Agent skill

Receiving Code Review

by TechDufus in TechDufus/oh-my-claude

How to handle code review feedback with technical rigor. An agent skill from TechDufus/oh-my-claude.

MITAuto-check passedDevelopment

Install Receiving Code Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add TechDufus/oh-my-claude --skill receiving-code-review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install TechDufus/oh-my-claude receiving-code-review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TechDufus/oh-my-claude.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/plugins/oh-my-claude/skills/receiving-code-review .claude/skills/receiving-code-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
receiving-code-review
GitHub stars
174
Token cost
~1.1k tokens
SKILL.md length
536 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
12
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

How to handle code review feedback with technical rigor. An agent skill from TechDufus/oh-my-claude.

  • Works in 5 steps: Clarify unclear items first (don't build… → Blocking/critical issues (things that… → Simple fixes (typos, naming, formatting) → …
  • Receiving review comments from code-reviewer agent
  • SKILL.md covers When to Apply, Response Pattern, Forbidden Responses and Source-Specific Handling, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Receiving Code Review is an agent skill from TechDufus/oh-my-claude. How to handle code review feedback with technical rigor. Use when receiving review comments from code-reviewer agent, PR reviews, or external feedback. Triggers on: 'review feedback', 'address review', 'fix review comments', 'code review response'.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Development, covering Code review and Pull requests. The repository describes itself as: Add ultrawork to any prompt for maximum parallel execution. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Receiving review comments from code-reviewer agent
  • External feedback
  • : review feedback
  • Fix review comments

Example prompts

  • “review feedback”
  • “address review”
  • “fix review comments”
  • “/receiving-code-review”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Clarify unclear items first (don't build on misunderstanding)
  2. Blocking/critical issues (things that prevent the code from working)
  3. Simple fixes (typos, naming, formatting)
  4. Complex fixes (refactors, architectural changes)
  5. Test each fix independently

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit ede75db. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Receiving Code Review loads about 1.1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 68 tokens; SKILL.md has 536 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~68
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.1k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from TechDufus/oh-my-claude at commit ede75db, republished under its MIT licence (© TechDufus). 536 words, ~1,111 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
receiving-code-review
description
How to handle code review feedback with technical rigor. Use when receiving review comments from code-reviewer agent, PR reviews, or external feedback. Triggers on: 'review feedback', 'address review', 'fix review comments', 'code review response'.

Receiving Code Review Skill

How to handle review feedback with technical rigor, not performative agreement.

When to Apply

  • After receiving code-reviewer agent output
  • PR review comments from teammates or external reviewers
  • External feedback on implementation decisions
  • When told to "address review comments" or "fix review feedback"

Response Pattern

READ -> UNDERSTAND -> VERIFY -> EVALUATE -> RESPOND -> IMPLEMENT

READ

Read the full review. Don't skim, don't react immediately. Take in every comment before acting on any of them. Later comments may contradict or contextualize earlier ones.

UNDERSTAND

For each issue, understand what's actually being flagged. Restate in your own words: "This comment is about X because Y." If you can't restate it, you don't understand it yet.

VERIFY

Check if the reviewer's claim is factually correct. Read the code they reference. Don't assume they're right or wrong -- look at the actual code at {file}:{line}.

EVALUATE

Is this a real issue? Does the suggested fix actually improve things? Is the effort justified given the impact? Not all feedback requires action.

RESPOND

Technical response only:

  • Agree with reasoning: "Correct. The null check is missing at line X. Fixing."
  • Disagree with evidence: "The review flags X, but {file}:{line} shows Y handles this case."
  • Ask for clarification: "The comment suggests X. Is the concern about safety or performance?"
IMPLEMENT

Fix in order: clarify unclear items -> blocking issues -> simple fixes -> complex fixes. Test each fix independently before moving to the next.

Forbidden Responses

These responses indicate you're people-pleasing, not engineering:

  • "You're absolutely right!" -- Performative agreement without understanding
  • "Great point!" -- Flattery is not technical discourse
  • "I'll fix that right away!" -- Understand before acting
  • "Of course, makes total sense!" -- Does it? Or are you people-pleasing?

Instead: "The review identifies X. Checking... [evidence]. This is correct because [reason]. Fixing."

Or: "The review suggests X, but [counter-evidence]. Keeping current approach because [reason]."

Source-Specific Handling

SourceTrust LevelResponse Style
Human partnerHigh contextClarify intent, implement thoughtfully
External reviewerMedium contextVerify claims against code, ask about unknowns
code-reviewer agentSystematic but no contextCross-reference with requirements, verify specifics
Show full SKILL.md (200 more words)Show less

When to Push Back

  • Technically incorrect -- "The review suggests X, but the code at {file}:{line} shows Y"
  • YAGNI -- "This adds complexity for a hypothetical scenario. Current implementation handles all existing cases"
  • Breaks existing functionality -- "This change would break {specific behavior} because {evidence}"
  • Missing context -- "The review assumes X, but the requirement specifies Y (see {reference})"

Pushing back is not adversarial. It's quality control. Reviewers benefit from knowing when their feedback misses context.

