A skill your agent uses when revising a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for a precise verification contribution on the first page, an explicit soundness/completeness statement…

MITAuto-check passedWriting & Content

Install Cav Writing Style

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cav-writing-style -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cav-writing-style --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/CAV-Skills/skills/cav-writing-style .claude/skills/cav-writing-style && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
cav-writing-style
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
577 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when revising a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for a precise verification contribution on the first page, an explicit soundness/completeness statement…

  • Revising a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for a precise verification contribution on the first page
  • SKILL.md covers Revision rules, Verification-paper skeleton, Sentence-level rewrites and Correctness-and-scope discipline, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • An explicit soundness/completeness statement

What it does

Cav Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when revising a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for a precise verification contribution on the first page, an explicit soundness/completeness statement, theorem-and-proof discipline in the LNCS page budget, fair benchmark claims, honest scope and limits, and double-blind wording for the anonymized categories.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Writing & Content, covering Brand voice and tone. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Revising a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for a precise verification contribution on the first page
  • An explicit soundness/completeness statement
  • Theorem-and-proof discipline in the LNCS page budget
  • Fair benchmark claims

Example prompts

  • “/cav-writing-style”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Cav Writing Style loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 85 tokens; SKILL.md has 577 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~85
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 577 words, ~1,371 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/cav-writing-style/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
cav-writing-style
description
Use when revising a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for a precise verification contribution on the first page, an explicit soundness/completeness statement, theorem-and-proof discipline in the LNCS page budget, fair benchmark claims, honest scope and limits, and double-blind wording for the anonymized categories.

CAV Writing Style

Use this when revising the main paper. CAV papers are Springer LNCS chapters read by verification researchers, so they need a precise verification contribution stated on the first page and a formal guarantee a reviewer can check. The failure this skill prevents is a technically fine paper that reads like a systems demo or a heuristic with a benchmark table but no stated property.

Revision rules

  • Lead with the verification contribution and its guarantee: the problem (what property, of what system), why current methods fall short, the contribution (technique and/or tool), what is formally guaranteed (soundness, completeness, an equisatisfiability/refinement claim), the benchmark evidence, and the scope.
  • State the formal claim precisely. Name the property, the assumptions, and the theorem. A paper whose "contribution" is only "faster on benchmarks" with no guarantee reads as a tool note, not a Regular Paper.
  • Give proofs their place. Key proofs go in the body; long proofs may go to a clearly-marked appendix — but reviewers are not obliged to read appendices, so the proof idea must be in the body (see cav-supplementary).
  • Make benchmark claims falsifiable. Every empirical claim names the benchmark set (with revision), the baseline tools and versions, and the resource limits (time/memory) — adjectives like "significantly faster" without these are not evidence (see cav-experiments).
  • State scope and limits as your own, not as a closing apology. Say which logics, system sizes, or property classes the method covers and where it stops. Over-claimed generality is the fastest way to lose a verification reviewer's trust.
  • Maintain double-blind wording for Regular and Application papers: anonymize self-citations, the tool/solver name, benchmark paths, acknowledgements, and repository links. (Tool and Industrial papers are not anonymized.)

Verification-paper skeleton

SectionJob it must doCommon failure
IntroProblem, inadequacy, contribution, the guarantee, benchmark preview, scope — first pageLeads with "SMT/model checking is important," not a precise problem
PreliminariesThe formal setting: logic, semantics, the property classNotation dumped without motivating the model
ApproachThe technique/algorithm, stated so it can be re-implementedAlgorithm described too thinly to reproduce
CorrectnessThe theorem(s) and proof idea; soundness/completenessA "clearly sound" claim with no argument
EvaluationBenchmarks, baselines, resource limits, per-instance data"Strong results" with no set revision or limits
Related workDelta-first positioning against the verification literatureCitation catalog with no contrast
Show full SKILL.md (196 more words)Show less

Sentence-level rewrites

Draft patternCAV-safe rewrite
"Our tool is significantly faster.""solves N previously-timed-out instances and reduces mean time by X% on the fixed-revision <set> under a 20-min/8-GB limit vs. <tool vA.B>"
"Our method is sound.""Theorem 1: the procedure preserves equisatisfiability under <assumptions>; proof in §4 (full proof, App. A)"
"We evaluate on standard benchmarks.""We evaluate on the <division> of <benchmark set, revision R>, listed in the artifact"
"Our approach scales.""runs to completion on instances up to <size/metric>; beyond that, <stated limit>"
"The solver handles all cases."Claim scoped to the logic/theory and property class actually supported

