New: 98,000+ skills indexed from GitHub repos with 100+ stars · every skill safety-checkedBrowse top skillsTop skills
Esc to closeBrowse all skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills

Agent skill

Asplos Supplementary

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when deciding what goes into an ASPLOS submission's appendices versus the 11 self-contained pages — applying the rule that reviewers are neither required nor encouraged to…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Asplos Supplementary

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill asplos-supplementary -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills asplos-supplementary --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ASPLOS-Skills/skills/asplos-supplementary .claude/skills/asplos-supplementary && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
asplos-supplementary
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.7k tokens
SKILL.md length
819 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when deciding what goes into an ASPLOS submission's appendices versus the 11 self-contained pages — applying the rule that reviewers are neither required nor encouraged to…

  • Works in 3 steps: Strip the supplement itself: author… → Cite it in the body as anonymous… → Include enough of the prior work that a…
  • Using anonymized supplements for unciteable own work
  • SKILL.md covers The reader-contract test, What ASPLOS appendices are…, The anonymized-supplement… and Pointer discipline, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Asplos Supplementary is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding what goes into an ASPLOS submission's appendices versus the 11 self-contained pages — applying the rule that reviewers are neither required nor encouraged to read supplemental material, using anonymized supplements for unciteable own work, and staging content for the revision and artifact phases.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.7k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Using anonymized supplements for unciteable own work
  • Staging content for the revision and artifact phases

Example prompts

  • “/asplos-supplementary”

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Strip the supplement itself: author block, acknowledgments, PDF metadata,
  2. Cite it in the body as anonymous supplemental material, not with a placeholder
  3. Include enough of the prior work that a reviewer can judge the delta — the point

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Asplos Supplementary loads about 1.7k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 84 tokens; SKILL.md has 819 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~84
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.7k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 819 words, ~1,709 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/asplos-supplementary/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
asplos-supplementary
description
Use when deciding what goes into an ASPLOS submission's appendices versus the 11 self-contained pages — applying the rule that reviewers are neither required nor encouraged to read supplemental material, using anonymized supplements for unciteable own work, and staging content for the revision and artifact phases.

ASPLOS Supplementary Material

ASPLOS 2027 lets appendices and supplemental material ride in the submission file with no page limit — under two conditions that define this entire skill: the 11-page body must be self-contained, and reviewers are neither required nor encouraged to read anything past it (CFP, checked 2026-07-08). Supplementary material is therefore not extra space; it is a different medium with a different reader contract.

The reader-contract test

For every block of content, ask: what happens if no reviewer ever reads this?

If unread, the paper...VerdictDestination
...loses a claim's only supportBody — the claim is otherwise unsupportedCompress into the 11 pages or cut the claim
...still stands; the block deepens confidenceLegitimate appendixAppendix, with a forward pointer from the body
...still stands; the block enables re-implementationAppendix or artifactAppendix now; artifact package later
...still stands; nobody would miss itCutNowhere

The self-containment rule has teeth: the CFP frames appendices explicitly as not a way to circumvent the page limit. A proof sketch, key config table, or summary sensitivity plot that a claim depends on belongs inside the 11 pages, however tight that makes them.

What ASPLOS appendices are actually good for

  • Full configuration dumps — simulator configs, kernel settings, tuning values whose summary appears in the evaluation section.
  • Extended result grids — every workload × platform cell, where the body shows the representative subset and states the selection rule.
  • Interface specifications — the full ISA-extension encoding or API surface the body describes functionally.
  • Proof details for any formal claims, with theorem statements kept in-body.
  • Reproduction detail that previews the Artifact Appendix (asplos-artifact-evaluation) without depending on it.

The anonymized-supplement mechanism (ASPLOS-specific)

The 2027 double-blind rules include a mechanism siblings lack: when your own prior or concurrent work cannot be cited in the third person without breaking anonymity — a workshop paper being extended, a related manuscript under review elsewhere — it is uploaded and cited as anonymized supplemental material. Checklist for using it:

  1. Strip the supplement itself: author block, acknowledgments, PDF metadata, repository URLs, venue headers/footers.
  2. Cite it in the body as anonymous supplemental material, not with a placeholder like "removed for review" (the placeholder wording is disallowed).
  3. Include enough of the prior work that a reviewer can judge the delta — the point of the mechanism is to make "how much is new here?" answerable.

