Agent skill

Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger

by Yeachan-Heo in Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code

Breaks a brief into ordered goals, keeps a durable ledger under .omc/ultragoal and prints handoff text so a Claude /goal run survives session restarts.

MITAuto-check passedAgent Workflows

Install Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger

skills CLI
$ npx skills add Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code --skill ultragoal -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code ultragoal --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/packages/coding-agent/src/defaults/gjc/skills/ultragoal .claude/skills/ultragoal && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
ultragoal
GitHub stars
2.9k
Token cost
~8.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
3,852 words
Files
6
Skills in repo
9
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Breaks a brief into ordered goals, keeps a durable ledger under .omc/ultragoal and prints handoff text so a Claude /goal run survives session restarts.

  • Works in 3 steps: project .gjc/config.yml → user /config.yml (normally… → built-in default
  • Tracking a large initiative across several Claude sessions or git worktrees
  • SKILL.md covers Purpose, Corrupt current-session state…, Always-used command examples and Create goals, plus 12 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Ultragoal splits a brief into an ordered set of goals and records start, checkpoint, blocker and failure events in an append-only ledger kept in the repository under `.omc/ultragoal`. The `omc ultragoal` command only writes those artifacts and prints a handoff for the active Claude agent, which must act on it in-session; it cannot change Claude's `/goal` state from the shell.

Claude Code's `/goal` is a session-scoped hook that keeps a session going until a condition holds, but it loses state across sessions. Ultragoal adds a durable plan, per-story attempt counts and evidence, and a final gate that runs ai-slop-cleaner, verification and a code review before completion. Goals are created from a brief file or from explicit goal arguments, in aggregate mode by default or per story with `--claude-goal-mode per-story`. It is not meant for single small changes, planning-only work or invoking `/goal` from a shell. The excerpt is cut off in the notes on parallel sessions.

When your agent uses it

  • Tracking a large initiative across several Claude sessions or git worktrees
  • Breaking a brief into ordered stories with attempt counts and evidence
  • Gating final completion behind cleanup, verification and code review
  • Keeping progress when a session restarts mid-task

Example prompts

  • “Create ultragoal goals from plan.md so we can track the migration across sessions.”
  • “Record a blocker on the backfill story in the ultragoal ledger and print the handoff text.”
  • “Set up ultragoal in per-story mode for the goals in this brief.”

Requirements

  • The `omc` CLI from oh-my-claudecode
  • Claude Code with its `/goal` command

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. project .gjc/config.yml
  2. user /config.yml (normally ~/.gjc/agent/config.yml, honoring
  3. built-in default

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 91fe978. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are bash and json).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger loads about 8.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 24 tokens; SKILL.md has 3,852 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~24
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~8.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code at commit 91fe978, republished under its MIT licence (© Yeachan-Heo). 3,852 words, ~8,392 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/ultragoal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 5 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
ultragoal
description
Create and execute durable repo-native multi-goal plans over GJC goal mode artifacts.
source
forked from upstream ultragoal skill and rebranded for GJC

Ultragoal Workflow

Use when the user asks for ultragoal, create-goals, complete-goals, durable multi-goal planning, or sequential execution over GJC goal mode.

Purpose

ultragoal turns a brief into repo-native durable artifacts and then drives execution through the unified goal tool as a UX bridge only. goals.json is the canonical source of goal identity and state; ledger.jsonl is the canonical proof stream for checkpoints, receipts, blockers, steering, and reviews. The inline goal tool and goal-mode-request create-bridge exist only to keep the agent's interactive loop focused on the current aggregate or story objective. Completion is verified purely from durable goals.json plus fresh ledger.jsonl receipts, never from inline goal state. The agent, not the CLI or hooks, calls goal({"op":"complete"}) or goal({"op":"drop"}) after durable run completion or cleanup; CLI commands and hooks never mutate goal state.

  • .gjc/_session-{sessionid}/ultragoal/brief.md
  • .gjc/_session-{sessionid}/ultragoal/goals.json
  • .gjc/_session-{sessionid}/ultragoal/ledger.jsonl (checkpoint and structured steering audit events)

Existing aggregate plans with the legacy enumerated objective are migrated to the stable pointer objective on read, persisted to goals.json, retained in gjcObjectiveAliases for already-active hidden goal reconciliation, and audited with an aggregate_objective_migrated ledger entry.

