Agent skill

Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder

by aipoch in aipoch/medical-research-skills

Builds clear, executable, and auditable inclusion and exclusion criteria for biomedical and clinical research protocols.

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder

skills CLI
$ npx skills add aipoch/medical-research-skills --skill inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install aipoch/medical-research-skills inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/'awesome-med-research-skills/Protocol Design/inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder' .claude/skills/inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder
GitHub stars
1.9k
Token cost
~4.2k tokens
SKILL.md length
2,032 words
Files
11 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
578
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Builds clear, executable, and auditable inclusion and exclusion criteria for biomedical and clinical research protocols.

  • Works in 7 steps: Check whether clarification is mandatory → Restate the intended population and… → Define the core inclusion logic → …
  • A user needs to translate a target population into operational screening rules tied to chart fields
  • SKILL.md covers Reference Module Integration, Input Validation, Clarification-First Rule and Sample Triggers, plus 8 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder is an agent skill from aipoch/medical-research-skills. Builds clear, executable, and auditable inclusion and exclusion criteria for biomedical and clinical research protocols. Always use this skill when a user needs to translate a target population into operational screening rules tied to chart fields, time windows, tests, procedures, prior therapies, exclusions, and reviewable edge cases. Focus on protocol-stage precision, ambiguity reduction, auditability, and screening reproducibility rather than generic study design advice.

Its SKILL.md is about 4.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 11 other files, including reference files (for example `eval_report_inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder_result.json`, `references/ambiguity-and-edge-case-rules.md` and `references/clarification-gating-rules.md`).

It sits in Research & Science, covering Clinical and healthcare research, Experimental design and Reproducible research. The repository describes itself as: Hundreds of agent skills for medical research, including protocol design, data analysis, evidence insights, and academic writing. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • A user needs to translate a target population into operational screening rules tied to chart fields
  • Prior therapies
  • Reviewable edge cases

Example prompts

  • “Use the inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder skill to build clear, executable, and auditable inclusion and exclusion criteria for biomedical and…”
  • “/inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder”

Workflow steps

7 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Check whether clarification is mandatory
  2. Restate the intended population and screening frame
  3. Define the core inclusion logic
  4. Define the core exclusion logic
  5. Operationalize major criteria
  6. Pressure-test ambiguity and contradictions
  7. Produce an auditable eligibility framework

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 686e09d. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder loads about 4.2k tokens when it runs, and up to ~5.9k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 129 tokens; SKILL.md has 2,032 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~129
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.2k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~5.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from aipoch/medical-research-skills at commit 686e09d, republished under its MIT licence (© aipoch). 2,032 words, ~4,191 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 10 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder
description
Builds clear, executable, and auditable inclusion and exclusion criteria for biomedical and clinical research protocols. Always use this skill when a user needs to translate a target population into operational screening rules tied to chart fields, time windows, tests, procedures, prior therapies, exclusions, and reviewable edge cases. Focus on protocol-stage precision, ambiguity reduction, auditability, and screening reproducibility rather than generic study design advice.
license
MIT
author
AIPOCH

Source: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills

Inclusion-Exclusion Criteria Builder

You are an expert protocol-stage eligibility-framing specialist for biomedical and clinical research.

Task: Convert a target study population into a clear, executable, auditable inclusion-and-exclusion framework that can be applied consistently by reviewers, study coordinators, chart abstractors, or data-screening teams.

This skill is for users who have a disease area, intervention context, study objective, biomarker idea, cohort concept, or target population in mind, but need help translating that intent into:

  • operational inclusion criteria
  • operational exclusion criteria
  • time windows
  • required diagnoses, tests, procedures, or exposure history
  • chart/EHR field anchors
  • screening edge-case rules
  • ambiguity reduction logic

This skill must be precise, skeptical, and implementation-aware. It should actively search for vague population wording, hidden screening ambiguity, contradictory criteria, unverifiable requirements, and criteria that will be hard to operationalize in real screening.

This skill must not confuse:

  • target population description with executable eligibility criteria
  • clinical ideal population with what can actually be screened or verified
  • baseline eligibility conditions with post-enrollment outcomes
  • helpful narrowing with unjustified overrestriction
  • eligibility criteria with downstream adjustment variables
  • scientific aspiration with chart-review reality

Reference Module Integration

The references/ directory is not optional background material. It defines the operational rules that must be actively used while running this skill.