Pointer discipline

Every appendix section earns a one-line, promise-shaped pointer in the body:

text
Good: "Appendix B lists the full gem5 configuration; §6.1 states the
       parameters that materially affect the results."
Bad:  "Due to space constraints, details are in the appendix."
       (names no content, admits the body is incomplete)
Bad:  "See Appendix C for why this is safe."
       (a safety argument is claim-support; it must live in the body)

Staging across the cycle

  • Submission: appendices frozen with the body; they share the PDF and the deadline (September 9, 2026 for the live gate).
  • Response window: you may point reviewers to specific appendix content that answers their question — this is the one moment unread appendices get read, and precise pointers (asplos-author-response) are what make it happen.
  • Major Revision: appendix deltas count as part of the revision; log them in the change note like body changes.
  • Camera-ready/AE: decide what migrates from appendix to the archived artifact, where it gains versioning and badges instead of page count.
Show full SKILL.md (324 more words)Show less

Appendix architecture

Unlimited length is not license for a junk drawer. Conventions that keep the appendix navigable for the two audiences who might read it (a response-window reviewer following your pointer, and a future artifact evaluator):

  • One appendix per purpose, lettered and titled by content ("Appendix B: Full gem5 configurations"), never "Additional results."
  • Order by likelihood of being pointed to during the response window: extended results and configurations first, proofs and encodings later.
  • Each appendix opens with a two-line scope note: what it contains and which body section it backs — orphan appendices with no body pointer get cut.
  • Keep appendix figures compilable from the same scripts as body figures; a supplement that contradicts the body (stale plot, different config) is worse than no supplement, because it is the kind of inconsistency that surfaces during revision re-review.

What never belongs in any supplement

  • Content that breaks anonymity (author-identifying configs, lab hostnames, grant boilerplate) — appendices are swept by the same double-blind rules as the body.
  • The only statement of a limitation. Burying a known weakness in an appendix reads as concealment when a reviewer finds it — and one usually does.
  • Results that contradict the body's claims without discussion; if the extended grid shows losing cases, the body's claim must already be scoped to survive them.
  • Anything you are not prepared to defend in the response window — appendices are in the reviewed record even when unread by default.

Interaction with the 11-page budget

The appendix is the pressure-relief valve that makes the figure-inclusive 11-page limit workable — but only content that passes the reader-contract test may flow through it. When asplos-writing-style's compression pass moves a result grid out of the body, the body must retain the summary statistic and the selection rule, so the claim remains supported by in-limit content alone. The test after every move: re-read the body claim and ask whether a reviewer who stops at page 11 still has grounds to believe it.

Output format

text
[Self-containment] claims supported only by appendix content: none / list
[Contract test] blocks re-classified body/appendix/artifact/cut: N moved
[Anonymized supplements] needed for: <own-work items> · stripped + cited correctly: Y/N
[Pointers] promise-shaped, content-naming: Y/N per appendix
[Staging] response-window pointer list drafted · artifact-migration list drafted

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in ASPLOS-Skills/skills/asplos-supplementary of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Asplos Supplementary next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Asplos Supplementary compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Asplos Supplementary this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Colm Supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Icdm Supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Naacl Supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Soda Supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Aaai Supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~852Automated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Colm Supplementary

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when deciding what goes into a COLM paper's appendices and supplementary material versus the strict 9-page main text — verbatim prompts, full evaluation configurations…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Icdm Supplementary

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when organizing supplementary and appendix material for an ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) paper - deciding what belongs in the body, in an appendix that…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Naacl Supplementary

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when deciding what goes into the content pages, the uncounted sections, the appendix, and the optional uploads of a NAACL-bound ARR submission — allocating material by what…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Soda Supplementary

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when organizing the back matter of a SODA (ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms) submission — there is no supplementary channel, so appendix architecture inside the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed

  • Aaai Supplementary

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when organizing AAAI supplementary material, including the technical appendix, multimedia appendix, and code/data ZIPs, while respecting that AAAI supplements are due with…

    1.2k GitHub stars~852 tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Acl Supplementary

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when organizing appendices and supplementary material for an ACL paper under ACL Rolling Review, covering the mandatory Limitations and optional ethics sections, appendices…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo

  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Asplos Supplementary

What does Asplos Supplementary do?

A skill your agent uses when deciding what goes into an ASPLOS submission's appendices versus the 11 self-contained pages — applying the rule that reviewers are neither required nor encouraged to…. Asplos Supplementary is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding what goes into an ASPLOS submission's appendices versus the 11 self-contained pages — applying the rule that reviewers are neither required nor encouraged to read supplemental material, using anonymized supplements for unciteable own work, and staging content for the revision and artifact phases.

When should I use Asplos Supplementary?

Asplos Supplementary fits situations like: using anonymized supplements for unciteable own work; staging content for the revision and artifact phases.

How do I install Asplos Supplementary in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill asplos-supplementary -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ASPLOS-Skills/skills/asplos-supplementary in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/asplos-supplementary in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Asplos Supplementary in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill asplos-supplementary -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ASPLOS-Skills/skills/asplos-supplementary in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/asplos-supplementary in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Asplos Supplementary in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill asplos-supplementary -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/asplos-supplementary, .gemini/skills/asplos-supplementary, .github/skills/asplos-supplementary and .opencode/skills/asplos-supplementary in your project.

What does Asplos Supplementary need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Asplos Supplementary is instructions for the agent only.

Does Asplos Supplementary access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Asplos Supplementary safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Asplos Supplementary use?

Asplos Supplementary is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Asplos Supplementary use?

About 1.7k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Asplos Supplementary?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Asplos Supplementary: Colm Supplementary (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars), Icdm Supplementary (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars), Naacl Supplementary (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars) and Soda Supplementary (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Asplos Supplementary?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.