  • Nudge budget setting — the per-story give-up budget (gjc.ultragoal.nudgeBudget, default 10, non-negative integer) is read through one shared resolver in this exact order (first valid value wins):
    1. project .gjc/config.yml
    2. user <agentDir>/config.yml (normally ~/.gjc/agent/config.yml, honoring GJC_CODING_AGENT_DIR/PI_CODING_AGENT_DIR; XDG applies only to categorized data/state/cache subdirs, never the workflow config path)
    3. built-in default config.yml uses the nested (schema) form - gjc: { ultragoal: { nudgeBudget } }. Project configuration beats user configuration. The reported source is the canonical path of the winning file, or default. config.yml is the ONLY settings surface: the legacy settings.json files (project and config-root) are retired: the config-root ~/.gjc/settings.json is migrated once into the default global agent config.yml and its source removed, while the project .gjc/settings.json is retained for non-workflow settings (only its workflow keys are migrated into project .gjc/config.yml and no longer read unless a migration target is absent - a migration that could not publish (e.g. a read-only .gjc) leaves the retained legacy value effective as the previously configured override until it can publish). Invalid optional settings files continue to the next layer or the default (tolerant).

Corrupt current-session state recovery

When ultragoal detects its own current-session state is corrupt, tampered, unreadable, or stale on resume, run gjc state clear --force --mode ultragoal before reseeding or restarting. Scope the clear to the current session via --session-id, the command payload, or GJC_SESSION_ID; it clears only ultragoal state for that session and never clears other skills or sessions.

Always-used command examples

Use these exact gjc ultragoal commands before spending tool calls rediscovering syntax:

sh
gjc ultragoal status
gjc ultragoal status --json
gjc ultragoal create-goals --brief "<brief>"
gjc ultragoal create-goals --brief-file <path>
gjc ultragoal complete-goals
gjc ultragoal complete-goals --retry-failed
gjc ultragoal quality-gate source-hash --json
gjc ultragoal quality-gate validate --quality-gate-json <quality-gate-json-or-path> [--goal-id <id>] [--json]
gjc ultragoal checkpoint --goal-id <id> --status complete --evidence "<evidence>" --quality-gate-json <quality-gate-json-or-path>
gjc ultragoal checkpoint --goal-id <id> --status failed --evidence "<blocker/evidence>"
gjc ultragoal record-review-blockers --goal-id <id> --title "Resolve final review blockers" --objective "<blocker-resolution objective>" --evidence "<review findings>"

Use these exact goal-tool calls for the inline goal state:

json
goal({"op":"get"})
goal({"op":"create","objective":"<printed aggregate or per-story objective>"})
goal({"op":"complete"})
goal({"op":"drop"})
goal({"op":"resume"})

drop clears the active goal without exiting goal mode; resume reactivates a paused goal.

Create goals

  1. Decide on the brief. To produce multiple stories, separate them with a reserved @goal: delimiter line; the title follows on the same line and the objective is everything beneath it until the next delimiter:

    text
    Shared brief constraints / context go here (optional preamble).
    
    @goal: Parse the intake CSVs
    Ingest reviewer CSVs from the watch dir, validate headers, and reject
    malformed rows with a per-row reason. Objectives can span multiple lines
    and contain `code`, "quotes", or commands — no escaping needed.
    
    @goal: Normalize records
    Map raw rows onto the canonical schema and dedupe by record id.
    
    @goal: Export the audit report
    Emit an audit-ready report covering every accepted and rejected row.

    Delimiter contract:

    • A @goal line is a story boundary only when it starts at column 0 (no leading whitespace) and the character right after @goal is :, whitespace (space or tab), or end-of-line. So @goal: Title, @goal Title, and a bare @goal line all open a story.
    • @goalish, @goals:, @goal-foo, @goal.foo, @goal/foo, and any indented or mid-line @goal are ordinary objective text, not delimiters. To keep a literal @goal line inside an objective, indent it.
    • A title-only block (no body) uses the title as its objective. An empty title borrows the first body line as the title. A block with neither title nor body is rejected — create-goals errors instead of writing a placeholder goal.
    • Preamble (any text before the first @goal delimiter) is global context/constraints only; it is retained in the brief but is not turned into a goal. Every executable story needs its own @goal block.
    • With no @goal delimiter anywhere, the whole brief becomes a single goal G001 (unchanged legacy behavior).

    Stories become G001, G002, … in order.

  2. Run one of:

    • gjc ultragoal create-goals --brief "<brief>"
    • gjc ultragoal create-goals --brief-file <path>
    • cat <brief> | gjc ultragoal create-goals --from-stdin
    • gjc ultragoal create-goals --gjc-goal-mode per-story --brief "<brief>" only when one GJC goal context per story is explicitly preferred
  3. Inspect .gjc/_session-{sessionid}/ultragoal/goals.json and refine if needed.