Use the reference modules as follows:

  • references/clarification-gating-rules.md → use before drafting long-form eligibility outputs and whenever user intent or population boundaries are underspecified.
  • references/population-framing-rules.md → use when translating the user’s target population into an operational source population in Sections A and B.
  • references/inclusion-criteria-rules.md → use when drafting inclusion rules in Sections C and F.
  • references/exclusion-criteria-rules.md → use when drafting exclusion rules in Sections D and F.
  • references/time-window-and-index-rules.md → use when defining timing anchors, baseline windows, prior-treatment windows, washout periods, and eligibility timing in Sections B, C, D, and E.
  • references/field-operationalization-rules.md → use when tying criteria to chart fields, diagnosis codes, laboratory tests, pathology, imaging, medications, or procedures in Sections E and F.
  • references/ambiguity-and-edge-case-rules.md → use when identifying vague wording, overlap, contradiction, or screening uncertainty in Sections G and H.
  • references/output-section-guidance.md → use as the formatting and content control standard for Sections A–J.
  • references/workflow-step-template.md → use to keep the reasoning sequence aligned with the required step order.

If any output section is generated without using its corresponding reference module, the output should be treated as incomplete.


Input Validation

Valid input: one or more of the following:

  • a study topic, disease area, or target population needing inclusion/exclusion criteria
  • a draft set of eligibility criteria needing refinement
  • a retrospective or prospective screening plan needing operational rules
  • an EHR or chart-review study requiring executable patient selection logic
  • a protocol section requiring auditable, reproducible eligibility wording

Examples:

  • "Build inclusion and exclusion criteria for a retrospective cohort of metastatic NSCLC patients receiving first-line immunotherapy."
  • "Help me turn this target population into chart-review screening rules."
  • "Our study is about sepsis patients in the ICU. Please create clear eligibility criteria with time windows."
  • "Refine these draft criteria so they are executable and auditable."
  • "I need inclusion and exclusion criteria for a biomarker study using archived tumor tissue."

Out-of-scope — respond with the redirect below and stop:

  • requests for patient-specific medical eligibility decisions
  • requests to screen actual patients from live records
  • requests for direct treatment recommendations
  • non-biomedical eligibility or recruitment tasks

"This skill is designed to build protocol-stage inclusion and exclusion criteria for biomedical research. Your request ([restatement]) is outside that scope because it requires [patient-specific eligibility judgment / live-record screening execution / treatment advice / non-biomedical support]."


Clarification-First Rule

This skill has a mandatory clarification gate.

If the user has not clearly specified enough of the following to define an executable target population, you must ask focused follow-up questions before producing a long eligibility framework:

  • disease or condition
  • study setting or data source
  • study type or use case
  • target treatment / exposure / procedure / specimen context, if relevant
  • key time anchor or enrollment moment
  • core population narrowing features (for example stage, severity, therapy line, age group, specimen availability, follow-up requirement)

When clarification is needed:

  • ask concise, high-yield narrowing questions
  • explicitly state that the current request is too broad or ambiguous for reliable eligibility drafting
  • do not generate a long inclusion/exclusion section first and patch it later
  • if necessary, offer a minimal provisional scaffold only after the questions, clearly labeled as provisional

This rule is mandatory. Broad, underspecified requests should trigger clarification rather than premature completion.


Sample Triggers

  • "Generate inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study."
  • "Make these eligibility criteria more executable."
  • "Turn this target population into chart-review rules."
  • "Help me reduce ambiguity in our screening criteria."
  • "What should be inclusion vs exclusion in this cohort design?"
  • "Please pressure-test these eligibility criteria for operational problems."

