A skill your agent uses when responding to Advanced Materials reviewer reports and an editor's decision — major or minor revision, or a rejection with a resubmission or transfer path.

MITAuto-check passed

Install Advmat Revision

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill advmat-revision -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills advmat-revision --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Advanced-Materials-Skills/skills/advmat-revision .claude/skills/advmat-revision && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
advmat-revision
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
586 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when responding to Advanced Materials reviewer reports and an editor's decision — major or minor revision, or a rejection with a resubmission or transfer path.

  • Responding to Advanced Materials reviewer reports and an editors decision — major
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Read the decision before the…, Response-letter structure and Answering the characteristic…, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • A rejection with a resubmission

What it does

Advmat Revision is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to Advanced Materials reviewer reports and an editor's decision — major or minor revision, or a rejection with a resubmission or transfer path. Structures the response and the manuscript changes; does not perform the underlying new experiments.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Responding to Advanced Materials reviewer reports and an editors decision — major
  • A rejection with a resubmission

Example prompts

  • “/advmat-revision”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Advmat Revision loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 70 tokens; SKILL.md has 586 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~70
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 586 words, ~1,369 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/advmat-revision/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
advmat-revision
description
Use when responding to Advanced Materials reviewer reports and an editor's decision — major or minor revision, or a rejection with a resubmission or transfer path. Structures the response and the manuscript changes; does not perform the underlying new experiments.

Advanced Materials Revision (advmat-revision)

When to trigger

  • Reviewer reports and an editor decision (major/minor revision, or reject) have arrived
  • You need a point-by-point response and a marked-up manuscript
  • Referees asked for additional characterization, benchmarking, or stability data
  • The decision is a rejection and you must decide: appeal, revise-and-resubmit, or transfer
  • A coauthor is drafting rebuttal language before the manuscript has actually changed

Read the decision before the reports

The editor's letter sets the terms; read it first.

  • Minor revision — largely presentational or small additions; turn it around promptly and precisely.
  • Major revision — substantive concerns; usually requires new data (added characterization, controls, stability). Address the science first, the prose second.
  • Reject with encouragement to resubmit — treat as a major revision with a higher bar; the resubmission is judged largely on whether the core objection is truly resolved.
  • Reject — decide between a reasoned appeal (only if the editor/referee made a clear factual error) and a transfer to a sibling Wiley journal (Adv. Funct. Mater., Adv. Sci., Small, AMI), which may carry the reviews with it.

Response-letter structure

  • Open with thanks and a summary of the main changes and the new data added.
  • Quote each referee point verbatim, then respond immediately beneath it.
  • For every point: state what you changed, where (section/figure/SI number), and the evidence. "We added X" with a pointer beats a paragraph of argument.
  • Where you disagree, do so with data and courtesy — concede what is fair, defend what the evidence supports, never dismiss.
  • Provide a marked-up manuscript (tracked changes or highlighted) alongside the clean version.

Answering the characteristic materials objections

Referee asks for...Strongest response
Proof the phase/structure is realAdd the complementary technique (SAED, EXAFS, Rietveld) they expect
Representative morphologyAdd distributions/statistics over many particles/devices
Fair benchmarkingAdd a matched-condition comparison table with cited SOTA references
Stability / durabilityAdd cycling/aging/operational-stability data (often to the SI)
Mechanism, not just correlationAdd the control or computation that isolates the mechanism
ReproducibilityAdd batch-to-batch statistics (n, mean ± s.d.) and full recipe in SI
"Why not a lower-tier journal?"Sharpen the advance framing and the broad-impact argument

Do the experiment when the objection is fair. A rebuttal that argues around missing data rarely survives a second round.

Show full SKILL.md (221 more words)Show less

Scope discipline in revision

  • Add what the referees asked for; resist bolting on unrelated new results that reopen the length budget.
  • Keep the central advance fixed — a revision that changes the headline claim reads as a new paper.
  • Re-run the fit and pointer audits after adding data (see advmat-length-management, advmat-submission): new figures may push you over the page budget or break cross-references.

