A skill your agent uses when deciding which amann- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a comprehensive review article from topic selection through revision for an Academy of Management…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Amann Workflow

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-workflow -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills amann-workflow --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-workflow .claude/skills/amann-workflow && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
amann-workflow
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.9k tokens
SKILL.md length
801 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when deciding which amann- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a comprehensive review article from topic selection through revision for an Academy of Management…

  • Works in 11 steps: amann-topic-selection — confirm the… → amann-proposal-framing — write the… → amann-literature-synthesis — once… → …
  • Deciding which amann- sub-skill to invoke next
  • SKILL.md covers Overview, When to trigger, Routing table and Default order, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Amann Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding which amann- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a comprehensive review article from topic selection through revision for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Deciding which amann- sub-skill to invoke next
  • Sequencing a comprehensive review article from topic selection through revision for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) submission

Example prompts

  • “/amann-workflow”

Workflow steps

11 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. amann-topic-selection — confirm the literature is Annals-scale (mature, important, fragmented, integrable)
  2. amann-proposal-framing — write the ≤5-page, four-heading proposal (the gate)
  3. amann-literature-synthesis — once invited, read the field systematically to saturation
  4. amann-organizing-framework — impose the novel integrative spine (the acceptance bar)
  5. amann-evidence-standards — appraise cumulative evidence and balance across schools
  6. amann-tables-figures — synthesis tables and the signature framework figure
  7. amann-writing-style — the authoritative, agenda-setting "attitude" voice (intro + abstract last)
  8. amann-editor-strategy — scope negotiation and review-article referee expectations
  9. amann-submission — Manuscript Central preflight (proposal or invited full review)
  10. amann-review-process — the proposal→invited-review process and twice-yearly cadence
  11. amann-revision — after the proposal decision or full-review letter

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Amann Workflow loads about 1.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 68 tokens; SKILL.md has 801 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~68
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 801 words, ~1,862 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/amann-workflow/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
amann-workflow
description
Use when deciding which amann-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a comprehensive review article from topic selection through revision for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Annals Workflow Router (amann-workflow)

Overview

This is the router. It tells you which amann- skill to use at the current stage* of a comprehensive, integrative review article aimed at the Academy of Management Annals (Annals) — the Academy of Management's review-of-the-field journal, published with Taylor & Francis. Annals does not publish original empirical research or stand-alone new theory; it publishes authoritative, theory-advancing reviews that synthesize a management/organization literature. Its mission is "up-to-date, in-depth and integrative reviews of research advances in management," and its house identity is "reviews with an attitude": a review must take a critical, integrative stance and set an agenda, not merely catalog papers (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).

So the lifecycle is not "design → identify → estimate → defend." It is judge whether a literature is Annals-scale → write the ≤5-page proposal (the gate) → if invited, read the whole literature → impose a novel organizing framework → appraise the evidence even-handedly → build synthesis exhibits → land the Annals voice → develop the full review through the editor-only process. The single binding constraint at every step is the same: does this review create a new way of seeing the field? A review that summarizes accurately but reorganizes nothing is the canonical Annals reject.

Default assumption: unless told otherwise, treat the target as Annals and the artefact as a comprehensive review, not a primary paper. Tells that you are at Annals and not a sibling: the work synthesizes other people's research rather than reporting your own; the first deliverable is a short proposal under a twice-yearly deadline, not a full draft; there is no hypothesis test or dataset of your own — you appraise the studies you cover; the contribution is an integrative map and agenda for a field. If the user has original theory, route to AMR; original data, route to AMJ — say so.

When to trigger

  • The user asks "what should I do next?" on a review article
  • A review draft reads like an annotated bibliography and needs an organizing spine
  • Work is ping-ponging between coverage, framing, evidence appraisal, and the proposal
  • An Annals proposal decision or a full-review referee letter arrived and the user must switch modes

Routing table

Current symptomNext skill
Unsure the literature is mature/important/fragmented enough for Annalsamann-topic-selection
Need to write the ≤5-page proposal that gates the whole processamann-proposal-framing
Reading is unsystematic; coverage gaps a referee could name are likelyamann-literature-synthesis
Draft is a list of papers, not an argument about the fieldamann-organizing-framework
Appraisal of cumulative evidence / balance across schools feels offamann-evidence-standards
Need who-found-what tables or a framework diagramamann-tables-figures
Prose is descriptive/jargon-laden; the "attitude" and agenda are missingamann-writing-style
Negotiating scope with the editor or anticipating review-article refereesamann-editor-strategy
Ready to submit a proposal or invited full review via Manuscript Centralamann-submission
Need to understand the two-step proposal→invited-review choreography and timelinesamann-review-process
Received a proposal decision or full-review referee letteramann-revision
Show full SKILL.md (331 more words)Show less

Default order

  1. amann-topic-selection — confirm the literature is Annals-scale (mature, important, fragmented, integrable)
  2. amann-proposal-framing — write the ≤5-page, four-heading proposal (the gate)
  3. amann-literature-synthesis — once invited, read the field systematically to saturation
  4. amann-organizing-framework — impose the novel integrative spine (the acceptance bar)
  5. amann-evidence-standards — appraise cumulative evidence and balance across schools
  6. amann-tables-figures — synthesis tables and the signature framework figure
  7. amann-writing-style — the authoritative, agenda-setting "attitude" voice (intro + abstract last)
  8. amann-editor-strategy — scope negotiation and review-article referee expectations
  9. amann-submission — Manuscript Central preflight (proposal or invited full review)
  10. amann-review-process — the proposal→invited-review process and twice-yearly cadence
  11. amann-revision — after the proposal decision or full-review letter

amann-writing-style is a late polish; do not rewrite the intro before the framework and evidence appraisal settle. The proposal comes early and is the gate — at Annals you cannot submit a full review cold, so amann-proposal-framing precedes the heavy reading.