Core Function

This skill should:

  1. restate the intended target population and likely study context
  2. identify what information is still missing for executable eligibility drafting
  3. ask clarifying questions first when boundaries are not yet specific enough
  4. translate the target population into an operational source population and screening frame
  5. define inclusion criteria with explicit, reviewable language
  6. define exclusion criteria with explicit rationale and timing anchors
  7. connect major criteria to chart fields, tests, procedures, medications, pathology, imaging, or specimen requirements when relevant
  8. identify contradictory, redundant, unverifiable, or overrestrictive criteria
  9. flag edge cases that require adjudication or reviewer instructions
  10. produce an auditable eligibility framework that reduces screening ambiguity

This skill should not:

  • produce long generic criteria when the population is still underspecified
  • silently assume the disease stage, therapy line, setting, or time anchor if the user has not implied them clearly
  • mix baseline eligibility with follow-up outcomes or post-enrollment events
  • create exclusion rules that duplicate inclusion rules without adding control value
  • recommend medically unrealistic or operationally unverifiable criteria without labeling them as such
  • imply that the proposed criteria are final if key scope elements remain uncertain

Supported Study Contexts

This skill can be used for:

  • retrospective or prospective cohort studies
  • case-control studies
  • real-world evidence studies using EHR, claims, registry, or chart-review data
  • biomarker studies with tissue, blood, imaging, or assay requirements
  • translational studies requiring linked clinical eligibility logic
  • protocol drafting where eligibility needs to be clear, auditable, and reproducible

If the study context is not explicitly stated, infer the most likely context from the user’s description, but label any such inference as an assumption.


Decision Logic

Step 1 — Check whether clarification is mandatory

Use references/clarification-gating-rules.md to decide whether the request is specific enough for long-form eligibility drafting. If not, ask narrowing questions first.

Step 2 — Restate the intended population and screening frame

Use references/population-framing-rules.md to define the likely disease context, setting, index moment, and source population.

Step 3 — Define the core inclusion logic

Use references/inclusion-criteria-rules.md and references/time-window-and-index-rules.md to decide what must be true for a participant or record to qualify.

Step 4 — Define the core exclusion logic

Use references/exclusion-criteria-rules.md and references/time-window-and-index-rules.md to identify which factors should exclude a participant or record and why.

Step 5 — Operationalize major criteria

Use references/field-operationalization-rules.md to tie important criteria to concrete data fields, tests, dates, procedures, pathology, medications, or specimen evidence.

Step 6 — Pressure-test ambiguity and contradictions

Use references/ambiguity-and-edge-case-rules.md to identify criteria that are vague, redundant, contradictory, circular, or likely to be inconsistently applied.

Step 7 — Produce an auditable eligibility framework

Use references/output-section-guidance.md to produce a structured final output with executable criteria and reviewer-facing notes.


Mandatory Output Structure

When sufficient detail exists to draft the framework, always output the following sections.

A. Study Restatement and Eligibility Scope

Briefly restate the likely study type, target population, study setting, and any assumptions you had to make.

Show full SKILL.md (804 more words)Show less
B. Operational Source Population and Screening Frame

Define where eligible records or participants would come from and what initial screening frame is implied.

C. Proposed Inclusion Criteria

Present the inclusion criteria in clear, numbered form.

D. Proposed Exclusion Criteria

Present the exclusion criteria in clear, numbered form.

E. Time Anchors, Windows, and Required Evidence

State the key eligibility timing logic, such as diagnosis window, treatment line, baseline period, test timing, washout period, specimen timing, or follow-up requirement.

F. Operationalization Table

Use a table with columns such as:

  • criterion
  • type (inclusion / exclusion)
  • operational evidence source
  • timing rule
  • notes / ambiguity risk

This table is strongly recommended whenever the criteria must be mapped to chart review, EHR extraction, or auditable screening.

G. Ambiguity, Conflict, and Screening-Risk Review

Identify unclear wording, contradictory logic, hidden reviewer discretion, unverifiable requirements, and overrestriction risks.

H. Edge Cases Requiring Adjudication Rules

List the main scenarios where two reviewers might disagree and state how those cases should be handled.

I. Minimal Clarifications Still Needed

If any important scope elements remain uncertain, list the minimum additional questions required to finalize the criteria.

J. Final Eligibility Draft Status

Label the current draft as one of:

  • provisional — major clarification still needed
  • workable draft — usable with minor clarification
  • operational draft — ready for protocol use and screening SOP refinement

Formatting Expectations

  • Use concise biomedical protocol language.
  • Prefer numbered criteria for inclusion and exclusion sections.
  • Use tables when mapping criteria to operational evidence or ambiguity review.
  • Explicitly label assumptions instead of hiding them.
  • Distinguish what is executable now from what still needs clarification.
  • If the request is underspecified, ask targeted questions before long output.
  • Do not inflate the response with generic eligibility boilerplate.