Checklist

  • The editor's decision terms are understood before drafting
  • Every referee point is quoted and answered individually
  • Each response states what changed, where, and the evidence
  • Requested new characterization / benchmarking / stability data actually added
  • Disagreements are backed by data and phrased courteously
  • A marked-up manuscript accompanies the clean version
  • Length budget and all cross-references re-checked after additions
  • The central advance is unchanged; scope creep avoided

Anti-patterns

  • Arguing around a fair request for data instead of providing it
  • Drafting rebuttal language before the manuscript and data are actually updated
  • Dismissive or defensive tone toward a referee
  • Silent changes not flagged in the response letter or the markup
  • Adding unrelated new results that reopen length and consistency problems
  • Appealing a rejection on preference when the referee raised a valid scientific gap

Output format

【Decision type】minor / major / reject-resubmit / reject → (appeal? transfer?)
【Per-point responses】R1.1 change+location+evidence / R1.2 ... / R2.1 ...
【New data added】characterization / benchmarking / stability / mechanism — list
【Disagreements】point — data-backed rationale
【Markup + clean versions】ready?  yes / fix
【Length & cross-refs re-audited】yes / fix
【Next】advmat-submission (re-preflight) or transfer to sibling journal

Revision formats, appeal routes, and transfer options are set by Wiley and evolve — verify current options on the official Advanced Materials author page and in the editor's letter.

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Advanced-Materials-Skills/skills/advmat-revision of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Advmat Revision next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Advmat Revision compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Advmat Revision this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Review Pending PR Reviewsnrwl/nx29k—~3.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Reviewthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74k—~556Automated safety check: PassMIT
ReviewClickHouse/ClickHouse50k—~8kAutomated safety check: NotesApache-2.0
Docling Pull Request Reviewdocling-project/docling69k—~1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Pre-Landing PR Reviewgarrytan/gstack136k—~20kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Review, grill, edit, and post pending PR review drafts saved by /review-pr (or its batch/cron runners).

    29k GitHub stars~3.9k tokensUpdated yesterday
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Review

    thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

    A skill your agent uses when applies to product pages, local business pages, recipes, apps, books, and any page that aggregates user reviews.

    74k GitHub stars~556 tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Review

    ClickHouse/ClickHouse

    Review a ClickHouse Pull Request for correctness, safety, performance, and compliance.

    50k GitHub stars~8k tokensUpdated today
    DatabasesAuto-check: notes
  • Docling Pull Request Review

    docling-project/docling

    Reviews or re-reviews a Docling pull request in fixed stages, with findings that can be reproduced and an explicit record of every check that was run.

    69k GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Pre-Landing PR Review

    garrytan/gstack

    Reviews your diff against the base branch before merge, looking for SQL safety problems, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects and other structural issues.

    136k GitHub stars~20k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check: notes
  • Code Review Checklist

    shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code

    Reviews code against a five-part checklist covering security, correctness, performance, maintainability and testing, and reports findings in a fixed format.

    78k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~1.1k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Advmat Revision

What does Advmat Revision do?

A skill your agent uses when responding to Advanced Materials reviewer reports and an editor's decision — major or minor revision, or a rejection with a resubmission or transfer path. Advmat Revision is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to Advanced Materials reviewer reports and an editor's decision — major or minor revision, or a rejection with a resubmission or transfer path.

When should I use Advmat Revision?

Advmat Revision fits situations like: responding to Advanced Materials reviewer reports and an editors decision — major; A rejection with a resubmission.

How do I install Advmat Revision in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill advmat-revision -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Advanced-Materials-Skills/skills/advmat-revision in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/advmat-revision in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Advmat Revision in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill advmat-revision -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Advanced-Materials-Skills/skills/advmat-revision in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/advmat-revision in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Advmat Revision in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill advmat-revision -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/advmat-revision, .gemini/skills/advmat-revision, .github/skills/advmat-revision and .opencode/skills/advmat-revision in your project.

What does Advmat Revision need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Advmat Revision is instructions for the agent only.

Does Advmat Revision access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Advmat Revision safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Advmat Revision use?

Advmat Revision is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Advmat Revision use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Advmat Revision?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Advmat Revision: Review Pending PR Reviews (nrwl/nx, 29k stars), Review (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Review (ClickHouse/ClickHouse, 50k stars) and Docling Pull Request Review (docling-project/docling, 69k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Advmat Revision?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.