Sync Upstream
nyaruka/phonenumbers
Sync this Go port with a new upstream google/libphonenumber release — regenerate the embedded metadata and reconcile the ported Java logic.
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) evaluates a manuscript — triage by the joint Editors-in-Chief, double-anonymized review by…
Install Aos Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aos-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aos-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process .claude/skills/aos-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "aos-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process into .claude/skills/aos-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aos-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aos-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aos-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process .agents/skills/aos-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "aos-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process into .agents/skills/aos-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aos-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aos-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aos-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process .cursor/skills/aos-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "aos-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process into .cursor/skills/aos-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aos-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aos-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aos-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process .gemini/skills/aos-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aos-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process into .gemini/skills/aos-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aos-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aos-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aos-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process .github/skills/aos-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aos-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process into .github/skills/aos-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aos-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aos-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aos-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process .opencode/skills/aos-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aos-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process into .opencode/skills/aos-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aos-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
aos-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.4k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 591 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) evaluates a manuscript — triage by the joint Editors-in-Chief, double-anonymized review by…
- You need to understand how Accounting
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How AOS handles a submission, What each referee archetype… and Reading the decision letter, plus 5 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Organizations and Society (AOS) evaluates a manuscript — triage by the joint Editors-in-Chief
What it does
Aos Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when you need to understand how Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) evaluates a manuscript — triage by the joint Editors-in-Chief, double-anonymized review by interdisciplinary referees, the meaning of each decision type, and how to read the editor's letter. Explains the process; it does not draft the revision response (aos-rebuttal).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Business, Finance & HR, covering Accounting and bookkeeping. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- You need to understand how Accounting
- Organizations and Society (AOS) evaluates a manuscript — triage by the joint Editors-in-Chief
- Double-anonymized review by interdisciplinary referees
- The meaning of each decision type
Example prompts
- “/aos-review-process”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Aos Review Process loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 92 tokens; SKILL.md has 591 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 591 words, ~1,375 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/aos-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- aos-review-process
- description
- Use when you need to understand how Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) evaluates a manuscript — triage by the joint Editors-in-Chief, double-anonymized review by interdisciplinary referees, the meaning of each decision type, and how to read the editor's letter. Explains the process; it does not draft the revision response (aos-rebuttal).
Review Process (aos-review-process)
When to trigger
- Calibrating expectations before or just after submitting to AOS
- A decision letter arrived and its signals need decoding
- You want to anticipate the reviewer mix an interdisciplinary journal will assemble
- You are deciding whether a rejected paper should be reworked for AOS or rerouted
How AOS handles a submission
- Triage by the joint EiCs. Three Editors-in-Chief share the desk (verified 2026-07-16: Marcia Annisette, Martin Messner, Hun-Tong Tan), with profiles spanning the journal's traditions — critical/interpretive, management accounting/qualitative, and experimental/JDM. Your paper will be read first by an editor fluent in its tradition; scope misfits are desk-rejected quickly, and the capital-markets-without-theory genre is the most frequent casualty.
- Double-anonymized refereeing. Reviewers are chosen for the paper's tradition and its theory: a field study using institutional theory may draw one accounting-field-study specialist and one reader closer to organization theory; an experiment draws JDM expertise. Expect referees who know the imported theory's primary sources.
- Decision types. Desk reject (scope/quality triage); reject after review; revise-and-resubmit in major or minor form; conditional accept. As across elite journals, acceptance is normally reached through one or more substantive revision rounds.
- Timelines vary with reviewer availability; the portal shows status. Re-check any process fact on the official Elsevier pages — this pack records durable structure, not current queue speeds.
What each referee archetype presses on
| Archetype | Standard objections |
|---|---|
| Interpretive/field specialist | Depth of engagement; traceability of interpretation; theory doing work |
| Social-theory reader | Fidelity to the imported tradition; primary sources misread or thinned |
| Experimental/JDM reader | Confounds, process evidence, participant-pool fit, effect inflation |
| Generalist accounting reader | Why accounting is central; what the field's conversation gains |
Write and revise anticipating two archetypes at once — the classic AOS tension is satisfying the theory reader without losing the accounting reader.
Reading the decision letter
- The editor's own paragraphs outrank the reports: where the editor restates your contribution, that restatement is the target the revision must hit; where the editor selects among conflicting reviewer demands, follow the selection rather than averaging.
- Classify every reviewer point: (a) misunderstanding you caused — fix the writing; (b) substantive gap — new analysis or fieldwork returns; (c) paradigm disagreement — argue it respectfully once, with sources.
