Agent skill

GitHub Project Triage

by steipete in steipete/agent-scripts

Produces maintainer-facing triage cards for a project's GitHub issues and pull requests, each with its URL, risk, test state, blockers and a next action.

MITAuto-check passedDevelopment

Install GitHub Project Triage

skills CLI
$ npx skills add steipete/agent-scripts --skill github-project-triage -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install steipete/agent-scripts github-project-triage --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/steipete/agent-scripts.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/github-project-triage .claude/skills/github-project-triage && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
github-project-triage
GitHub stars
7.3k
Token cost
~4k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,722 words
Files
3 (incl. scripts)
Skills in repo
45
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Produces maintainer-facing triage cards for a project's GitHub issues and pull requests, each with its URL, risk, test state, blockers and a next action.

  • Works in 7 steps: Read the issue/PR, related code, docs,… → Decide if it is autonomous → Implement or fix the PR in the best… → …
  • Reviewing the open issue and pull request queue of a repo you maintain
  • SKILL.md covers Setup, Local Repo Gate, Scope Rule and Triage Output, plus 8 more sections
  • Runs Shell scripts from its folder; calls gh, git and swift; reaches github.com

What it does

When you type triage, the agent reviews the open issues and pull requests of the current GitHub project and answers with one card per item, never a bare list of numbers. Every card opens with the item's GitHub URL and then says what it is about, why it matters, how far to trust the author, how well it fits the project, the risk, the proof or test state, any blockers and the next action.

For a wide pass across several owners or organizations it starts with the RepoBar tool to find busy queues, then runs a detail pass on individual repos. Before touching a local checkout it checks git status, the current branch and a fast-forward pull, and it stops to ask you if the branch is not main or the tree has changes. The default owners for broad triage are the author's own accounts, so expect to adjust them. A script named scripts/github-activity.sh ships with the skill.

When your agent uses it

  • Reviewing the open issue and pull request queue of a repo you maintain
  • Working out which pull requests are held up by CI, review or missing proof
  • Getting a shortlist of issues and PRs with one URL per item
  • Running a cross-repo triage pass over several owners or organizations

Example prompts

  • “Triage the open pull requests in this repo and tell me which are safe to merge.”
  • “Do a broad triage across all my GitHub orgs and list one URL per item.”
  • “Go through the issue queue here and flag anything blocked on failing CI.”

Requirements

  • A local Git checkout with a GitHub remote
  • The `repobar` tool for broad multi-owner queue discovery

Workflow steps

7 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Read the issue/PR, related code, docs, CI, and VISION.md if present; Google/use official docs when facts may be stale or unclear.
  2. Decide if it is autonomous
  3. Implement or fix the PR in the best maintainable way. Prefer updating the contributor PR when writable; otherwise recreate locally with…
  4. Verify locally and live end-to-end when possible. For UI behavior, use the repo's expected live UI proof path, such as Peekaboo…
  5. Run Codex Auto Review before commit/land unless trivial/docs-only or explicitly skipped; address accepted/actionable findings.
  6. Ensure CI is green, PR description/changelog are good, land/close/comment with evidence, then return to main, pull --ff-only, and verify a…
  7. After every landed PR, post a PR comment with exactly how it was tested: local commands, live/UI/API proof, CI run/check state, landed…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 79150cf. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 1 file in scripts/ (Shell), which the agent can run.

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • gh
    • git
    • swift
    • jq

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    Hosts in commands or code, which the agent is likely to contact:

    • github.com

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

GitHub Project Triage loads about 4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 24 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,722 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~24
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from steipete/agent-scripts at commit 79150cf, republished under its MIT licence (© steipete). 1,722 words, ~3,982 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/github-project-triage/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 2 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
github-project-triage
description
GitHub issue/PR triage: queues, CI, blockers, risk, proof, next actions.

GitHub Project Triage

Always use this skill when the user types triage, unless the request explicitly targets a non-GitHub domain. From inside a repo, use the current GitHub project by default. Triage means maintainer-facing item cards: URL, what each issue/PR is about, why it matters, author trust, fit, risk, proof/test state, blockers, and next action. Never return only queue numbers or opaque refs.