Create-goals granularity: merge validation-coupled stories

Before splitting a brief into many thin stories, check whether the candidate stories are validation-coupled. Merge validation-coupled stories into one goal and fan out executor slices inside that goal instead of creating one goal per slice. Two stories are validation-coupled when they share any of:

  • the same feature stack (one story's code cannot be meaningfully verified without the other's),
  • the same acceptance surface,
  • the same red-team surface, or
  • the same final review boundary (they can only be signed off as a unit).

Fanning out executor slices inside a single merged goal keeps one review/QA boundary while preserving parallel implementation. When validation-coupled stories must stay as separate goals for scheduling reasons, use an aggregate-mode validation batch (below) so the coupled review happens once at the final member.

Complete goals

Loop until gjc ultragoal status reports all goals complete:

  1. Run gjc ultragoal complete-goals.
  2. Read the printed handoff.
  3. Call goal({"op":"get"}).
  4. If no active GJC goal exists, call goal({"op":"create","objective":"<printed payload objective>"}) with the printed payload. In aggregate mode, if the same aggregate objective is already active, continue the current GJC story without creating a new GJC goal. If goal({"op":"get"}) shows a stale dropped goal (status "dropped") and a new aggregate must start, no extra cleanup is needed — goal({"op":"create"}) succeeds directly. If a previous aggregate is still active and you genuinely need a fresh start in the same session, call goal({"op":"drop"}) first, then goal({"op":"create"}).
  5. Complete the current GJC story only.
  6. Run a completion audit against the story objective and real artifacts/tests.
  7. Before any --status complete checkpoint, run the mandatory final cleanup/review gate below. In aggregate mode, do not call goal({"op":"complete"}) for intermediate stories; checkpoint each story while the aggregate objective is still active. On the final story, create the final aggregate receipt first; only after that receipt exists may goal({"op":"complete"}) run.
  8. Checkpoint the durable ledger. Complete checkpoints require --quality-gate-json only: gjc ultragoal checkpoint --goal-id <id> --status complete --evidence "<evidence>" --quality-gate-json <quality-gate-json-or-path> A successful complete checkpoint is story completion, not automatic run completion. Read the checkpoint output: when it prints Next ultragoal goal: <id>, continue that active story under the same aggregate GJC goal; when it prints All ultragoal goals are complete, the durable run is terminal. gjc ultragoal complete-goals remains the supported manual next-story command if continuation output was missed.
  9. If blocked or failed, checkpoint failure: gjc ultragoal checkpoint --goal-id <id> --status failed --evidence "<blocker/evidence>"
  10. For legacy per-story completed-goal blockers, preserve the non-terminal blocker with: gjc ultragoal checkpoint --goal-id <id> --status blocked --evidence "<completed legacy GJC goal blocks goal create in this thread>"
  11. Resume failed goals with gjc ultragoal complete-goals --retry-failed.

Blocker triage and pause discipline

An active Ultragoal run must not give up on a blocker by pausing the goal and asking the user. Classify every blocker before deciding what to do, and default to resolvable when unsure:

  • resolvable — anything the agent can act on: failing tests, missing implementation, a dependency to install, an ambiguous-but-inferable detail, investigation. Never pause. Exhaust autonomous resolution first: investigate, gjc ultragoal steer --kind add_subgoal --title "Investigate blocker" --objective "..." --evidence "..." --rationale "...", delegate an executor, or preserve the blocker durably with gjc ultragoal checkpoint --status blocked / gjc ultragoal record-review-blockers and keep scheduling the next goal.
  • human_blocked — only the user can act: credentials/secrets, a manual or physical step, an external approval/decision, access the agent lacks. Pause is the last resort and is gated.

goal({"op":"pause"}) is blocked at runtime while an Ultragoal run is active unless the latest blocker_classified ledger event is human_blocked and a later bound clean pause terminal critic verdict is recorded for it (see Terminal critic gate). assertUltragoalPauseAllowed first consumes a pre-existing give-up nudge (a durable ledger write) before it runs the read-only pause diagnostic; only isUltragoalPauseBlocked is a pure reader. To pause, first record the human-only classification and capture its event id, then record the terminal critic's clean bound pause verdict, and only then pause:

sh
gjc ultragoal classify-blocker --classification human_blocked --evidence "<the specific human-only dependency>" [--goal-id <id>]
gjc ultragoal record-critic-verdict --terminus pause --classification-event-id <eventId> --verdict OKAY --evidence "<terminal critic evidence>"
goal({"op":"pause"})

Recording --classification resolvable is an audit note only; it never authorizes a pause. The ask tool stays blocked during active runs regardless of classification — record unresolved decisions as durable blockers instead of prompting.

