A skill your agent uses when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Aaai Reproducibility

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaai-reproducibility -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aaai-reproducibility --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-reproducibility .claude/skills/aaai-reproducibility && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
aaai-reproducibility
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.5k tokens
SKILL.md length
760 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost…

  • Works in 6 steps: Unzip the submitted package into a clean… → Read only the included README, not local… → Run the smallest command that… → …
  • Strengthening an AAAI papers reproducibility checklist (placed after references)
  • SKILL.md covers Reproducibility audit, Common AAAI weaknesses, Checklist-to-evidence… and Claim-evidence ledger, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Aaai Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Reproducible research. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Strengthening an AAAI papers reproducibility checklist (placed after references)
  • Experimental traceability
  • Seed and hyperparameter reporting
  • Compute and cost disclosure

Example prompts

  • “/aaai-reproducibility”

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Unzip the submitted package into a clean directory.
  2. Read only the included README, not local lab notes.
  3. Run the smallest command that regenerates one headline table or figure.
  4. Check that expected runtime, hardware, random seeds, data download/access, and license constraints
  5. Confirm that output files have deterministic names and map back to paper tables.
  6. Mark any non-runnable or restricted component as such in both the README and checklist.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Aaai Reproducibility loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 90 tokens; SKILL.md has 760 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~90
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.5k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 760 words, ~1,523 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/aaai-reproducibility/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
aaai-reproducibility
description
Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

AAAI Reproducibility

Use this when a draft needs to survive AAAI review on rigor, not just novelty. AAAI-27 requires the reproducibility checklist to be uploaded separately from the main PDF, in its own field on the submission form (AAAI-26 carried it inside the PDF after the references) — so it is a document a reviewer opens on its own, and it has to agree with the paper and supplement rather than read as an afterthought. AAAI-27 also states that reviewers assess reproducibility from what was actually submitted, and that material promised "after acceptance or publication" is not evidence it exists.

Reproducibility audit

  • Map each central claim to submitted evidence: theorem, table, figure, ablation, appendix item, checklist answer, or code/data artifact.
  • Record seeds, splits, preprocessing, hyperparameters, model selection, early stopping, prompt selection, and hardware.
  • Report variance or uncertainty when stochasticity affects conclusions.
  • Document dataset licenses, access constraints, sensitive data, human-subjects issues, and annotation procedures.
  • Separate training compute, inference compute, and experiment search cost.
  • Check the reproducibility checklist for contradictions with the main text and supplement.

Common AAAI weaknesses

  • Checklist says code/data are available but supplement lacks runnable commands.
  • Main results rely on one seed, one benchmark, or one prompt family.
  • Baselines are weaker than current open-source or widely cited systems.
  • Evaluation uses closed data or APIs with no reproducibility substitute.
  • Human evaluation omits annotator instructions or quality control.

Checklist-to-evidence consistency grid

AAAI places the reproducibility checklist after the references, and reviewers cross-check each "yes" against the paper and supplement. A "yes" with no backing artifact reads worse than an honest "no", because it signals the checklist was filled in carelessly.

Checklist answerMust be backed byPhase-1 risk if unbacked
code availablerunnable scripts in the ZIP"claimed but absent"
seeds reportedseed list and variance"single-run cherry-pick"
compute disclosedtrain vs. inference vs. search cost"hidden tuning budget"
data accessiblelicense and access path"irreproducible by anyone"

Claim-evidence ledger

Create a row for every claim that appears in the abstract, introduction, or conclusion. The ledger should be short enough to audit before submission and concrete enough that a Phase-1 reviewer can see that each headline claim is checkable.

Ledger fieldWhat to recordCommon failure
Claim textexact sentence or paraphrase from the paperclaim becomes stronger than the evidence
Evidence artifacttheorem, table, figure, appendix, code command, data sheet, or log pathevidence exists but is not submitted
Reproducibility inputsseeds, splits, prompts, preprocessing, hardware, hyperparameters, and model versionsrerun cannot recreate the result
Variance and controlsconfidence interval, standard deviation, multiple seeds, ablation, or matched-compute baselinesingle lucky run drives the claim
Checklist answerthe checklist item whose answer depends on this artifactchecklist contradicts the supplement
Reviewer riskwhat a skeptical reviewer would challenge firstrebuttal cannot fix missing evidence

For each row, choose one of three actions: keep the claim because the artifact is present, weaken the claim to match the evidence, or add the missing artifact before submission. Do not leave a row in "promise later" state.

