A skill your agent uses when drafting or polishing prose for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review so it lands the authoritative-yet-accessible house voice for a broad psychology readership.

MITAuto-check passedWriting & Content

Install Arpsych Writing Style

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-writing-style -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arpsych-writing-style --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-writing-style .claude/skills/arpsych-writing-style && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
arpsych-writing-style
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.2k tokens
SKILL.md length
534 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when drafting or polishing prose for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review so it lands the authoritative-yet-accessible house voice for a broad psychology readership.

  • Works in 5 steps: Hooks with why this topic matters now to… → Frames the organizing question (not the… → States the spine — "We organize this… → …
  • Tasks that involve Brand voice and tone
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, What the ARPsych voice is, Write the abstract and… and The future-directions close…, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Arpsych Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting or polishing prose for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review so it lands the authoritative-yet-accessible house voice for a broad psychology readership. Shapes voice, abstract, and intro; it does not design the spine (arpsych-organizing-framework) or run final checks (arpsych-submission).

Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Writing & Content, covering Brand voice and tone. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Brand voice and tone

Example prompts

  • “/arpsych-writing-style”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Hooks with why this topic matters now to a broad readership.
  2. Frames the organizing question (not the topic label).
  3. States the spine — "We organize this literature around …".
  4. Previews the contribution — what the reader will understand differently after.
  5. Closes by foreshadowing the future-directions agenda.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Arpsych Writing Style loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 85 tokens; SKILL.md has 534 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~85
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 534 words, ~1,201 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/arpsych-writing-style/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
arpsych-writing-style
description
Use when drafting or polishing prose for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review so it lands the authoritative-yet-accessible house voice for a broad psychology readership. Shapes voice, abstract, and intro; it does not design the spine (arpsych-organizing-framework) or run final checks (arpsych-submission).

Writing Style — The ARPsych Voice (arpsych-writing-style)

When to trigger

  • The framework, balance, and exhibits are settled; it is time to write (or rewrite) prose
  • A draft is technically correct but reads like a grant report or a primary-paper method section
  • The abstract and introduction need to be written (do these last)
  • A non-specialist test reader gets lost in jargon or cannot find the argument

What the ARPsych voice is

ARPsych reviews are read across all of psychology and by adjacent fields. The register is authoritative but accessible: written by a leading expert, readable by a smart psychologist outside the subfield, and usable in a graduate seminar. The two failure poles are (1) a dense specialist treatise only insiders can parse, and (2) a chatty overview with no analytical edge. Aim between them: deep but legible.

PrincipleIn practice
Argument forwardEvery section advances the spine; the reader always knows where they are in the framework
Define on first useSpell out constructs, paradigms, and acronyms for the adjacent reader
Show the mechanismExplain why an effect occurs, not just that N studies found it
Synthesize, don't listDiscuss cell-defining work; cluster confirmatory studies in citations
Calibrated confidence"Robust", "mixed", "contested", "unknown" used precisely (ties to balance)
Active, concrete prosePrefer plain verbs over nominalizations; one idea per sentence

Write the abstract and introduction LAST

The introduction must promise exactly what the review delivers — so write it once the spine is final. A strong ARPsych intro:

  1. Hooks with why this topic matters now to a broad readership.
  2. Frames the organizing question (not the topic label).
  3. States the spine — "We organize this literature around …".
  4. Previews the contribution — what the reader will understand differently after.
  5. Closes by foreshadowing the future-directions agenda.

The abstract is the most-read paragraph: organizing question, the framework, the headline synthesis, and the open agenda — no method-section throat-clearing.

Show full SKILL.md (221 more words)Show less

The future-directions close (do not skip it)

ARPsych reviews are expected to end by pointing forward: the open questions, the methodological needs, the contradictions awaiting resolution — ideally the empty cells of your framework (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). This section is a large part of why the field reads the review; it is not a perfunctory wrap-up.

One voice for multi-author reviews

A co-authored review must read as one author. Assign a single integrator to do a unifying pass; differing section voices are a common reviewer complaint.

