A skill your agent uses when an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) decision letter arrives (R&R or conditional accept) and a response-to-referees letter plus a revision plan…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Aeja Rebuttal

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aeja-rebuttal -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aeja-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/AEJ-Applied-Economics-Skills/skills/aeja-rebuttal .claude/skills/aeja-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
aeja-rebuttal
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.2k tokens
SKILL.md length
556 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) decision letter arrives (R&R or conditional accept) and a response-to-referees letter plus a revision plan…

  • Works in 5 steps: Opening summary — thank the… → Point-by-point — quote each comment,… → Tone — gracious, concrete,… → …
  • An American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) decision letter arrives (R&R
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How to read an AEJ: Applied…, Response-letter structure and Triage table, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Aeja Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) decision letter arrives (R&R or conditional accept) and a response-to-referees letter plus a revision plan must be drafted. Plans and structures the response; it does not run the new analysis (aeja-identification / aeja-robustness) or the submission preflight.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Econometrics and empirical research and Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • An American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) decision letter arrives (R&R
  • Conditional accept) and a response-to-referees letter plus a revision plan must be drafted

Example prompts

  • “/aeja-rebuttal”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Opening summary — thank the editor/referees; state the 3–5 substantive changes that define the revision (lead with the…
  2. Point-by-point — quote each comment, then respond with: what you did, where in the paper (section/table/page), and the result. Use a…
  3. Tone — gracious, concrete, non-defensive. Concede valid points fully; where you disagree, argue with evidence, not assertion.
  4. Triage discipline — every comment gets one of: done (changed + located), partially done (with reason), or respectfully declined (with an…
  5. Highlight the decisive evidence — if a referee doubted the design, show the new heterogeneity-robust estimate / honest-DID bound /…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Aeja Rebuttal loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 87 tokens; SKILL.md has 556 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~87
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 556 words, ~1,234 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/aeja-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
aeja-rebuttal
description
Use when an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) decision letter arrives (R&R or conditional accept) and a response-to-referees letter plus a revision plan must be drafted. Plans and structures the response; it does not run the new analysis (aeja-identification / aeja-robustness) or the submission preflight.

Rebuttal & Response Letter (aeja-rebuttal)

When to trigger

  • An AEJ: Applied R&R or conditional acceptance decision letter has arrived
  • You need to triage referee comments into must-do / argue / defer
  • You are drafting the response-to-referees document and revision plan
  • A reject-and-resubmit invitation needs a strategy before re-engaging

How to read an AEJ: Applied decision

The editor's letter is the priority signal: it tells you which referee concerns are binding and which are optional. At AEJ: Applied the binding asks are almost always about design credibility (the identification, robustness, inference) before exposition. Address the editor's stated priorities first and in full; treat the referee reports as the menu the editor has already filtered. A revision is judged on whether the identification concerns are genuinely resolved, not on volume of new tables.

Response-letter structure

  1. Opening summary — thank the editor/referees; state the 3–5 substantive changes that define the revision (lead with the identification/robustness changes).
  2. Point-by-point — quote each comment, then respond with: what you did, where in the paper (section/table/page), and the result. Use a consistent format per point.
  3. Tone — gracious, concrete, non-defensive. Concede valid points fully; where you disagree, argue with evidence, not assertion.
  4. Triage discipline — every comment gets one of: done (changed + located), partially done (with reason), or respectfully declined (with an evidence-based argument). No comment is ignored.
  5. Highlight the decisive evidence — if a referee doubted the design, show the new heterogeneity-robust estimate / honest-DID bound / falsification result explicitly and quote the new number with its SE.