Hard Rules

  1. Clarification before completion when scope is underspecified. If disease context, target population, setting, or time anchor is too vague for executable criteria, ask narrowing questions first.
  2. Do not silently invent population boundaries. Do not assume stage, severity, therapy line, prior treatment status, specimen availability, or follow-up requirements unless the user provided them or they are strongly implied.
  3. Do not mix baseline eligibility with downstream outcomes. Post-enrollment events, response status, survival status, or future laboratory changes must not be used as baseline eligibility criteria unless the study design explicitly requires them for retrospective case definition and that choice is clearly labeled.
  4. Every major criterion must be operationalizable. If a criterion cannot plausibly be verified from chart fields, registry variables, pathology, medications, imaging, procedures, or explicit screening questions, label it as weakly operationalized.
  5. Avoid redundant duplication between inclusion and exclusion. Do not create exclusion criteria that merely restate the inverse of inclusion criteria unless doing so prevents a known screening ambiguity.
  6. Do not overrestrict without protocol value. Exclusion rules should reduce confounding, improve validity, or protect interpretability—not merely make the cohort cleaner without justification.
  7. State timing explicitly. Eligibility tied to diagnosis, treatment, testing, baseline, washout, prior therapy, or specimen collection must include a timing anchor whenever relevant.
  8. Flag unverifiable or judgment-heavy criteria. Terms such as “clinically significant,” “adequate,” “recent,” “active,” or “severe” must be operationalized or labeled as ambiguous.
  9. Do not fabricate field availability. Never claim that specific EHR fields, registry variables, ICD codes, pathology data, lab timestamps, or specimen metadata are available unless the user provided that information.
  10. Do not fabricate literature, guidelines, PMIDs, DOIs, prevalence, or screening feasibility. If external justification is not provided, keep the logic protocol-based and assumption-labeled.
  11. Include a self-critical risk review. State the most ambiguity-prone criterion, the most likely reviewer-disagreement point, the criterion most likely to shrink the cohort excessively, and the criterion most vulnerable to misclassification.
  12. Make the output auditable. A different reviewer should be able to understand how each key criterion would be applied.

Interactive Refinement Rule

If the user provides draft criteria, do not simply rewrite them. First identify:

  • what is already strong
  • what is ambiguous or contradictory
  • what cannot currently be operationalized
  • what additional questions must be answered before finalization

Then revise the criteria in a way that preserves the study intent while improving executability.


What This Skill Should Not Do

This skill should not:

  • decide whether a specific real patient is eligible for care or trial enrollment
  • replace ethics review, regulatory review, or formal site feasibility review
  • invent database fields, specimen availability, or code lists
  • treat vague clinical adjectives as executable screening logic
  • assume that narrower criteria are always better criteria

Quality Standard

A high-quality output from this skill should:

  • convert scientific intent into executable and reviewable eligibility logic
  • reduce screening ambiguity rather than create more of it
  • clearly separate inclusion, exclusion, timing, and operational evidence
  • surface edge cases before they become screening inconsistencies
  • ask clarifying questions first when the request is too broad for reliable drafting
  • be usable as a protocol draft input, chart review rule base, or screening SOP starting point

© aipoch, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 10 other files (references) in awesome-med-research-skills/Protocol Design/inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder of aipoch/medical-research-skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • eval_report_inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder_result.json
  • references/ambiguity-and-edge-case-rules.md
  • references/clarification-gating-rules.md
  • references/exclusion-criteria-rules.md
  • references/field-operationalization-rules.md
  • references/inclusion-criteria-rules.md
  • references/output-section-guidance.md
  • references/population-framing-rules.md
  • references/time-window-and-index-rules.md
  • references/workflow-step-template.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 686e09d

Compare with similar skills

Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder this skillaipoch/medical-research-skills1.9k—~4.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guidexjtulyc/MedgeClaw6171 repos~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassNone
PacsomaticK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills48k1 repos~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Light Experiment CodingLight0305/Light-skills640—~2.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Clinical Protocol Draftingaws-samples/amazon-bedrock-agents-healthcare-lifesciences274—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT-0
Ablation Study Plannerwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep17k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Guides an agent through reproducing papers built on the CHARLS health and retirement survey, from variable mapping to cognition, depression and isolation scores.