Dynamic steering

Use gjc ultragoal steer when real findings or blockers prove the current story decomposition should change while the aggregate objective and constraints stay fixed. Steering is explicit-only and evidence-backed; broad natural-language requests are rejected instead of guessed.

Allowed mutation kinds are:

  • add_subgoal
  • split_subgoal
  • reorder_pending
  • revise_pending_wording
  • annotate_ledger
  • mark_blocked_superseded

Examples:

sh
gjc ultragoal steer --kind add_subgoal --title "Investigate blocker" --objective "Validate the blocker and report evidence." --evidence "log/test output" --rationale "The blocker changes the safe execution order." --json
gjc ultragoal steer --kind split_subgoal --goal-id G002 --replacements-json '[{"title":"Fix parser","objective":"Resolve parser blocker."},{"title":"Verify parser","objective":"Run focused parser verification."}]' --evidence "Implementation split found two separable risks" --rationale "Splitting keeps each sub-goal independently verifiable." --json
gjc ultragoal steer --kind reorder_pending --order-json '["G003","G002"]' --evidence "Dependency order changed after investigation" --rationale "G003 must land before G002 can proceed safely." --json
gjc ultragoal steer --kind revise_pending_wording --goal-id G002 --title "Clarify blocker story" --evidence "The current title hides the actual blocker" --rationale "Clear wording keeps the ledger auditable." --json
gjc ultragoal steer --kind annotate_ledger --evidence "User changed release ordering at runtime" --rationale "The aggregate objective is unchanged, but the execution history needs an audit note." --json
gjc ultragoal steer --kind mark_blocked_superseded --goal-id G004 --evidence "The blocked work is no longer required because replacement evidence covers it" --rationale "No replacement sub-goal is needed; superseding only the blocked sub-goal unblocks final completion without changing the aggregate objective." --json

--directive-json and UserPromptSubmit structured steering are planned/deferred routing surfaces, not part of the native typed --kind CLI path described above.

Steering invariants:

  • Do not edit the aggregate goal objective, original brief constraints, quality gates, or completion status. The aggregate objective is a stable pointer to .gjc/_session-{sessionid}/ultragoal/goals.json and .gjc/_session-{sessionid}/ultragoal/ledger.jsonl, not an enumeration of initial goal ids.
  • Do not hard-delete goals, auto-complete work, weaken verification, or silently mutate .gjc/_session-{sessionid}/ultragoal.
  • Accepted and rejected attempts append structured audit entries to .gjc/_session-{sessionid}/ultragoal/ledger.jsonl.
  • Superseded goals remain in goals.json with steering metadata and are skipped for scheduling.
  • Blocked goals without replacements are skipped for scheduling but still block final completion until later explicit steering replaces or supersedes them.

UserPromptSubmit structured steering directives are a planned/deferred routing surface. Normal prose does not mutate state.

Role-agent delegation guidance

Ultragoal execution should use GJC's bundled role-agent roster when a durable story is large enough to benefit from delegation:

  • Use executor for bounded implementation, refactoring, and fix slices.
  • Use planner for story sequencing or handoff refinement when execution uncovers a missing plan branch.
  • Use architect for read-only architecture and code-review lanes, including CLEAR / WATCH / BLOCK status.
  • Use critic for read-only plan or handoff critique before execution proceeds.
Implementation delegation guidance

Direct inline implementation by the leader is the default. Delegate to executor subagents only when the expected diffs land in genuinely different sub-domains, modules, or systems — separable surfaces with independent acceptance criteria and no shared-file contention. File count or line count alone does not force delegation; a large change confined to one domain/subsystem is usually better done inline or by a single sequenced executor.

Delegation is worth it when:

  • The story spans multiple distinct sub-domains / modules / systems (e.g. a CLI surface plus an unrelated runtime subsystem plus docs tooling) whose slices can proceed in parallel without coordinating on the same files.
  • Each slice can be bounded with explicit targets and acceptance criteria that are verifiable independently of the other slices.
  • The leader's checkpoint/verification duties would otherwise be crowded out by juggling unrelated domains inline.

When delegating:

  • Give each executor bounded targets and explicit acceptance criteria, and keep checkpoint/goal-state ownership in the leader.
  • Parallelize only across genuinely different sub-domains/modules/systems; sequence anything with a real dependency or shared-surface overlap.
  • Work within a single domain/subsystem stays with the leader as direct edits — do not split one cohesive change across subagents, and do not over-delegate trivial work.
  • After integrating delegated slices, you MAY run architect / critic review lanes for early signal, but treat them as advisory: the canonical review is the boundary cohort gate below, and a slice-level lane never substitutes for it or its verdict. Skip slice review entirely when the boundary cohort will cover the same change set shortly. Worker agents never mutate .gjc/_session-{sessionid}/ultragoal or call goal tools.

