Review content for accessibility across cognitive and literacy levels.

MITAuto-check passedFrontend & Design

Install Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/accessible-content/skills/review .claude/skills/review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
review
GitHub stars
105
Token cost
~543 tokens
SKILL.md length
246 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
55
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Review content for accessibility across cognitive and literacy levels.

  • Works in 5 steps: Structure Check → Readability Check → Image and Media Check → …
  • Auditing existing content for accessibility
  • SKILL.md covers Process and Output
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Review is an agent skill from Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills. Review content for accessibility across cognitive and literacy levels. Chains: readable-content, alt-text-design, heading-structure, link-text-design, table-accessibility, form-labelling, multimedia-accessibility. Use when auditing existing content for accessibility.

Its SKILL.md is about 540 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Frontend & Design, covering Accessibility and On-page SEO. The repository describes itself as: Inclusive design skills for AI coding agents — from cognitive accessibility to adaptive interfaces, inclusive research, and accessibility decision-making. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Auditing existing content for accessibility
  • Tasks that involve Accessibility
  • Tasks that involve On-page SEO

Example prompts

  • “/review”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Structure Check
  2. Readability Check
  3. Image and Media Check
  4. Link and Navigation Check
  5. Table and Form Check

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 6e0740f. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Review loads about 543 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 69 tokens; SKILL.md has 246 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~69
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~543

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills at commit 6e0740f, republished under its MIT licence (© Owl-Listener). 246 words, ~543 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
review
description
Review content for accessibility across cognitive and literacy levels. Chains: readable-content, alt-text-design, heading-structure, link-text-design, table-accessibility, form-labelling, multimedia-accessibility. Use when auditing existing content for accessibility.

Accessible Content Review

Run a comprehensive review of content accessibility — covering structure, language, images, links, tables, forms, and multimedia.

Process

Phase 1: Structure Check

Using heading-structure, verify the document outline:

  • One H1, no skipped levels, headings describe content
  • Someone reading only headings would understand the page
Phase 2: Readability Check

Using readable-content, assess the text:

  • Reading level appropriate to audience
  • Sentences under 20 words, paragraphs under 4 sentences
  • Most important information first
  • Scannable with headings, bold, and lists
Phase 3: Image and Media Check

Using alt-text-design and multimedia-accessibility, review:

  • Every image has appropriate alt text (or empty alt for decorative)
  • Complex images have extended descriptions
  • Video has captions, audio has transcripts
  • Media players are keyboard accessible

Using link-text-design, verify:

  • All link text makes sense out of context
  • No generic "click here" or "read more"
  • File links state type and size
Phase 5: Table and Form Check

Using table-accessibility and form-labelling, review:

  • Tables have headers, captions, and responsive behaviour
  • Forms have visible labels, grouping, and error association
  • No placeholder-only labels

Output

Present findings as:

  1. Summary — overall content accessibility rating
  2. Issue list — each issue with location, type, severity, and fix
  3. Quick wins — issues that can be fixed in under 5 minutes each
  4. Structural issues — problems that need redesign or rewriting

Severity definitions:

  • Critical — content is inaccessible to one or more user groups
  • Major — content is difficult to access or understand
  • Minor — content could be improved but is functional

© Owl-Listener, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in accessible-content/skills/review of Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 6e0740f

Compare with similar skills

Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Review this skillOwl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills105—~543Automated safety check: PassMIT
Roier SEOdavila7/claude-code-templates33k—~2.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Md Reviewborghei/Claude-Skills891—~3.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Blog System Designswyxio/skills176—~3.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Web Interface Guidelines Reviewervercel-labs/openreview1.7k97 repos~308Automated safety check: PassNone
Accessibility Reviewmarkmead/hyperui12k1 repos~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Roier SEO

    davila7/claude-code-templates

    Technical SEO auditor and fixer. An agent skill from davila7/claude-code-templates.

    33k GitHub stars~2.7k tokensUpdated today
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Md Review

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Pre-publication quality gate for authored Markdown — heading structure, on-disk link resolution, readability, accessibility, terminology.

    891 GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Blog System Design

    swyxio/skills

    Design, build, or revise a technical blog as a product system.

    176 GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Web Interface Guidelines Reviewer

    vercel-labs/openreview

    Official

    Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my…

    1.7k GitHub starsUsed in 97 repos~308 tokens
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Accessibility Review

    markmead/hyperui

    Run a WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility audit on a design or page. An agent skill from markmead/hyperui.

    12k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.1k tokens
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Web Animation Design

    baptisteArno/typebot.io

    Guides easing, timing and animation choices for UI motion, based on a web animation course, and reviews existing animations in a before-and-after table.

    11k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.7k tokens
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed

More from Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

All 55 skills in this repo
  • Assistive Technology Scenarios

    Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

    Writes usage scenarios, use cases and storyboards that show real people using screen readers, switches, voice control and other assistive technology to finish tasks.

    105 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Error Prevention and Recovery

    Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

    Designs forgiving forms and flows: prevent input errors, write messages that say what happened and what to do, and add undo, confirmation and recovery paths.

    105 GitHub stars~739 tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Accessible Heading Structure

    Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

    Designs heading hierarchies for screen reader navigation and cognitive accessibility on pages, articles, dashboards and forms.

    105 GitHub stars~763 tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ability Spectrum Mapping

    Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

    Maps a feature across a range of vision, hearing, motor and cognitive ability to find where the design starts to fail, and to explain accessibility scope to stakeholders.

    105 GitHub stars~917 tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Accessibility Debt Tracking

    Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

    Track and manage accessibility debt — known accessibility issues that have been deferred.

    105 GitHub stars~869 tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Accessibility Testing Strategy

    Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

    Plan what to test, how to test, and who should test for accessibility.

    105 GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Review

What does Review do?

Review content for accessibility across cognitive and literacy levels. Review is an agent skill from Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills. Review content for accessibility across cognitive and literacy levels.

When should I use Review?

Review fits situations like: auditing existing content for accessibility; tasks that involve Accessibility; tasks that involve On-page SEO.

How do I install Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (accessible-content/skills/review in Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills) into .claude/skills/review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (accessible-content/skills/review in Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills) into .agents/skills/review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/review, .gemini/skills/review, .github/skills/review and .opencode/skills/review in your project.

What does Review need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Review is instructions for the agent only.

Does Review access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Review use?

Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Review use?

About 543 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 2.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Review: Roier SEO (davila7/claude-code-templates, 33k stars), Md Review (borghei/Claude-Skills, 891 stars), Blog System Design (swyxio/skills, 176 stars) and Web Interface Guidelines Reviewer (vercel-labs/openreview, 1.7k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Review?

Owl-Listener (a GitHub user) maintains it in Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills, which has 105 GitHub stars. The repository holds 55 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on June 9, 2026.

Source: Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.