Web Interface Guidelines Reviewer
vercel-labs/openreview
Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my…
Review and surface undocumented accessibility assumptions in an existing feature or product.
Install Review
$ npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill review -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills review --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/accessibility-decisions/skills/review .claude/skills/review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills/tree/main/accessibility-decisions/skills/review into .claude/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills/tree/main/accessibility-decisions/skills/reviewType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill review -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills review --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/accessibility-decisions/skills/review .agents/skills/review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills/tree/main/accessibility-decisions/skills/review into .agents/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill review -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills review --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/accessibility-decisions/skills/review .cursor/skills/review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills/tree/main/accessibility-decisions/skills/review into .cursor/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills.git --path accessibility-decisions/skills/review--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill review -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills review --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/accessibility-decisions/skills/review .gemini/skills/review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills/tree/main/accessibility-decisions/skills/review into .gemini/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills reviewInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill review -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/accessibility-decisions/skills/review .github/skills/review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills/tree/main/accessibility-decisions/skills/review into .github/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill review -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills review --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/accessibility-decisions/skills/review .opencode/skills/review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills/tree/main/accessibility-decisions/skills/review into .opencode/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
review- GitHub stars
- 105
- Token cost
- ~641 tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 300 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 55
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
Review and surface undocumented accessibility assumptions in an existing feature or product.
- Works in 5 steps: Identify Implicit Decisions → Assess Each Decision → Check for Undocumented Tradeoffs → …
- Inheriting a product
- SKILL.md covers Process and Output
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Review is an agent skill from Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills. Review and surface undocumented accessibility assumptions in an existing feature or product. Chains: decision-documentation, tradeoff-analysis, compliance-mapping, accessibility-debt-tracking. Use when inheriting a product, joining a team, or auditing a feature where accessibility decisions were never formally captured.
Its SKILL.md is about 640 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Frontend & Design, covering Accessibility. The repository describes itself as: Inclusive design skills for AI coding agents — from cognitive accessibility to adaptive interfaces, inclusive research, and accessibility decision-making. The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Inheriting a product
- Auditing a feature where accessibility decisions were never formally captured
Example prompts
- “/review”
Workflow steps
5 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 6e0740f. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Review loads about 641 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 82 tokens; SKILL.md has 300 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills at commit 6e0740f, republished under its MIT licence (© Owl-Listener). 300 words, ~641 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- review
- description
- Review and surface undocumented accessibility assumptions in an existing feature or product. Chains: decision-documentation, tradeoff-analysis, compliance-mapping, accessibility-debt-tracking. Use when inheriting a product, joining a team, or auditing a feature where accessibility decisions were never formally captured.
Review Accessibility Decisions
Surface the accessibility decisions that were made — deliberately or by default — in an existing feature, and document them before they get lost.
Process
Step 1: Identify Implicit Decisions
Walk through the feature and list every design choice that affects accessibility, even if nobody explicitly decided it:
- How is keyboard navigation handled?
- What happens with screen readers?
- What colour and contrast choices were made?
- How are errors communicated?
- What motion and animation exists?
- What user preferences are respected?
Many of these were never consciously decided — they were inherited from a framework, copied from another feature, or left at defaults. Those are still decisions. Document them.
Step 2: Assess Each Decision
For each identified decision, determine:
- Was this intentional or accidental?
- Does it meet current accessibility standards?
- Who does it serve well? Who does it exclude?
- Is there evidence behind it or was it arbitrary?
Step 3: Check for Undocumented Tradeoffs
Using tradeoff-analysis, identify decisions where accessibility was traded for something else:
- Speed: "we didn't have time to make this keyboard accessible"
- Complexity: "the accessible version was too hard to build"
- Design: "the accessible version didn't look right"
- Ignorance: "we didn't know this was an issue"
Document each with its current impact on users.
Step 4: Map Current Compliance
Using compliance-mapping, assess the feature's current state against WCAG 2.2 Level AA. Identify conformance gaps.
