Autom Automation
ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills
Automate Autom tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). An agent skill from ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills.
A skill your agent uses when drafting ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) author responses, covering the double-anonymous rebuttal that must first survive the early-rejection gate and —…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Ase Author Response
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ase-author-response -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ase-author-response --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response .claude/skills/ase-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "ase-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response into .claude/skills/ase-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ase-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-responseType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ase-author-response -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ase-author-response --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response .agents/skills/ase-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "ase-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response into .agents/skills/ase-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ase-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ase-author-response -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ase-author-response --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response .cursor/skills/ase-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "ase-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response into .cursor/skills/ase-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ase-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ase-author-response -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ase-author-response --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response .gemini/skills/ase-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ase-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response into .gemini/skills/ase-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ase-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ase-author-responseInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ase-author-response -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response .github/skills/ase-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ase-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response into .github/skills/ase-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ase-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ase-author-response -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ase-author-response --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response .opencode/skills/ase-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ase-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response into .opencode/skills/ase-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ase-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
ase-author-response- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.4k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 604 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when drafting ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) author responses, covering the double-anonymous rebuttal that must first survive the early-rejection gate and —…
- Drafting ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) author responses
- SKILL.md covers Triage (both turns), Turn 1 — the rebuttal (only if…, Turn 2 — the revision… and Reviewer pushback patterns…, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Ase Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) author responses, covering the double-anonymous rebuttal that must first survive the early-rejection gate and — distinctively — the criteria-bound revision-round summary-of-changes that maps every stated revision criterion to a concrete change and is re-checked against those criteria.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Drafting ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) author responses
Example prompts
- “/ase-author-response”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Ase Author Response loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 92 tokens; SKILL.md has 604 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 604 words, ~1,402 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/ase-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- ase-author-response
- description
- Use when drafting ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) author responses, covering the double-anonymous rebuttal that must first survive the early-rejection gate and — distinctively — the criteria-bound revision-round summary-of-changes that maps every stated revision criterion to a concrete change and is re-checked against those criteria.
ASE Author Response
Use this after ASE reviews are released. ASE has two distinct speaking turns, and conflating them is a common mistake: a short rebuttal (for papers that survive the early-rejection gate), and — if you receive a Revision — a summary-of-changes accompanying a revised paper that is re-checked against the reviewers' explicitly stated criteria. Both must respect double-anonymity: no author names, institutions, or revealed repository ownership, even to strengthen a point.
Triage (both turns)
- Answer what affects the decision: significance and soundness of the automation, evaluation quality on real subjects, threats to validity, clarity, and the Data Availability / artifact posture.
- Use evidence that already exists or that the revision will concretely add — never a vague promise.
- Correct factual misreadings first; a reviewer who misread your tool's configuration or a table is often persuadable.
- Keep every word anonymous. Do not name your tool's real name, institution, grant, or a private repository.
Turn 1 — the rebuttal (only if you survived early rejection)
If your paper reached the rebuttal stage, at least one reviewer saw value; a uniformly negative set would have been early-rejected. So the rebuttal's job is narrow: move the borderline reviewer.
- Short and decision-focused. One decision-critical point per reviewer beats an exhaustive reply.
- Concede what is true, correct what is misread, and point to exactly where the answer lives in the submitted paper or artifact.
- Do not paste large new results the reviewers cannot verify; if a small, checkable number answers a direct question ("what is the runtime overhead?"), give it.
- Signal what you would do in a revision, because Revision is a live outcome — but do not promise a redesign you cannot deliver in the window.
Turn 2 — the revision summary-of-changes (the distinctive ASE move)
A Revision is criteria-bound: the reviewers wrote concrete, actionable criteria and agreed to accept in principle if they are met. The summary-of-changes is a criterion ledger: for every stated criterion, either meet it and show where, or explain precisely why it is infeasible and what you did instead.
[C1] Criterion (quoted): "Add a comparison against tool X on the same subjects."
-> Action: DONE | added §5.3, Table 4: X run with an equal, documented budget on all 90 subjects
-> Where: §5.3, Table 4; artifact/eval/compare_X.sh
[C2] Criterion: "Report an ablation isolating the learned component."
-> Action: DONE | §5.4, Table 5 replaces learned templates with static rewrites
[C3] Criterion: "Evaluate on an industrial code base."