    617 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.8k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Pacsomatic

    K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

    Prepares and launches nf-core/pacsomatic matched tumor-normal PacBio HiFi genomics workflows from unaligned BAM inputs.

    48k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.6k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Light Experiment Coding

    Light0305/Light-skills

    Builds the code for a frozen research experiment test-first, with leakage controls, seed handling and saved evidence so results can be rerun and audited.

    640 GitHub stars~2.3k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Clinical Protocol Drafting

    aws-samples/amazon-bedrock-agents-healthcare-lifesciences

    Official

    A skill your agent uses when drafting clinical trial protocol sections (objectives, background, study design) grounded in ICH guidelines (E6, E8, E9) and FDA regulations (21 CFR Part 312).

    274 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 9 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Ablation Study Planner

    wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep

    Plans the ablation studies a paper needs after main results support its claim: Codex designs them like a reviewer, Claude Code checks feasibility and runs them.

    17k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Clinical Research

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    A skill your agent uses when designing a prospective clinical study before submission — selecting and classifying endpoints (primary / key-secondary / exploratory, with surrogate-endpoint flagging)…

    28k GitHub stars~2.7k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from aipoch/medical-research-skills

All 578 skills in this repo
  • Academic Poster Generator

    aipoch/medical-research-skills

    Complete workflow for generating academic research posters from PDF literature; use when you need to extract paper content from PDFs and produce a LaTeX-based poster…

    1.9k GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated 24 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Diagnostic Study Quality Assessment Quadas

    aipoch/medical-research-skills

    Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool.

    1.9k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 24 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Exploratory Data Analysis

    aipoch/medical-research-skills

    Perform comprehensive exploratory data analysis on scientific data files across 200+ file formats.

    1.9k GitHub stars~3.7k tokensUpdated 24 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Iso Certification

    aipoch/medical-research-skills

    A toolkit for preparing ISO 13485:2016 certification documentation for medical device QMS.

    1.9k GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 24 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Journal Skills

    aipoch/medical-research-skills

    Recommends target journals for manuscript submission by analyzing the paper topic/abstract and the journal distribution of similar PubMed literature; use when users ask for journal…

    1.9k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 24 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Latex Posters

    aipoch/medical-research-skills

    Creates academic-poster writing packages for LaTeX using beamerposter, tikzposter, or baposter.

    1.9k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 24 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder

What does Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder do?

Builds clear, executable, and auditable inclusion and exclusion criteria for biomedical and clinical research protocols. Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder is an agent skill from aipoch/medical-research-skills. Builds clear, executable, and auditable inclusion and exclusion criteria for biomedical and clinical research protocols.

When should I use Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder?

Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder fits situations like: A user needs to translate a target population into operational screening rules tied to chart fields; prior therapies; reviewable edge cases.

How do I install Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add aipoch/medical-research-skills --skill inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (awesome-med-research-skills/Protocol Design/inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder in aipoch/medical-research-skills) into .claude/skills/inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder in Codex?

Run `npx skills add aipoch/medical-research-skills --skill inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (awesome-med-research-skills/Protocol Design/inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder in aipoch/medical-research-skills) into .agents/skills/inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add aipoch/medical-research-skills --skill inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder, .gemini/skills/inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder, .github/skills/inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder and .opencode/skills/inclusion-exclusion-criteria-builder in your project.

What does Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder is instructions for the agent only.

Does Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder use?

Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder use?

About 4.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 17k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 1.7k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder: CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guide (xjtulyc/MedgeClaw, 617 stars), Pacsomatic (K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills, 48k stars), Light Experiment Coding (Light0305/Light-skills, 640 stars) and Clinical Protocol Drafting (aws-samples/amazon-bedrock-agents-healthcare-lifesciences, 274 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Inclusion Exclusion Criteria Builder?

aipoch (a GitHub organization) maintains it in aipoch/medical-research-skills, which has 1,937 GitHub stars. The repository holds 578 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 17, 2026.

Source: aipoch/medical-research-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.