Agent skill

Research Ideation

by pedrohcgs in pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow

Generate structured research questions, testable hypotheses, and candidate empirical strategies from a topic, phenomenon, or dataset description.

MITAuto-check passedAgent Workflows

Install Research Ideation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill research-ideation -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow research-ideation --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/research-ideation .claude/skills/research-ideation && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
research-ideation
GitHub stars
1.7k
Token cost
~1.7k tokens
SKILL.md length
571 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
59
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Generate structured research questions, testable hypotheses, and candidate empirical strategies from a topic, phenomenon, or dataset description.

  • Works in 6 steps: Understand the input. Read $ARGUMENTS… → Generate 3-5 research questions ordered… → Tag each RQ with a likely paper type… → …
  • User says give me research ideas on X
  • SKILL.md covers Steps, Output Format, Post-Flight Verification… and Principles
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Research Ideation is an agent skill from pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow. Generate structured research questions, testable hypotheses, and candidate empirical strategies from a topic, phenomenon, or dataset description. Use when user says "give me research ideas on X", "brainstorm questions about Y", "what could I study with this data?", "I'm looking for a paper idea on...", "generate hypotheses for...". One-shot generation, not multi-turn. For idea-refinement use /interview-me.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.7k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Agent Workflows, covering Hypothesis generation, Brainstorming and Requirements gathering. The repository describes itself as: A ready-to-fork Claude Code template for academics using LaTeX/Beamer + R. Multi-agent review, quality gates, adversarial QA, and replication protocols. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • User says give me research ideas on X
  • Brainstorm questions about Y
  • What could I study with this data?
  • Im looking for a paper idea on...

Example prompts

  • “give me research ideas on X”
  • “brainstorm questions about Y”
  • “what could I study with this data?”
  • “/research-ideation”

Requirements

  • Pre-approved tools (allowed-tools): Read, Grep, Glob, Write, WebSearch, WebFetch, Agent, Task

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Understand the input. Read $ARGUMENTS and any referenced files. Check master_supporting_docs/ for related papers. Check .claude/rules/ for…
  2. Generate 3-5 research questions ordered from descriptive to causal
  3. Tag each RQ with a likely paper type (drawn from methods-referee.md)
  4. For each research question, develop
  5. Rank the questions by feasibility and contribution.
  6. Save the output to quality_reports/research_ideation_[sanitized_topic].md

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit ae72617. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves these tools, so the agent can use them without asking each time:

    • Read
    • Grep
    • Glob
    • Write
    • WebSearch
    • WebFetch
    • Agent
    • Task

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are markdown).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Research Ideation loads about 1.7k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 107 tokens; SKILL.md has 571 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~107
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.7k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow at commit ae72617, republished under its MIT licence (© pedrohcgs). 571 words, ~1,665 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/research-ideation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
research-ideation
description
Generate structured research questions, testable hypotheses, and candidate empirical strategies from a topic, phenomenon, or dataset description. Use when user says "give me research ideas on X", "brainstorm questions about Y", "what could I study with this data?", "I'm looking for a paper idea on...", "generate hypotheses for...". One-shot generation, not multi-turn. For idea-refinement use `/interview-me`.
allowed-tools
Read, Grep, Glob, Write, WebSearch, WebFetch, Agent, Task
argument-hint
[topic, phenomenon, or dataset description] [--no-verify]

Research Ideation

Generate structured research questions, testable hypotheses, and empirical strategies from a topic, phenomenon, or dataset.

Input: $ARGUMENTS — a topic (e.g., "minimum wage effects on employment"), a phenomenon (e.g., "why do firms cluster geographically?"), or a dataset description (e.g., "panel of US counties with pollution and health outcomes, 2000-2020").


Steps

  1. Understand the input. Read $ARGUMENTS and any referenced files. Check master_supporting_docs/ for related papers. Check .claude/rules/ for domain conventions.

  2. Generate 3-5 research questions ordered from descriptive to causal:

    • Descriptive: What are the patterns? (e.g., "How has X evolved over time?")
    • Correlational: What factors are associated? (e.g., "Is X correlated with Y after controlling for Z?")
    • Causal: What is the effect? (e.g., "What is the causal effect of X on Y?")
    • Mechanism: Why does the effect exist? (e.g., "Through what channel does X affect Y?")
    • Policy: What are the implications? (e.g., "Would policy X improve outcome Y?")
  3. Tag each RQ with a likely paper type (drawn from methods-referee.md):

    • reduced-form (DiD, IV, RD, event study, synthetic control)
    • structural (estimation of a fully-specified model)
    • theory+empirics (formal model + empirical test of its predictions)
    • descriptive (measurement, data construction, pattern documentation)
    • formal-theory (pure theory, no empirical test in this paper)
    • survey-experiment (vignette, conjoint, list-experiment)
    • unsure (when multiple types are plausible — the user can pick later via /interview-me)

    Use .claude/references/discipline-cards.md to bias the distribution by field (econ vs poli-sci default frequencies differ — e.g., poli-sci skews more toward survey-experiment and formal-theory than econ does).

