Agent skill

Xuefeng Method

by staruhub in staruhub/ClaudeSkills

雪峰式AI-Native产品开发方法论。适用于:(1) 用户行为开放、不可穷举的AI-native产品(AI日历、AI助手、AI推荐、对话式产品等),(2) 强模型依赖型场景,AI驱动核心决策而非仅辅助,(3) 多专精Agent架构设计与分工,(4) 上线后快速校准、行为审计与漂移检测,(5) 模型选择和智能路由策略,(6)…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Xuefeng Method

skills CLI
$ npx skills add staruhub/ClaudeSkills --skill xuefeng-method -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install staruhub/ClaudeSkills xuefeng-method --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/staruhub/ClaudeSkills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/Geek-skills-xuefeng-method .claude/skills/xuefeng-method && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
xuefeng-method
GitHub stars
727
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
225 words
Files
6 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
20
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

雪峰式AI-Native产品开发方法论。适用于:(1) 用户行为开放、不可穷举的AI-native产品(AI日历、AI助手、AI推荐、对话式产品等),(2) 强模型依赖型场景,AI驱动核心决策而非仅辅助,(3) 多专精Agent架构设计与分工,(4) 上线后快速校准、行为审计与漂移检测,(5) 模型选择和智能路由策略,(6)…

  • Works in 5 steps: 用户的输入是自由文本/语音,而非选择菜单? → 同一输入,你希望AI给出不同风格的输出? → 用户会因为AI的回答方式而改变自己的后续行为? → …
  • SKILL.md covers 第零步:产品类型判断(必须先做), 第一原则:穷举是死循环, 第二原则:多养专精虾 and 第三原则:唯快不破, plus 6 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Xuefeng Method is an agent skill from staruhub/ClaudeSkills. 雪峰式AI-Native产品开发方法论。适用于:(1) 用户行为开放、不可穷举的AI-native产品(AI日历、AI助手、AI推荐、对话式产品等),(2) 强模型依赖型场景,AI驱动核心决策而非仅辅助,(3) 多专精Agent架构设计与分工,(4) 上线后快速校准、行为审计与漂移检测,(5) 模型选择和智能路由策略,(6) 概率性输出的质量评估。触发场景包括"AI-native产品怎么做"、"用户行为不可预测怎么办"、"多agent怎么分工"、"模型漂移怎么处理"、"校准到95%太难了"、"唯快不破"、"怎么选模型"、"agent并行分工"、"AI产品上线后怎么迭代"。注意:如果产品是场景明确、边界可定义的+AI类型,请改用 keqian-method skill。即使用户没有明确说"AI-native",但在讨论AI驱动决策、用户行为不可预测、概率性输出等话题时也应触发。

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 7 other files, including reference files (for example `evals/routing-evals.json`, `references/behavioral-clusters.md` and `references/drift-detection.md`).

The repository describes itself as: 13 curated Agent Skills for research, product decisions, decks, publishing, audits, and more — portable across skills-compatible agents. The licence is MIT.

Example prompts

  • “AI-native产品怎么做”
  • “用户行为不可预测怎么办”
  • “多agent怎么分工”
  • “/xuefeng-method”

Requirements

  • Python 3

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. 用户的输入是自由文本/语音,而非选择菜单?
  2. 同一输入,你希望AI给出不同风格的输出?
  3. 用户会因为AI的回答方式而改变自己的后续行为?
  4. 你无法为产品写出完整的功能测试用例集?
  5. 产品的核心价值在于AI的"判断"而非"执行"?