Implementation Order

  1. Clarify unclear items first (don't build on misunderstanding)
  2. Blocking/critical issues (things that prevent the code from working)
  3. Simple fixes (typos, naming, formatting)
  4. Complex fixes (refactors, architectural changes)
  5. Test each fix independently

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy It's WrongDo This Instead
Fix everything without reading all commentsLater comments may contradict earlier onesRead ALL comments first
Performative agreementHides misunderstandingRespond with technical reasoning
Batch all fixes in one commitCan't isolate if something breaksOne logical change per commit
Skip re-testing after fixesFixes introduce new bugsTest after every change
Ignore minor issuesThey accumulateFix or explicitly defer with reason

The Bottom Line

Review feedback is data, not judgment. Evaluate it technically, respond with evidence, implement with discipline.

© TechDufus, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in plugins/oh-my-claude/skills/receiving-code-review of TechDufus/oh-my-claude.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit ede75db

Compare with similar skills

Receiving Code Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Receiving Code Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Receiving Code Review this skillTechDufus/oh-my-claude174—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
PR Babysitteropeninterpreter/openinterpreter69k3 repos~4.2kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
WooCommerce Code Reviewwoocommerce/woocommerce11k3 repos~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Open Code Review CLIalibaba/open-code-review45k—~3.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
GitHub Review Iterationprisma/orm48k—~2.2kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Understand Diff AnalysisEgonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • PR Babysitter

    openinterpreter/openinterpreter

    Watches an open GitHub pull request until it merges, handling review comments, diagnosing CI failures and retrying flaky checks along the way.

    69k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~4.2k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • WooCommerce Code Review

    woocommerce/woocommerce

    Reviews WooCommerce code changes against the project's standards, flagging backend PHP architecture, naming, documentation, data integrity and testing violations.

    11k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~1.1k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Open Code Review CLI

    alibaba/open-code-review

    Runs the ocr command-line tool to review Git changes, a commit or a branch comparison with an AI model, returning line-level comments and optionally applying fixes.

    45k GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Official

    Runs a loop on a GitHub pull request: fetch review state, triage comments into actions, implement them and resolve threads, repeating until nothing actionable is left.

    48k GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Understand Diff Analysis

    Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything

    Reads your git changes or a pull request against a prebuilt knowledge graph of the project to explain what changed, which components are affected and what is risky.

    86k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Code Review

    flutter/flutter

    Performs a comprehensive, multi-step code review of pull requests or local code changes, using iterative refinement (generation, critique, synthesis) to ensure high-quality, actionable feedback.

    179k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed

More from TechDufus/oh-my-claude

All 12 skills in this repo
  • Debugger

    TechDufus/oh-my-claude

    Systematic debugging methodology for diagnosing failures and root cause analysis.

    174 GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Oh My Claude Runtime

    TechDufus/oh-my-claude

    A skill your agent uses when applying oh-my-claude workflow guidance, ultrawork modes, agent orchestration, plan execution, or plugin configuration.

    174 GitHub stars~4.3k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • PR Creation

    TechDufus/oh-my-claude

    MUST be used when creating pull requests. An agent skill from TechDufus/oh-my-claude.

    174 GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ralph Loop Init

    TechDufus/oh-my-claude

    Transform approved plans into ralph loop infrastructure. An agent skill from TechDufus/oh-my-claude.

    174 GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check: notes
  • Ralph Plan

    TechDufus/oh-my-claude

    Structured PRD generation with interview, research, and approval workflow.

    174 GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check: notes
  • Writing Skills

    TechDufus/oh-my-claude

    Methodology for creating effective skills using TDD principles.

    174 GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Receiving Code Review

What does Receiving Code Review do?

How to handle code review feedback with technical rigor. An agent skill from TechDufus/oh-my-claude. Receiving Code Review is an agent skill from TechDufus/oh-my-claude. How to handle code review feedback with technical rigor.

When should I use Receiving Code Review?

Receiving Code Review fits situations like: receiving review comments from code-reviewer agent; external feedback; : review feedback; fix review comments.

How do I install Receiving Code Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add TechDufus/oh-my-claude --skill receiving-code-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/oh-my-claude/skills/receiving-code-review in TechDufus/oh-my-claude) into .claude/skills/receiving-code-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Receiving Code Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add TechDufus/oh-my-claude --skill receiving-code-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/oh-my-claude/skills/receiving-code-review in TechDufus/oh-my-claude) into .agents/skills/receiving-code-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Receiving Code Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add TechDufus/oh-my-claude --skill receiving-code-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/receiving-code-review, .gemini/skills/receiving-code-review, .github/skills/receiving-code-review and .opencode/skills/receiving-code-review in your project.

What does Receiving Code Review need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Receiving Code Review is instructions for the agent only.

Does Receiving Code Review access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Receiving Code Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Receiving Code Review use?

Receiving Code Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Receiving Code Review use?

About 1.1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Receiving Code Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Receiving Code Review: PR Babysitter (openinterpreter/openinterpreter, 69k stars), WooCommerce Code Review (woocommerce/woocommerce, 11k stars), Open Code Review CLI (alibaba/open-code-review, 45k stars) and GitHub Review Iteration (prisma/orm, 48k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Receiving Code Review?

TechDufus (a GitHub user) maintains it in TechDufus/oh-my-claude, which has 174 GitHub stars. The repository holds 12 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on July 13, 2026.

Source: TechDufus/oh-my-claude on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.