  4. For each research question, develop:

    • Hypothesis: A testable prediction with expected sign/magnitude
    • Identification strategy: How to establish causality (DiD, IV, RDD, synthetic control, etc.)
    • Data requirements: What data would be needed? Is it available?
    • Key assumptions: What must hold for the strategy to be valid?
    • Potential pitfalls: Common threats to identification
    • Related literature: 2-3 papers using similar approaches
  5. Rank the questions by feasibility and contribution.

  6. Save the output to quality_reports/research_ideation_[sanitized_topic].md


Output Format

markdown
# Research Ideation: [Topic]

**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Input:** [Original input]

## Overview

[1-2 paragraphs situating the topic and why it matters]

## Research Questions

### RQ1: [Question] (Feasibility: High/Medium/Low)

**Type:** Descriptive / Correlational / Causal / Mechanism / Policy
**Paper type:** reduced-form / structural / theory+empirics / descriptive / formal-theory / survey-experiment / unsure

**Hypothesis:** [Testable prediction]

**Identification Strategy:**
- **Method:** [the identification approach you would defend in a seminar]
- **Treatment:** [What varies and when]
- **Control group:** [Comparison units]
- **Key assumption:** [the assumption the method's validity rests on, stated so it can be attacked]

**Data Requirements:**
- [Dataset 1 — what it provides]
- [Dataset 2 — what it provides]

**Potential Pitfalls:**
1. [Threat 1 and possible mitigation]
2. [Threat 2 and possible mitigation]

**Related Work:** [Author (Year)], [Author (Year)]

---

[Repeat for RQ2-RQ5]

## Ranking

| RQ | Feasibility | Contribution | Priority |
|----|-------------|-------------|----------|
| 1  | High        | Medium      | ...      |
| 2  | Medium      | High        | ...      |

## Suggested Next Steps

1. [Most promising direction and immediate action]
2. [Data to obtain]
3. [Literature to review deeper]

Show full SKILL.md (256 more words)Show less

Post-Flight Verification (mandatory, CoVe)

Before returning the ideation report, run the Post-Flight Verification protocol from .claude/rules/post-flight-verification.md. Research ideation is hallucination-prone in three specific ways:

  1. Negative-literature claims — "no prior work studies X" is frequently wrong.
  2. Dataset structure claims — "The CPS contains field educ_attain" can be confidently wrong about variable names, coverage years, or restricted-access status.
  3. Estimator feasibility claims — "this works with panel fixed effects" can misstate an identification assumption.
Steps
  1. Extract claims from the draft ideation report: each negative-literature claim, each named dataset with attributed fields, each claimed identification strategy + required data structure.
  2. Generate verification questions per claim. Example: "Has Card & Krueger, Autor, or anyone in the last 10 years studied X? Search Google Scholar + NBER working papers." / "Does IPUMS-CPS include the educ_attain variable 1990–2024?"
  3. Spawn claim-verifier via the Agent tool with subagent_type=claim-verifier, in a fresh context — a named Agent call, not a conversation fork, which would inherit the draft. Hand it claims + questions + source pointers (WebSearch allowed, NBER/SSRN URLs preferred, dataset codebooks preferred). Do NOT include the draft.
  4. Reconcile: PASS → attach green block; PARTIAL → mark uncertain RQs with flags; FAIL → rewrite the affected RQ/hypothesis/strategy.
Skip conditions
  • --no-verify flag
  • User explicitly says "I'll verify the literature myself"

Principles

  • Be creative but grounded. Push beyond obvious questions, but every suggestion must be empirically feasible.
  • Think like a referee. For each causal question, immediately identify the identification challenge.
  • Consider data availability. A brilliant question with no available data is not actionable.
  • Suggest specific datasets where possible (FRED, Census, PSID, administrative data, etc.).

