Multi-agent code review covering correctness, quality, architecture, test coverage, and security

MITAuto-check passedTesting & QA

Install Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit --skill review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/review .claude/skills/review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
review
GitHub stars
171
Token cost
~1.9k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,026 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
16
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Multi-agent code review covering correctness, quality, architecture, test coverage, and security

  • Works in 6 steps: Determine Review Scope and Load Context → Read All Changed Files → Launch Review Agents → …
  • Tasks that involve Test coverage
  • SKILL.md covers Ethos, Context, Input and Prerequisites, plus 1 more section
  • Calls git

What it does

Review is an agent skill from atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit. Multi-agent code review covering correctness, quality, architecture, test coverage, and security

Its SKILL.md is about 1.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Testing & QA, covering Test coverage, Code review and Multi-agent orchestration. It works with Git. The repository describes itself as: Shared SDLC skills and templates for Claude Code. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Test coverage
  • Tasks that involve Code review
  • Tasks that involve Multi-agent orchestration

Example prompts

  • “/review”

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Determine Review Scope and Load Context
  2. Read All Changed Files
  3. Launch Review Agents
  4. Consolidate Findings
  5. Present Review
  6. Summary

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 3a48c27. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • git

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use git, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Review loads about 1.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 26 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,026 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~26
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit at commit 3a48c27, republished under its MIT licence (© atelier-fashion). 1,026 words, ~1,938 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
review
description
Multi-agent code review covering correctness, quality, architecture, test coverage, and security
argument-hint
Optional file paths, branch name, or REQ/TASK ID to scope the review

/review — Multi-Agent Code Review

You are performing a thorough code review of recent changes using multiple specialized review agents.

This skill is the pre-push ADLC review gate. It runs 5 specialized review agents in parallel, covering the same dimensions the CI llm-review workflow would cover if it ran (correctness, conventions, test coverage, security) plus an architecture dimension the CI workflow doesn't have. Running this before pushing means the ADLC gate catches issues regardless of whether the CI layer is available — CI-layer LLM reviews can be blocked (billing, infra, outages) and must not become the sole safety net.

Ethos

!test -s .adlc/ETHOS.md && cat .adlc/ETHOS.md || echo No ethos found — run /init to vendor .adlc/ETHOS.md

Context

  • Current branch: !git branch --show-current || echo Not a git repo
  • Committed changes vs main: !git diff-tree --stat -r main HEAD || echo No diff available
  • Uncommitted changes: !git status --short

Context files loaded on demand: .adlc/context/conventions.md and recent lessons are loaded by Step 1 below — skip the Reads if they are already in the current conversation (e.g., when invoked from /proceed, which preloads conventions.md at Phase 0).

Input

Scope: $ARGUMENTS

Prerequisites

Before proceeding, verify that .adlc/context/conventions.md exists. If it doesn't, stop and tell the user: "The .adlc/ structure hasn't been initialized. Run /init first to set up conventions."

Instructions

Step 1: Determine Review Scope and Load Context
  1. If given specific file paths, review those files
  2. If given a branch name, review all changes on that branch vs main
  3. If given a REQ/TASK ID, find the associated branch and review its changes
  4. If no argument, review all uncommitted changes + commits on the current branch vs main
  5. Get the full diff: git diff main...HEAD (or git diff for uncommitted changes)
  6. Conventions: if .adlc/context/conventions.md is NOT already in your conversation context, Read it now. Otherwise skip — it's already loaded.
  7. Relevant lessons (mirrors the spirit of llm-review.yml, but relevance-ranked instead of time-ranked): a. Derive the set of touched components from the diff. Components are inferred from file paths — e.g. api/auth/* → API/auth, app/Sources/Views/*.swift → iOS/SwiftUI, infrastructure/terraform/* → infra/terraform. Produce a short list of plausible component values and a broader list of domain values (e.g. API, iOS, infra). b. Glob .adlc/knowledge/lessons/*.md and read each file's frontmatter (domain, component, tags). Keep lessons where component matches any touched component exactly, OR where domain matches any touched domain AND component is a prefix of a touched component, OR where any tag matches a touched component/domain. This is the relevance set. c. If the relevance set has fewer than 5 entries, top it up with the most recently modified lessons from .adlc/knowledge/lessons/ (the previous time-based heuristic) until the set has up to 10 entries. This keeps small or cross-cutting diffs from losing context entirely. d. Cap the final list at 15 lessons. Read their bodies in full. e. Pass the content of every selected lesson as context to every review agent in Step 3. When a finding later matches one of these lessons, cite its id explicitly (Step 4 uses this to elevate severity). Fallback: if any lesson has no component / domain / tags frontmatter (legacy file), fall back to reading its title + first paragraph and include it only if the title contains any touched domain or component substring. Do not skip it silently — it may be load-bearing.
Step 2: Read All Changed Files

