignoring a well-known CVE that already demonstrated the attack is a recognizable CCS reject pattern that no amount of measurement polish repairs.

Show full SKILL.md (150 more words)Show less

Positioning vignette

Imagine the paper reports a new cache side-channel that recovers keys from a TLS library. Its nearest neighbors: an S&P paper with a slower channel, a USENIX defense that assumed the channel was impractical, and a public CVE for a related timing bug. The novelty sentence should name all three contrasts — a faster channel than the S&P line, a break of the USENIX paper's practicality assumption, and a distinct root cause from the CVE.

Concurrent-work judgment calls

  • Independently concurrent arXiv or disclosure work: cite neutrally, state the technical difference, and avoid priority claims reviewers cannot verify.
  • Your own prior workshop or poster version: usually citable and non-archival, but verify against the current CFP wording and phrase the citation to preserve double-blind review.
  • When unsure whether a co-located CCS workshop counts as archival overlap, declare it in the submission form rather than gambling on a chair's reading.

Output format

text
[Eligibility] clear / needs declaration / risky
[Closest literatures] <big-four / specialist / practitioner record>
[Nearest 3 works] <work -> distinction>
[Archival-overlap risk] <none / issues>
[Novelty sentence] <CCS-ready contribution contrast>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in ACM-CCS-Skills/skills/ccs-related-work of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Ccs Related Work next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Ccs Related Work compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Ccs Related Work this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~876Automated safety check: PassMIT
Ijcai Related Workfranklee16/academic-research-skills2231 repos~427Automated safety check: PassNone
Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent12620 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Systematic Literature Review Builderbytedance/deer-flow84k2 repos~4.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Paper Research on arXivXiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code14k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Literature Review AgentAr9av/PaperOrchestra6791 repos~5.2kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Ijcai Related Work

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an IJCAI or IJCAI-ECAI submission against archival AI literature, arXiv preprints, workshop papers, prior rejected versions, dual-submission rules, shortened…

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~427 tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Literature Review

    neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent

    Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).

    126 GitHub starsUsed in 20 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Searches arXiv across many papers on one topic, extracts each paper's methodology and findings in parallel, and synthesizes a cited literature review.

    84k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~4.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Paper Research on arXiv

    XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code

    Searches arXiv, fetches metadata, generates BibTeX, downloads PDFs and finds citations and related papers using a bundled Python script.

    14k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Literature Review Agent

    Ar9av/PaperOrchestra

    Step 3 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). An agent skill from Ar9av/PaperOrchestra.

    679 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~5.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Arxiv MCP Server

    blazickjp/arxiv-mcp-server

    A skill your agent uses when finding, comparing, reading, or monitoring arXiv papers, including requests for abstracts, citation graphs, original LaTeX, section-level technical details, or…

    3.2k GitHub stars~353 tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Questions about Ccs Related Work

What does Ccs Related Work do?

A skill your agent uses when positioning an ACM CCS submission against the security big-four and specialist literature, including arXiv preprints, prior CCS/S&P/USENIX/NDSS papers, concurrent…. Ccs Related Work is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when positioning an ACM CCS submission against the security big-four and specialist literature, including arXiv preprints, prior CCS/S&P/USENIX/NDSS papers, concurrent disclosures, CVE and advisory records, and the attack-and-defense lineage that a SIGSAC program committee expects to see credited.

When should I use Ccs Related Work?

Ccs Related Work fits situations like: positioning an ACM CCS submission against the security big-four and specialist literature; including arXiv preprints; prior CCS/S&P/USENIX/NDSS papers; concurrent disclosures.

How do I install Ccs Related Work in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ccs-related-work -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ACM-CCS-Skills/skills/ccs-related-work in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/ccs-related-work in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Ccs Related Work in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ccs-related-work -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ACM-CCS-Skills/skills/ccs-related-work in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/ccs-related-work in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Ccs Related Work in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ccs-related-work -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ccs-related-work, .gemini/skills/ccs-related-work, .github/skills/ccs-related-work and .opencode/skills/ccs-related-work in your project.

What does Ccs Related Work need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ccs Related Work is instructions for the agent only.

Does Ccs Related Work access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Ccs Related Work safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Ccs Related Work use?

Ccs Related Work is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Ccs Related Work use?

About 876 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Ccs Related Work?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ccs Related Work: Ijcai Related Work (franklee16/academic-research-skills, 223 stars), Literature Review (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars), Systematic Literature Review Builder (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars) and Paper Research on arXiv (XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code, 14k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Ccs Related Work?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.