-> Action: INFEASIBLE (with reason) | no license to redistribute proprietary subjects; added
an open large-scale subject instead (§5.5) and noted the residual external-validity threatThe rule that turns a Revision into an acceptance: address every criterion. A criterion that is neither met nor explicitly and reasonably addressed is what the re-check punishes — the discussion lead maps your summary-of-changes back onto the criteria one by one.
Show full SKILL.md (229 more words)Show less
Reviewer pushback patterns (automated-SE flavored)
| Pushback | What it signals | ASE-ready response |
|---|---|---|
| "The baseline tool is not tuned/fair" | Soundness doubt about the comparison | Re-run with an equal, documented budget; report new numbers, or justify the setup |
| "Evaluated only on toy or self-selected subjects" | External-validity limit | Add real subject systems, or scope the claim and name the threat |
| "The improvement is the model, not your design" | Model-as-contribution doubt | Add the ablation isolating the automation from the model; report marginal value |
| "The tool/artifact does not run" | Reproducibility / availability gap | Fix and re-anonymize; describe the run path and re-execution oracle in the response |
| "Overlaps prior automation X" | Novelty/delta doubt | Sharpen the delta sentence; add the missing head-to-head comparison |
Anonymity in the response (easy to slip)
- Refer to your own prior work in the third person, as in the paper.
- Describe tool/artifact changes without linking to an identity-revealing repository; use the anonymized location.
- Do not thank a named collaborator or funder inside the response or the summary-of-changes.
Calibration
- Respond to the criterion the reviewer actually raised, not the one you would rather defend.
- Length and format norms for both turns vary by cycle; confirm the current instructions before sending.
- The PC discussion (and, for a Revision, the re-check against the stated criteria) decides; write the response as evidence for an advocate, and make the revised paper — not the letter — carry the argument.
Output format
[Turn] rebuttal / revision summary-of-changes
[Priority issue] <reviewer concern or stated criterion>
[Decision dimension] significance / soundness / evaluation / threats / clarity / data-availability
[Criterion ledger] <criterion -> DONE/PARTIAL/INFEASIBLE + where in paper/artifact>
[Anonymity check] <no identity leak in the response: passed/issues>© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Ase Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ase Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Autom AutomationComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills | 77k | 3 repos | ~723 | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Doppler Marketing Automation AutomationComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills | 77k | 3 repos | ~809 | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Suggest Automationsn8n-io/n8n | 207k | — | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Responsive Unitsthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist | 74k | — | ~472 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Aero Workflow AutomationComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills | 77k | 3 repos | ~753 | Automated safety check: Pass | None |
Similar skills
Doppler Marketing Automation Automation
ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills
Automate Doppler Marketing Automation tasks via Rube MCP (Composio).
- Official
Suggest Automations
n8n-io/n8n
Offer the three most common automations for a user as a single-choice card, from your own knowledge of their team and their apps, then build the one they choose once they confirm, or offer more.
Responsive Units
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
A skill your agent uses when reviewing stylesheets, component styles, and responsive behavior related to Use relative units for responsive layouts.
Aero Workflow Automation
ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills
Automate Aero Workflow tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). An agent skill from ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills.
Anchor Browser Automation
ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills
Automate Anchor Browser tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). An agent skill from ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Ase Author Response
What does Ase Author Response do?
A skill your agent uses when drafting ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) author responses, covering the double-anonymous rebuttal that must first survive the early-rejection gate and —…. Ase Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) author responses, covering the double-anonymous rebuttal that must first survive the early-rejection gate and — distinctively — the criteria-bound revision-round summary-of-changes that maps every stated revision criterion to a concrete change and is re-checked against those criteria.
When should I use Ase Author Response?
Ase Author Response fits situations like: drafting ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) author responses.
How do I install Ase Author Response in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ase-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/ase-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Ase Author Response in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ase-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ASE-Skills/skills/ase-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/ase-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Ase Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ase-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ase-author-response, .gemini/skills/ase-author-response, .github/skills/ase-author-response and .opencode/skills/ase-author-response in your project.
What does Ase Author Response need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ase Author Response is instructions for the agent only.
Does Ase Author Response access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Ase Author Response safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Ase Author Response use?
Ase Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Ase Author Response use?
About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Ase Author Response?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ase Author Response: Autom Automation (ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills, 77k stars), Doppler Marketing Automation Automation (ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills, 77k stars), Suggest Automations (n8n-io/n8n, 207k stars) and Responsive Units (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Ase Author Response?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.