Output is URL-first: every surfaced issue/PR/repo item must include its GitHub URL in the first line or first sentence for that item. If giving a shortlist, print one URL per item.

Use RepoBar as the first pass only for broad queue discovery across relevant owners/orgs. RepoBar is faster and more profile-aware than hand-rolling gh repo list loops, and it already understands repo activity, issue counts, PR counts, local projects, auth, cache, and filters.

Setup

Prefer a real repobar binary when installed. In this workspace it may only exist as a SwiftPM product in ~/Projects/RepoBar.

bash
repobar_cmd() {
  if command -v repobar >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    repobar "$@"
  elif [ -x "$HOME/Projects/RepoBar/.build/debug/repobarcli" ]; then
    "$HOME/Projects/RepoBar/.build/debug/repobarcli" "$@"
  else
    swift run --package-path "$HOME/Projects/RepoBar" repobarcli "$@"
  fi
}

repobar_cmd status --json

Default owners for broad triage: steipete, openclaw. For broad/default queue triage, include a detail pass for openclaw/openclaw even if it is not the first repo by count, because it is the main ClawdBot/OpenClaw queue. Do not include amantus-ai or other owners unless the user names them, the current repo is already under that owner, or the task explicitly asks for all/everything. For an exact owner-specific task, do not broaden beyond the named owner.

Local Repo Gate

Before starting work inside any local project, verify the checkout is ready:

bash
git status --short --branch
git branch --show-current
git pull --ff-only
git status --short --branch

Proceed only when the branch is main, the pull succeeds, and the worktree is clean. If the branch is not main, the pull fails, or git status --short shows changes, stop and ask Peter what to do. Do not switch branches, stash, commit, reset, restore, or clean without explicit direction.

Scope Rule

If the user says triage and the current working directory is a Git repo with a GitHub remote, triage only that project. Do not broaden to all Peter/org queues unless the user says broad, all, everything, names multiple owners/orgs, or asks for cross-repo triage.

If the repo has VISION.md, read it before judging what can be handled autonomously. Use it as the product-fit source of truth, then apply this skill's risk/testability rules. If no VISION.md exists, use the autonomous-fit rules below.

Find the current project:

bash
repo=$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner --jq .nameWithOwner 2>/dev/null || true)
if [ -z "$repo" ]; then
  url=$(git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null || true)
  repo=$(printf '%s\n' "$url" |
    sed -E 's#^git@github.com:##; s#^https://github.com/##; s#\\.git$##')
fi
printf '%s\n' "$repo"

Current-project triage starts with:

bash
gh issue list --repo "$repo" --state open --limit 50 \
  --json number,title,author,labels,createdAt,updatedAt,url
gh pr list --repo "$repo" --state open --limit 50 \
  --json number,title,author,isDraft,reviewDecision,mergeStateStatus,createdAt,updatedAt,url

Before acting on any issue or PR, read all comments and treat Peter/owner comments as authoritative routing instructions. If Peter says it looks good, needs changes, is superseded, is product-approved, or is not wanted, that overrides bot labels and ordinary triage judgment. If there is no Peter/owner comment, use maintainer judgment and say that the call is yours.

Then inspect enough detail to explain every surfaced item. For small queues (about 10 open items or fewer), inspect all items. For larger queues, inspect the top priority slice and say what was not expanded.

bash
gh issue view <n> --repo "$repo" \
  --json number,title,author,body,comments,labels,createdAt,updatedAt,url
gh pr view <n> --repo "$repo" \
  --json number,title,author,body,comments,files,commits,isDraft,reviewDecision,mergeStateStatus,statusCheckRollup,createdAt,updatedAt,url
gh pr diff <n> --repo "$repo" --patch

Only comment, close, merge, rerun, or patch with strong evidence.