Correctness-and-scope discipline

text
[Guarantee]   name the property (sound? complete? terminating?) and the assumptions it needs
[Proof]       proof idea in the body; full proof in the body or a clearly-marked appendix
[Checkability] where possible, emit a witness/certificate a reviewer can independently check
[Scope]       state the logics/theories/system-sizes/property-classes covered — and the boundary
-> put the limit next to the claim, not only in a closing paragraph

Vignette: compressing a technique-plus-tool paper

A draft with a long preliminaries section, three theorems, and a sprawling evaluation: keep the motivating problem and the main soundness theorem with its proof idea in the body; move two supporting lemmas' full proofs and the per-instance benchmark table to the appendix/artifact with explicit forward references; keep the headline benchmark comparison (with limits) in the body. The test of a good cut: a reviewer should be able to answer "what is guaranteed, and how much faster/more capable is it, under what budget?" from the body alone.

Output format

text
[Writing diagnosis] clear / no-stated-guarantee / over-claimed / unfalsifiable-benchmarks / over-scoped
[First-page fix] <new framing leading with the contribution and its guarantee>
[Claim audit] <claim -> theorem or benchmark evidence -> where -> falsifiable? yes/no>
[Scope fix] <the boundary to state next to the claim>
[Anonymity edits] <tool/solver names / self-citations / benchmark paths to rewrite (if anonymized)>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in CAV-Skills/skills/cav-writing-style of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Cav Writing Style next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Cav Writing Style compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Cav Writing Style this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Avoid AI Writingconorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing4.9k3 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
BrandOhh-889/skyroc79513 repos~733Automated safety check: PassMIT
Khazix WeChat Article WriterKKKKhazix/khazix-skills21k1 repos~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Writing Guidelinesvercel-labs/agent-skills32k7 repos~309Automated safety check: PassNone
Unslop AI Writing Cleanuptheclaymethod/unslop518—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Avoid AI Writing

    conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing

    Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms").

    4.9k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~8.1k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Brand

    Ohh-889/skyroc

    Brand voice, visual identity, messaging frameworks, asset management, brand consistency.

    795 GitHub starsUsed in 13 repos~733 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Khazix WeChat Article Writer

    KKKKhazix/khazix-skills

    Writes long-form WeChat official account articles in the personal style of the Khazix account, from briefs, links, PDFs or rough notes, with a topic quality check.

    21k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.9k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Writing Guidelines

    vercel-labs/agent-skills

    Official

    Review docs/prose for Writing Guidelines compliance. An agent skill from vercel-labs/agent-skills.

    32k GitHub starsUsed in 7 repos~309 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Unslop AI Writing Cleanup

    theclaymethod/unslop

    Removes AI writing tells from prose through an audit-first flow, routing to a two-pass rewrite, a report-only cleanup, voice teaching or mimicry depending on the sub-command used.

    518 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • UX Writing

    content-designer/ux-writing-skill

    Applies UX writing practice to interface copy such as buttons, errors, forms and onboarding, using four quality standards and accessibility guidance.

    224 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.8k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Cav Writing Style

What does Cav Writing Style do?

A skill your agent uses when revising a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for a precise verification contribution on the first page, an explicit soundness/completeness statement…. Cav Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when revising a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for a precise verification contribution on the first page, an explicit soundness/completeness statement, theorem-and-proof discipline in the LNCS page budget, fair benchmark claims, honest scope and limits, and double-blind wording for the anonymized categories.

When should I use Cav Writing Style?

Cav Writing Style fits situations like: revising a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for a precise verification contribution on the first page; an explicit soundness/completeness statement; theorem-and-proof discipline in the LNCS page budget; fair benchmark claims.

How do I install Cav Writing Style in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cav-writing-style -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (CAV-Skills/skills/cav-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/cav-writing-style in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Cav Writing Style in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cav-writing-style -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (CAV-Skills/skills/cav-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/cav-writing-style in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Cav Writing Style in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cav-writing-style -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/cav-writing-style, .gemini/skills/cav-writing-style, .github/skills/cav-writing-style and .opencode/skills/cav-writing-style in your project.

What does Cav Writing Style need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Cav Writing Style is instructions for the agent only.

Does Cav Writing Style access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Cav Writing Style safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Cav Writing Style use?

Cav Writing Style is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Cav Writing Style use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Cav Writing Style?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Cav Writing Style: Avoid AI Writing (conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing, 4.9k stars), Brand (Ohh-889/skyroc, 795 stars), Khazix WeChat Article Writer (KKKKhazix/khazix-skills, 21k stars) and Writing Guidelines (vercel-labs/agent-skills, 32k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Cav Writing Style?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.