Show full SKILL.md (259 more words)Show less

Artifact dry-run

Before upload, run the artifact as if the reviewer has no private context:

  1. Unzip the submitted package into a clean directory.
  2. Read only the included README, not local lab notes.
  3. Run the smallest command that regenerates one headline table or figure.
  4. Check that expected runtime, hardware, random seeds, data download/access, and license constraints are stated before the command.
  5. Confirm that output files have deterministic names and map back to paper tables.
  6. Mark any non-runnable or restricted component as such in both the README and checklist.

The dry-run can be small; it does not need to reproduce every experiment. Its purpose is to prove that the submitted artifact is not merely decorative and that the checklist answers are honest.

Reviewer-pushback patterns

  • "Checklist says code available but I see only figures." Fix: ship scripts and a one-line driver before the deadline; do not promise the repository in rebuttal.
  • "Results may be seed-dependent." Fix: report multiple seeds with spread, and set the checklist seed answer to match the supplement exactly.
  • "Closed API, not reproducible." Fix: add an open substitute model or release prompts and outputs so the claim is checkable.

Worked vignette

A vision-language paper checks "code and data available" but the ZIP holds only PDFs of plots. Audit verdict: reproducibility grade "fragile", with a checklist conflict between the "yes" and the missing scripts. The smallest fix is a reproduce.sh that regenerates one headline table from seeds plus a dataset license note, after which the checklist answer becomes truthful and Phase-1 defensible.

Output format

text
[Reproducibility grade] strong / adequate / fragile / not reviewable
[Checklist conflicts] <answers that contradict paper/supplement>
[Evidence gaps] <claims without submitted verification>
[Compute/data disclosure] complete / incomplete
[Priority fixes] <smallest changes before submission>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-reproducibility of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Aaai Reproducibility next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Aaai Reproducibility compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Aaai Reproducibility this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guidexjtulyc/MedgeClaw6171 repos~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Compute Environment Setupaipoch/open-science5.5k—~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Figure Styleaipoch/open-science5.5k—~5.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Add Bactopia Toolbactopia/bactopia522—~4.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Guides an agent through reproducing papers built on the CHARLS health and retirement survey, from variable mapping to cognition, depression and isolation scores.

    617 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.8k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Compute Environment Setup

    aipoch/open-science

    Prepares setup instructions and a named activation file for a user-managed software environment on an Open-Science SSH or Slurm compute host.

    5.5k GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Figure Style

    aipoch/open-science

    Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots.

    5.5k GitHub stars~5.1k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Add Bactopia Tool

    bactopia/bactopia

    Scaffold a complete Bactopia Tool across all three tiers -- module, subworkflow, and workflow entry point under workflows/bactopia-tools/.

    522 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Modeling Code and Result Contracts

    yushui2022/MathModel-Skill

    Generates result-evidence contracts, tables and runnable q1 to q3 modeling code scaffolds for a math modeling paper from a model route, a data plan and cleaned data.

    454 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Aaai Reproducibility

What does Aaai Reproducibility do?

A skill your agent uses when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost…. Aaai Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

When should I use Aaai Reproducibility?

Aaai Reproducibility fits situations like: strengthening an AAAI papers reproducibility checklist (placed after references); experimental traceability; seed and hyperparameter reporting; compute and cost disclosure.

How do I install Aaai Reproducibility in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaai-reproducibility -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/aaai-reproducibility in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Aaai Reproducibility in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaai-reproducibility -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/aaai-reproducibility in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Aaai Reproducibility in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaai-reproducibility -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/aaai-reproducibility, .gemini/skills/aaai-reproducibility, .github/skills/aaai-reproducibility and .opencode/skills/aaai-reproducibility in your project.

What does Aaai Reproducibility need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Aaai Reproducibility is instructions for the agent only.

Does Aaai Reproducibility access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Aaai Reproducibility safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Aaai Reproducibility use?

Aaai Reproducibility is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Aaai Reproducibility use?

About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Aaai Reproducibility?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Aaai Reproducibility: Peer Review (K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer, 2.4k stars), CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guide (xjtulyc/MedgeClaw, 617 stars), Compute Environment Setup (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars) and Figure Style (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Aaai Reproducibility?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.