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 66e02d2. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are python).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Xuefeng Method loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs, and up to ~4.2k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 102 tokens; SKILL.md has 225 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~102
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~4.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from staruhub/ClaudeSkills at commit 66e02d2, republished under its MIT licence (© staruhub). 225 words, ~1,379 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/xuefeng-method/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 5 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
xuefeng-method
description
雪峰式AI-Native产品开发方法论。适用于:(1) 用户行为开放、不可穷举的AI-native产品(AI日历、AI助手、AI推荐、对话式产品等),(2) 强模型依赖型场景,AI驱动核心决策而非仅辅助,(3) 多专精Agent架构设计与分工,(4) 上线后快速校准、行为审计与漂移检测,(5) 模型选择和智能路由策略,(6) 概率性输出的质量评估。触发场景包括"AI-native产品怎么做"、"用户行为不可预测怎么办"、"多agent怎么分工"、"模型漂移怎么处理"、"校准到95%太难了"、"唯快不破"、"怎么选模型"、"agent并行分工"、"AI产品上线后怎么迭代"。注意:如果产品是场景明确、边界可定义的+AI类型,请改用 keqian-method skill。即使用户没有明确说"AI-native",但在讨论AI驱动决策、用户行为不可预测、概率性输出等话题时也应触发。
version
1.1.0

雪峰方法论:AI-Native 产品开发实战体系

核心理念:强模型依赖 × 多专精Agent × 快速校准 × 行为审计

来源:雪峰——AI-Native连续创业者,深耕AI日历管理等AI驱动产品。 核心洞察:穷举是死循环,唯快不破才是AI-native的生存之道。

与克谦方法论(keqian-method)互为对偶: 克谦解决"如何让AI在明确边界内可靠执行", 雪峰解决"当边界本身不确定时怎么办"。


第零步:产品类型判断(必须先做)

在选择任何开发策略之前,先判断你的产品类型。 选错方法论比没有方法论更危险。

类型特征关键判断标准推荐方法
+AI(场景依赖型)用户行为可枚举,AI辅助执行确定性流程能列出所有合法输入输出组合→ keqian-method
AI-native(强模型依赖型)AI驱动核心决策,用户行为开放式用户的下一步操作你无法预测→ 本skill
混合型核心流程确定,部分环节AI-native能拆分出哪些模块是确定的、哪些是开放的→ 两者结合,按模块选用
快速判断清单

回答以下问题,如果3个以上答"是",你大概率是AI-native:

  1. 用户的输入是自由文本/语音,而非选择菜单?
  2. 同一输入,你希望AI给出不同风格的输出?
  3. 用户会因为AI的回答方式而改变自己的后续行为?
  4. 你无法为产品写出完整的功能测试用例集?
  5. 产品的核心价值在于AI的"判断"而非"执行"?

第一原则:穷举是死循环

"穷举意味着:有多少人工,就有多少智能。这是死循环。"

为什么在AI-native场景下穷举不可行

在+AI场景下,克谦说"边界内可穷举,单维度选项有限"——这是对的。 但AI-native场景的数学不一样:

用户行为空间(开放) × 模型输出空间(概率性) × 上下文状态(动态)
= 组合爆炸,不可穷举

一个日历管理能有多复杂?答案是:走AI-native路线后,非常复杂。 因为用户一旦习惯AI-native交互,就永远回不到传统模式—— 你必须持续适应用户不断演化的期望。

替代穷举的三个策略

策略1:行为模式簇(Behavioral Clusters)

不枚举每个case,而是聚类用户行为模式:

原始行为空间(不可穷举)
    ↓ 聚类
行为模式簇(5-15个典型模式)
    ↓ 每个模式簇
设计对应的AI响应策略
    ↓ 边界case
优雅降级到确定性逻辑

策略2:优雅降级(Graceful Degradation)

AI不确定时,回退到确定性逻辑:

AI置信度 > 阈值 → AI决策(快路径)
AI置信度 < 阈值 → 确定性回退(安全路径)
AI置信度极低 → 请求人工介入(慢路径)

策略3:概率性验收(Probabilistic Acceptance)

不用 assert output == expected,而用 check output ∈ acceptable_set:

python
# 传统断言式(克谦适用)
assert response == "会议安排在下午3点"

# 行为属性式(雪峰适用)
assert "下午" in response
assert contains_time(response)
assert tone_is_professional(response)
assert no_hallucinated_contacts(response)

第二原则:多养专精虾

"多养两只虾,每只都比较专业,只干一种活。出了问题找bug容易。 一个全面能干的虾,出了问题找问题非常麻烦。"