Triage Output

When the user says triage, always scan open issues and open PRs for the current repo. Return:

  • Autonomous candidates: items that appear fixable/landable without more product input, with URL, why it qualifies, required verification, and confidence. This is a selection for review, not permission to start work unless the user also asks for autonomous execution.
  • Needs Peter: items blocked on Peter/owner decision, product direction, missing credentials/access, live-provider proof that cannot be obtained, security/privacy judgment, or an authoritative Peter comment requesting changes.
  • Defer/close/supersede: stale, duplicate, lower-quality, or overlapping items where the likely action is not new code.

For every plausible autonomous candidate, use available high-reasoning subagents, oracle, or independent agent review to check feasibility before presenting it when tool support exists. Give the subagent only task-local evidence and ask whether the item can be completed autonomously, what verification is required, and what could make it unsafe. If subagents are unavailable, do the same depth yourself and say so.

Autonomous Work Mode

When the user says do work autonomously, work you can do autonomously, keep going, or similar, do not stop after a queue summary or one local patch. Treat it as permission to process the eligible issue/PR queue sequentially until no safe autonomous item remains, each item is landed/closed/deferred with proof, or a blocker requires Peter.

Never work multiple tickets at once. For each item:

  1. Read the issue/PR, related code, docs, CI, and VISION.md if present; Google/use official docs when facts may be stale or unclear.
  2. Decide if it is autonomous:
    • Go: performance improvements unless complexity rises too much; bugfixes with repro/root cause and verification path; small UI/UX tweaks; docs fixes; narrow test/internal fixes; low-risk dependency/CI cleanup with green proof.
    • Ask first: new features, product/vision choices, broad behavior changes, risky dependencies, security-sensitive changes without strong proof, live-provider work without usable credentials, anything that cannot be end-to-end tested.
    • Refactor preference: choose a clean bounded refactor when it is the better fix for an autonomous item; do not use "small patch" as the default if it leaves worse design.
  3. Implement or fix the PR in the best maintainable way. Prefer updating the contributor PR when writable; otherwise recreate locally with credit.
  4. Verify locally and live end-to-end when possible. For UI behavior, use the repo's expected live UI proof path, such as Peekaboo, browser-use, screenshots, or VM proof. For API/provider behavior, use a real usable key/account through the expected secret workflow when available. If access is missing, stop before pretending the item is done and ask Peter for help.
  5. Run Codex Auto Review before commit/land unless trivial/docs-only or explicitly skipped; address accepted/actionable findings.
  6. Ensure CI is green, PR description/changelog are good, land/close/comment with evidence, then return to main, pull --ff-only, and verify a clean worktree before selecting the next autonomous item.
  7. After every landed PR, post a PR comment with exactly how it was tested: local commands, live/UI/API proof, CI run/check state, landed commit, and any caveats. If verification images apply, upload/post them with gh image when available; if the uploader is unavailable, say so and include the screenshot path or alternate GitHub attachment proof instead of silently omitting images.

Do not end autonomous mode with dirty files or an unpushed local fix unless blocked. If blocked, state the exact blocker, current branch/status, proof already gathered, and the next decision needed.

Autonomous work is still bounded by scope: current repo by default; broad/all queues only when the user asked for broad/all/everything or named owners/orgs.

Show full SKILL.md (654 more words)Show less

Trust Signals

Include author/opener trust for every non-maintainer item you recommend acting on. For low-risk Dependabot/internal items, a terse bot/internal trust line is enough.

Prefer the bundled helper:

bash
skills/github-project-triage/scripts/github-activity.sh --repo <owner/repo> --global <login>

Fallback if this skill checkout lacks the helper:

bash
~/Projects/clawdbot/.agents/skills/openclaw-pr-maintainer/scripts/github-activity.sh --repo <owner/repo> --global <login>

Also use github-author-context when a PR needs deeper trust judgment, especially for OpenClaw, security-sensitive changes, broad PRs, new accounts, or unusual author behavior. Prefer existing contributor notes first:

bash
~/Projects/maintainers/scripts/clawtributors find github <login>

Trust output must stay factual:

text
Trust: @login; acct 2021-04-03; repo 2 PRs/1 issue/0 commits in 12mo; GitHub 9 PRs/3 issues/12 reviews; signal: known contributor / new drive-by / bot / unknown.

