Search
Git · Test coverage
Skills
Sort:BestMost starsTrending todayTrending this weekTrending this monthNewestRecently updatedName
| # | Skill | Repository | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adds Worktrunk-specific rules to the tend CI workflows: Codecov polling, Rust test commands, labels and review criteria for pull requests handled in CI. | max-sixty/ | 9k | — | ~6.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | Unknown | today |
| 2 | Reviews the tests added in a pull request for fix coverage, quality, edge cases and test type, and recommends lighter test types where they would do. | dotnet/ | 23k | — | ~2.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | today |
| 3 | Takes a blocked community pull request in React Router and adds the missing tests, change file or docs so it can merge, working on the contributor's branch. | remix-run/ | 57k | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | yesterday |
| 4 | A skill your agent uses when reviewing PRs, code changes, or conducting code audits in obsidian-terminal. | polyipseity/ | 948 | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | AGPL-3.0 | 5 days ago |
| 5 | Helps increment code coverage in this Kotlin Multiplatform project. | alexvanyo/ | 267 | — | ~1.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | today |
| 6 | EXPERIMENTAL. An agent skill from Ovid/paad. | Ovid/ | 131 | — | ~2.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | yesterday |
| 7 | Parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test… | Dimillian/ | 4k | 1 repo | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 6 mo ago |
| 8 | Review uncommitted code changes using parallel Claude sub-agents (Bug Hunter, Rules Auditor, optional Architect). | peterkrueck/ | 1.4k | — | ~3.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 2 mo ago |
| 9 | Writes tests for newly added or changed code by reading the git diff, mapping every code path and writing one-assertion tests that match the project's conventions. | poshan0126/ | 871 | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 10 | Multi-agent code review that checks the current diff from multiple angles (spec compliance, bugs from two lenses, conventions/modernization, abstraction reuse, security, DB query performance, test… | sendou-ink/ | 297 | — | ~5.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | AGPL-3.0 | yesterday |
| 11 | Read-only verdict on whether an implementation meets its spec: each acceptance criterion classified, unintended changes flagged, test coverage checked. | changkun/ | 112 | — | ~1.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 4 days ago |
| 12 | Reviews a pull request, commit or diff for security problems, using git history, caller counts and test coverage, and writes a markdown report. | trailofbits/ | 7.4k | — | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Notes | CC-BY-SA-4.0 | yesterday |
| 13 | 13.Write Tests Add missing test coverage for your local code changes by generating new test files (covers uncommitted and untracked changes, or the latest commit if everything is committed). | NeoLabHQ/ | 1.7k | — | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | GPL-3.0 | 1 mo ago |
| 14 | 14.Review Multi-agent code review covering correctness, quality, architecture, test coverage, and security | atelier-fashion/ | 171 | — | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 9 days ago |
| 15 | 15.Review Swarm Parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test… | sickn33/ | 47k | 1 repo | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | yesterday |
| 16 | 16.Code Review Review a diff against its acceptance criteria in four segments (convention adherence, bug scan, historical-context regressions, test-coverage gaps) as a NON-implementing agent. | Prismer-AI/ | 1.6k | — | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 8 days ago |
| 17 | 17.Review Code Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps and low-value tests by running internal reviews and a peer review in… | tobihagemann/ | 407 | — | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | yesterday |
| 18 | 18.Code Review Review a diff, branch, or PR for correctness, repository standards, and spec coverage. | nodetool-ai/ | 556 | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | AGPL-3.0 | today |
| 19 | 19.Stryker JS Introduce StrykerJS mutation testing or assess JavaScript/TypeScript test quality. | mizchi/ | 356 | — | ~2.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | No licence | 6 days ago |
| 20 | Triggers LUCI try jobs to generate code coverage data. An agent skill from nwjs/chromium.src. | nwjs/ | 160 | — | ~786 | Automated safety check: Pass | BSD-3-Clause | 4 days ago |
| 21 | 21.PR Review Diff-based PR review across code quality, test coverage, silent failures, type design, and comment quality with severity-ranked findings. | Mathews-Tom/ | 328 | — | ~2.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 22 | 22.Test Updates Updates, generates, and validates tests using git-workspace context and TDD/BDD methodology. | athola/ | 342 | — | ~3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 2 days ago |