专精Agent架构
               ┌─ 理解Agent(NLU:解析用户意图)
               │
用户输入 → 路由器 ─┼─ 执行Agent(Action:调用API/修改数据)
               │
               ├─ 校验Agent(Verify:检查执行结果)
               │
               └─ 表达Agent(NLG:生成用户可见回复)

每只虾只干一种活的好处:

  • 出bug时,能精确定位是哪只虾的问题
  • 单独升级/替换某只虾,不影响其他
  • 每只虾可以用最适合它的模型(路由策略)
拆分决策矩阵
条件拆分?原因
功能正交,输出互不依赖✅并行执行,互不干扰
各自有独立的验证标准✅单独eval,精确定位
失败时只影响局部✅局部重试,不整体报废
有上下文依赖链❌合并时容易出不一致
你无法精确控制上下文注入❌注入什么、多少都要精确控制
合并结果需要复杂对齐❌合并成本可能超过收益
与克谦方法的差异
维度克谦(单agent极致)雪峰(多专精agent)
默认选择顺序执行并行分工
适用场景有依赖链的长程任务功能正交的独立模块
出错定位在长链中回溯直接定位出错的虾
风险链越长概率乘越低合并时可能不一致

不是对错,是产品类型不同。 同一产品内也可以混用。


第三原则:唯快不破

"无法预知上线后用户反馈和喜好,只能唯快不破。"

AI-Native快速迭代循环
Phase 1: 行为属性测试(上线前)
├── 不是断言式测试,是属性检查
├── "输出合理吗?" 而非 "输出等于X吗?"
└── 通过 = 可以上线,不通过 = 还不够稳

Phase 2: 快速上线(MVP心态)
├── 不追求完美,追求"可接受"
├── 95%校准极难,先追求80%
└── 剩下的靠用户反馈补

Phase 3: 用户反馈 + 漂移检测
├── 收集:用户满意度、异常行为、投诉
├── 检测:模型输出分布是否偏移
└── 预警:漂移超过阈值 → 触发校准

Phase 4: 快速校准
├── 提示词迭代(最快)
├── 模型切换/升级(中等)
├── 微调/RLHF(最慢但最持久)
└── 下一轮上线 → 回到Phase 3
迭代速度 > 单次质量
策略单次质量迭代速度AI-native适用性
一次做到95%极高极慢❌ 不现实
先80%上线再迭代中等快✅ 推荐
60%就上低极快⚠️ 风险大,慎用

第四原则:模型选择实战

"如果不是纯coding,尽量不要用xxx-codex模型,直接切通用模型就行了。" "慢点就慢点,但牢靠,不啰嗦。"

模型路由决策树、dumb zone 防护和多模型协作细节见 references/model-routing.md。


第五原则:行为审计替代质量门禁

克谦用严格门禁 → 缓存命中飞轮。这在确定性输出场景有效。 AI-native输出是概率性的,需要不同的质量策略。

质量策略对比
维度克谦门禁(确定性)雪峰审计(概率性)
测试方式assert output == expectedcheck output ∈ acceptable_set
失败处理自动修复 → 升级人工分析漂移原因 → 调整策略
质量指标缓存命中率用户满意度 + 模型一致性
迭代触发门禁不通过用户反馈 + 漂移检测
成本模型高缓存命中 = 低成本路由到合适模型 = 可控成本
行为审计实施
定期(每日/每周)
├── 采样模型输出(N=100+)
├── 自动检查行为属性(格式、安全、一致性)
├── 人工抽检(关键决策质量)
├── 漂移检测(输出分布与基线对比)
└── 生成审计报告 → 决定是否触发校准
漂移检测信号

以下信号出现时,说明模型可能在漂移:

  1. 输出分布偏移:同类输入的输出风格/长度/结构发生变化
  2. 用户投诉增加:满意度指标下降
  3. 异常行为增多:超时、拒答、幻觉增加
  4. 上下游不一致:Agent间的输出格式或语义不对齐

第六原则:一切以用户为中心

"AI-native的代价很大,就是一切以用户为中心。" "用户一旦用惯了AI-native,就再也回不到传统模式了。"

