Hypothesis Generation
spacering-net/codeg
Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. An agent skill from spacering-net/codeg.
A skill your agent uses when deciding which arpsych- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing an invited review article from topic through revision for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych)…
Install Arpsych Workflow
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-workflow -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arpsych-workflow --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow .claude/skills/arpsych-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "arpsych-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow into .claude/skills/arpsych-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arpsych-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflowType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-workflow -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arpsych-workflow --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow .agents/skills/arpsych-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "arpsych-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow into .agents/skills/arpsych-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arpsych-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-workflow -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arpsych-workflow --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow .cursor/skills/arpsych-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "arpsych-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow into .cursor/skills/arpsych-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arpsych-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-workflow -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arpsych-workflow --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow .gemini/skills/arpsych-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "arpsych-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow into .gemini/skills/arpsych-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arpsych-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arpsych-workflowInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-workflow -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow .github/skills/arpsych-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "arpsych-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow into .github/skills/arpsych-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arpsych-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-workflow -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arpsych-workflow --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow .opencode/skills/arpsych-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "arpsych-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow into .opencode/skills/arpsych-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arpsych-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
arpsych-workflow- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.8k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 756 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when deciding which arpsych- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing an invited review article from topic through revision for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych)…
- Works in 11 steps: arpsych-topic-selection — confirm the… → arpsych-proposal-and-commissioning — get… → arpsych-literature-synthesis — gather… → …
- Deciding which arpsych- sub-skill to invoke next
- SKILL.md covers Overview, When to trigger, Routing table and Default order, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Arpsych Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding which arpsych- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing an invited review article from topic through revision for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Deciding which arpsych- sub-skill to invoke next
- Sequencing an invited review article from topic through revision for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) manuscript
Example prompts
- “/arpsych-workflow”
Workflow steps
11 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- arpsych-topic-selection — confirm the topic is ARPsych-scale (mature, important, needs synthesis)
- arpsych-proposal-and-commissioning — get the topic to the Committee / shape the accepted invitation
- arpsych-literature-synthesis — gather and read the literature systematically
- arpsych-organizing-framework — impose the analytical spine
- arpsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance — even-handed coverage across labs and paradigms
- arpsych-tables-figures — summary tables and the conceptual figure
- arpsych-writing-style — the authoritative-yet-accessible ARPsych voice (abstract + intro last)
- arpsych-transparency-and-reproducibility — document the search; make any meta-analysis reproducible
- arpsych-editor-strategy — scope and the Editor/production relationship
- arpsych-submission — Annual Reviews delivery preflight
- arpsych-revision — after the editor/peer-review letter
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Arpsych Workflow loads about 1.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 65 tokens; SKILL.md has 756 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 756 words, ~1,842 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/arpsych-workflow/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- arpsych-workflow
- description
- Use when deciding which arpsych-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing an invited review article from topic through revision for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
ARPsych Workflow Router (arpsych-workflow)
Overview
This is the router. It tells you which arpsych- skill to use at the current stage* of an invited review article aimed at the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) — the Annual Reviews (nonprofit) survey series for psychology, founded 1950, published as an annual volume, and edited by Susan T. Fiske (检索于 2026-06；editor since 2000；以官网为准). It is among the highest-impact journals in the field (检索于 2026-06；JIF ~29.4 in 2024, ranked #1 in Psychology；以官网为准). ARPsych does not publish original empirical studies. It publishes authoritative, accessible review articles that synthesize a topic — across cognitive, social, developmental, clinical, biological/neuro, I-O, and methods psychology — for the whole field and adjacent disciplines. So the lifecycle is not "design → run → analyze → defend"; it is find a synthesis-worthy topic → get on the Editorial Committee's commission list → read the whole literature → impose an organizing framework → cover it even-handedly → land the ARPsych voice → handle production → revise.
Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as ARPsych and the artefact as an invited review, not a primary-research paper. Operational tells that you are at ARPsych and not a sibling: the work reviews other people's findings rather than reporting its own studies; unsolicited manuscripts are not accepted — the Editorial Committee plans each volume and invites authors (you may suggest a topic, but you cannot self-submit a finished paper) (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准); there is no study of your own to power or preregister (you appraise the studies you cover); the contribution is an analytical map of a literature, not a new effect. If the user has original data, they want a primary outlet (a Psychological Science, a JPSP, a specialty journal) — say so. If they have a stand-alone meta-analysis or a self-submitted review, that is Psychological Bulletin, not ARPsych.