Do not treat trust as proof. It changes review depth, not correctness.

Item Evaluation

Classify each item:

  • bug: require repro/log/failing test/current-main proof when feasible; identify root cause before recommending fix/merge.
  • feature: require end-to-end test plan. If live validation needs a provider key, account, device, service, model access, or paid API, say exactly what credential/access is missing before work can be considered complete.
  • dependency: explain package group, major/minor risk, failing checks, runtime/engine changes, and whether to split.
  • security: raise priority, require careful code-path proof, tests, and trust/context; do not merge on rationale alone.
  • docs/internal: lower risk, but still explain user-visible relevance and stale/generated churn risk.

Judge:

  • Fit: good / mixed / poor, with one reason.
  • Risk: low / medium / high, with blast radius.
  • Proof: current CI, local repro, failing test, live E2E, or missing proof.
  • Blocker: first-time contributor CI approval, failing check, missing key, unclear product direction, stale branch, untrusted/broad diff, no repro, conflicts.
  • Next: approve CI, run test, request repro, split PR, patch locally, merge after green, close with proof, or defer.

Fast Queue Map

Use this only when the scope is broad. Start with repo-level queue maps. This finds repos with open issues and/or PRs and gives counts.

PR queue, primary triage order:

bash
repobar_cmd repos \
  --scope all \
  --only-with work \
  --owner steipete \
  --owner openclaw \
  --sort prs \
  --json

Issue pressure, second pass when issues matter:

bash
repobar_cmd repos \
  --scope all \
  --only-with work \
  --owner steipete \
  --owner openclaw \
  --sort issues \
  --json

Use --forks and --archived only when the user says "all", "everything", or asks for archaeology. Default triage should omit forks and archived repos unless their queues are specifically relevant.

For a compact terminal view:

bash
repobar_cmd repos --scope all --only-with work --owner steipete --owner openclaw --sort prs --plain

Useful jq summary:

bash
repobar_cmd repos --scope all --only-with work --owner steipete --owner openclaw --sort prs --json |
  jq -r '.[] | [.fullName, .openIssues, .openPulls, .activityTitle, .activityActor] | @tsv'

When summarizing a PR-sorted queue, preserve RepoBar's PR-count order. Do not include a lower-PR repo while omitting a higher-PR repo from the same owner scope. Zero-issue repos with open PRs, for example openclaw/crabbox, are still triage-relevant.

Detail Pass

After a broad queue map, inspect only the top repos unless the user explicitly wants exhaustive detail.

bash
repobar_cmd issues <owner/name> --limit 50 --json
repobar_cmd pulls <owner/name> --limit 50 --json
repobar_cmd ci <owner/name> --limit 20 --json
repobar_cmd activity <owner/name> --limit 20 --json

For PRs that look mergeable or suspicious, switch to gh for maintainer-grade state:

bash
gh pr view <n> --repo <owner/name> --json number,title,state,author,isDraft,mergeStateStatus,reviewDecision,statusCheckRollup,updatedAt,url
gh pr diff <n> --repo <owner/name> --patch
gh run list --repo <owner/name> --branch <branch> --limit 10

For issues that may already be fixed, switch to gh issue view, then inspect current source before commenting or closing.

For OpenClaw/ClawdBot queues, use the OpenClaw maintainer pass when useful:

  • search duplicates/related threads with gitcrawl if available;
  • use the activity helper for opener/author identity;
  • suppress top-maintainer noise unless the user asks for maintainer-owned work;
  • prefer external/user-reported bugs and PRs with clear proof.

Local Cross-Check

Use this when the task mentions local project state, dirty repos, or "what do I own here".

bash
repobar_cmd local --root "$HOME/Projects" --depth 1 --limit 200 --plain
repobar_cmd local --root "$HOME/Projects" --depth 1 --sync --limit 200 --json

Do not run destructive local actions (local reset, branch deletes, checkout moves) unless the user explicitly asks.