用户适应性飞轮
用户使用AI-native产品
  → 用户期望提高(不接受传统交互)
  → 产品必须持续进化
  → 需要更强的模型 / 更好的校准
  → 用户体验提升
  → 用户期望进一步提高
  → …(正向循环,但也是成本螺旋)
管理用户期望
  • 不要过度承诺:AI-native不是万能的,明确能力边界
  • 设计优雅降级:AI不确定时给用户选择权,而非强行给答案
  • 透明度:让用户知道AI在做什么,建立信任
  • 反馈闭环:让用户的反馈真正影响产品迭代

验收标准(按本方法论执行的任务,交付前自查)

  • 第零步已做:产品类型判断(+AI / AI-native / 混合)有明确结论并据此选了方法
  • Agent 分工遵循"每只虾只干一种活",每个 Agent 的职责一句话说得清
  • 上线/交付带行为审计方案:知道怎么发现模型行为漂移,而不是等用户投诉
  • 没有为追求"校准到 95%"而无限延期——快速上线 + 快速校准的节奏有体现
  • 模型选择有路由依据(成本/能力/延迟),不是全用最贵的

实战与协作模板

实战工作流、日常运维节奏、与 keqian-method 的互补关系,以及心法总结已集中到 references/operating-playbook.md。入口文件只保留判断、原则和导航,避免主文档继续膨胀。


参考资料

更多细节请查阅:

  • references/behavioral-clusters.md — 行为模式簇设计方法
  • references/drift-detection.md — 模型漂移检测与校准协议
  • references/model-routing.md — 模型选择、上下文阈值和智能路由
  • references/operating-playbook.md — 实战工作流、运维节奏和方法论互补关系
  • evals/routing-evals.json — 触发边界回归用例(含与 keqian-method 的互斥镜像),改动 description 后用仓库根 scripts/run_routing_evals.py 校验

© staruhub, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 5 other files (references) in skills/Geek-skills-xuefeng-method of staruhub/ClaudeSkills.

  • SKILL.md
  • evals/routing-evals.json
  • references/behavioral-clusters.md
  • references/drift-detection.md
  • references/model-routing.md
  • references/operating-playbook.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 66e02d2

Compare with similar skills

Xuefeng Method next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Xuefeng Method compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Xuefeng Method this skillstaruhub/ClaudeSkills727—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Santa Methodaffaan-m/ECC276k3 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Santa Methodaffaan-m/ECC276k—~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Santa Methodaffaan-m/ECC276k—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Modern Array Methodsthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74k—~494Automated safety check: PassMIT
Refactor Method Complexity Reducegithub/awesome-copilot40k1 repos~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Santa Method

    affaan-m/ECC

    Multi-agent adversarial verification: two independent reviewers with the same rubric must both pass before output ships, with a fix-and-re-review convergence loop and human escalation cap.

    276k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~3.1k tokens
    EducationAuto-check passed
  • Santa Method

    affaan-m/ECC

    収束ループを持つマルチエージェント敵対的検証。2つの独立したレビューエージェントが両方合格して初めて出力を出荷できます。

    276k GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Santa Method

    affaan-m/ECC

    具有收敛循环的多智能体对抗验证。两个独立的审查代理必须都通过,输出才能发送。

    276k GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Modern Array Methods

    thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

    A skill your agent uses when reviewing scripts, client components, bundles, or runtime behavior related to Use modern array and object methods.

    74k GitHub stars~494 tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Refactor Method Complexity Reduce

    github/awesome-copilot

    Official

    Refactor given method ${input:methodName} to reduce its cognitive complexity to ${input:complexityThreshold} or below, by extracting helper methods.

    40k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.1k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Decide whether to fine-tune at all, and route to the right method (SFT, DPO/ORPO/KTO, GRPO/RLVR, continued pretraining) and base model.