Triage table

Referee askDefault response
Core identification doubt (binding per editor)do it in full; show the new estimate + SE; update the paper
Robustness/inference requestrun it; report stability of the point estimate
External-validity / estimandadd a calibrated scope statement; do not overclaim
Additional outcome/subgrouprun with MHT adjustment; or argue why it is out of scope
Exposition / framingrevise; cheap to do, builds goodwill
Out-of-scope new paperrespectfully decline with a one-line reason
Show full SKILL.md (234 more words)Show less

Checklist

  • Editor's stated priorities identified and addressed first, in full
  • Every referee comment answered: done / partial / declined — none ignored
  • Each "done" response cites the exact section/table/page and the new result
  • Decisive identification/robustness evidence quoted with numbers and SEs
  • Tone gracious and concrete; disagreements argued with evidence
  • Replication package updated to match the revised exhibits (aeja-replication-package)
  • A short cover note to the editor summarizing how the binding concerns were resolved

Worked vignette (illustrative)

Referee 2 says the staggered-DID estimate is biased and the parallel-trends story is thin; the editor's letter flags this as the binding concern. A weak response argues that TWFE "should be fine here." The AEJ: Applied response: re-estimate with Callaway–Sant'Anna, report the new ATT of 3.1pp (s.e. 0.9, vs. 3.6pp under TWFE), add the event-study leads and a Goodman-Bacon decomposition, and run an honest-DID bound — then in the letter quote the new number, cite the exact figure/table, and note the conclusion is unchanged but now robust. The editor sees the binding concern fully resolved with evidence, not assertion.

Anti-patterns

  • Answering the referees but ignoring the editor's prioritization
  • Defensive or dismissive tone; arguing by assertion instead of new evidence
  • Claiming a change without saying where in the paper it landed
  • Adding a wall of new tables that dodges the actual identification concern
  • Letting the replication package drift out of sync with the revised paper
  • Silently dropping a comment you found inconvenient

Output format

【Decision type】R&R / conditional accept / reject-and-resubmit
【Editor priorities】[binding asks, in order]
【Triage】done: [...] | partial: [...] | declined (with reason): [...]
【Decisive evidence】new identification/robustness result + number(SE) + location
【Tone check】gracious, concrete, evidence-based? [Y/N]
【Package sync】replication updated to match revision? [Y/N]
【Next step】aeja-submission (resubmit) → re-enter aeja-workflow if further rounds

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in AEJ-Applied-Economics-Skills/skills/aeja-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Aeja Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Aeja Rebuttal compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Aeja Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Review Papermaxwell2732/paper-replicate-agent-demo1372 repos~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Review Paperbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.6k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Jape Review Processfranklee16/academic-research-skills2231 repos~621Automated safety check: PassNone
Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg3.9k17 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg3.9k11 repos~3.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Review Paper

    maxwell2732/paper-replicate-agent-demo

    Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections

    137 GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~1.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Review Paper

    brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

    Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections.

    4.6k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Jape Review Process

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when navigating the Journal of Applied Econometrics (JAE) editorial process — single-blind peer review by anonymous reviewers in addition to the Editor, with final…

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~621 tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Peer Review

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 17 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Scholar Evaluation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 11 repos~3.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Writing Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.

    51k GitHub stars~16k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Aeja Rebuttal

What does Aeja Rebuttal do?

A skill your agent uses when an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) decision letter arrives (R&R or conditional accept) and a response-to-referees letter plus a revision plan…. Aeja Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) decision letter arrives (R&R or conditional accept) and a response-to-referees letter plus a revision plan must be drafted.

When should I use Aeja Rebuttal?

Aeja Rebuttal fits situations like: an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) decision letter arrives (R&R; conditional accept) and a response-to-referees letter plus a revision plan must be drafted.

How do I install Aeja Rebuttal in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aeja-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (AEJ-Applied-Economics-Skills/skills/aeja-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/aeja-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Aeja Rebuttal in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aeja-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (AEJ-Applied-Economics-Skills/skills/aeja-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/aeja-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Aeja Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aeja-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/aeja-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/aeja-rebuttal, .github/skills/aeja-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/aeja-rebuttal in your project.

What does Aeja Rebuttal need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Aeja Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.

Does Aeja Rebuttal access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Aeja Rebuttal safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Aeja Rebuttal use?

Aeja Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Aeja Rebuttal use?

About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Aeja Rebuttal?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Aeja Rebuttal: Review Paper (maxwell2732/paper-replicate-agent-demo, 137 stars), Review Paper (brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills, 4.6k stars), Jape Review Process (franklee16/academic-research-skills, 223 stars) and Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Aeja Rebuttal?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.