Agent skill

Review

by parcadei in parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3

Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis

MITAuto-check passedDevelopment

Install Review

skills CLI

$ npx skills add parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 --skill review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/review .claude/skills/review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Paste into Claude Code

Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3/tree/main/.claude/skills/review into .claude/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.

Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

$skill-installer

$skill-installer install https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3/tree/main/.claude/skills/review

Type this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 --skill review -a codex

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 review --agent codex

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/review .agents/skills/review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.

Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/

Paste into Codex

Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3/tree/main/.claude/skills/review into .agents/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.

Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 --skill review -a cursor

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 review --agent cursor

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/review .cursor/skills/review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.

Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/

Paste into Cursor

Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3/tree/main/.claude/skills/review into .cursor/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.

Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

gemini skills install

$ gemini skills install https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3.git --path .claude/skills/review

--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 --skill review -a gemini-cli

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 review --agent gemini-cli

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/review .gemini/skills/review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.

Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/

Paste into Gemini CLI

Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3/tree/main/.claude/skills/review into .gemini/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.

Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 review

Installs for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

skills CLI

$ npx skills add parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 --skill review -a github-copilot

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/review .github/skills/review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.

GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/

Paste into GitHub Copilot

Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3/tree/main/.claude/skills/review into .github/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.

GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 --skill review -a opencode

OpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 review --agent opencode

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/review .opencode/skills/review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.

OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/

Paste into OpenCode

Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3/tree/main/.claude/skills/review into .opencode/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.

OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

Facts

Skill name: review
GitHub stars: 3.9k
Used in: 1 other repo
Token cost: ~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length: 140 words
Files: 1
Skills in repo: 141
Repo updated: Jan 26, 2026
First seen: Oct 7, 2026
Licence: MIT

At a glance

Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis

Works in 2 steps: Parallel Reviews → Synthesis
Tasks that involve Code review
SKILL.md covers When to Use, Workflow Overview, Agent Sequence and Review Perspectives, plus 4 more sections
Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Review is an agent skill from parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3. Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Development, covering Code review. The repository describes itself as: Context management for Claude Code. Hooks maintain state via ledgers and handoffs. MCP execution without context pollution. Agent orchestration with isolated context windows. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

Tasks that involve Code review

Example prompts

“/review”

Workflow steps

2 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

Parallel Reviews
Synthesis

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit d07ff4b. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Review loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 21 tokens; SKILL.md has 140 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it: ~21
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches: ~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 at commit d07ff4b, republished under its MIT licence (© parcadei). 140 words, ~1,291 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).

name: review
description: Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis

/review - Code Review Workflow

Multi-perspective code review with parallel specialists.

When to Use

"Review this code"
"Review my PR"
"Check this before I merge"
"Get feedback on implementation"
Before merging significant changes
Quality gates

Workflow Overview

         ┌──────────┐
         │  critic  │ ─┐
         │ (code)   │  │
         └──────────┘  │
                       │
         ┌──────────┐  │      ┌──────────────┐
         │plan-reviewer│ ─┼────▶ │ review-agent │
         │ (plan)   │  │      │ (synthesis)  │
         └──────────┘  │      └──────────────┘
                       │
         ┌──────────┐  │
         │plan-reviewer│ ─┘
         │ (change) │
         └──────────┘

         Parallel                Sequential
         perspectives            synthesis

Agent Sequence

#	Agent	Focus	Execution
1	critic	Code quality, patterns, readability	Parallel
1	plan-reviewer	Architecture, plan adherence	Parallel
1	plan-reviewer	Change impact, risk assessment	Parallel
2	review-agent	Synthesize all reviews, final verdict	After 1

Review Perspectives

critic: Is this good code? (Style, patterns, readability)
plan-reviewer: Does this match the design? (Architecture, plan)
plan-reviewer: Is this change safe? (Risk, impact, regressions)
review-agent: Overall assessment and recommendations

Execution

Phase 1: Parallel Reviews

# Code quality review
Task(
  subagent_type="critic",
  prompt="""
  Review code quality: [SCOPE]

  Evaluate:
  - Code style and consistency
  - Design patterns used
  - Readability and maintainability
  - Error handling
  - Test coverage

  Output: List of issues with severity (critical/major/minor)
  """,
  run_in_background=true
)

# Architecture review
Task(
  subagent_type="plan-reviewer",
  prompt="""
  Review architecture alignment: [SCOPE]

  Check:
  - Follows established patterns
  - Matches implementation plan (if exists)
  - Consistent with system design
  - No architectural violations

  Output: Alignment assessment with concerns
  """,
  run_in_background=true
)

# Change impact review
Task(
  subagent_type="plan-reviewer",
  prompt="""
  Review change impact: [SCOPE]

  Assess:
  - Risk level of changes
  - Affected systems/components
  - Backward compatibility
  - Potential regressions
  - Security implications

  Output: Risk assessment with recommendations
  """,
  run_in_background=true
)

# Wait for all parallel reviews
[Check TaskOutput for all three]

Phase 2: Synthesis

Task(
  subagent_type="review-agent",
  prompt="""
  Synthesize reviews for: [SCOPE]

  Reviews:
  - critic: [code quality findings]
  - plan-reviewer: [architecture findings]
  - plan-reviewer: [change impact findings]

  Create final review:
  - Overall verdict (APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / NEEDS_DISCUSSION)
  - Prioritized action items
  - Blocking vs non-blocking issues
  - Summary for PR description
  """
)

Review Modes

Full Review

User: /review
→ All four agents, comprehensive review

Quick Review

User: /review --quick
→ critic only, fast feedback

Security Focus

User: /review --security
→ Add aegis (security agent) to parallel phase

PR Review

User: /review PR #123
→ Fetch PR diff, review changes

Example

User: /review the authentication changes

Claude: Starting /review workflow...

