Editorial Policy
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
A skill your agent uses when auditing a blog, news site, or YMYL content site for trust signals, drafting editorial policy page content, or evaluating whether a site meets Google's quality rater…
A skill your agent uses when calibrating expectations for the Annual Review of Economics (ARE) Editorial Committee review cycle on an invited article — what happens after delivery, who reviews, the…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Arecon Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arecon-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process .claude/skills/arecon-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "arecon-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process into .claude/skills/arecon-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arecon-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arecon-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process .agents/skills/arecon-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "arecon-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process into .agents/skills/arecon-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arecon-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arecon-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process .cursor/skills/arecon-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "arecon-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process into .cursor/skills/arecon-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arecon-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arecon-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process .gemini/skills/arecon-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "arecon-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process into .gemini/skills/arecon-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arecon-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arecon-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process .github/skills/arecon-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "arecon-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process into .github/skills/arecon-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arecon-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arecon-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process .opencode/skills/arecon-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "arecon-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process into .opencode/skills/arecon-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arecon-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
arecon-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.2k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 508 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when calibrating expectations for the Annual Review of Economics (ARE) Editorial Committee review cycle on an invited article — what happens after delivery, who reviews, the…
- The accuracy/rigor/balance bar
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How an invited ARE review is…, Timeline reality and What referees push on (and how…, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- The annual-volume timeline
What it does
Arecon Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when calibrating expectations for the Annual Review of Economics (ARE) Editorial Committee review cycle on an invited article — what happens after delivery, who reviews, the accuracy/rigor/balance bar, and the annual-volume timeline. Sets expectations; it does not run the delivery preflight (arecon-submission) or draft the response letter (arecon-revision).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- The accuracy/rigor/balance bar
- The annual-volume timeline
Example prompts
- “/arecon-review-process”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Arecon Review Process loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 96 tokens; SKILL.md has 508 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 508 words, ~1,202 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/arecon-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- arecon-review-process
- description
- Use when calibrating expectations for the Annual Review of Economics (ARE) Editorial Committee review cycle on an invited article — what happens after delivery, who reviews, the accuracy/rigor/balance bar, and the annual-volume timeline. Sets expectations; it does not run the delivery preflight (arecon-submission) or draft the response letter (arecon-revision).
Review Process — What to Expect (arecon-review-process)
When to trigger
- The commissioned draft is delivered and you want to know what happens next
- You are unsure whether an invited review is auto-accepted (it is not) and what it is judged on
- You need to plan around the annual-volume production schedule
- A coauthor expects journal-style turnaround and you must reset that to the Committee cadence
How an invited ARE review is evaluated
Being invited gets your draft reviewed, not accepted. After delivery, the Editorial Committee assesses the manuscript for accuracy, rigor, and balance, and may route it to another Committee member or an external expert as appropriate (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). The bar is the review-article bar, not the primary-research bar:
| Stage | What happens | What it tests |
|---|---|---|
| Commissioning | Committee invites the topic/author; scope is set | fit, author standing, ARE-shaped topic |
| Delivery | author submits the invited draft in the commissioned workflow | completeness, format, declarations |
| Committee/expert review | a Committee member and/or external referee read it | accuracy, rigor, balance, accessibility, coverage |
| Revision | author addresses comments (see arecon-revision) | gaps closed; fairness restored; spine sharpened |
| Production | production editor copyedits, sets figures, applies house style | format, references, figure quality |
| Volume publication | article appears in the annual volume (open access under S2O) | — |
Special-case integrity: if a Committee member is the author, they do not participate in reviewing their own article, which is handled by another member or external expert under the same policies (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
Timeline reality
ARE runs on an annual cadence: one volume per year with fixed production deadlines (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). This differs sharply from a rolling journal — there is no continuous queue, and a draft that misses a volume's production window can slip to the next volume. Treat the production editor's schedule as the binding constraint and plan revision time backward from it. Do not assume journal-style "decision in N months"; confirm the specific volume timeline with the editor.