Anti-patterns

  • Submitting a full review cold — Annals is proposal-first; an uninvited full manuscript is out of process (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准)
  • Treating the review as an annotated bibliography with no integrative framework — the named Annals reject
  • Producing a descriptive map with no "attitude": no critique, no reconciliation, no agenda
  • Centering the review on the author's own program (self-promotion; review-article referees punish this)
  • Confusing Annals with AMR (original theory) or AMJ (empirical) — Annals is the review-of-the-field
  • Missing the April 1 / October 1 proposal windows because the team treated intake as rolling

Routing by review archetype

A "review" is not one thing; the bottleneck differs by type. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link.

ArchetypeLikely first bottleneckEnter at
field-defining integrative review (broad domain)scope is enormous; needs a new organizing architectureamann-organizing-framework
construct-clarification / reconciliation reviewrival definitions and incommensurable measures; needs an integrating logicamann-organizing-framework
cumulative-evidence stock-take (what do we know?)even-handed appraisal of conflicting findingsamann-evidence-standards
emerging / fast-moving domain reviewis it mature enough for Annals yet?amann-topic-selection
systematic / bibliometric reviewsearch transparency + turning the corpus into an argumentamann-literature-synthesis

Minimal decision snippet

if proposal_decision_or_referee_letter:  -> amann-revision
elif understanding_two_step_process:     -> amann-review-process
elif ready_to_submit:                    -> amann-submission
elif scope_or_referee_anticipation:      -> amann-editor-strategy
elif prose_descriptive_no_attitude:      -> amann-writing-style
elif need_tables_or_framework_figure:    -> amann-tables-figures
elif evidence_appraisal_or_balance_off:  -> amann-evidence-standards
elif reads_like_a_list:                  -> amann-organizing-framework
elif reading_unsystematic:               -> amann-literature-synthesis
elif no_proposal_yet:                     -> amann-proposal-framing
else:                                     -> amann-topic-selection

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-workflow of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Amann Workflow next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Amann Workflow compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Amann Workflow this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Sub SkillMoonshotAI/kimi-code7.8k—~281Automated safety check: PassMIT
Sub Agentsparcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33.9k1 repos~929Automated safety check: NotesMIT
Offensive Lorawan Sub GhzSnailSploit/Claude-Red7.4k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Create Invoke TaskDataDog/datadog-agent3.8k—~606Automated safety check: NotesApache-2.0
Sub-Agent DelegationTokenRhythm/opensquilla7.1k—~3kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Sub Skill

    MoonshotAI/kimi-code

    Discover and reorganize the skill inventory into hierarchical sub-skill bundles.

    7.8k GitHub stars~281 tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Sub Agents

    parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3

    Create and configure Claude Code sub-agents with custom prompts, tools, and models

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~929 tokens
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check: notes
  • Offensive Lorawan Sub Ghz

    SnailSploit/Claude-Red

    LoRaWAN and sub-GHz (433 / 868 / 915 MHz) attack methodology — LoRaWAN ABP/OTAA join attack, network/session key reuse, frame counter replay, downlink injection on TTN/Helium-style networks, sub-GHz…

    7.4k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 19 days ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Create Invoke Task

    DataDog/datadog-agent

    Official

    Create a new Python invoke task for the dda CLI. An agent skill from DataDog/datadog-agent.

    3.8k GitHub stars~606 tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check: notes
  • Sub-Agent Delegation

    TokenRhythm/opensquilla

    Hands a self-contained coding task to Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode or Pi as a non-interactive background process, using OpenSquilla's exec_command and process tools.

    7.1k GitHub stars~3k tokensUpdated today
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Launch Sub Agent

    NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

    Launch an intelligent sub-agent with automatic model selection based on task complexity, specialized agent matching, Zero-shot CoT reasoning, and mandatory self-critique verification

    1.7k GitHub stars~3k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Amann Workflow

What does Amann Workflow do?

A skill your agent uses when deciding which amann- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a comprehensive review article from topic selection through revision for an Academy of Management…. Amann Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding which amann- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a comprehensive review article from topic selection through revision for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) submission.

When should I use Amann Workflow?

Amann Workflow fits situations like: deciding which amann- sub-skill to invoke next; sequencing a comprehensive review article from topic selection through revision for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) submission.

How do I install Amann Workflow in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-workflow -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/amann-workflow in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Amann Workflow in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-workflow -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/amann-workflow in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Amann Workflow in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-workflow -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/amann-workflow, .gemini/skills/amann-workflow, .github/skills/amann-workflow and .opencode/skills/amann-workflow in your project.

What does Amann Workflow need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Amann Workflow is instructions for the agent only.

Does Amann Workflow access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Amann Workflow safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Amann Workflow use?

Amann Workflow is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Amann Workflow use?

About 1.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Amann Workflow?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Amann Workflow: Sub Skill (MoonshotAI/kimi-code, 7.8k stars), Sub Agents (parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3, 3.9k stars), Offensive Lorawan Sub Ghz (SnailSploit/Claude-Red, 7.4k stars) and Create Invoke Task (DataDog/datadog-agent, 3.8k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Amann Workflow?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.