Phase 1: Running parallel reviews...
┌────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ critic: Reviewing code quality...          │
│ plan-reviewer: Checking architecture...         │
│ plan-reviewer: Assessing change impact...         │
└────────────────────────────────────────────┘

critic: Found 2 issues
- [minor] Inconsistent error messages in auth.ts
- [major] Missing input validation in login()

plan-reviewer: ✅ Matches authentication plan

plan-reviewer: Medium risk
- Affects: login, signup, password reset
- Breaking change: session token format

Phase 2: Synthesizing...

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Review Summary                              │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Verdict: REQUEST_CHANGES                    │
│                                             │
│ Blocking:                                   │
│ 1. Add input validation to login()          │
│                                             │
│ Non-blocking:                               │
│ 2. Standardize error messages               │
│                                             │
│ Notes:                                      │
│ - Document session token format change      │
│ - Consider migration path for existing      │
│   sessions                                  │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Verdicts

APPROVE: Ready to merge, all issues are minor
REQUEST_CHANGES: Blocking issues must be fixed
NEEDS_DISCUSSION: Architectural decisions need input

Files

Just SKILL.md in .claude/skills/review of parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit d07ff4b

Used in 1 other repository

We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

vibeeval/vibecosystemskills/review

Compare with similar skills

Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Review compared with similar skills
Skill	Stars	Used in	Tokens	Auto-check	Licence	Repo updated
Review this skillparcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3	3.9k	1 repos	~1.3k	Automated safety check: Pass	MIT	8 mo ago
PR Babysitteropeninterpreter/openinterpreter	69k	3 repos	~4.2k	Automated safety check: Pass	Apache-2.0	3 days ago
Code Review ChecklistshareAI-lab/learn-claude-code	78k	5 repos	~1.1k	Automated safety check: Pass	MIT	11 days ago
Backend Code Reviewlangflow-ai/langflow	155k	—	~3.5k	Automated safety check: Notes	MIT	yesterday
Mole Bug Patternstw93/Mole	70k	—	~2k	Automated safety check: Pass	GPL-3.0	yesterday
Backend Code Reviewlanggenius/dify	158k	—	~676	Automated safety check: Pass	Custom licence	today

Similar skills

PR Babysitter
openinterpreter/openinterpreter
Watches an open GitHub pull request until it merges, handling review comments, diagnosing CI failures and retrying flaky checks along the way.
69k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~4.2k tokens
DevelopmentAuto-check passed
Code Review Checklist
shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code
Reviews code against a five-part checklist covering security, correctness, performance, maintainability and testing, and reports findings in a fixed format.
78k GitHub starsUsed in 5 repos~1.1k tokens
DevelopmentAuto-check passed
Backend Code Review
langflow-ai/langflow
Review backend code for quality, security, maintainability, and best practices based on established checklist rules.
155k GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
DevelopmentAuto-check: notes
Mole Bug Patterns
tw93/Mole
A catalog of recurring bug shapes in the Mole Mac cleaner, used to review safety-sensitive diffs for deletion safety, unbounded commands, shell traps and weak tests.
70k GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated yesterday
DevelopmentAuto-check passed
Backend Code Review
langgenius/dify
Reviews backend code under api/ for concrete, reproducible defects, routes to rule packs for architecture, schema, repositories and SQLAlchemy, and ranks findings from P0 to P3.
158k GitHub stars~676 tokensUpdated today
DevelopmentAuto-check passed
WooCommerce Code Review
woocommerce/woocommerce
Reviews WooCommerce code changes against the project's standards, flagging backend PHP architecture, naming, documentation, data integrity and testing violations.
11k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~1.1k tokens
DevelopmentAuto-check passed

Questions about Review

What does Review do?

Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis. Review is an agent skill from parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3.

When should I use Review?

Review fits situations like: tasks that involve Code review.

How do I install Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 --skill review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.claude/skills/review in parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3) into .claude/skills/review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 --skill review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.claude/skills/review in parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3) into .agents/skills/review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 --skill review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/review, .gemini/skills/review, .github/skills/review and .opencode/skills/review in your project.

What does Review need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Review is instructions for the agent only.

Does Review access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Review use?

Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Review use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Review: PR Babysitter (openinterpreter/openinterpreter, 69k stars), Code Review Checklist (shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code, 78k stars), Backend Code Review (langflow-ai/langflow, 155k stars) and Mole Bug Patterns (tw93/Mole, 70k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Review?

parcadei (a GitHub user) maintains it in parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3, which has 3,943 GitHub stars. The repository holds 141 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on January 26, 2026.

Source: parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.

Install Review

Facts

At a glance

What it does

When your agent uses it

Example prompts

Workflow steps

What it can do on your machine

Tool permissions

Runs code

Network

Credentials

Context cost

Safety

SKILL.md

/review - Code Review Workflow

When to Use

Workflow Overview

Agent Sequence

Review Perspectives

Execution

Phase 1: Parallel Reviews

Phase 2: Synthesis

Review Modes

Full Review

Quick Review

Security Focus

PR Review

Example

Verdicts

Files

Used in 1 other repository

Compare with similar skills

Similar skills

More from parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3

Related

Questions about Review