Arize Evaluator
github/awesome-copilot
Handles LLM-as-judge evaluation workflows on Arize including creating/updating evaluators, running evaluations on spans or experiments, managing tasks, trigger-run operations, column mapping, and…
A skill your agent uses to understand how the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review with at least two referees, the desk screen, decision…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Bjps Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill bjps-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills bjps-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process .claude/skills/bjps-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "bjps-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process into .claude/skills/bjps-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "bjps-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill bjps-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills bjps-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process .agents/skills/bjps-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "bjps-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process into .agents/skills/bjps-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "bjps-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill bjps-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills bjps-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process .cursor/skills/bjps-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "bjps-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process into .cursor/skills/bjps-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "bjps-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill bjps-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills bjps-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process .gemini/skills/bjps-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "bjps-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process into .gemini/skills/bjps-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "bjps-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills bjps-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill bjps-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process .github/skills/bjps-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "bjps-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process into .github/skills/bjps-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "bjps-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill bjps-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills bjps-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process .opencode/skills/bjps-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "bjps-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process into .opencode/skills/bjps-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "bjps-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
bjps-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.3k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 581 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses to understand how the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review with at least two referees, the desk screen, decision…
- Works in 5 steps: Double-blind. Reviewers do not know the… → Desk screen first. The editorial team… → External review. Papers passing the desk… → …
- Understand how the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review with at least two referees
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How BJPS review works, Shape the paper to pass and Anti-patterns, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Bjps Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use to understand how the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review with at least two referees, the desk screen, decision categories, and what reviewers are asked to weigh. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Understand how the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review with at least two referees
- The desk screen
- Decision categories
- What reviewers are asked to weigh
Example prompts
- “/bjps-review-process”
Workflow steps
5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Double-blind. Reviewers do not know the authors and authors do not know reviewers. Anonymize the
- Desk screen first. The editorial team assesses fit — wide political-science interest, scope,
- External review. Papers passing the desk are sent to at least two expert referees, who weigh
- Decision categories: reject / revise-and-resubmit / (rarely on first round) accept. An R&R is a
- Format-aware screening. Letters are held to "complete short contribution" standards; Comments
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Bjps Review Process loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 82 tokens; SKILL.md has 581 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 581 words, ~1,335 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/bjps-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- bjps-review-process
- description
- Use to understand how the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review with at least two referees, the desk screen, decision categories, and what reviewers are asked to weigh. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
Review Process (bjps-review-process)
Knowing how BJPS screens and decides lets you pre-empt the failure modes before submitting. BJPS uses double-blind review usually involving at least two referees, and an editorial team drawn from across the discipline screens for fit before sending a paper out.
When to trigger
- Before submitting, to stress-test against desk-screen grounds
- Interpreting a decision letter and setting expectations
- Understanding what reviewers are instructed to weigh
- Deciding whether the paper's general interest is strong enough to send out for review
How BJPS review works
- Double-blind. Reviewers do not know the authors and authors do not know reviewers. Anonymize the
manuscript accordingly: remove author names, affiliations, acknowledgments, funding notes, and links
to personal/university websites (see
bjps-submission). - Desk screen first. The editorial team assesses fit — wide political-science interest, scope, adequate English, and basic competence — before external review. A competent but parochial (single-subfield or single-country-framed) paper is a common desk-screen casualty.
- External review. Papers passing the desk are sent to at least two expert referees, who weigh the contribution's significance, the soundness of theory and design, and the credibility of the evidence on the method's own terms.
- Decision categories: reject / revise-and-resubmit / (rarely on first round) accept. An R&R is a genuine signal; conditional acceptance follows a convergent revision (待核实 exact category labels on the live page).
- Format-aware screening. Letters are held to "complete short contribution" standards; Comments are judged on whether they engage the target article accurately and add to the record.
Shape the paper to pass
- Make wide interest explicit (avoids the parochialism desk-screen failure).
- Engage the relevant literatures, including across subfields and countries.
- Clear ethics/consent and human-subjects compliance up front.
- Anonymize thoroughly — broken anonymity can compromise double-blind review.
- Write to expert reviewers: anticipate the strongest objection and answer it in the design.