When delegating with native subagents, an await timeout only limits the leader's wait. It is not subagent failure evidence and must not be used as a cancellation reason; inspect or continue independent work, and cancel only when the subagent has actually failed, gone off-track, or become unrecoverably wrong.

Subagent reuse and resumption (token efficiency)

Fresh spawns re-pay the full context ramp-up (file reads, domain orientation, contract restatement) on every delegation. When a later slice or lane targets the same sub-domain/module/system as a prior subagent of the same role, resume the prior subagent instead of freshly spawning:

  • Track the subagent id per role + domain as it is created; on the next same-domain executor slice or same-scope architect review lane, resume that id and inject only the delta (new targets, new acceptance criteria, the updated frozen change set) rather than re-briefing from scratch.
  • Reuse is domain-scoped: resume only when the prior context is an asset. A slice in a genuinely different sub-domain/module/system gets a fresh spawn — stale cross-domain context is a liability, not a saving.
  • Resumability requires retained subagent resume metadata and a persistent parent session; use existing subagent resume/steer controls only. Route per attempt: running → steer/inject to the same id and await; queued → retain or await the same id; terminal (completed/failed/cancelled) with context available → resume the same id; context_unavailable, not_found, no_runner, or resume_failed → fresh spawn fallback for that slice.
  • A resumed subagent is still the same worker under the same contract: it must not mutate .gjc/_session-{sessionid}/ultragoal, call goal tools, or absorb checkpoint/goal-state ownership, and review lanes (architect, critic) stay read-only when resumed.
  • Resumption never weakens gates: a resumed architect review or executor QA lane must still evaluate the current frozen change set on its own evidence, not rubber-stamp its earlier verdict.

If an Ultragoal request has no approved plan or consensus artifact and the scope genuinely needs one, run ralplan first and preserve its PRD, test spec, role roster, and verification guidance in the Ultragoal ledger. Skip ralplan for small scope: work that fits a single reviewable PR and is tied to a single domain/subsystem can proceed directly from the brief — record that judgment in the ledger instead of running a planning round. Reach for ralplan when the scope spans multiple domains/subsystems, needs cross-cutting sequencing, or would not fit a single PR.

The Ultragoal leader owns .gjc/_session-{sessionid}/ultragoal/goals.json and .gjc/_session-{sessionid}/ultragoal/ledger.jsonl. Role agents return implementation/review evidence; they do not checkpoint Ultragoal or mutate goal state.

Show full SKILL.md (1,562 more words)Show less
Native executor parallelism contract

Native subagent parallelism is a contract for bounded executor delegation, not a runtime scheduler:

  • Use native executor parallelism only when a story's expected diffs fall in genuinely different sub-domains/modules/systems, each boundable by a per-slice coordination contract.
  • Default to direct leader edits otherwise; sequence any work with real dependencies, shared-file overlap, or a single-domain footprint, and never parallelize work that lacks a safe contract.
  • Worker agents MUST NOT mutate .gjc/_session-{sessionid}/ultragoal, call goal tools, make checkpoint decisions, own integration, or own final verification. The Ultragoal leader keeps those responsibilities.
  • Workers must not run gjc ultragoal checkpoint: checkpoint authority stays with the leader after worker tasks are terminal. The leader checkpoints from worker evidence plus the current-session GJC goal snapshot, and performs no hidden goal mutation.

Before workers start, each per-slice coordination contract MUST name the target files/surfaces, independence assumptions, allowed coordination channel, conflict-escalation rule, expected evidence, and terminal status. Conflict or assignment changes remain leader-owned and must be auditable through durable ledger evidence.

For failed, timed-out, or contract-violating slices, record durable ledger evidence; preserve successful terminal slices only when safe; and reassign, retry, or collapse the invalid work to serial execution under an updated contract. Completion after parallel work still requires terminal worker evidence, leader integration, targeted verification, and the existing cleaner + architect + executor QA/red-team gate before checkpoint complete.

Boundary verification (aggregate default)

Heavyweight review runs once per boundary, not once per story. In aggregate mode the whole required-goal set is one implicit boundary by default: every checkpoint before the run's final required goal may present the lightweight deferredToBatch gate, and only the final goal carries the full strict gate. Nothing needs to be declared to get this — it is the default.