Step 5: Catalogue Debt
Using accessibility-debt-tracking, create a debt record for every known issue discovered in this review.
Output
Deliver a decision review report:
- Decision inventory — every accessibility-affecting decision found, marked as intentional or accidental
- Undocumented tradeoffs — decisions where accessibility was sacrificed, with current user impact
- Compliance gaps — WCAG criteria not currently met
- Debt register — known issues with severity, owner, and recommended timeline
- Recommendations — which decisions should be revisited first
© Owl-Listener, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in accessibility-decisions/skills/review of Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 6e0740f
Compare with similar skills
Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review this skillOwl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills | 105 | — | ~641 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Web Interface Guidelines Reviewervercel-labs/openreview | 1.7k | 97 repos | ~308 | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Accessibility Reviewmarkmead/hyperui | 12k | 1 repos | ~1.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Web Animation DesignbaptisteArno/typebot.io | 11k | 2 repos | ~2.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Accessibility Fixeribelick/ui-skills | 9.6k | 4 repos | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Wcag Audit PatternsvmDeshpande/ai-agent-automation | 178 | 11 repos | ~610 | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 |
Similar skills
- Official
Accessibility Review
markmead/hyperui
Run a WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility audit on a design or page. An agent skill from markmead/hyperui.
Web Animation Design
baptisteArno/typebot.io
Guides easing, timing and animation choices for UI motion, based on a web animation course, and reviews existing animations in a before-and-after table.
Accessibility Fixer
ibelick/ui-skills
Audits and fixes HTML accessibility problems such as ARIA labels, keyboard navigation, focus management, contrast and form errors with minimal changes.
Wcag Audit Patterns
vmDeshpande/ai-agent-automation
Conduct WCAG 2.2 accessibility audits with automated testing, manual verification, and remediation guidance.
Baseline UI
ibelick/ui-skills
Applies a fixed set of UI rules for stack, components, interaction, animation, typography and layout, or reviews a file against them with concrete fixes.
More from Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills
All 55 skills in this repoAssistive Technology Scenarios
Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills
Writes usage scenarios, use cases and storyboards that show real people using screen readers, switches, voice control and other assistive technology to finish tasks.
Error Prevention and Recovery
Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills
Designs forgiving forms and flows: prevent input errors, write messages that say what happened and what to do, and add undo, confirmation and recovery paths.
Accessible Heading Structure
Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills
Designs heading hierarchies for screen reader navigation and cognitive accessibility on pages, articles, dashboards and forms.
Ability Spectrum Mapping
Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills
Maps a feature across a range of vision, hearing, motor and cognitive ability to find where the design starts to fail, and to explain accessibility scope to stakeholders.
Accessibility Debt Tracking
Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills
Track and manage accessibility debt — known accessibility issues that have been deferred.
Accessibility Testing Strategy
Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills
Plan what to test, how to test, and who should test for accessibility.
Related
Categories
Questions about Review
What does Review do?
Review and surface undocumented accessibility assumptions in an existing feature or product. Review is an agent skill from Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills. Review and surface undocumented accessibility assumptions in an existing feature or product.
When should I use Review?
Review fits situations like: inheriting a product; auditing a feature where accessibility decisions were never formally captured.
How do I install Review in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (accessibility-decisions/skills/review in Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills) into .claude/skills/review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Review in Codex?
Run `npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (accessibility-decisions/skills/review in Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills) into .agents/skills/review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/review, .gemini/skills/review, .github/skills/review and .opencode/skills/review in your project.
What does Review need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Review is instructions for the agent only.
Does Review access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Review safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Review use?
Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Review use?
About 641 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 2.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Review?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Review: Web Interface Guidelines Reviewer (vercel-labs/openreview, 1.7k stars), Accessibility Review (markmead/hyperui, 12k stars), Web Animation Design (baptisteArno/typebot.io, 11k stars) and Accessibility Fixer (ibelick/ui-skills, 9.6k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Review?
Owl-Listener (a GitHub user) maintains it in Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills, which has 105 GitHub stars. The repository holds 55 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on June 9, 2026.
Source: Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.