Triage Heuristics

Prioritize:

  • PRs with green or nearly-green CI, recent maintainer activity, or low-risk dependency/docs/test changes.
  • Repos with high open PR counts but recent activity, because they often hide obvious cleanup.
  • Issues that are reproducible, recently reported, or block releases.
  • Security, release, auth, install, CI, and data-loss reports before cosmetic items.
  • Bugs with clear current-main reproduction and narrow owner path.
  • Features only when live validation is possible or the missing access is explicit.

Deprioritize:

  • Archived repos unless the user asked for them.
  • Fork-only queues unless the fork is actively maintained by Peter.
  • Old broad feature requests with no reproduction or owner signal.
  • Repos with missing/removable remotes until local state is clarified.
  • Feature/provider PRs that need unavailable API keys or accounts for end-to-end proof.
  • Broad generated changes without a clear user problem, test plan, or trusted author signal.

Output Shape

For current-project triage, answer with:

text
Repo: owner/name
Source: gh list/view/diff/checks, local source/tests where inspected

Immediate:
- #123 PR: title
  What: one-line summary in plain words.
  Type/Fit/Risk: bug|feature|dependency; good|mixed|poor; low|medium|high because ...
  Trust: @login; acct date; repo/global activity; known/unknown/bot.
  Proof: CI/repro/test/e2e state.
  Blocker: none / missing key / first-time CI approval / failing lint / unclear direction.
  Next: exact maintainer action.

Needs judgment:
- #124 issue: ...

Defer/close:
- #125 issue: ...

Skipped:
- <why>

For a broad scan, answer with:

text
Owners scanned: steipete, openclaw
Source: RepoBar <command summary>, plus gh for selected PRs/issues

Top queues:
- owner/repo: X issues, Y PRs; why it matters; next action

Immediate actions:
- <small obvious merge/fix/comment/rerun, with item summary>

Needs judgment:
- <larger/ambiguous queues, with item summary>

Skipped:
- archived/forks/missing access/etc.

When the user asks to act, keep going: inspect the selected PRs/issues with gh, rerun/fix CI, comment/close/merge only with evidence, and report exact commands/proof.

© steipete, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 2 other files (scripts) in skills/github-project-triage of steipete/agent-scripts.

  • SKILL.md
  • agents/openai.yaml
  • scripts/github-activity.sh

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 79150cf

Compare with similar skills

GitHub Project Triage next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

GitHub Project Triage compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
GitHub Project Triage this skillsteipete/agent-scripts7.3k—~4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Pre-Release PR Triagejamiepine/voicebox57k—~3.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Ouroboros Maintainer TriageQ00/ouroboros6.2k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Qwen Code Issue and PR TriageQwenLM/qwen-code28k—~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Open Source Maintainer Assistantslopus/happy24k—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Triage Contributor PRsprisma/orm48k—~3.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Pre-Release PR Triage

    jamiepine/voicebox

    Sorts a backlog of open pull requests into must-merge, candidate, superseded and deferred, writes a triage doc and works the merge loop before a release.

    57k GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Triages and works through GitHub issues and pull requests in the Q00/ouroboros repo as a maintainer, within a stated review boundary and clear limits on what it may change.

    6.2k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated yesterday
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Gatekeeps GitHub issues and pull requests for Qwen Code maintainers through staged static reviews that post a comment after each stage, under strict safety rules.

    28k GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Helps maintain the slopus/happy open source project by triaging issues, drafting closing comments, finding duplicates and checking fixes, with approval before anything is posted.

    24k GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Official

    Triages open pull requests from external contributors to prisma/orm, producing a per-PR verdict with evidence, without closing, commenting on or approving anything.

    48k GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated yesterday
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • GitHub Triage

    trailofbits/skills

    Official

    Triages open GitHub issues and pull requests with the gh CLI, optionally merging ready PRs, closing resolved issues with evidence and assigning local priority and size estimates.

