A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a topic fits the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ), now an integrated field-wide journal, and whether the manuscript's dominant…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Aerj Topic Selection

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aerj-topic-selection -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aerj-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/American-Educational-Research-Journal-Skills/skills/aerj-topic-selection .claude/skills/aerj-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
aerj-topic-selection
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
615 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a topic fits the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ), now an integrated field-wide journal, and whether the manuscript's dominant…

  • Works in 4 steps: Field-wide stakes. Could a researcher in… → Significance for policy and/or practice.… → Conceptual contribution, not just a… → …
  • Deciding whether a topic fits the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ)
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The fit test (broad…, Naming the dominant lens and Anti-patterns, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Aerj Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding whether a topic fits the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ), now an integrated field-wide journal, and whether the manuscript's dominant education-research lens is clear. AERJ rewards broad significance to education research, not subfield-only description. Tests fit; it does not generate research questions.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Hypothesis generation. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Deciding whether a topic fits the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ)
  • Now an integrated field-wide journal
  • Whether the manuscripts dominant education-research lens is clear

Example prompts

  • “/aerj-topic-selection”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Field-wide stakes. Could a researcher in a different education subfield care about the finding
  2. Significance for policy and/or practice. AERJ values work that informs how education is
  3. Conceptual contribution, not just a result. What do we understand differently afterward? Tie
  4. Equity and context. AERJ readers expect attention to who is studied, in what context, and for

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Aerj Topic Selection loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 89 tokens; SKILL.md has 615 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~89
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 615 words, ~1,403 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/aerj-topic-selection/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
aerj-topic-selection
description
Use when deciding whether a topic fits the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ), now an integrated field-wide journal, and whether the manuscript's dominant education-research lens is clear. AERJ rewards broad significance to education research, not subfield-only description. Tests fit; it does not generate research questions.

Topic Selection & AERJ Fit (aerj-topic-selection)

AERJ publishes work that spans the whole field of education research and matters beyond a single subfield. Before anything else, decide two things: is the question of broad significance, and what dominant education-research lens makes it legible to the integrated AERJ audience.

When to trigger

  • Choosing or sharpening the question for an AERJ paper
  • Unsure whether the topic is "big enough" for a flagship general journal
  • Naming the dominant lens: policy/institutional, teaching/learning, human development, or cross-cutting
  • Weighing AERJ vs a specialty outlet (e.g., a subfield or methods journal)

The fit test (broad significance)

  1. Field-wide stakes. Could a researcher in a different education subfield care about the finding or the framing? If only one niche cares, it may be off-fit.
  2. Significance for policy and/or practice. AERJ values work that informs how education is organized, taught, or experienced — name the stake explicitly.
  3. Conceptual contribution, not just a result. What do we understand differently afterward? Tie this to aerj-theory-and-framework.
  4. Equity and context. AERJ readers expect attention to who is studied, in what context, and for whom the claim holds.

Naming the dominant lens

Your topic is about...Dominant lens
Policy, governance, finance, accountability, organizations, institutions, equity at the system levelPolicy / institutional / organizational
Teaching, instruction, curriculum, learning processes, cognition, motivation, human developmentTeaching / learning / development
The school as an organization and what happens in classroomsName the dominant framing; explain cross-field travel

The lens is about topic and framing, not method. A multilevel quantitative study and an ethnography can both belong if the field-wide contribution is clear.

Anti-patterns

  • A descriptive result with no broader significance ("we found X in one district")
  • Pitching to a niche when the framing could reach the field
  • Picking a lens by method (e.g., "it's qualitative so it must be learning/development") — wrong axis
  • Chasing trendiness over a durable conceptual question

Fit-and-routing decision grid (AERJ-specific)

A flagship AERA general journal weighs reach across the field more heavily than methodological novelty alone. Read your topic against this grid before committing to the AERJ target.