Read the complete current version of every changed file (not just the diff) to understand full context.

Show full SKILL.md (459 more words)Show less
Step 3: Launch Review Agents

Launch 5 formal review agents in parallel using the Agent tool. Each agent is defined in ~/.claude/agents/ with its full checklist, model selection, and tool restrictions. Running in parallel minimizes wall-clock time.

  1. correctness-reviewer agent — provide it the list of changed files, the full diff, conventions.md content, and recent lessons. Focus: logic errors, null risks, race conditions, edge cases, concurrency bugs. Tell it: "Report findings only. Do not apply fixes."
  2. quality-reviewer agent — same inputs. Focus: naming, convention compliance, code duplication, complexity, maintainability. Tell it: "Report findings only. Do not apply fixes."
  3. architecture-reviewer agent — same inputs plus architecture.md content. Focus: layering, separation of concerns, API contracts, module boundaries, scope discipline. Tell it: "Report findings only. Do not apply fixes."
  4. test-auditor agent — same inputs. Focus: test coverage gaps for the changed code, mock completeness, edge case coverage, test isolation, determinism. Tell it: "Audit test coverage only for the diff under review. Report findings only. Do not apply fixes."
  5. security-auditor agent — same inputs. Focus: input validation, authentication/authorization gaps, data exposure (PII, secrets), injection risks, dependency issues, rate limiting. Tell it: "Audit security posture only for the diff under review. Report findings only. Do not apply fixes."

Each agent returns structured findings with severity (Critical/Major/Minor/Nit), file path, line number, and suggested fix.

Gate rule (mirrors llm-review.yml): if ANY agent reports a Critical finding, the review gate FAILS and the changes are not ready to merge. Fix critical findings before proceeding to push. Major findings should typically be fixed before merge but can be escalated to the user for judgment calls.

Step 4: Consolidate Findings
  1. Collect results from all 5 agents
  2. Deduplicate overlapping findings
  3. Categorize by severity:
    • Critical: Must fix before merge (bugs, security, data loss, test gaps that hide regressions)
    • Major: Should fix before merge (convention violations, missing tests, architectural smells)
    • Minor: Nice to fix (style, naming, minor improvements)
    • Nit: Optional suggestions
  4. Cross-reference findings against the loaded recent lessons — if a finding matches a known pitfall, escalate its severity by one level (e.g., a Minor finding that matches a prior LESSON becomes a Major). Flag this explicitly in the report.
Step 5: Present Review

Display findings organized by file, then by severity within each file. Include a dimension summary at the top so the user can see which of the 5 dimensions have issues at a glance:

## Dimension Summary

| Dimension | Critical | Major | Minor | Nit | Gate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correctness | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | PASS |
| Quality | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | PASS |
| Architecture | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | PASS |
| Test Coverage | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | PASS |
| Security | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | PASS |

**Overall gate: PASS / FAIL**

## file/path.js

### Critical
- Line XX: description of issue

### Major
- Line XX: description of issue
Step 6: Summary
  1. Overall gate: PASS (ready to merge) / FAIL (fix criticals first) / RESHAPE (significant rework needed)
  2. Count of issues by severity and by dimension
  3. Top 3 most important things to address
  4. Any findings that matched recent lessons (elevated-severity items)
  5. If changes look good, say so clearly — an empty review is a valid result for small, well-scoped changes

