A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence…

MITAuto-check passedWriting & Content

Install Asplos Writing Style

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill asplos-writing-style -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills asplos-writing-style --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ASPLOS-Skills/skills/asplos-writing-style .claude/skills/asplos-writing-style && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
asplos-writing-style
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.7k tokens
SKILL.md length
758 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence…

  • Revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads
  • SKILL.md covers Engineering pages 1-2 as a…, The insight sentence, Structuring the mechanism… and Claim calibration, systems…, plus 6 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence

What it does

Asplos Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and footnotes.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.7k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Writing & Content, covering Brand voice and tone. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads
  • Stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence
  • Structuring per-layer mechanism sections
  • Writing bounded claims

Example prompts

  • “/asplos-writing-style”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Asplos Writing Style loads about 1.7k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 86 tokens; SKILL.md has 758 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~86
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.7k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 758 words, ~1,668 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/asplos-writing-style/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
asplos-writing-style
description
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and footnotes.

ASPLOS Writing Style

Two 2027 mechanics dictate ASPLOS prose (CFP, checked 2026-07-08): the rapid review reads only the first two pages, and the 11-page limit counts all text, figures, tables, and footnotes — references excluded. The first makes pages 1-2 a survival organ; the second makes every figure a budget decision. Style here is mostly resource allocation.

Engineering pages 1-2 as a standalone document

By the bottom of page 2, a screener must hold four things. Audit for them mechanically, in order:

ElementTestCommon failure
Cross-layer problemCan a reader from any of the three communities restate it?A single-community problem with "co-design" sprinkled on
One-sentence insightIs there a sentence a screener could quote in their note?Insight diffused across three paragraphs, or a category ("we co-design X and Y") instead of an idea
Mechanism sketchDoes the reader know what each layer does?Architecture described, software hand-waved (or vice versa)
Headline evidenceResult + platform class (silicon/FPGA/simulator) + baseline named?"Significant improvements on a variety of workloads"

Corollary: background sections, notation, and roadmaps do not belong on pages 1-2. The worked example (../../resources/worked-examples/01-introduction.md) shows a full before → after against exactly this table.

The insight sentence

The load-bearing sentence in an ASPLOS paper names information or capability that crosses a layer boundary: what the hardware knows that the OS needs, what the compiler can prove that the microarchitecture can exploit. Drafting discipline:

text
Weak:   "We propose a hardware/software co-designed approach to memory tiering."
        (names a category and a topic; contains no idea)
Strong: "The contention data the OS needs already passes through the memory
        controller on every access; the fix is a narrow architectural channel,
        not a smarter kernel heuristic."
        (names the information, its current location, and the boundary moved)

If this sentence cannot be written, the problem is usually fit, not prose — return to asplos-topic-selection.

Structuring the mechanism across layers

Give each layer its own subsection with its own contribution statement, then a section for the interface between them — the interface is the paper's actual thesis and deserves first-class treatment (encoding, semantics, virtualization behavior, failure modes). Reviewers from different communities will each read "their" subsection closely; the interface section is where they meet.

Claim calibration, systems dialect

  • Bound claims by construction: "never regresses more than 2% on our non-tiered suite" is a stronger sentence than "negligible overhead."
  • Attach the instrument to the number in the same sentence: "1.18× gmean on real hardware (14 workloads)" vs "up to 3.4× in simulation" are different epistemic objects and must not blend.
  • Write the losing case in the same register as the winning ones. One honestly analyzed regression buys more reviewer trust than a page of wins.

The 11-page budget with figures inside it

Because figures count against the limit, they compete with prose on equal terms:

  • Every figure must either carry a claim or explain the mechanism; delete gallery plots and merge panels that make one point.
  • Prefer one annotated diagram of the boundary/interface over three block diagrams of components — reviewers cite the diagram that explains the idea.
  • Compression order when over budget: cut duplicate-message plots → collapse per-workload bars into summary + appendix grid → tighten mechanism prose → never touch template geometry (mandatory template; violations risk rejection unread).
Show full SKILL.md (283 more words)Show less

House-rule details that mark a native submission

  • References carry every author's full first and last name — no "et al." — with hyperlinked in-text numbers and DOIs per entry; a hygiene-signaling detail reviewers notice early.
  • Third-person self-citation throughout; no "removed for blind review" text.
  • GenAI assistance, if any, disclosed per ACM policy (Acknowledgments, immediately before References).