© pedrohcgs, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in .claude/skills/research-ideation of pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit ae72617

Compare with similar skills

Research Ideation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Research Ideation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Research Ideation this skillpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow1.7k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Idea Generationvoidful/academic-skills135—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Research Ideationmaxwell2732/paper-replicate-agent-demo1371 repos~914Automated safety check: PassNone
Light Idea GenerationLight0305/Light-skills640—~4.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Idea Memo WriterWILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills513—~441Automated safety check: PassNone
Scholar Brainstormjoshzyj/open-scholar-skill168—~4.2kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Idea Generation

    voidful/academic-skills

    學術研究的 Idea 產生技能——從發散到收斂,系統化地產出高品質研究構想。當使用者想腦力激盪研究方向、找新 research idea、或問「我接下來可以做什麼研究」時,一定要使用此技能。觸發詞包括:brainstorm、想 idea、研究方向、下一步做什麼、有什麼可以研究的、找 gap、research proposal。適用於任何階段的學術研究構想生成。

    135 GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Research Ideation

    maxwell2732/paper-replicate-agent-demo

    Generate structured research questions, testable hypotheses, and empirical strategies from a topic or dataset

    137 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~914 tokens
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Light Idea Generation

    Light0305/Light-skills

    Light 科研主线第 3 步·提 idea:从模糊方向/数据/文献结构化发散(激发算子系统生成,不是泛泛头脑风暴) → 产值得做且做得成的分层候选 idea(moonshot 冲刺/solid 稳妥/safe 保底),每个必答为什么值得做·创新点· 比现有强在哪·解决什么具体问题·能投什么层次,且提出时就自带撞车前置自查(最像的前作+delta,吃上游 literature-search…

    640 GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Idea Memo Writer

    WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

    Synthesize the shortlist into a discussion-ready research idea brainstorm memo, writing output/REPORT.md, output/APPENDIX.md, and output/REPORT.json.

    513 GitHub stars~441 tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Scholar Brainstorm

    joshzyj/open-scholar-skill

    Generate research questions from existing materials — codebooks, survey questionnaires, datasets, or published papers/abstracts.

    168 GitHub stars~4.2k tokensUpdated 22 days ago
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Research Ideation

    meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff

    Generate research questions from economic phenomena. An agent skill from meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff.

    646 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.5k tokens
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed

More from pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow

All 59 skills in this repo
  • Devils Advocate

    pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow

    Adversarial 5-7 question challenge to a deck's pedagogical choices — ordering, prerequisites, cognitive load, motivation.

    1.7k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~641 tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Vaccinate

    pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow

    Qualify a check before it is allowed to clear anything — prove it can detect the failure it is meant to catch.

    1.7k GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check: notes
  • Compile Latex

    pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow

    Compile a Beamer LaTeX slide deck with XeLaTeX (3 passes + bibtex).

    1.7k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~492 tokens
    Auto-check: notes
  • Context Status

    pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow

    Show current context status and session health. An agent skill from pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow.

    1.7k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~613 tokens
    Auto-check: notes
  • Capture Environment

    pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow

    Snapshot the computational environment for a replication package — detects the analysis stack (R / Stata / Python) and emits the right lockfiles (renv.lock + sessionInfo.txt, requirements.txt /…

    1.7k GitHub stars~2.8k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check: notes
  • Checkpoint

    pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow

    Save a structured state snapshot before stopping or handing off.

    1.7k GitHub stars~2.8k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check: notes

Questions about Research Ideation

What does Research Ideation do?

Generate structured research questions, testable hypotheses, and candidate empirical strategies from a topic, phenomenon, or dataset description. Research Ideation is an agent skill from pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow. Generate structured research questions, testable hypotheses, and candidate empirical strategies from a topic, phenomenon, or dataset description.

When should I use Research Ideation?

Research Ideation fits situations like: user says give me research ideas on X; brainstorm questions about Y; what could I study with this data?; im looking for a paper idea on...

How do I install Research Ideation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill research-ideation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.claude/skills/research-ideation in pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow) into .claude/skills/research-ideation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Research Ideation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill research-ideation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.claude/skills/research-ideation in pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow) into .agents/skills/research-ideation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Research Ideation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill research-ideation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/research-ideation, .gemini/skills/research-ideation, .github/skills/research-ideation and .opencode/skills/research-ideation in your project.

What does Research Ideation need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Research Ideation is instructions for the agent only. Its frontmatter pre-approves these tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Write, WebSearch, WebFetch, Agent, Task.

Does Research Ideation access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Research Ideation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Research Ideation use?

Research Ideation is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Research Ideation use?

About 1.7k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Research Ideation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Research Ideation: Idea Generation (voidful/academic-skills, 135 stars), Research Ideation (maxwell2732/paper-replicate-agent-demo, 137 stars), Light Idea Generation (Light0305/Light-skills, 640 stars) and Idea Memo Writer (WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills, 513 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Research Ideation?

pedrohcgs (a GitHub user) maintains it in pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow, which has 1,655 GitHub stars. The repository holds 59 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.