A deferred gate is just the proof the runtime cannot know: that targeted verification ran. Everything mechanical — kind, the batch tuple, deferredLanes, and the whole changeSet block (paths, changeSetHash) — is auto-filled from durable state and the computed cumulative git diff. Never hand-compute a hash. The minimal valid gate:

json
{
  "deferredToBatch": {
    "ranLanes": ["targetedVerification"],
    "targetedVerification": {
      "status": "passed",
      "commands": ["bun test <targeted suite>"],
      "evidence": "what was verified and how it passed"
    }
  }
}

deferredToBatch.ranLanes lists the lanes you actually ran (targetedVerification, plus optionally aiSlopCleaner / iteration); declaration and evidence must match in both directions. ranLanes can never claim architectReview or executorQa, and a deferred gate can never contain architectReview, executorQa, or validationBatchClose — review always belongs to the boundary, and deferring never manufactures approvals. Any optional field you do supply must match reality; a wrong value fails closed. Check with gjc ultragoal quality-gate validate before checkpointing.

Validation batches (explicit phase/module boundaries)

When one ledger is large enough that a single end-of-run boundary is too coarse, use an explicit validation batch to subdivide it into phase/module boundaries, each with its own final member. Validation batches are aggregate-only, explicit-only, and fail-closed. They are created only through --validation-batch-json; there is no inference from brief prose, no per-story batching, and no other batching input path.

Create a batch explicitly:

sh
gjc ultragoal create-goals --brief-file <path> --validation-batch-json '[{"schemaVersion":1,"batchId":"VB001","memberIds":["G001","G002","G003"],"finalGoalId":"G003"}]'

Checkpoint contract summary — the full contract lives in the validation-batch-contracts fragment (skill-fragments/ultragoal/validation-batch-contracts.md); load it before checkpointing any batch member:

  • Non-final members checkpoint complete with a single top-level deferredToBatch quality gate (kind validation-batch-deferred) proving targeted verification, a declaration-matched lane set, and a cumulative-since-base change set — never architectReview, executorQa, or validationBatchClose; deferring never manufactures fake review approvals.
  • The final member (finalGoalId) checkpoints complete with the normal full strict gate PLUS a top-level validationBatchClose proof covering all members; out-of-order close is rejected, close state is append-only proof on the final member only, and batch invalidation is fail-closed. Like the deferred gate, every close field except coverageEvidence is auto-filled from durable receipts and the computed diff — the minimal close is {"validationBatchClose":{"coverageEvidence":"..."}} alongside the strict gate.
Intra-goal validation-lane parallelism

Cohort lanes are parallel by construction: the boundary gate freezes one sourceHash first, so cleaner, architect, and qa can run concurrently against the identical immutable snapshot and then join. Fall back to sequential lanes only when code is still changing (nothing can be frozen yet), when the red-team lane depends on architect fixes, or when architect findings gate the QA scope. Either way the lanes must join before checkpoint — no lane checkpoints independently, and repair work starts only after the join.

Internal Ultragoal sub-skill fragments

The completion-gate cleanup sweep is driven by ai-slop-cleaner, an internal Ultragoal sub-skill bundled as a kind: "skill-fragment" prompt with parent skill ultragoal (installed at skill-fragments/ultragoal/ai-slop-cleaner.md). It is analogous to deep-interview's auto-research fragment: loaded on demand for one specific hook, never a user-facing skill.

  • It is not slash-command discoverable, has no public skill-listing entry, and is never resolvable through skill://.
  • It is a read-only detector+reporter over the active story's changed files only: it never edits code, writes files, mutates .gjc/, checkpoints, calls goal tools, or spawns workflows.
  • It classifies every finding as blocking or advisory across the full taxonomy (fallback-like masking vs. grounded, duplication, dead code, needless abstraction, boundary violations, UI/design slop, missing tests).
  • The leader and a leader-spawned executor own all fixes; the cleaner reruns until zero blocking findings remain. Advisory findings live in the gate report only.
  • Recursion guard: it must not spawn nested ralplan/deep-interview/ultragoal; broad or architectural findings are handed back to the leader as review blockers.

Boundary completion cohort gate

This heavyweight gate applies only at a boundary: the run's final required goal, or an explicit validation batch's final member. Intermediate stories use the lightweight deferredToBatch checkpoint above and never run this cohort. At a boundary, one frozen-snapshot review generation runs: verify, freeze the change set, run the cohort lanes (ai-slop-cleaner, architect review, executor QA/red-team) on that snapshot, then join all lane verdicts before any repair. Validate the gate with gjc ultragoal quality-gate validate before checkpointing.

