Create Workflow Command

### Analysis Phase (Parallel)

Launch 3 agents simultaneously:
1. Agent 1: Security analysis → Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/step-1a-security.md
2. Agent 2: Performance analysis → Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/step-1b-performance.md
3. Agent 3: Code quality analysis → Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/step-1c-quality.md

**Wait for all**, then consolidate results.

### Synthesis Phase
Launch agent with all analysis results...

### Step 1: Initialize
Launch agent, **capture agent_id**

### Step 2: Continue (same context)
Resume agent using agent_id:
- **resume**: <agent_id from Step 1>
- **prompt**: "Proceed to phase 2: <additional instructions>"

---
description: Execute feature implementation through research, planning, and coding phases
argument-hint: [feature-description]
allowed-tools: Task, Read, TodoWrite
model: sonnet
---

# Implement Feature

## User Input
\`\`\`text
$ARGUMENTS
\`\`\`

Create TodoWrite with workflow steps.

## Phase 1: Research

Launch general-purpose agent:
- **Description**: "Research feature requirements"
- **Prompt**:
  \`\`\`
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/step-1-feature-impl-research.md

  Feature: $ARGUMENTS
  \`\`\`

**Extract**: Key findings, constraints, existing patterns

## Phase 2: Architecture

Launch general-purpose agent:
- **Description**: "Design feature architecture"
- **Prompt**:
  \`\`\`
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/step-2-feature-impl-architecture.md

  Feature: $ARGUMENTS
  Research findings: <summary from Phase 1>
  \`\`\`

**Extract**: File structure, components, interfaces

## Phase 3: Implementation

Launch developer agent:
- **Description**: "Implement feature code"
- **Prompt**:
  \`\`\`
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/step-3-feature-impl-implement.md

  Architecture: <summary from Phase 2>
  \`\`\`

## Completion

Mark todos complete. Report:
1. Files created/modified
2. Tests added
3. Remaining work

# Step 1: Feature Research

## Context
You are the research phase of a feature implementation workflow.

## Goal
Thoroughly understand the feature requirements and existing codebase context before any implementation begins.

## Instructions

1. **Parse Feature Request**
   - Extract core requirements
   - Identify acceptance criteria
   - Note any constraints mentioned

2. **Codebase Analysis**
   - Search for similar existing features
   - Identify relevant patterns and conventions
   - Find reusable components/utilities

3. **Dependency Check**
   - What existing code will this feature interact with?
   - Are there breaking change risks?
   - What tests exist for related functionality?

4. **Gap Analysis**
   - What's missing from the request?
   - What clarifications might be needed?
   - What edge cases should be considered?

## Constraints
- Do NOT write any implementation code
- Do NOT modify any files
- Focus purely on research and analysis

## Expected Output

Return a structured research summary:

\`\`\`markdown
## Feature Understanding
- Core requirement: <summary>
- Acceptance criteria: <list>

## Codebase Context
- Similar features: <list with file paths>
- Patterns to follow: <list>
- Reusable code: <list with file paths>

## Dependencies
- Files affected: <list>
- Tests to consider: <list>

## Open Questions
- <Question 1>
- <Question 2>

## Recommendation
<Brief recommendation for architecture phase>
\`\`\`

## Success Criteria
- [ ] Feature requirements clearly articulated
- [ ] Relevant existing code identified
- [ ] No implementation attempted
- [ ] Clear handoff to architecture phase