Checklist

  • Every section visibly advances the framework (no orphan sections)
  • Constructs/paradigms/acronyms defined on first use for the adjacent reader
  • Mechanisms explained, not just effects tallied
  • Confidence language calibrated (robust/mixed/contested/unknown used precisely)
  • Abstract + introduction written last; intro states the organizing question and spine
  • Future-directions section is substantive and tied to the framework's open cells
  • A non-specialist psychologist test-reader can follow it end to end
  • Multi-author draft passed through one integrating voice

Anti-patterns

  • Primary-paper register: long methods-style passages, no synthesis
  • Jargon dump with undefined acronyms (loses the adjacent reader)
  • "Study A found… Study B found…" narration with no argument (the list trap)
  • A perfunctory or missing future-directions section
  • Overclaiming ("X is established") where the evidence is contested
  • A co-authored review that reads as stitched-together sections
  • Writing the intro first, then drifting from it as the spine changes

Output format

text
【Voice】authoritative + accessible; passes non-specialist read? Y/N
【Argument-forward】every section advances the spine? Y/N
【Definitions】constructs/acronyms defined on first use? Y/N
【Confidence calibration】robust/mixed/contested/unknown precise? Y/N
【Abstract + intro】written last; state organizing question + spine? Y/N
【Future directions】substantive, tied to framework's open cells? Y/N
【One voice】multi-author integrated? (N/A if single author)
【Next step】→ arpsych-transparency-and-reproducibility (document search / meta-analysis)

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-writing-style of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Arpsych Writing Style next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Arpsych Writing Style compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Arpsych Writing Style this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Avoid AI Writingconorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing4.9k3 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
BrandOhh-889/skyroc79513 repos~733Automated safety check: PassMIT
Khazix WeChat Article WriterKKKKhazix/khazix-skills21k1 repos~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Writing Guidelinesvercel-labs/agent-skills32k7 repos~309Automated safety check: PassNone
Unslop AI Writing Cleanuptheclaymethod/unslop518—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Avoid AI Writing

    conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing

    Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms").

    4.9k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~8.1k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Brand

    Ohh-889/skyroc

    Brand voice, visual identity, messaging frameworks, asset management, brand consistency.

    795 GitHub starsUsed in 13 repos~733 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Khazix WeChat Article Writer

    KKKKhazix/khazix-skills

    Writes long-form WeChat official account articles in the personal style of the Khazix account, from briefs, links, PDFs or rough notes, with a topic quality check.

    21k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.9k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Writing Guidelines

    vercel-labs/agent-skills

    Official

    Review docs/prose for Writing Guidelines compliance. An agent skill from vercel-labs/agent-skills.

    32k GitHub starsUsed in 7 repos~309 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Unslop AI Writing Cleanup

    theclaymethod/unslop

    Removes AI writing tells from prose through an audit-first flow, routing to a two-pass rewrite, a report-only cleanup, voice teaching or mimicry depending on the sub-command used.

    518 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • UX Writing

    content-designer/ux-writing-skill

    Applies UX writing practice to interface copy such as buttons, errors, forms and onboarding, using four quality standards and accessibility guidance.

    224 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.8k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Arpsych Writing Style

What does Arpsych Writing Style do?

A skill your agent uses when drafting or polishing prose for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review so it lands the authoritative-yet-accessible house voice for a broad psychology readership. Arpsych Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting or polishing prose for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review so it lands the authoritative-yet-accessible house voice for a broad psychology readership.

When should I use Arpsych Writing Style?

Arpsych Writing Style fits situations like: tasks that involve Brand voice and tone.

How do I install Arpsych Writing Style in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-writing-style -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/arpsych-writing-style in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Arpsych Writing Style in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-writing-style -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/arpsych-writing-style in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Arpsych Writing Style in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-writing-style -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/arpsych-writing-style, .gemini/skills/arpsych-writing-style, .github/skills/arpsych-writing-style and .opencode/skills/arpsych-writing-style in your project.

What does Arpsych Writing Style need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Arpsych Writing Style is instructions for the agent only.

Does Arpsych Writing Style access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Arpsych Writing Style safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Arpsych Writing Style use?

Arpsych Writing Style is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Arpsych Writing Style use?

About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Arpsych Writing Style?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Arpsych Writing Style: Avoid AI Writing (conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing, 4.9k stars), Brand (Ohh-889/skyroc, 795 stars), Khazix WeChat Article Writer (KKKKhazix/khazix-skills, 21k stars) and Writing Guidelines (vercel-labs/agent-skills, 32k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Arpsych Writing Style?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.