A skill your agent uses when drafting an AAMAS rebuttal to preliminary OpenReview reviews, covering the double-blind constraint, the no-new-results and no-revised-paper norms, how to answer…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Aamas Author Response

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-author-response -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aamas-author-response --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-author-response .claude/skills/aamas-author-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
aamas-author-response
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~970 tokens
SKILL.md length
458 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when drafting an AAMAS rebuttal to preliminary OpenReview reviews, covering the double-blind constraint, the no-new-results and no-revised-paper norms, how to answer…

  • Works in 4 steps: State the decision-critical correction… → Point to the exact submitted evidence… → Explain the strategic or empirical… → …
  • Drafting an AAMAS rebuttal to preliminary OpenReview reviews
  • SKILL.md covers Triage, Drafting pattern, Multi-reviewer pushback patterns and Response micro-example, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Aamas Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting an AAMAS rebuttal to preliminary OpenReview reviews, covering the double-blind constraint, the no-new-results and no-revised-paper norms, how to answer game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewers at once, and how to give the area chair a clean acceptance rationale within a short response window.

Its SKILL.md is about 970 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Drafting an AAMAS rebuttal to preliminary OpenReview reviews
  • Covering the double-blind constraint
  • The no-new-results and no-revised-paper norms
  • How to answer game-theory

Example prompts

  • “/aamas-author-response”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. State the decision-critical correction or concession in the first line.
  2. Point to the exact submitted evidence (section, figure, appendix, or theorem number).
  3. Explain the strategic or empirical consequence for the reviewer's concern.
  4. Promise a camera-ready wording fix only if it adds no unsupported new claim.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Aamas Author Response loads about 970 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 83 tokens; SKILL.md has 458 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~83
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~970

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 458 words, ~970 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/aamas-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
aamas-author-response
description
Use when drafting an AAMAS rebuttal to preliminary OpenReview reviews, covering the double-blind constraint, the no-new-results and no-revised-paper norms, how to answer game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewers at once, and how to give the area chair a clean acceptance rationale within a short response window.

AAMAS Author Response

Use this after AAMAS preliminary reviews are released. Reopen the current OpenReview instructions and the rebuttal-window rules before drafting; response mechanics are cycle-specific and AAMAS reviews and decisions become public afterward.

Triage

  • Answer only what can move the decision: correctness of the game model or proofs, the reality of the interaction claim, baseline/opponent fairness, reproducibility, and scope.
  • Use evidence already in the submission: sections, appendices, the supplement, theorem statements, learning curves, and opponent-set definitions. AAMAS rebuttals do not add new results and typically do not upload a revised paper.
  • Keep the reply anonymous: no institution, no named system, no private URLs or repository owners.
  • Correct outright factual errors first, then address requests for missing comparisons, ablations, equilibrium analysis, or seeds.

Drafting pattern

  1. State the decision-critical correction or concession in the first line.
  2. Point to the exact submitted evidence (section, figure, appendix, or theorem number).
  3. Explain the strategic or empirical consequence for the reviewer's concern.
  4. Promise a camera-ready wording fix only if it adds no unsupported new claim.

Multi-reviewer pushback patterns

AAMAS pools game theorists, MARL researchers, and systems-minded reviewers on one paper, so a single rebuttal often answers three different lenses at once.

PushbackWhat it signalsAAMAS-ready fix
"This is really a single-agent method"The interaction claim did not landPoint to where the result depends on other agents co-adapting; cite the ablation that freezes them
"Which equilibrium do you converge to?"A game theorist read the solution conceptName it (Nash / correlated / coarse / no-regret) and cite the proof or convergence plot
"Baselines are self-play only"Opponent set looks weakAnchor to the held-out opponents or population in the appendix, or concede a camera-ready addition
"Seeds and variance are missing"An empirical reviewer checked rigorReference the seeded runs and standard errors; do not promise new experiments as fact
Show full SKILL.md (151 more words)Show less

Response micro-example

Reviewer objection: the cooperation result may be an artifact of a single random seed. Reply skeleton:

  1. Note that Figure 3 already aggregates 30 seeds with standard errors.
  2. Quote the exact aggregate so the reviewer need not re-open the PDF.
  3. Point to Appendix C for the per-seed spread and the opponent set used.
  4. Offer one camera-ready sentence stating the seed count in the caption.

Discussion-window calibration

  • One decision-critical point per reviewer beats an exhaustive reply; the area chair reads for whether the central interaction or correctness objection was actually resolved.
  • Never paste a fresh proof or a new game variant into the response box; sketch the argument and anchor it in submitted material.
  • Reply early - AAMAS rebuttal windows are short and reviewers who engage once rarely return.
  • Remember the reviews and your response may become public with the paper; write as if they will.

Output format

text
[Priority issue] <reviewer concern>
[Decision dimension] correctness / interaction-reality / significance / reproducibility / scope
[Draft response] <AAMAS-ready anonymous text>
[Evidence anchor] <section/appendix/figure/theorem>
[Forbidden content removed] <identity leaks, new results, revised-paper promises>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Aamas Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Aamas Author Response compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Aamas Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~970Automated safety check: PassMIT
Hypothesis Generationspacering-net/codeg3.9k14 repos~3.6kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
GitHub Deep Researchbytedance/deer-flow84k4 repos~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills47k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Content Research Writerweapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss1.9k25 repos~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Last30daysmvanhorn/last30days-skill64k—~7.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Hypothesis Generation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. An agent skill from spacering-net/codeg.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 14 repos~3.6k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • GitHub Deep Research

    bytedance/deer-flow

    Researches a GitHub repository over four rounds using the GitHub API and web search, then writes a structured markdown report with timeline, metrics and Mermaid diagrams.

    84k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~1.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Nature Paper Card

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Content Research Writer

    weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss

    Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section.

    1.9k GitHub starsUsed in 25 repos~3.5k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Last30days

    mvanhorn/last30days-skill

    Research what people actually say about any topic in the last 30 days.

    64k GitHub stars~7.9k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Peer Review

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 17 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Aamas Author Response

What does Aamas Author Response do?

A skill your agent uses when drafting an AAMAS rebuttal to preliminary OpenReview reviews, covering the double-blind constraint, the no-new-results and no-revised-paper norms, how to answer…. Aamas Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting an AAMAS rebuttal to preliminary OpenReview reviews, covering the double-blind constraint, the no-new-results and no-revised-paper norms, how to answer game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewers at once, and how to give the area chair a clean acceptance rationale within a short response window.

When should I use Aamas Author Response?

Aamas Author Response fits situations like: drafting an AAMAS rebuttal to preliminary OpenReview reviews; covering the double-blind constraint; the no-new-results and no-revised-paper norms; how to answer game-theory.

How do I install Aamas Author Response in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/aamas-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Aamas Author Response in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/aamas-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Aamas Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/aamas-author-response, .gemini/skills/aamas-author-response, .github/skills/aamas-author-response and .opencode/skills/aamas-author-response in your project.

What does Aamas Author Response need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Aamas Author Response is instructions for the agent only.

Does Aamas Author Response access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Aamas Author Response safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Aamas Author Response use?

Aamas Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Aamas Author Response use?

About 970 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Aamas Author Response?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Aamas Author Response: Hypothesis Generation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), GitHub Deep Research (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars), Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars) and Content Research Writer (weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss, 1.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Aamas Author Response?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.