When to trigger
- The user asks "what should I do next?" on an invited review
- A review draft reads like an annotated bibliography and needs a spine
- Work is ping-ponging between coverage, framing, balance, and the invitation
- An ARPsych production/peer-review letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode
Routing table
| Current symptom | Next skill |
|---|---|
| Unsure the topic is mature/important enough to review for ARPsych | arpsych-topic-selection |
| Need to get a topic to the Editorial Committee / respond to an invitation | arpsych-proposal-and-commissioning |
| Reading is unsystematic; coverage gaps likely | arpsych-literature-synthesis |
| Draft is a list of studies, not an argument about the literature | arpsych-organizing-framework |
| Coverage feels lopsided, lab-centric, or self-promotional | arpsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance |
| Need a who-found-what table or a conceptual framework figure | arpsych-tables-figures |
| Prose is dense/jargon-laden; an adjacent psychologist can't follow | arpsych-writing-style |
| The review includes a meta-analysis or systematic search to document | arpsych-transparency-and-reproducibility |
| Working with the Editor / production editor on scope and timeline | arpsych-editor-strategy |
| Ready to deliver the commissioned draft; need a preflight | arpsych-submission |
| Received an editor/peer review on the delivered review | arpsych-revision |
Show full SKILL.md (295 more words)Show less
Default order
arpsych-topic-selection— confirm the topic is ARPsych-scale (mature, important, needs synthesis)arpsych-proposal-and-commissioning— get the topic to the Committee / shape the accepted invitationarpsych-literature-synthesis— gather and read the literature systematicallyarpsych-organizing-framework— impose the analytical spinearpsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance— even-handed coverage across labs and paradigmsarpsych-tables-figures— summary tables and the conceptual figurearpsych-writing-style— the authoritative-yet-accessible ARPsych voice (abstract + intro last)arpsych-transparency-and-reproducibility— document the search; make any meta-analysis reproduciblearpsych-editor-strategy— scope and the Editor/production relationshiparpsych-submission— Annual Reviews delivery preflightarpsych-revision— after the editor/peer-review letter
arpsych-writing-styleis a late-stage polish; do not rewrite the intro before the framework and balance settle. The invitation comes early — ARPsych is commissioning-first, soarpsych-proposal-and-commissioningprecedes the heavy reading and an agreed length lands before drafting.
Anti-patterns
- Treating ARPsych as a journal you submit to cold — it is invitation-driven; unsolicited manuscripts are not accepted (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准)
- Treating the review as an annotated bibliography (no framework) — the cardinal review-article failure
- Centering the review on the author's own lab and citing oneself disproportionately (self-promotion)
- Importing primary-research instincts: there is no "preregistration" or "power analysis" of your own — you appraise others' designs
- Confusing ARPsych with Psychological Bulletin (submitted reviews/meta-analyses), Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (the clinical sister), or Perspectives on Psychological Science (shorter, opinionated essays)
Routing by review archetype
A "review" is not one thing; the bottleneck differs by type. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link.
| Archetype | Likely first bottleneck | Enter at |
|---|---|---|
| field-defining synthesis (broad subfield) | scope is enormous; needs a taxonomy | arpsych-organizing-framework |
| construct/theory review (one idea across paradigms) | accessibility + balance across rival accounts | arpsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance |
| quantitative stocktake (meta-analysis embedded) | reproducible search + effect synthesis | arpsych-transparency-and-reproducibility |
| emerging-area review (young, fast-moving) | is it mature enough for an ARPsych volume yet? | arpsych-topic-selection |
Minimal decision snippet
if editor_or_review_letter: -> arpsych-revision
elif ready_to_deliver_draft: -> arpsych-submission
elif scope_or_timeline_with_editor: -> arpsych-editor-strategy
elif meta_analysis_or_search_to_doc: -> arpsych-transparency-and-reproducibility
elif prose_dense_or_inaccessible: -> arpsych-writing-style
elif need_tables_or_figures: -> arpsych-tables-figures
elif coverage_lopsided_or_selfpromo: -> arpsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance
elif reads_like_a_list: -> arpsych-organizing-framework
elif reading_unsystematic: -> arpsych-literature-synthesis
elif no_invitation_yet: -> arpsych-proposal-and-commissioning
else: -> arpsych-topic-selection© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Arpsych Workflow next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arpsych Workflow this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Hypothesis Generationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 14 repos | ~3.6k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| GitHub Deep Researchbytedance/deer-flow | 84k | 4 repos | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills | 47k | 2 repos | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Content Research Writerweapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss | 1.9k | 25 repos | ~3.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Last30daysmvanhorn/last30days-skill | 64k | — | ~7.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
GitHub Deep Research
bytedance/deer-flow
Researches a GitHub repository over four rounds using the GitHub API and web search, then writes a structured markdown report with timeline, metrics and Mermaid diagrams.
Nature Paper Card
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.
Content Research Writer
weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section.
Last30days
mvanhorn/last30days-skill
Research what people actually say about any topic in the last 30 days.
Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Arpsych Workflow
What does Arpsych Workflow do?
A skill your agent uses when deciding which arpsych- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing an invited review article from topic through revision for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych)…. Arpsych Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding which arpsych- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing an invited review article from topic through revision for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) manuscript.
When should I use Arpsych Workflow?
Arpsych Workflow fits situations like: deciding which arpsych- sub-skill to invoke next; sequencing an invited review article from topic through revision for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) manuscript.
How do I install Arpsych Workflow in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-workflow -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/arpsych-workflow in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Arpsych Workflow in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-workflow -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/arpsych-workflow in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Arpsych Workflow in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-workflow -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/arpsych-workflow, .gemini/skills/arpsych-workflow, .github/skills/arpsych-workflow and .opencode/skills/arpsych-workflow in your project.
What does Arpsych Workflow need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Arpsych Workflow is instructions for the agent only.
Does Arpsych Workflow access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Arpsych Workflow safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Arpsych Workflow use?
Arpsych Workflow is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Arpsych Workflow use?
About 1.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Arpsych Workflow?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Arpsych Workflow: Hypothesis Generation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), GitHub Deep Research (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars), Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars) and Content Research Writer (weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss, 1.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Arpsych Workflow?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.