Anti-patterns
- Submitting a single-subfield or single-country-framed paper to a broad generalist journal
- Ignoring an obvious related literature across subfields/countries
- Expecting an R&R for a paper far from publishable — R&R signals near-readiness
- Leaving self-identifying material that breaks double-blind anonymity
Output format
【Desk-screen check】wide interest / scope / English / competence — any red flags?
【Interest】broad enough to clear the parochialism screen? [Y/N]
【Literature engaged】incl. cross-subfield / cross-national? [Y/N]
【Format】Research Article / Letter / Comment — held to its standard?
【Realistic outcome】reject / R&R / (rare) accept
【Next】bjps-submission (or bjps-rebuttal if decided)Show full SKILL.md (243 more words)Show less
What BJPS referees probe, by tradition
BJPS draws referees from across an international discipline, so a single paper may be read by a comparativist, a formal theorist, and a methodologist at once. Calibrate to whichever lens is decisive, but expect the wide-interest question to be asked by all of them.
| Tradition | The check a BJPS referee runs first | The fix that earns the benefit of the doubt |
|---|---|---|
| Comparative / single-country | Does the case speak to a general mechanism, or stay local? | State what the case is a case of and what travels |
| Observational causal | Is the "causal" word doing more than the design licenses? | State estimand + assumption; sensitivity to a confounder |
| Survey / lab experiment | Is inference randomization-based and pre-registered? | Randomization inference, pre-registered estimand, MDE reported |
| Cross-national quantitative | Do measures mean the same thing across countries? | Report measurement equivalence before pooling |
| Formal / interpretive | Does the argument buy a non-obvious, portable result? | Name the comparative static / the conceptual move it enables |
Calibration anchors (hedged)
- BJPS's premium is wide interest across countries and subfields — a competent but parochial paper is a common desk-screen casualty even when its within-niche execution is sound.
- The journal practises methodological pluralism: a rigorous qualitative, formal, or interpretive paper is not second-class to a regression. Match the inference standard to the design.
- Exact decision-category labels, referee count, and time-to-decision can change — confirm against the journal's current peer-review guidelines before relying on them.
Supplementary resources
../../resources/official-source-map.md— peer-review policy, double-blind model, referee count, decision categories
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Bjps Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bjps Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Arize Evaluatorgithub/awesome-copilot | 40k | 1 repos | ~8.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| LLM Evaluationdavila7/claude-code-templates | 33k | 12 repos | ~3.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Agent Evaluationsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | 47k | 1 repos | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| EvaluatorsArize-ai/phoenix | 12k | — | ~1.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Agent Evaluation Reportingsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | 47k | 1 repos | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
- Official
LLM Evaluation
davila7/claude-code-templates
Master comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications, from automated metrics to human evaluation and A/B testing.
Agent Evaluation
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Evaluate agent behavior with versioned cases and explicit verifiers.
Evaluators
Arize-ai/phoenix
Author or refine a Phoenix evaluator — code or LLM-as-a-judge — that scores a run's output.
Agent Evaluation Reporting
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
A skill your agent uses when summarizing agent evaluations where autonomous, assisted, failed, timed-out, or invalid outcomes must remain distinct and comparable.
- Official
Creating Online Evaluations
PostHog/posthog
Author continuously-running online evaluations in PostHog AI observability, grounded in real failure modes you've identified.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Bjps Review Process
What does Bjps Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses to understand how the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review with at least two referees, the desk screen, decision…. Bjps Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use to understand how the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review with at least two referees, the desk screen, decision categories, and what reviewers are asked to weigh.
When should I use Bjps Review Process?
Bjps Review Process fits situations like: understand how the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review with at least two referees; the desk screen; decision categories; what reviewers are asked to weigh.
How do I install Bjps Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill bjps-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/bjps-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Bjps Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill bjps-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/bjps-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Bjps Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill bjps-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/bjps-review-process, .gemini/skills/bjps-review-process, .github/skills/bjps-review-process and .opencode/skills/bjps-review-process in your project.
What does Bjps Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Bjps Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Bjps Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Bjps Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Bjps Review Process use?
Bjps Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Bjps Review Process use?
About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Bjps Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Bjps Review Process: Arize Evaluator (github/awesome-copilot, 40k stars), LLM Evaluation (davila7/claude-code-templates, 33k stars), Agent Evaluation (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars) and Evaluators (Arize-ai/phoenix, 12k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Bjps Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.