Profiling Client Performance

Profiling the Trilium client

Two tools, used in order. Skipping the first wastes the second on the wrong subsystem.

1. Find the subsystem: analyze a trace

Ask for a DevTools Performance recording (Performance panel → record → download). Then:

# A 90MB trace needs the bigger heap; the default one dies parsing it.
node --max-old-space-size=8192 .claude/skills/profiling-client-performance/analyze-trace.mjs <trace> summary
node ... analyze-trace.mjs <trace> spikes      # self time inside the long tasks only — usually the answer
node ... analyze-trace.mjs <trace> profile 25  # top self/total time across the whole trace
node ... analyze-trace.mjs <trace> timeline    # ASCII busy-per-bucket, for spotting a beat

spikes is the one to reach for: a stutter is the long tasks, and aggregating self time inside them with a stack attached names the culprit directly. summary prints each long task with the gap from the previous one — a steady gap means a timer or a debounce, an erratic one means the user is driving it.

Two trace-format traps the script already handles, and which will silently mislead a hand-rolled parser:

• Profiles are numbered per process. Every process starts its Profile/ProfileChunk ids at the same value, so keying on id alone merges the browser process's profile into the renderer's and attributes main-process frames to page code.
• The GPU process's vsync thread is busy for the whole trace by design. Picking "the busiest thread" hands you 11.5s of nothing. The renderer main thread is CrRendererMain.

Chunk names in a production trace are hashed (board-B_DI2aI3.js). Resolve them by extracting from the installed app rather than guessing:

npx --yes @electron/asar list "<install>/resources/app.asar" | grep <chunk>
# then extract via the node API with path.join("public","src",<chunk>) — the CLI mangles the separators

2. Measure the cost: debug_perf

apps/client/src/services/debug_perf.ts. Nothing calls into it by default — that is deliberate. Add call sites for as long as the investigation takes, then take them back out.

import { perfCount, perfSpan } from "../services/debug_perf";

perfCount("board.card.render");                    // how often
const end = perfSpan("board.getBoardData");        // how long; end() also returns the ms
try { ... } finally { end(); }

Adding the first call site is what pulls the module into the bundle, which is also what puts triliumPerf on window. There is nothing else to arm. Then, in the devtools console:

triliumPerf.enable()    // also starts reporting stalls
// ...reproduce the problem...
triliumPerf.report()    // console.table of calls / total / avg / max

Count before you time. A counter is one line and often reframes the problem outright: "4858 card renders" divided by 949 cards is six full redraws, not the one-per-pointer-move that had been assumed, which changes what is worth fixing.

Reproducing against a real database

Most of these only appear at real data volumes. Point a dev build at a copy of the user's data:

$env:TRILIUM_DATA_DIR = "C:\path\to\a\copy-of-trilium-data"
pnpm desktop:start

Interpreting what comes back

A STALL line is not the cost of an operation. It is the gap between animation frames, so on a saturated main thread it spans every operation that fell inside one contiguous busy period. Two runs are then not comparable — a "regression" from 434ms to 1196ms was two redraws landing in one stall rather than anything getting slower. For "what did this cost", use a span; only its returned duration is per-operation.

Check for saturation first. summary prints it. Above ~60% busy, stall durations stop meaning much and the timeline stops having gaps to read.

Long Tasks are Chromium-only. Firefox has no longtask entry type, and observe({ entryTypes }) drops an unrecognized one with a console warning instead of throwing — so a naive observer reports nothing at all, which reads as "no stalls happened". debug_perf checks supportedEntryTypes and falls back to an animation-frame watchdog, and says which it is using.

To separate JavaScript from layout and paint, close a span in a useLayoutEffect: it runs after Preact has mutated the DOM but before the browser paints. Compare its total against the stall total. Most of the stall inside the span means JS; most of it outside means layout/paint, and no amount of memoization will help.

Dev-build numbers are inflated but proportionate — roughly 1.5× against a production Electron build in practice. Ratios and rankings transfer; absolute figures don't. Firefox's frame-gap watchdog is coarser than Chromium's Long Tasks, so prefer the desktop app for final numbers.