Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
論文、提案書、文献レビュー、方法論セクション、証拠の質、引用サポート、研究論文フィードバックのための構造化された学術的作業評価。
Install Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation
$ npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install affaan-m/ECC scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation .claude/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation" agent skill from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/tree/main/docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation into .claude/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/tree/main/docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluationType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install affaan-m/ECC scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation .agents/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation" agent skill from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/tree/main/docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation into .agents/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install affaan-m/ECC scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation .cursor/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation" agent skill from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/tree/main/docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation into .cursor/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC.git --path docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install affaan-m/ECC scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation .gemini/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation" agent skill from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/tree/main/docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation into .gemini/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install affaan-m/ECC scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluationInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation .github/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation" agent skill from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/tree/main/docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation into .github/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install affaan-m/ECC scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation .opencode/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation" agent skill from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/tree/main/docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation into .opencode/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation- GitHub stars
- 276k
- Token cost
- ~610 tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 114 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 683
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
論文、提案書、文献レビュー、方法論セクション、証拠の質、引用サポート、研究論文フィードバックのための構造化された学術的作業評価。
- Works in 9 steps: 問題と研究質問 → 文献とコンテキスト → 方法論 → …
- Tasks that involve Peer review
- SKILL.md covers 使用するタイミング, 評価の範囲, ルーブリック and レビュープロセス, plus 2 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation is an agent skill from affaan-m/ECC. 論文、提案書、文献レビュー、方法論セクション、証拠の質、引用サポート、研究論文フィードバックのための構造化された学術的作業評価。
Its SKILL.md is about 610 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond. The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Tasks that involve Peer review
Example prompts
- “/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation”
Workflow steps
9 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 4eb71d9. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are markdown).
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation loads about 610 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 26 tokens; SKILL.md has 114 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from affaan-m/ECC at commit 4eb71d9, republished under its MIT licence (© affaan-m). 114 words, ~610 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation
- description
- 論文、提案書、文献レビュー、方法論セクション、証拠の質、引用サポート、研究論文フィードバックのための構造化された学術的作業評価。
- origin
- community
Scholar Evaluation
このスキルを使用して、再現可能なルーブリックで学術的または科学的な作業を評価します。
使用するタイミング
- 研究論文、提案書、論文章、または文献レビューのレビュー。
- 主張が引用された証拠によって支持されているかの確認。
- 方法論、研究デザイン、分析、または限界の評価。
- 品質または関連性について2つ以上の論文を比較する。
- 改訂のための構造化されたフィードバックの作成。
評価の範囲
まず成果物を特定します:
- 実証的研究論文
- 理論論文
- 技術レポート
- システマティックまたはナラティブ文献レビュー
- 研究提案書
- 論文または学位論文の章
- 学会アブストラクトまたは短い論文
次に範囲を選択します:
- 包括的: すべてのルーブリック次元
- 的を絞った: 1つまたは2つの次元（方法や引用など）
- 比較的: 同じルーブリックに対して複数の作品をランク付け
ルーブリック
該当する各次元を1から5でスコアリング:
- 5: 優れている；明確、厳密で、出版の準備ができている
- 4: 良好；軽微な改善が必要
- 3: 適切；意味のあるギャップがあるが使用可能
- 2: 弱い；実質的な改訂が必要
- 1: 不十分；主要な有効性または明確性の問題
適用されない次元には N/A を使用します。
1. 問題と研究質問
- 問題は明確かつ具体的か？