Topic shapeLikely verdictDominant lensWhy
Single-district descriptive finding, no broader claimBetter suited to a specialty outletNone yetFails broad-significance test
Statewide accountability policy and its equity consequencesStrong fitPolicy / institutionalSystem-level institutional question
Classroom-level mechanism of how students learn a conceptStrong fitTeaching / learning / developmentLearning/development process
School organization shaping classroom instructionFit — name dominant lensCross-cuttingStraddles; pick framing axis, justify it
Methods demonstration with thin substantive stakeNeeds sharpeningNone yetAERJ wants the education question foregrounded
Show full SKILL.md (188 more words)Show less

Worked fit vignette (illustrative)

A researcher has data on a principal-mentoring program across 60 schools and finds a leadership turnover reduction of about 9 percentage points (illustrative). Pitched as "a turnover study," it reads as a niche HR result. Re-pitched as how institutional support reshapes who stays to lead high-need schools and what that means for equity of access to stable leadership, it becomes a policy/institutional question of broad significance — the same 9-point number now carries a field-wide stake. The topic did not change; the framing crossed it from subfield-only to AERJ-appropriate.

Common rejection-at-the-gate patterns and the fix

  • Topic is real but small. → Connect the local finding to a field-wide debate or a policy/practice stake the whole field recognizes; if none exists, route to a specialty journal honestly.
  • Lens chosen by method, not topic. → Re-choose on the topic axis; AERJ publishes quantitative, qualitative, and mixed work.
  • Trend-chasing with no durable question. → Anchor to a conceptual question that survives the news cycle; confirm scope expectations against the journal's current submission guidelines.

Output format

【Question】one sentence
【Broad significance】who beyond the subfield cares + policy/practice stake
【Conceptual contribution】what we understand differently
【Dominant lens】policy/institutional / teaching-learning / development / cross-cutting (and why)
【Fit verdict】strong / needs sharpening / better suited elsewhere
【Next】aerj-literature-positioning

Supplementary resources

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in American-Educational-Research-Journal-Skills/skills/aerj-topic-selection of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Aerj Topic Selection next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Aerj Topic Selection compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Aerj Topic Selection this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hypothesis Generationspacering-net/codeg3.9k14 repos~3.6kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills47k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Hypothesis GenerationK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Good QuestionRimagination/good-question3051 repos~4.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
High Stakes Analytics Decision Lablimingrui679-design/high-stakes-analytics-decision-lab1k—~2.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Hypothesis Generation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. An agent skill from spacering-net/codeg.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 14 repos~3.6k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Nature Paper Card

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Hypothesis Generation

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Formulate evidence-bounded scientific questions, candidate hypotheses, rival explanations, causal or associational claims, discriminating predictions, measurements, and preregistration-ready…

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Good Question

    Rimagination/good-question

    A skill your agent uses when a researcher is choosing, framing, refining, or stress-testing a research question, hypothesis, thesis topic, project idea, grant direction, paper angle, or stalled…

    305 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • High Stakes Analytics Decision Lab

    limingrui679-design/high-stakes-analytics-decision-lab

    Build or review source-backed descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, and prescriptive analysis for consequential decisions.

    1k GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Claim-Driven Experiment Planner

    zjYao36/Auto-Research-Refine

    Turns a refined research proposal into a claim-to-evidence-to-run-order roadmap instead of a sprawling benchmark wishlist.

    128 GitHub starsUsed in 6 repos~2.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Aerj Topic Selection

What does Aerj Topic Selection do?

A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a topic fits the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ), now an integrated field-wide journal, and whether the manuscript's dominant…. Aerj Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding whether a topic fits the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ), now an integrated field-wide journal, and whether the manuscript's dominant education-research lens is clear.

When should I use Aerj Topic Selection?

Aerj Topic Selection fits situations like: deciding whether a topic fits the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ); now an integrated field-wide journal; whether the manuscripts dominant education-research lens is clear.

How do I install Aerj Topic Selection in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aerj-topic-selection -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (American-Educational-Research-Journal-Skills/skills/aerj-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/aerj-topic-selection in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Aerj Topic Selection in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aerj-topic-selection -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (American-Educational-Research-Journal-Skills/skills/aerj-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/aerj-topic-selection in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Aerj Topic Selection in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aerj-topic-selection -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/aerj-topic-selection, .gemini/skills/aerj-topic-selection, .github/skills/aerj-topic-selection and .opencode/skills/aerj-topic-selection in your project.

What does Aerj Topic Selection need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Aerj Topic Selection is instructions for the agent only.

Does Aerj Topic Selection access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Aerj Topic Selection safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Aerj Topic Selection use?

Aerj Topic Selection is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Aerj Topic Selection use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Aerj Topic Selection?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Aerj Topic Selection: Hypothesis Generation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars), Hypothesis Generation (K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer, 2.4k stars) and Good Question (Rimagination/good-question, 305 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Aerj Topic Selection?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.