A load-order for the abstract

Six sentences, in this order, cover what both the rapid screener and the eventual citer need: (1) the friction two layers create today; (2) the insight sentence; (3) the mechanism, one clause per layer; (4) the headline number with instrument and baseline; (5) the bound on the downside; (6) what the interface enables beyond this paper. Most first drafts invert 1 and a background sentence — delete the background sentence; ASPLOS readers do not need to be told memory matters.

Section skeleton that serves three readerships

A cross-layer paper defaults well to: motivation-with-evidence (measured, not asserted — a characterization figure beats three citations); design overview around one boundary diagram; per-layer mechanism sections; the interface section; evaluation ordered by the claim matrix; related work by lanes (asplos-related-work); then discussion of what the boundary change costs. Each community's reviewer should be able to find "their" section from the table of contents alone — a paper organized by implementation chronology instead forces reviewers to reconstruct the design, and annoyed reconstruction reads as "unclear writing" in reviews.

Revision-aware prose

Because Major Revision is a standing outcome, write sentences that can absorb revision without rewiring: quantitative claims phrased with their scope ("across the 14-workload suite") extend gracefully when workloads are added; hard-coded superlatives ("the first", "the fastest") require re-litigation at every resubmission and are the first phrases a shepherd strikes.

Output format

text
[Two-page audit] problem / insight-sentence / mechanism / evidence — each Y/N + fix
[Insight sentence] <quoted verbatim>
[Layer structure] per-layer subsections + interface section present: Y/N
[Claim calibration] unbounded adjectives found: N · instrument attached per number: Y/N
[Figure budget] figures: N · pages consumed: N · deletions/merges proposed
[House rules] citations format / self-cite person / GenAI disclosure — pass/fail

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in ASPLOS-Skills/skills/asplos-writing-style of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Asplos Writing Style next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Asplos Writing Style compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Asplos Writing Style this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Avoid AI Writingconorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing4.9k3 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
BrandOhh-889/skyroc79513 repos~733Automated safety check: PassMIT
Khazix WeChat Article WriterKKKKhazix/khazix-skills21k1 repos~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Writing Guidelinesvercel-labs/agent-skills32k7 repos~309Automated safety check: PassNone
Unslop AI Writing Cleanuptheclaymethod/unslop518—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Avoid AI Writing

    conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing

    Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms").

    4.9k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~8.1k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Brand

    Ohh-889/skyroc

    Brand voice, visual identity, messaging frameworks, asset management, brand consistency.

    795 GitHub starsUsed in 13 repos~733 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Khazix WeChat Article Writer

    KKKKhazix/khazix-skills

    Writes long-form WeChat official account articles in the personal style of the Khazix account, from briefs, links, PDFs or rough notes, with a topic quality check.

    21k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.9k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Writing Guidelines

    vercel-labs/agent-skills

    Official

    Review docs/prose for Writing Guidelines compliance. An agent skill from vercel-labs/agent-skills.

    32k GitHub starsUsed in 7 repos~309 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Unslop AI Writing Cleanup

    theclaymethod/unslop

    Removes AI writing tells from prose through an audit-first flow, routing to a two-pass rewrite, a report-only cleanup, voice teaching or mimicry depending on the sub-command used.

    518 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • UX Writing

    content-designer/ux-writing-skill

    Applies UX writing practice to interface copy such as buttons, errors, forms and onboarding, using four quality standards and accessibility guidance.

    224 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.8k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Asplos Writing Style

What does Asplos Writing Style do?

A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence…. Asplos Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and footnotes.

When should I use Asplos Writing Style?

Asplos Writing Style fits situations like: revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads; stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence; structuring per-layer mechanism sections; writing bounded claims.

How do I install Asplos Writing Style in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill asplos-writing-style -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ASPLOS-Skills/skills/asplos-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/asplos-writing-style in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Asplos Writing Style in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill asplos-writing-style -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ASPLOS-Skills/skills/asplos-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/asplos-writing-style in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Asplos Writing Style in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill asplos-writing-style -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/asplos-writing-style, .gemini/skills/asplos-writing-style, .github/skills/asplos-writing-style and .opencode/skills/asplos-writing-style in your project.

What does Asplos Writing Style need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Asplos Writing Style is instructions for the agent only.

Does Asplos Writing Style access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Asplos Writing Style safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Asplos Writing Style use?

Asplos Writing Style is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Asplos Writing Style use?

About 1.7k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Asplos Writing Style?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Asplos Writing Style: Avoid AI Writing (conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing, 4.9k stars), Brand (Ohh-889/skyroc, 795 stars), Khazix WeChat Article Writer (KKKKhazix/khazix-skills, 21k stars) and Writing Guidelines (vercel-labs/agent-skills, 32k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Asplos Writing Style?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.