    7.4k GitHub stars~5.8k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    DevelopmentAuto-check: notes

More from steipete/agent-scripts

All 45 skills in this repo
  • Mac Fleet Maintenance

    steipete/agent-scripts

    Inventories and maintains a fleet of Macs from a desired-state file: package updates, repo and Xcode sync, and disk, backup and security health reports.

    7.3k GitHub stars~4.8k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Agent Transcript for PRs

    steipete/agent-scripts

    Finds a coding agent's session log, trims and redacts it, and inserts it into a GitHub PR or issue only when the user has asked for a transcript.

    7.3k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~698 tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Parallels macOS VM Lab

    steipete/agent-scripts

    Uses a clean Parallels macOS VM to test GUI automation, TCC permission prompts and screenshot tools like Peekaboo, verifying results from outside the guest.

    7.3k GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • ClawSweeper Status

    steipete/agent-scripts

    Reports ClawSweeper's status with a bundled script: workflow health, active workers, queue health and recently merged, reviewed, commented and closed items.

    7.3k GitHub stars~972 tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Nano Banana Image Generation

    steipete/agent-scripts

    Generates and edits images with Google's Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) through a uv script, with a draft-then-final workflow and sizes from 512 to 4K.

    7.3k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • npm Registry Operations

    steipete/agent-scripts

    Handles npm registry tasks such as whoami checks, package name availability, name reservation and publishing, with credentials pulled from 1Password.

    7.3k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Categories

Questions about GitHub Project Triage

What does GitHub Project Triage do?

Produces maintainer-facing triage cards for a project's GitHub issues and pull requests, each with its URL, risk, test state, blockers and a next action. When you type triage, the agent reviews the open issues and pull requests of the current GitHub project and answers with one card per item, never a bare list of numbers. Every card opens with the item's GitHub URL and then says what it is about, why it matters, how far to trust the author, how well it fits the project, the risk, the proof or test state, any blockers and the next action.

When should I use GitHub Project Triage?

GitHub Project Triage fits situations like: reviewing the open issue and pull request queue of a repo you maintain; working out which pull requests are held up by CI, review or missing proof; getting a shortlist of issues and PRs with one URL per item; running a cross-repo triage pass over several owners or organizations.

How do I install GitHub Project Triage in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add steipete/agent-scripts --skill github-project-triage -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/github-project-triage in steipete/agent-scripts) into .claude/skills/github-project-triage in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install GitHub Project Triage in Codex?

Run `npx skills add steipete/agent-scripts --skill github-project-triage -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/github-project-triage in steipete/agent-scripts) into .agents/skills/github-project-triage in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use GitHub Project Triage in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add steipete/agent-scripts --skill github-project-triage -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/github-project-triage, .gemini/skills/github-project-triage, .github/skills/github-project-triage and .opencode/skills/github-project-triage in your project.

What does GitHub Project Triage need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, GitHub Project Triage needs a shell for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (gh, git, swift and jq). Our summary lists: A local Git checkout with a GitHub remote; The `repobar` tool for broad multi-owner queue discovery.

Does GitHub Project Triage access the network?

SKILL.md names 1 domain. In commands or code: github.com; the agent is likely to contact it when it follows the instructions. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is GitHub Project Triage safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does GitHub Project Triage use?

GitHub Project Triage is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does GitHub Project Triage use?

About 4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 16k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to GitHub Project Triage?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with GitHub Project Triage: Pre-Release PR Triage (jamiepine/voicebox, 57k stars), Ouroboros Maintainer Triage (Q00/ouroboros, 6.2k stars), Qwen Code Issue and PR Triage (QwenLM/qwen-code, 28k stars) and Open Source Maintainer Assistant (slopus/happy, 24k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains GitHub Project Triage?

steipete (a GitHub user) maintains it in steipete/agent-scripts, which has 7,259 GitHub stars. The repository holds 45 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 4, 2026.

Source: steipete/agent-scripts on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.