- A "reject with encouragement to submit new work" is not an invitation to resubmit the same paper lightly edited; AOS editors remember manuscripts.
Show full SKILL.md (211 more words)Show less
If the decision is negative
- Diagnose which bar failed: scope (wrong journal), theory (lens decorative), or evidence (thin engagement/underpowered design). Reroute scope failures to a sibling venue (MAR, AAAJ, CPA, BRIA, CAR) rather than re-arguing AOS's mission.
- Salvageable theory/evidence failures may return to AOS as genuinely new papers after substantial rework — flag the history honestly in the cover letter.
Before you submit: the two-referee dry run
Give the draft to two colleagues playing different archetypes from the table above (one theory reader, one accounting/method reader) and collect their objections cold. Papers that survive this dry run rarely meet a review surprise; papers that skip it usually meet both archetypes for the first time in round one.
Checklist
- Submission matched to the tradition an EiC can champion
- Manuscript survives both of its likely referee archetypes on a cold read
- Decision letter mapped: editor's frame identified; points classified (a)/(b)/(c)
- Conflicting reviewer demands resolved by the editor's steer, not by averaging
- Negative decision diagnosed (scope/theory/evidence) before any next move
Anti-patterns
- Averaging incompatible reviewers instead of following the editor's synthesis.
- Relitigating scope with an editor whose desk rejection was about the journal's mission.
- Resubmitting a rejected paper barely changed under a new title.
- Reading referee tradition-blindness as malice — write the bridge paragraphs instead.
Output format
【Stage】pre-submission calibration / decision received ...
【Likely referees】archetypes and their objections ...
【Editor's frame】the contribution as the editor restates it ...
【Point classification】(a) writing / (b) substance / (c) paradigm ...
【Diagnosis if negative】scope / theory / evidence → reroute or rework ...
【Next step】aos-rebuttal (on R&R) or aos-topic-selection (on reroute)© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Aos Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aos Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Sync Upstreamnyaruka/phonenumbers | 1.6k | — | ~2.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Radiology Tablehuang-sir1/radiology-skills | 1.9k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| ERPClaw ERP Controlleravansaber/erpclaw | 116 | — | ~18k | Automated safety check: Pass | GPL-3.0 | |
| Odoo Agency Fleet Reviewerpipe-org/mcp-odoo | 421 | — | ~699 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Beancount Closebex-co/beancount-io | 297 | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Radiology Table
huang-sir1/radiology-skills
Create/audit editable publication tables with source reconciliation; not figures or statistical inference.
ERPClaw ERP Controller
avansaber/erpclaw
Operates the ERPClaw self-hosted ERP in plain language: accounting, invoicing, inventory, purchasing, tax, HR, payroll and reports, treating the ERP as the single source of truth.
Odoo Agency Fleet Review
erpipe-org/mcp-odoo
Review many client Odoo databases at once through odoo-mcp's cross-instance tools — fleet-wide accounting health, per-client aging, partial-failure triage — for agencies and partners managing 5–50…
Beancount Close
bex-co/beancount-io
Close an accounting period in a Beancount ledger by reconciling each active account through beancount-reconcile, checking assertions and recurring gaps, reviewing flags, then proposing a commit with…
Forward Implementation First
Vuk97/forward-implementation-first
Keeps an agent building and validating real output instead of servicing its own bookkeeping.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Aos Review Process
What does Aos Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) evaluates a manuscript — triage by the joint Editors-in-Chief, double-anonymized review by…. Aos Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when you need to understand how Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) evaluates a manuscript — triage by the joint Editors-in-Chief, double-anonymized review by interdisciplinary referees, the meaning of each decision type, and how to read the editor's letter.
When should I use Aos Review Process?
Aos Review Process fits situations like: you need to understand how Accounting; organizations and Society (AOS) evaluates a manuscript — triage by the joint Editors-in-Chief; double-anonymized review by interdisciplinary referees; the meaning of each decision type.
How do I install Aos Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aos-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/aos-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Aos Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aos-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/aos-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Aos Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aos-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/aos-review-process, .gemini/skills/aos-review-process, .github/skills/aos-review-process and .opencode/skills/aos-review-process in your project.
What does Aos Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Aos Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Aos Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Aos Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Aos Review Process use?
Aos Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Aos Review Process use?
About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Aos Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Aos Review Process: Sync Upstream (nyaruka/phonenumbers, 1.6k stars), Radiology Table (huang-sir1/radiology-skills, 1.9k stars), ERPClaw ERP Controller (avansaber/erpclaw, 116 stars) and Odoo Agency Fleet Review (erpipe-org/mcp-odoo, 421 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Aos Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.