    40k GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed

More from staruhub/ClaudeSkills

All 20 skills in this repo
  • Deep Research

    staruhub/ClaudeSkills

    A skill your agent uses when the user wants an evidence-based research memo, literature review, market/policy/technical landscape, or a multi-source decision brief with citations, trade-offs, and a…

    727 GitHub stars~2.8k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Wechat Article Writer

    staruhub/ClaudeSkills

    专业微信公众号文章助手,支持四个独立且可组合模式:article 写正文;image-prompts 从文章生成版本化、provider-neutral 的图片提示词 manifest 与稳定占位符,但不调用生图;layout 把文章和 manifest 确定性转换为微信安全的内联 HTML;full-pipeline…

    727 GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • A Share Analyst

    staruhub/ClaudeSkills

    A股分析研究助手,提供行情数据获取与技术面/基本面分析框架(仅供研究参考,不构成投资建议)。适用于:(1) 获取A股行情和历史数据,(2) 技术面分析(K线形态、MACD、KDJ、RSI、布林带等),(3) 基本面分析(财务指标、估值分析),(4) 板块热点追踪,(5) 选股策略筛选与量化因子分析,(6)…

    727 GitHub stars~871 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • C Drive Cleaner

    staruhub/ClaudeSkills

    Windows C盘清理和磁盘空间管理。当用户说C盘满了、磁盘空间不足、清理临时文件/缓存/回收站/系统日志、查找大文件、分析磁盘占用时使用。仅适用于 Windows 环境。不用于:macOS/Linux 磁盘清理、卸载软件(引导用户走系统卸载)、清理用户个人文件(只报告位置,删除决定权在用户)。

    727 GitHub stars~518 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Gaokao Expert

    staruhub/ClaudeSkills

    资深高考命题专家助手,提供专业的命题指导和评审服务。适用于创作高考试题、评审试题质量、分析试卷结构、了解命题趋势等场景。结合文档工具提取解压文件,使用网络搜索了解当年最新命题趋势,使用分析工具评估题目质量和试卷结构。涵盖"一核四层四翼"评价体系、题型规范、评分标准、命题流程等多个维度。不用于:大学/考研/中考命题(体系不同,仅可借鉴)、日常作业题编写、直接替考生解题。

    727 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • LLM Wiki

    staruhub/ClaudeSkills

    Build and maintain a structured LLM-generated wiki for any codebase.

    727 GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Xuefeng Method

What does Xuefeng Method do?

雪峰式AI-Native产品开发方法论。适用于:(1) 用户行为开放、不可穷举的AI-native产品(AI日历、AI助手、AI推荐、对话式产品等),(2) 强模型依赖型场景,AI驱动核心决策而非仅辅助,(3) 多专精Agent架构设计与分工,(4) 上线后快速校准、行为审计与漂移检测,(5) 模型选择和智能路由策略,(6)…. Xuefeng Method is an agent skill from staruhub/ClaudeSkills.

How do I install Xuefeng Method in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add staruhub/ClaudeSkills --skill xuefeng-method -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/Geek-skills-xuefeng-method in staruhub/ClaudeSkills) into .claude/skills/xuefeng-method in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Xuefeng Method in Codex?

Run `npx skills add staruhub/ClaudeSkills --skill xuefeng-method -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/Geek-skills-xuefeng-method in staruhub/ClaudeSkills) into .agents/skills/xuefeng-method in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Xuefeng Method in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add staruhub/ClaudeSkills --skill xuefeng-method -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/xuefeng-method, .gemini/skills/xuefeng-method, .github/skills/xuefeng-method and .opencode/skills/xuefeng-method in your project.

What does Xuefeng Method need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Xuefeng Method is instructions for the agent only. Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Xuefeng Method access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Xuefeng Method safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Xuefeng Method use?

Xuefeng Method is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Xuefeng Method use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 2.8k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Xuefeng Method?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Xuefeng Method: Santa Method (affaan-m/ECC, 276k stars), Santa Method (affaan-m/ECC, 276k stars), Santa Method (affaan-m/ECC, 276k stars) and Modern Array Methods (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Xuefeng Method?

staruhub (a GitHub user) maintains it in staruhub/ClaudeSkills, which has 727 GitHub stars. The repository holds 20 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on August 13, 2026.

Source: staruhub/ClaudeSkills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.