- 貢献は意義があるか？
- 範囲と前提は明示的か？
- 質問は主張された貢献と一致しているか？
2. 文献とコンテキスト
- 関連する先行研究はカバーされているか？
- 作業はソースを単に列挙するのではなく統合しているか？
- ギャップは正確に特定されているか？
- 最近のソースと基礎的なソースはバランスが取れているか？
3. 方法論
- 方法は研究質問に答えるか？
- デザインの選択は正当化されているか？
- 変数、データセット、参加者、または材料は明確に説明されているか？
- 別の研究者が研究を再現できるか？
- 倫理的および実際的な制約は認識されているか？
4. データと証拠
- データソースは信頼性があり適切か？
- サンプルサイズまたはコーパスのカバレッジは十分か？
- 包含、除外、前処理の決定は文書化されているか？
- 欠損データとバイアスのリスクは議論されているか？
5. 分析
- 統計的、定性的、または計算的方法は適切か？
- ベースラインとコントロールは公正か？
- 必要に応じて不確実性、感度、またはロバスト性のチェックが含まれているか？
- 代替の説明は考慮されているか？
6. 結果と解釈
- 結果は明確に提示されているか？
- 主張は証拠の範囲内に留まっているか？
- 図、表、メトリクスは理解しやすいか？
- 否定的または帰無的な結果は正直に扱われているか？
7. 限界と妥当性への脅威
- 限界は一般的でなく具体的か？
- 内部、外部、構成概念、結論の妥当性リスクは対処されているか？
- 論文は投機的な結果と実証された結果を区別しているか？
8. 文章と構造
- 論証は理解しやすいか？
- セクションは研究質問を中心に構成されているか？
- 定義と表記は明確か？
- トーンは正確で学術的か？
9. 引用
- 引用された論文はそれに付けられた主張を支持しているか？
- 可能な限り一次ソースが使用されているか？
- レビューはレビューとしてラベル付けされているか？
- プレプリントはプレプリントとしてラベル付けされているか？
- 引用メタデータとリンクは正しいか？
レビュープロセス
- 主張された貢献についてアブストラクト、序論、図、結論を読む。
- 証拠の質について方法と結果を読む。
- 最も強い主張を引用されたソースと照合する。
- 該当する各次元をスコアリングする。
- 重大なブロッカーと改訂提案を分離する。
- 具体的な次の編集で終了する。
出力テンプレート
# Scholar Evaluation: <成果物>
## 総合評価
- 総合スコア: <1-5 または N/A>
- 信頼度: <高 | 中 | 低>
- サマリー: <3-5 文>
## 次元スコア
| 次元 | スコア | 証拠 | 改訂優先度 |
| --- | ---: | --- | --- |
| 問題と質問 | | | |
| 文献とコンテキスト | | | |
| 方法論 | | | |
| データと証拠 | | | |
| 分析 | | | |
| 結果と解釈 | | | |
| 限界 | | | |
| 文章と構造 | | | |
| 引用 | | | |
## 重大な問題
## 推奨される改訂
## 必要な証拠確認落とし穴
- スコアを具体的なフィードバックの代替として使用しない。
- 範囲外の次元の省略で論文にペナルティを与えない。
- 引用数、出版場所、または著者の評判を品質の証拠として扱わない。
- アブストラクトに現れるからといって根拠のない主張を受け入れない。
© affaan-m, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation of affaan-m/ECC.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 4eb71d9
Compare with similar skills
Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation this skillaffaan-m/ECC | 276k | — | ~610 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from affaan-m/ECC
All 682 skills in this repoSkill Stocktake
affaan-m/ECC
Audits your installed Claude skills and commands for quality, with a quick mode for recently changed skills and a full mode that evaluates all of them through subagents.
VideoDB Video Search and Editing
affaan-m/ECC
Ingests, indexes, searches, edits and monitors video, audio and live streams through the VideoDB Python SDK, returning stream links, clips and timestamps.
Docs Governance
affaan-m/ECC
Route broad documentation-governance requests to existing ECC skills and run an opt-in, read-only audit of mapped documentation roles, links, ADR indexes, and evidence references.
Rules Distillation
affaan-m/ECC
Scans installed skills for principles that recur across them and proposes rule-file changes: append, revise, add a section, create a file or leave as covered.
Master Agreement Generator
affaan-m/ECC
Builds DRAFT counterparty agreements from one markdown template and a small JSON spec per party, with clauses picked by the party's role.
Frontend Design Direction
affaan-m/ECC
Set an ECC-specific frontend design direction for production UI work.
Related
Categories
Questions about Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation
What does Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation do?
論文、提案書、文献レビュー、方法論セクション、証拠の質、引用サポート、研究論文フィードバックのための構造化された学術的作業評価。. Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation is an agent skill from affaan-m/ECC.
When should I use Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation?
Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation fits situations like: tasks that involve Peer review.
How do I install Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation in affaan-m/ECC) into .claude/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation in Codex?
Run `npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (docs/ja-JP/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation in affaan-m/ECC) into .agents/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation, .gemini/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation, .github/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation and .opencode/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation in your project.
What does Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation is instructions for the agent only.
Does Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation use?
Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation use?
About 610 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 2.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation?
affaan-m (a GitHub user) maintains it in affaan-m/ECC, which has 276,111 GitHub stars. The repository holds 683 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 10, 2026.
Source: affaan-m/ECC on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.