The full contract lives in the boundary-cohort-gate fragment. Read embedded:gjc/skill-fragments/ultragoal/boundary-cohort-gate.md before acting on this section; do not act from this summary alone.

Terminal critic gate

Both terminal exits (completion and blocked/pause termini) require a read-only critic role agent's OKAY verdict, once per run terminus. It is additive to the per-story review lanes and fails closed.

The full contract lives in the terminal-critic-gate fragment. Read embedded:gjc/skill-fragments/ultragoal/terminal-critic-gate.md before acting on this section; do not act from this summary alone.

Review mode

gjc ultragoal review runs the same hardened gate against an already implemented PR, branch, or worktree. Use --pr <number> for a PR, --branch <ref> for a branch diff, omit both for the current worktree, and pass --spec <path> when a real contract exists. --mode review-only emits the verdict/findings without creating fix work; --mode review-start records review blockers for follow-up. Review mode validates the same executorQa shape and live-surface artifacts as checkpoint --status complete. A thin or derived-only contract can never clean-pass: the verdict is capped at inconclusive: weak-contract until a supplied spec or equivalent strong acceptance criteria are available.

Receipts are freshness-scoped:

  • Per-goal receipts remain fresh for their target goal unless that goal, its blocker metadata, or its supersession metadata changes.
  • Normal later goal_started or clean receipt-backed goal_checkpointed events for other goals do not stale older per-goal receipts.
  • Appending required goals or changing final required-goal state stales final aggregate receipts. Final aggregate completion requires a fresh final aggregate receipt proving no incomplete, blocked, or review_blocked required goals remain.
  • Deferred per-goal receipts (validation-batch members) are incomplete until a matching fresh batch-close receipt exists on the batch's finalGoalId; a story-scope query for a deferred member stays blocked until that close, and mutating a member after close stales the batch-close and final aggregate receipts.

Cross-repository succession

When approved work belongs in another repository, never edit repositoryBinding or copy the runtime directory; use gjc ultragoal succession offer|adopt|status instead.

The full contract lives in the cross-repository-succession fragment. Read embedded:gjc/skill-fragments/ultragoal/cross-repository-succession.md before acting on this section; do not act from this summary alone.

Handoff back to planning

When the aggregate ultragoal is complete OR the user requests return to planning/clarification, mark ultragoal ready for handoff so the skill tool's chain guard permits the backward transition:

gjc state ultragoal write --input '{"current_phase":"handoff"}' --json

The skill tool then dispatches /skill:ralplan or /skill:deep-interview same-turn and runs gjc state ultragoal handoff --to <ralplan|deep-interview> --json in-process to atomically demote ultragoal, promote the callee, and sync both .gjc/_session-{sessionid}/state/skill-active-state.json files. You do not need to run the handoff verb yourself.

Constraints

  • The shell command emits a model-facing handoff for the active GJC agent; it does not invoke any /goal slash-command and the agent loop must not depend on any /goal subcommand.
  • Use only the unified goal-tool surface from the agent loop: goal({"op":"get"}), goal({"op":"create"}), goal({"op":"complete"}), goal({"op":"drop"}), goal({"op":"resume"}). drop clears the active goal without exiting goal mode so the next goal({"op":"create"}) works in-session. No slash-command cleanup exists or is required; Ultragoal never calls any /goal subcommand.
  • For back-to-back ultragoal runs in the same session/thread, when goal({"op":"get"}) still reports an active aggregate, call goal({"op":"drop"}) before goal({"op":"create"}); when no active goal exists or the prior aggregate is already complete or dropped, call goal({"op":"create"}) directly. The goal tool remains callable across drop; no slash-command cleanup exists or is required.
  • Never call goal({"op":"create"}) when goal({"op":"get"}) reports a different active goal.
  • Never call goal({"op":"complete"}) unless the aggregate run or legacy per-story goal is actually complete.
  • In aggregate mode, intermediate and final story checkpoints update durable goals.json state and append receipt proof to ledger.jsonl; the final story checkpoint creates the final aggregate receipt before the agent may call goal({"op":"complete"}).
  • Completion checkpoints require --quality-gate-json only. Shell commands and hooks must not mutate goal state; the agent reconciles inline goal-tool state after durable completion.
  • Final-aggregate completion additionally requires a criticReview OKAY; a human_blocked pause additionally requires a fresh OKAY critic_verdict receipt.
  • Treat ledger.jsonl as the durable audit trail; checkpoint after every success or failure.

© Yeachan-Heo, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 5 other files in packages/coding-agent/src/defaults/gjc/skills/ultragoal of Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code.