© atelier-fashion, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in review of atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 3a48c27

Compare with similar skills

Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Review this skillatelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit171—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Evaluate PR Testsdotnet/maui23k—~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
O2 Review Loopopenobserve/openobserve22k—~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassAGPL-3.0
Code Reviewpolyipseity/obsidian-terminal951—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassAGPL-3.0
Code ReviewPrismer-AI/PrismerCloud1.6k—~2.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Review Codetobihagemann/turbo408—~3.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Official

    Reviews the tests added in a pull request for fix coverage, quality, edge cases and test type, and recommends lighter test types where they would do.

    23k GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • O2 Review Loop

    openobserve/openobserve

    Splits a change into planner, coder and independent reviewer roles: you confirm a spec, a subagent implements it, and a separate reviewer checks each round's local WIP commit.

    22k GitHub stars~3.7k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Code Review

    polyipseity/obsidian-terminal

    A skill your agent uses when reviewing PRs, code changes, or conducting code audits in obsidian-terminal.

    951 GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 7 days ago
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Code Review

    Prismer-AI/PrismerCloud

    Review a diff against its acceptance criteria in four segments (convention adherence, bug scan, historical-context regressions, test-coverage gaps) as a NON-implementing agent.

    1.6k GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    DevelopmentAuto-check: notes
  • Review Code

    tobihagemann/turbo

    Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps and low-value tests by running internal reviews and a peer review in…

    408 GitHub stars~3.3k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Worktrunk Tend CI Guidance

    max-sixty/worktrunk

    Adds Worktrunk-specific rules to the tend CI workflows: Codecov polling, Rust test commands, labels and review criteria for pull requests handled in CI.

    9.2k GitHub stars~6.4k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed

More from atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit

All 16 skills in this repo
  • Canary

    atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit

    Canary deployment with smoke tests — deploy to a zero-traffic revision, run health checks, and promote on success.

    171 GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Sprint

    atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit

    Parallel pipeline orchestrator — launch multiple /proceed sessions concurrently across REQs, monitor progress, and report status.

    171 GitHub stars~9.8k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Template Drift

    atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit

    Detect drift across ALL the sync surfaces /init vendors into a project — .adlc/templates/.md, .adlc/partials/.sh, .adlc/ETHOS.md, and the workflow runtime (.adlc/workflows/adlc-sprint.workflow.js +…

    171 GitHub stars~9k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Proceed

    atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit

    End-to-end ADLC pipeline that takes a requirement from spec through to deployed.

    171 GitHub stars~14k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check: warnings
  • Init

    atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit

    Bootstrap .adlc/ structure in a new repo or subdirectory. An agent skill from atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit.

    171 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Manifest

    atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit

    Remote-derived view of all in-flight ADLC work — open PRs and pushed feat/REQ- branches across every session — with a coarse component/domain overlap report.

    171 GitHub stars~4.8k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Questions about Review

What does Review do?

Multi-agent code review covering correctness, quality, architecture, test coverage, and security. Review is an agent skill from atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit.

When should I use Review?

Review fits situations like: tasks that involve Test coverage; tasks that involve Code review; tasks that involve Multi-agent orchestration.

How do I install Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit --skill review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (review in atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit) into .claude/skills/review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit --skill review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (review in atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit) into .agents/skills/review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit --skill review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/review, .gemini/skills/review, .github/skills/review and .opencode/skills/review in your project.

What does Review need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Review needs the command-line tools its instructions call (git).

Does Review access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Its commands use git, which can reach the network depending on how they are called. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Review use?

Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Review use?

About 1.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Review: Evaluate PR Tests (dotnet/maui, 23k stars), O2 Review Loop (openobserve/openobserve, 22k stars), Code Review (polyipseity/obsidian-terminal, 951 stars) and Code Review (Prismer-AI/PrismerCloud, 1.6k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Review?

atelier-fashion (a GitHub organization) maintains it in atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit, which has 171 GitHub stars. The repository holds 16 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 28, 2026.

Source: atelier-fashion/adlc-toolkit on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.