Repository
XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content agent skills
- skills
- 16
- GitHub stars
- 7.2k
GitHub description: “You're reading this. The skill predicted it. A workflow that turns every post into a calibrated experiment—score, blind-predict, retro, evolve. The future doesn't reward effort, it rewards those who see the pattern first. 1M followers in a month — not luck, system.”
- Stars
- 7,225 (963 forks)
- Licence
- MIT
- Last push
- Oct 2026
- Created
- May 2026
Install all skills
npx skills add XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-contentAdd --skill <name> for a single skill and -a <agent> to choose the agent (see the agent guides).
Skills in XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content, ranked
Ranked by score. Sort bymost stars,trending,newest,recently updated
| # | Skill | Repository | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Proposes and applies upgrades to a content-scoring rubric: a full formula bump with blind re-scoring and a cross-model audit, or a lighter bucket-boundary recalibration. | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~3.5k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 2 | Onboards a new user to the cheat-on-content workflow with a short question flow, creating the project scaffolding and optionally importing past video history. | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~4.3k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 3 | Imports scripts and engagement numbers from an account you want to emulate, then extracts content patterns and starting scoring signals from them. | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~2.3k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 4 | Upgrades an older .cheat-state.json to the current schema version by applying migration files in order, with dry-run, backup and stop-on-failure behavior. | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 5 | Turns content creation into a calibrated loop of scoring, blind prediction, post-publish review and rubric evolution, with a built-in rubric for opinion videos. | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~2.7k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 6 | Builds or refreshes an account's audience profile from the comments in its post retrospectives and writes it to audience.md for later topic and script work. | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 7 | Writes an immutable blind prediction log for a finished content draft: a seven-dimension score, bucket, probability distribution and counterfactuals, scored blind by a sub-agent. | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~4k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 8 | Records that a piece of content went live by writing its URL, platform and publish time into the prediction file header and state file, leaving the prediction text untouched. | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 9 | Ranks a pool of content topic candidates by composite score and recommends the top picks, each with a score breakdown, anchor comparison and a one-line reason. | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 10 | Chinese-language retro step that gathers a post's results after a set window, compares them with the earlier prediction and records lessons in rubric-memo.md. | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 11 | Scores a single draft against the project's rubric and prints the composite to the console only, with no files written and no prediction made. | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 12 | INTERNAL sub-agent for blind 7-dim rubric scoring. **NOT a user-facing skill — do NOT invoke from main conversation.** Called via Task tool by… | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 13 | Develops one content topic at a time through conversation: you bring a theme or experience, the agent digs for angles and writes a draft, with an optional batch brainstorm mode. | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~3.5k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 14 | 14.Cheat Shoot 登记一条视频已拍摄。建 video folder + 询问实际拍摄稿是否与 scripts/<id.md 一致 + buffer +1。与 cheat-publish 配对：拍了进队列，发了出队列。触发词："拍了"/"拍了 X"/"shot"/"shot it"/"已拍 X"/"录完了"。 | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 15 | 15.Cheat Status cheat-on-content 的状态看板。显示当前模式 / rubric 版本 / 校准进度 / 待复盘 / pool 状态 / 是否该升级 SQLite / 是否该 bump rubric。任何时候都可调，无副作用。触发词："状态"/"看板"/"status"/"我现在该做什么"/"进度怎么样"。 | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 16 | 16.Cheat Trends 从配置的热点源（HN / Reddit / YouTube trending / B 站热门 / 等）抓今天的热门话题，去重 + 粗打分 + 写入 candidates.md。绝大部分人没有候选池——这是让"我没素材"问题在 onboarding 第二步就消失的钥匙。触发词："抓热点"/"fetch trends"/"今天有什么可做的"/"trending now"/"找选题"。 | XBuilderLAB/ | 7.2k | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 2 days ago |
Questions, answered from the data.
What is the best skill in XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content?
Rubric Bump Proposer from XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content ranks first of the 16 skills in XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content listed here, with the highest score: its repository has 7.2k GitHub stars, its SKILL.md loads about 3.5k tokens and it has informational notes only in the automated safety check. Next come Cheat-on-Content Setup and Benchmark Account Importer.
Are the skills in XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content official?
None yet. All 16 skills in XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content listed here come from community repositories; a skill counts as official when the product's own GitHub organization publishes it.
How do I install all skills from XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content?
Run npx skills add XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content in your project: the open-source skills CLI installs the repository's skills into your coding agent's skills folder. To install a single skill, open its page here for the exact command.
How are these skills ranked?
By Skill Navigator score, which combines the GitHub stars of the skill's repository (shared across that repo's skills and discounted for large collections), how many other GitHub owners carry a copy of the skill, and automated SKILL.md quality checks, minus penalties for safety-check warnings and for each further skill from the same repository. Skills that fail the safety check are not listed.