  • SKILL.md
  • ai-slop-cleaner.md
  • boundary-cohort-gate.md
  • cross-repository-succession.md
  • terminal-critic-gate.md
  • validation-batch-contracts.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 91fe978

Compare with similar skills

Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger this skillYeachan-Heo/gajae-code2.9k—~8.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
MemPalace Task HandoffMemPalace/mempalace60k—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Planning And Task Breakdownabashev/vfs-s31068 repos~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
ULW Plan Workflowcode-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent70k—~3.9kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Ask NavigatorYeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode40k—~4.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Planning with FilesOthmanAdi/planning-with-files27k—~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • MemPalace Task Handoff

    MemPalace/mempalace

    Creates, hands off, claims, executes and closes agent tasks through the MemPalace logstream, with approval of the exact task before it is recorded.

    60k GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated today
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Breaks work into ordered tasks. An agent skill from abashev/vfs-s3.

    106 GitHub starsUsed in 8 repos~1.9k tokens
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • ULW Plan Workflow

    code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent

    Explore-first planning that turns a vague or large request into one decision-complete work plan, written only after your approval and executed by a separate worker.

    70k GitHub stars~3.9k tokensUpdated today
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Ask Navigator

    Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode

    Charts a foggy effort into a map of decision tickets on the repo's issue tracker and works through them one per session, producing decisions rather than deliverables.

    40k GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Planning with Files

    OthmanAdi/planning-with-files

    Keeps a task plan, findings and progress log in markdown files on disk so long agent tasks survive context resets, with Gemini hooks and helper scripts.

    27k GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Implementation Plan Creator

    tailcallhq/forgecode

    Writes a structured Markdown implementation plan with checkbox tasks, verification criteria and risks, then checks it with a validation script; no code changes.

    7.6k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.1k tokens
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed

More from Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code

All 9 skills in this repo
  • Autoresearch Improvement Loop

    Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code

    Runs one improvement mission as a bounded loop: each round makes a change, runs a strict JSON evaluator, logs the decision in markdown and continues until a max runtime is hit.

    2.9k GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Gjc SDK Operate

    Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code

    Operate trusted local GJC sessions through a reviewed broker-bound CLI allowlist with single-use human approval.

    2.9k GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Ralplan Consensus Planning

    Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code

    Shorthand for oh-my-claudecode's consensus planning, where Planner, Architect and Critic agents iterate on a plan before any execution begins.

    2.9k GitHub stars~8.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Gjc Delegation

    Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code

    Delegate planning and execution workflows to gajae-code via the coordinator MCP server.

    2.9k GitHub stars~439 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Gjc SDK Discover

    Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code

    Discover and inspect trusted local GJC sessions through the broker-bound session CLI.

    2.9k GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Gjc SDK Session

    Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code

    Operate GJC SDK sessions from the CLI (gjc sdk session list|inspect|send|status|tail|close|raw plus the explicit raw control|query|global hatch).

    2.9k GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger

What does Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger do?

Breaks a brief into ordered goals, keeps a durable ledger under .omc/ultragoal and prints handoff text so a Claude /goal run survives session restarts. omc/ultragoal`. The `omc ultragoal` command only writes those artifacts and prints a handoff for the active Claude agent, which must act on it in-session; it cannot change Claude's `/goal` state from the shell.

When should I use Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger?

Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger fits situations like: tracking a large initiative across several Claude sessions or git worktrees; breaking a brief into ordered stories with attempt counts and evidence; gating final completion behind cleanup, verification and code review; keeping progress when a session restarts mid-task.

How do I install Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code --skill ultragoal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (packages/coding-agent/src/defaults/gjc/skills/ultragoal in Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code) into .claude/skills/ultragoal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger in Codex?

Run `npx skills add Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code --skill ultragoal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (packages/coding-agent/src/defaults/gjc/skills/ultragoal in Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code) into .agents/skills/ultragoal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code --skill ultragoal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ultragoal, .gemini/skills/ultragoal, .github/skills/ultragoal and .opencode/skills/ultragoal in your project.

What does Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger is instructions for the agent only. Our summary lists: The `omc` CLI from oh-my-claudecode; Claude Code with its `/goal` command.

Does Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger use?

Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger use?

About 8.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 34k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger: MemPalace Task Handoff (MemPalace/mempalace, 60k stars), Planning And Task Breakdown (abashev/vfs-s3, 106 stars), ULW Plan Workflow (code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent, 70k stars) and Ask Navigator (Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode, 40k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Ultragoal Multi-Goal Ledger?

Yeachan-Heo (a GitHub user) maintains it in Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code, which has 2,937 GitHub stars. The repository holds 9 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 10, 2026.

Source: Yeachan-Heo/gajae-code on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.