Show full SKILL.md (197 more words)Show less
What referees push on (and how to pre-empt)
Because ARE referees judge the review as a review, the predictable pushbacks are upstream-preventable:
- "You omit literature X." →
arecon-literature-synthesissaturation log; close the gap before delivery. - "This slights school Z / over-cites the author." →
arecon-evidence-standardsbalance + self-citation audit. - "This reads like an annotated bibliography." →
arecon-organizing-framework; make the spine explicit. - "A non-specialist can't follow Section 4." →
arecon-writing-style; intuition-first. - "You mischaracterize study W." → fix precisely; the reviewed author may be the referee.
Checklist
- Team understands invitation ≠ acceptance; the draft is reviewed for accuracy/rigor/balance
- Expectations set to the annual-volume cadence, not journal rolling turnaround
- Production deadline obtained; revision time planned backward from it
- The five predictable referee pushbacks pre-empted upstream before delivery
- Any author–Committee conflict-of-interest handled per Annual Reviews policy
- Volatile timeline/process re-confirmed with the editor / on the author pages
Anti-patterns
- Assuming an invited review is rubber-stamped — it is refereed for rigor and balance
- Expecting rolling-journal turnaround instead of an annual production schedule
- Discovering a coverage or balance problem at review that the saturation log would have caught
- Missing the volume production window and slipping a full year
- Quoting a specific decision timeline from memory rather than confirming the volume schedule
Output format
【Stage】commissioning / delivery / Committee-review / revision / production
【Bar】judged on accuracy + rigor + balance + accessibility + coverage? confirmed
【Cadence】annual volume; production deadline obtained? Y/N · 待核实
【Pre-empted pushbacks】coverage / balance / framework / accessibility / appraisal — checked? Y/N
【COI】author–Committee conflicts handled per policy? Y/N
【Next step】→ arecon-revision (after the comments) → arecon-submission (re-deliver)© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Arecon Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arecon Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Editorial Policythedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist | 74k | — | ~763 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Editorial Designsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | 47k | 1 repos | ~2.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Expectmillionco/expect | 3.6k | — | ~988 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| CLI Anything CalibreHKUDS/CLI-Anything | 52k | — | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | |
| After Hours Editorial Templatenexu-io/open-design | 100k | — | ~607 | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 |
Similar skills
Editorial Design
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Web and App implementation guide for Editorial Design. An agent skill from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills.
Expect
millionco/expect
A skill your agent uses when editing .tsx/.jsx/.css/.html, React components, pages, routes, forms, styles, or layouts.
CLI Anything Calibre
HKUDS/CLI-Anything
Command-line interface for Calibre - A stateful CLI harness for e-book library management, metadata editing, and format conversion wrapping the real Calibre tools (calibredb, ebook-convert…
After Hours Editorial Template
nexu-io/open-design
Luxury dark-editorial HyperFrames template for three-page cinematic storyboards, inspired by haute couture title cards and magazine chapter spreads.
Editorial
bergside/awesome-design-skills
Magazine-inspired editorial layout with refined serif typography, structured grids, and elegant reading experiences.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Arecon Review Process
What does Arecon Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when calibrating expectations for the Annual Review of Economics (ARE) Editorial Committee review cycle on an invited article — what happens after delivery, who reviews, the…. Arecon Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when calibrating expectations for the Annual Review of Economics (ARE) Editorial Committee review cycle on an invited article — what happens after delivery, who reviews, the accuracy/rigor/balance bar, and the annual-volume timeline.
When should I use Arecon Review Process?
Arecon Review Process fits situations like: the accuracy/rigor/balance bar; the annual-volume timeline.
How do I install Arecon Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/arecon-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Arecon Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/arecon-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Arecon Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/arecon-review-process, .gemini/skills/arecon-review-process, .github/skills/arecon-review-process and .opencode/skills/arecon-review-process in your project.
What does Arecon Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Arecon Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Arecon Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Arecon Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Arecon Review Process use?
Arecon Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Arecon Review Process use?
About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Arecon Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Arecon Review Process: Editorial Policy (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Editorial Design (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars), Expect (millionco/expect, 3.6k stars) and CLI Anything Calibre (HKUDS/CLI-Anything, 52k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Arecon Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.